Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Electoral systems discussion

1235713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,400 ✭✭✭corkie


    https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2024/0924/1471762-electronic-vote-counting/

    • The electronic counting of votes could be considered for future elections if the trend of large numbers of candidates on ballot papers continues.
    • He said he did not believe there was an appetite for electronic voting, but that electronic counting is something that could be considered.
    • It is not something for today or tomorrow, but perhaps down the line if this persists as a problem and there isn't any viable solution from a ballot-paper design perspective, it is something that we might have a look at," he said.

    So is it something in consideration for the future. Hardly be implemented for the next GE anyway.

    ⓘ "At some point something inside me just clicked and I realized that I didn't have to deal with anyone's bullshit ever again."
    » “mundus sine caesaribus” «



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭EnPassant


    The votes cast in the 3 constituencies of Dublin North, Dublin West and Meath in 2002 (the 3 constituencies that used electronic voting) were published as spreadsheets.

    There is a link here showing the number of preferences cast in Meath - several thousand (about 3 or 4%) voted for all 14 candidates:- https://www.researchgate.net/figure/In-the-2002-Irish-election-for-meath-constituency-most-of-the-voters-rank-only-3-to-5_fig1_359687608
    I looked at them at the time - as far as I can remember they were almost entirely unique.

    It would certainly be possible to send a personalised leaflet to every voter in a constituency, with a unique set of preferences on each leaflet, requesting/instructing voters to vote as per the leaflet, and pointing out that you would know whether they had complied or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    I see they're talking about our farcical electoral system and register on Prime Time now.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,364 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Quote [It would certainly be possible to send a personalised leaflet to every voter in a constituency, with a unique set of preferences on each leaflet, requesting/instructing voters to vote as per the leaflet, and pointing out that you would know whether they had complied or not.]

    For what purpose would anyone bother with that? The release of raw data would be anonymised, and probably delayed by a year or more. Who would try this out, and who would pay the required bribes? And how would they escape detection?

    Not even 1984 suggested that. If fixing the vote, why not just stuff the ballots into the boxes like all good tyrants do?

    Nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes, but you're not explaining why anyone would do this. There are much, much easier and cheaper ways to get yourself sent to prison.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The electoral system is excellent, the electoral register is farcical.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    No need for any of that nonsense. Dail elections are not a problem. Just raise the ludicriously low bar to enter the EP elections slightly.

    I am really not a fan of the idea of votes disappearing into an electronic "black box" and then as if by magic a result appears.

    If we don't count all the votes manually we can't trust it. If we do count all the votes manually, we're just wasting money on the electronic count.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    I wouldn't say excellent. The counting of votes is imprecise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The Electoral Commission is called An Comisiun Toghcháin.

    What sort of name is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,372 ✭✭✭✭dulpit




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's not a comment on Irish.

    It's just a ridiculous name that no one will use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭EnPassant


    The vote data would obviously be released immediately as happened in 2002.

    And though the data is anonymized, the large number of possible combinations mean that it is possible
    a) for a voter to prove that they voted in a particular way
    b) for someone to ask a voter to vote in a particular way, and to know if the voter complied
    Neither of the above is possible using a paper system.

    I had a quick google and I found the Dublin North vote data at

    https://web.archive.org/web/20060103234059/http%3A//www.dublincountyreturningofficer.com/Results/Votes_Dublin_North.zip

    There were 12 candidates - 3662 of the 43942 voters voted for all 12 candidates . Only 12 of these votes were not unique.
    All 597 votes with 11 preferences were unique.
    All 676 votes with 10 preferences were unique.

    Below are the first 10 votes as an example of the format of the file:-

    Mixed Vote No.

    Boland,Cathal,F.G.

    Daly,Clare,S.P.

    Davis,Mick,S.F.

    Glennon,Jim,F.F.

    Goulding,Ciaran,Non-P

    Kennedy,Michael,F.F.

    Owen,Nora,F.G.

    Quinn,Eamonn,Non-P

    Ryan,Seán,Lab

    Sargent,Trevor,G.P.

    Walshe,David Henry,C.C. CSP

    Wright,G.V.,F.F.

    1

    2

    1

    2

    1

    3

    2

    3

    1

    2

    4

    3

    4

    3

    2

    4

    5

    1

    5

    3

    2

    1

    6

    5

    2

    4

    3

    1

    7

    1

    3

    2

    8

    2

    7

    12

    1

    6

    8

    3

    11

    5

    4

    10

    9

    9

    4

    5

    2

    3

    1

    10

    4

    5

    2

    6

    1

    3



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,364 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    @EnPassant

    What are you on about?

