Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Automatic Red Light and Bus Lane Cameras Coming

13

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,025 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Wait, what. Cyclists are more likely to cause accidents due to breaking the speed limit. I haven't seen this data, can you link to it. This would imply that cyclists who cause accidents are a small subset of all cyclists. Also has nothing to do with RLJ or bus lane cameras but I am only replying as I had never heard this before, anywhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,411 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    No don't try and avoid the question with some nonsense reply..

    If there's going to be cycle lane speed limits then how will those who break the speed limits you suggest be caught and punished? Will they get points on their "Cycling license"…. If you can't answer these questions then just admit your suggestion was a Joke..

    Post edited by Tenzor07 on


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    [mod] You are just trolling now and off topic, don’t post in this thread again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,392 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    No it would not only apply at left turning T Junctions, it could apply to any junction with a left turn filter lane (which would be a lot of the junctions where this left turn on flashing amber would apply). At your standard cross junction, some or all left turns could happen in the same phase.

    The situation described at the Infirmary Road/Conynham Road T junction (where left turn from one road coincides with left/right/straight on from the perpendicular road) could equally apply to a cross junction.

    It depends on filter lanes and light phasing rather than if the junction is a T or a cross. The key is the left filter lane, without it you can't hold left turning traffic so they don't cross the cycle lane when cyclists are continuing straight. If you have the left filter lane, and it can get green as part of an existing light phase, the flashing amber left turn just puts pedestrians and cyclists in danger unnecessarily.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Is not the whole point of the flashing amber to combine left turn filters with pedestrian crossings and turn two cycles into one? The alternative is to have first filter lights, then ped crossing lights. On a cross junction this should, in theory, reduce the time between pedestrian crossings. They won't work well if there is a lot of expected turn traffic I'll grant you.

    I'll admit I'm just incredibly used to them so I don't think too much about it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,392 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    But if the left turn can already happen in an existing phase in the light sequence (as with Infirmary Road/Conynham Road and many others), it doesn't reduce the time between pedestrian crossings. It only impinges on time specifically allocated to pedestrians. Imo pedestrian green should be sacrosanct, drivers can feck off when the man is green.

    I'm sure there are some junction layouts and time sequences where a phase could be avoided by combining the pedestrian crossing with a flashing amber left turn but even then, I'd be against the idea. Give drivers an inch and they will take a mile.

    And I am well used to the turn on flashing amber too but I still don't see the need for it in a lot of cases.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    But if the left turn can already happen in an existing phase in the light sequence (as with Infirmary Road/Conynham Road and many others), it doesn't reduce the time between pedestrian crossings.

    A left turn only at a cross junction inevitably involves increasing the traffic light sequence time though. If you need to put in turning filters as part of the sequence then you are increasing the length of the total sequence.

    I don't really have an issue with someone objecting to it and I can see why people don't like it, I just don't agree that it is "solely" for drivers. It speeds up the light cycle which is a large part of what drives pedestrians to risk crossing against the lights as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Private vehicles staying out of bus lanes is a safety issue for bicycle and motorcyclists.

    It's an offence for a motorcycle to enter a bus lane the same as for a car.

    And…will these red light cameras do anything about the hordes of cyclists who ignore them and just plough on through once it's 'only' pedestrians crossing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,392 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    A left turn only at a cross junction inevitably involves increasing the traffic light sequence time though

    No, multiple left turns can happen in the same phase. Also right turns from the perpendicular arms of the junction could happen in the same phase as a left turn.

    In most cases, these phases are there already. It is possible that a flashing amber left turn could reduce the number of phases but that does come at a price (trusting drivers to respect pedestrians is dangerous imo). It wouldn't reduce phases at all junctions, I suspect only a minority so hardly seems worth introducing.

    The main reason for having left turns on filters imo is to avoid having cars turning across cyclists continuing straight on. It would be much better to eliminate that where possible, particularly on busy cycle routes (which will hopefully be all routes when the infrastructure is suitably improved).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,319 ✭✭✭SteM


    Surprise, surprise. I doubt there'll ever be any meaningful roll out of this in my lifetime, we're a country that generally loves to drag it's heels on anything that might upset motorists.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/transport/2024/05/14/red-light-camera-system-will-be-established-in-just-one-or-two-dublin-locations/

    http://archive.today/2NtDj



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,013 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The same fella claims to be a cyclist over on the Limerick threads.

    You know the type. "I'm all for cycle lanes but" "I'm all for active travel but"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I think we can all agree that driver adherence to road rules has absolutely plummeted to near zero.

    I'm not sure if red light cameras will change anything, but they're a start. Bus-lane cameras would make a huge difference.

