Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

.308 factory match ammo for the slightly longer ranges

  • 20-05-2024 10:00am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭


    Hi all,

    I've been taking part in the F-restricted outings in MNSCI the last few times (600 and 800 yds). Thoroughly enjoying it. Shot my 6.5 Creedmoor yesterday.

    But I'd like to shoot my .308 a bit more in this. I'm using the Sako 168gr Racehead ammo which is pretty good in my 12" twist. But most 168gr has a rep for being a short fat bullet with quite a bit of drag. I'm definitely shooting worse on the 800 with it than the 6.5 Creedmoor.

    Any suggestions for .308 factory match ammo that's available for the longer ranges? I've tried looking for the Sako TRG Precision 175gr, but I'm told they no longer produce it.

    Thanks in advance,

    alanmc



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭BSA International


    Have you tried Adi?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭alanmc


    I haven't yet no. Heard good things about it though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 841 ✭✭✭tonysopprano


    CillDara Hunting and Shooting has a deal on ADI 308match at the moment, €45 per 20 or €400 per 200. Limited stock

    If you can do the job, do it. If you can't do the job, just teach it. If you really suck at it, just become a union executive or politician.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cass


    In your 1:12 don't exceed 155gr.

    The 168gr stuff (pretty much any brand or type I tried) is a disaster from 800+ with a 2+ moa drop more than even 175 and up to 4 moa more than 155gr.

    175 is better than 168 but not ideal for consistency at or after 800.

    Stick to 150 or ideally 155 stuff. You get better ballistics, better stability hence better consistency and accuracy from 800 to 1,000.

    155gr Factory ammo will suffer at 1,000yds but not to the extent as to make it useless, which 168 and even 175 can possibly suffer from. This is due to it becoming transonic and even subsonic at 900 and 1,000 yards.

    So while more expensive I'd stick to 155 in some form of match grade round with a muzzle velocity of at least 2,900.

    The reason I recommend this is you want a single, dependable round that will perform from 600 to 1,000 as it leaves you with a single set of dopes to learn.

    Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County

    If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.

    Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭BSA International


    .308 1 in 10 what's best?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cass


    175gr at the minimum, but I'd lean towards 185 to 200gr.

    Also stick with a match grade bullet. Even BT but steer clear of HP. I found them a little worse , even unpredictable, in the wind.

    Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County

    If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.

    Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭BSA International


    Cheers Cass. Been using 168's out to 300 but be stepping it out now.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cass


    I'm sure there have been improvements to all bullets since I was competitive but I cannot emphasize how poor the 168s are compared to ever other bullet.

    At 1,000 yards I was ammo testing rounds from 155 to 200gr. The 155s, 155,5s, 175s were pretty much on the nose. The 185s, 190s and 200s had about 1-1.5 moa lower point of impact but the 168s were just about staying on the board.

    That's a 3 foot drop compared to the 155s and almost 2 foot compared to the rest. The second worse performing were the 190s but they were, at worse, 2 moa lower than my point of aim.

    The 168s were also as terrible in the wind. Of course the 155s were more prone to drift, and the heaviest such as the 185s and 200s were the least affected, but the 168 were not just badly affected but unpredictable. Same wind conditions and wind call and you were looking at MOA+ in point of impact.

    I assumed it was to due with the transonic/subsonic nature of the round after 800 yards, it's "stubby" design, stumpy bearing surface and even though they were match bullets they were HP but evidently so. Meaning it was quite larger than the HP nature of the comparable 155s. Iow if you were into "pointing" your bullets it made the 168 more aggressive in bearing surface design.

    Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County

    If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.

    Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 570 ✭✭✭BSA International


    THanks Cass. Very interesting!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,140 ✭✭✭alanmc


    I honestly haven't seen 155gr match factory ammo on the shelves in a while. I remember seeing Hornady 155gr ELD-Ms at one point. Having said that I haven't shopped around lately.

    Anyone know of a RFD that has 155s?

    Thanks lads.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭fish slapped


    Ah Cass what would you know 😉😂😂

    600 to 800 are perfect distances forgood 155's.

    I used 155s out to a 1000 yardsfor many years. Get to know your ammo and its ability. Chopping and changing. Your only going down a rabbit hole.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cass


    @fish slapped "Ah Cass what would you know"

    Not much to be fair. The blonde hair is not just for show. 😁

    How are ya btw, long time no hear.

    Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County

    If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.

    Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,925 ✭✭✭BUACHAILL


    Cass what's your thoughts on best ammo in a .308 with a 1:11 twist rate for distance? Cheers



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,697 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cass


    I used 175 gr A-max in my 1:11.25 twist Remington to great effect. MOA (or less) at distances to 600 yards. Never used it for anything further as I had my FTR rifle for that and she was running heavies in a 1:10. However the 175 A-Max has a more secant ogive and longer bearing surface so better ballistics.

    That being said you'll get decent performances with anything in the 150-155 range out to a certain distance, but it'll show any shortcomings the further out you go. I'm still, as is evident from the above, not a fan of the 165-168 range of bullets. The bearing surface is shorter, a lot shorter in some cases, and the tangent ogive seems worse than other bullets so does not give good ballistics.

    Please understand that my long distance shooting days are well behind me so my information is probably out of date by about a decade. In other words there may be other alternatives to the brands I'm discussing but the weight range of the round should remain close to what I'm suggesting as ballistics have not changed.

    Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County

    If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.

    Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,072 ✭✭✭clivej


    I'm using 155gr AMax in my Sako 75 .308 that is shooting just a tad over half MOA. Shot out to 600y with good results.



Advertisement