    1. It is unlikely anyone would be bothered with buying votes, and if they were not buying votes, why would they be concerned how votes were cast?
    2. How would the vote buyer be sure that the authorities would not sus what was going on and prosecute the organisers?
    3. And just why????

    This looks like a scheme dreamt up by a very young child looking for a scam to infect the underworld, probably with the assistance of Spiderman.

    The fact that a possible flaw might exist in a system does not make it likely to be used, or if used, to be undetected, and even if undetected, would be worth doing at all.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,823 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    We used to do that a long time ago, like when Enda Kenny was a young fella….. it did not work! We though of all those tricks a long time ago and most failed. The Irish voting system is long established, very much favoured by the voters - they have rejected proposals to change it twice and people have great confidence in the integrity of the process. So the chances of getting to chance it are pretty well zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    One of the reasons why the Irish people think the system is great is because Irish people tell themselves it's great.

    They ignore the numerous issues and problems with the system, beginning with the electoral register and the process/ difficulty in voting. The farcical counting process where the electoral officer picks a bundle to count for the surplus etc etc.

    Btw the machines would have dealt with this surplus issue.

    They should have experimented with the machines for a local election first. It scared too many people doing at a general election. Irish people often not open to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Why is it any more ridiculous than "the Electoral Commission"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,372 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    The electoral register is a separate issue to the voting system and needs to be sorted regardless of how we vote.

    What is the difficulty in voting?

    What are the other numerous problems with the current system?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    100% of the population understand the words "The Electoral Commission", care to hazard a guess how many know what "Toghcháin" means?

    This forced linguistical rebranding nonsense is an increasing trend across the public sector. Imagine what things will be like if/when SF get in… we're already wasting lots of taxpayers' money on advertising the vast majority of them can't understand. On TG4 / RnaG / Irish language publications, fine, but the audience for English language media is… surprise surprise.. English speaking.

    Who exactly does this benefit and who decided this was a good use of resources?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,370 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Comisiun na Mean is another one for the Media Regulator. Ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    There is no rebranding. The body in question was only established in 2023 and has been known by this name since its establishment.

    It seems to me, though, that you are calling for a rebranding now, in which case the onus is really on you to say how much you think should be spent on the exercise, who will benefit from it, and why this would be a good use of resources.

    And I do not think the Irish people are as stupid as you suppose. Over the years they have managed perfectly well with Bord na Móna, Bord Bia, RTÉ, CIÉ, Aer Rianta, Aer Lingus, etc without any outbreaks of mass incomprehension. If you have evidence that people struggle with the name of this particular body, now would be a good time to produce it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Pedantic in the extreme.

    There's a lot more than a bikeshed being wasted on this rubbish every week.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,240 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    So is Screen Ireland … oh wait … !

    I am sure there are many that never heard of the IRTC, BCI or the BAI.


    ______

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,751 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,751 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    .Tell me that you don't work in security without telling me that you don't work in security.

    Because we have lots of controls that prevent ballot stuffing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    You're so-called rebranding is totally fictional; it exists only in your own head; and pointing this out is "pedantic"?

    I don't think that word means what you think it means, Hottie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It's taking the place of the Referendum Commission. Nobody felt the need to brand that in Irish.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's a completely different body with a much broader set of functions. Its functions do include the functions previously carried on by the Refernedum Commission, but the constitutional principle that a body which inherits the functions of a body that was named in English must itself be named in English was abandoned as long ago as 1945, when Córas Iompair Éireann took over the functions previously discharged by Great Southern Railways and the Dublin United Tramways Company. Mass confusion did not result. Keep up, Hotblack!

    [For the record, An Chomisiún Toghcháin has (and has always had) two names and it uses both, as a visit to its website (with the telling address of electoralcommission.ie) will verify.]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,256 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Good example of why we should never have e-voting / e-counting:

    A former Colorado county election official has been sentenced to nine years in prison for tampering with voting machines after the 2020 presidential election.

    Tina Peters, a Republican, was convicted last August on most counts against her in the election interference case.

    Peters helped breach Mesa County's election computer systems and allowed an unauthorised individual to access voting equipment and election records.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,620 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    How many people know what CIE stands for, or what Mona, Rianta, or Lingus mean?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    At least as many as need to for the entities concerned to be able to discharge their function without mass public confusion.



Advertisement