    The thing I'm much more looking forward to is the dashcam reporting portal, because when anyone around you can report you for your rule-breaking, then karma will follow you around everywhere.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,110 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    On topic please.

    The topic is not cyclists or having a rant about cyclists, etc.

    — Moderator



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,774 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Is there any defined timeline for the introduction of the dashcam portal? It has been talked about for so long that I don't believe it will ever happen. The old nugget of GDPR etc is/has been cited as a reason. Yet, when there is a major incident Garda appeal for motorists dashcam footage l.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The dashcam portal will be a load of crap as it is being made out to be something which it is not.
    Currently, our law is that video evidence of an offence is not actual evidence. It is used to back up a written statement which in reality is the evidence. This law has not changed and a written statement is still required.
    So when the portal opens and everyone starts loading their dashcam footage of what they see, how many of them will actually take the time to head down to their local Garda station and spend the time watching a garda write out what you dictate to them (and also correct their inclusions, reverting back to what you actually said to them!)? You can be quite sure that it will be feck all!

    The system is deliberately set up to be unhelpful!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,774 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    I agree the current system is set up to be cumbersome, ineffective etc.

    However, is it not the case that the evidential/legislative basis has to /will be changed for the red light cameras to be introduced. Any change for that, if done correctly, would facilitate a dashcam portal.

    Who knows...This is Ireland where our track record on roads policing is a close second to that of (Public) Transport Policing, which has none.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Nope. Apparently, we are getting a slightly fresher version of what we already have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,774 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Thats disappointing...Another loophole (sic. amendment) to the RTA, which is already a very complex and confusing outdated piece of legislation.

    Meanwhile a complete consolidation /overhaul of the RTA into a simplified form for for the 21st Century remains a recommendation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,411 ✭✭✭Tenzor07




  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    I've witness some atrocious driving lately, particularly when it comes to breaking red lights but just now saw a Panda recycling truck drop a gear a good 10 metres back from a junction on an orange light, and sailed through the junction a good 5 seconds after it turned red.

    This particular junction is a busy crossroads in an urban area right beside a school, and it's now school collection time so there are loads of children around.

    A red light camera would prevent that behaviour or else ensure that moron is issued with a fine and points (and as he was driving a very identifiable company vehicle possibly even disciplinary action at work).

    I'd nearly argue that junctions with no lights would be safer these days, as drivers will always proceed with far more caution when traffic lights are not working.

    And as for bus lane cameras, bus lanes may aswell not exist right now as they are so frequently used by private vehicles. The inbound section of the Fairview road works is a prime example of this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,172 ✭✭✭trellheim


    over on motors forum there's been a shite drivers camera thread for donkeys plenty of evidence if people wanted to prosecute .

    Any Garda needing a quota of tickets need only stand on any number of junctions ( or Chesterfield avenue in the Phoenix park) and their quota will be filled within the hour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 Seamie123


    Automatic red light cameras coming in early 2025.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/dublin/2024/12/30/cameras-to-catch-drivers-breaking-red-lights-to-be-introduced-in-dublin/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    The link is quoting Ryan as the source.

    I’ll believe it when it happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 Seamie123


    No it isn't. It's quoting DCC's Head of Traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Those are the ones whose bonnnets I slap and I say this as 70% driver, 30% pedestrian. No allowances given to motorists in my life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,834 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I’m

    it’s a facile viewpoint, however, when the law does not preclude the sale of scooters or e-bikes which breach the law. It’s the same as cars which are capable of breaching the speed limits. Gardai don’t even bother pull in over e-scooters with a seat despite them being precluded. I have followed an e-skateboard which continuously pulled away from me at 50kmh. The law, in this case, is an ass. Motorists are 70% responsible for law breaches and other road users 30%. Each need a much higher level of enforcement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Love when an old thread gets bumped with news related solely to traffic law enforcement and the usuals can't restrain themselves from grumbling about cyclists for two seconds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭Kiteview


    The proposed new cameras should also be used to penalise motorists who stop at junctions where there is a “bike box” ahead of the stop line for cars etc


    Based on observation of multiple junctions over a long period of time, I’d say that probably 95%+ of motorists routinely stop in “bike boxes”. I’d like to say that was just due to ignorance of the rules of the road but many seem to go out of their way to obstruct bike boxes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,157 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    A six month trial 10 years ago and now they think actually this is a good idea - like WTF - is it the Netherlands if you even stop over the white line at a junction you get fined (camera system)

    They should be at every traffic light controlled junction because red light jumping is rampant in Dublin (and based on dash cam footage everywhere else in Ireland) - as a pedestrian you take your life into your own hands crossing a junction

    3 points for every infraction on top of an ever increasing fine would be the cherry on top



Advertisement