Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Baby boom generation starting to retire in or around 2030

Options
1468910

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 159 ✭✭zerosquared


    the same “conservatives” proceed to open threads about having to pay taxes for people on welfare and having to support such people and their sprogs and get them housing

    Or moan about school meals



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The Baby Boom Era applies to America and doesn't apply to here. It was an era of full employment, greater access to education, greater affluence and economic expansion after the War.

    This did not happen in Ireland. Children still left school as early as 13 up til the late 1960s here, something which had disappeared a generation before in America.

    Emigration was scandalously high, unemployment was high, conditions were bleak here.

    The Baby Boom refers not only to a increase in population but a cultural change in those countries who experienced it.

    Both aspects of this period did not happen in Ireland. Have you never talked to an Irish person over the age of 65 before and they will tell you what Ireland was like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    A baby boom means women of all ages having children at the same time. It's not about women having more children.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,973 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    Our baby boom didn't happen until the early 70's, and then a brief surge during the Cetic Tiger years of the 2000's.

    Other than that, steady decline overall.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/IRL/ireland/birth-rate#:~:text=The%20current%20birth%20rate%20for,a%202.81%25%20decline%20from%202021.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'm not interested in your denials and semantics. There was a baby boom. It happened. The fact that many people emigrated is irrelevant.

    Since you're just repeating yourself and providing no evidence, let's just leave it.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Marriage rates in this period were shockingly low in Ireland but those that did marry had very large families which keep fertility rates high.

    In America, this is not what happened. Marriage rates were high and families sizes were small, but because marriage rates were so high, the population grew.

    Suspect you aren't interested in debating. You never are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,806 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    'burden', seriously, we ll put you down so, when you come of age….

    theres no burden here, just a serious lack of will to prepare for this reality, again, the market is not capable of providing us with all our needs, therefore its critical that the state plays a vital role in attempting to do so…..



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I don't need to ask others; I am a baby boomer myself.

    Yes, the baby boom played out differently in Ireland and in the US; you'd expect that. But that doesn't mean it didn't happen in Ireland or has no meaning in Ireland. It absolutely did play out here, and it did and does have meaning.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Just cringey for Irish people when they use American terms that don't apply to them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Even cringier when you urge someone to get the perspectives of people born in that era while yourself dismissing the perspectives of people born in that era.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Clearly "burden" is being used in solely economic terms. The faux outrage is unnecessary. The more pensioners we have, the more we have to spend on their pensions. That means we either increase taxes, implement new ones, or cut pensions which is political suicide.

    Everyone should be able to retire with dignity and a good pension is the heart of that but society needs to adapt if things are to stay that way.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    No it's cringey you want to label yourself a baby boomer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,806 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …but this isnt actually a 'burden' at all, this is an inevitability, we have known this for years/decades, yet we have decided the best way to manage this is to simply ignore it, this approach wont work, and again, market based approaches wont work, therefore the state has to step in…

    ….yes taxes are simply going to have to increase, and not just for the needs of pensioners, but for all citizens needs, we have to start taxing wealth more, and not default towards the usual approaches of consumption and income related taxes, this approach will simply also fail….

    …yes people should be entitled to retire with dignity and respect, we have the wealth, we know how to create this wealth, but what we dont have the will to do is appropriately tax and redistribute this wealth….



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It is a burden, again purely in economic terms before you start with the faux outrage again. Being inevitable does not alter that fact.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,597 ✭✭✭yagan


    It's nuts that anyone who lived all their life in Ireland would refer to themselves as a boomer. Yes, they may have been born into a demographic boom, but the cultural term boomer is very much a US, Australia, NZ and UK thing. I bet they've also adopted the term expat for Irish emigrants.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    What's cringey is that you want me to consider the views and experiences of this age group while so casually dissmissing it yourself.

    Seriously, did you not pause to think how that would look? Cringe city, man.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    You didn't bother to respond to any of the points I made.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,056 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I responded in some detail, with facts, that you ignored.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,407 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    if you cant read or follow logic then yes done



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,407 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    you seem to be ignorant of the facts, perhaps a bit of self education wouldn't go astray



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,407 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    people use US generations when discussing it is the problem, the issue with Boomers in the states, as seen by those with rose tinted glasses is they had it good in comparison to others

    irelands baby boom did not, 70s and 80s ireland when it peaked and thus when they grew up was a bleak and barren land

    nothing like what the US baby boomers had

    so when People say boomer, genx gen z millenials, none of it applies here

    the popes children celtic cubs make more sense



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,806 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …but again, this isnt a 'burden', the term itself has an inbuilt negative meaning, this isnt negative, this is in fact a critical societal need, we need to make sure that those that do retire, at whatever age, have their most critical of needs met, theres clearly an extremely serious issue rising here, and its clearly obvious our governments are ill prepared for this, they still seem to think market based entities will fulfill these needs, they clearly wont…..



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,407 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    the issue is people dont give 2 **** about it until it affects them

    by that point its too late

    just human nature



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    The economics just won't stack up anymore, the economic burden will become too high on the current working population so changes will have to be made. Working aged people just won't accept higher and higher taxes. So they can fund the lifestyles of retired homeowners, when they themselves are stuck renting into their forties or possibly forever. While the same retirees endless object to any new housing or infrastructure that could make working aged peoples lives better.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,215 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It is. You can deny it all you want but I've made myself perfectly clear. We're done.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,653 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Indeed there's 3 options for the future operation of state pension system, raise taxes for the working younger generations and use the gains to prop it up, cut services for everyone and use the gains to prop it up or reform the whole state pension system.

    Auto enrollment will help many under 50 when it finally kicks in but the problem is far too many people in the 50+ age brackets decided to ignorantly count solely on the state pension system due to a gross misunderstanding of how it works. Far too many still believe its some form of savings system akin to a private pension however in reality any money paid into the state pension system today is paid out to someone else tomorrow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Nermal


    You're writing as if paying taxes is a choice. Unless you think the working age population will strike or emigrate en masse, the scenario you described is exactly what will happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,806 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i disagree to a point, theres now so much pressure being placed on people, they actually dont truly have the space in their lives to even think about their retirement, this again can be traced back to processes such as financialisation of our property markets, its a monumental failure…

    its one of the reasons of why i have always agreed with the auto-enrolment of pensions, this should have been done years ago, but our governments fcuking sat on it as usual, this once again can be traced back to their fundamental ideologies of not getting too involved, to promote more market based approaches, it has simply failed….

    …you mean, you re done, please dont try speak for me…



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Ignoring the sniping over the last few pages…

    I'm a 36 year old woman, and only now am at a point where I can maybe think about children in the next year or so. I bought a small house on my own 2 years ago that needs a lot of work, and it will probably only be to a decent standard in the next 2/3 years.

    I only met someone I could even contemplate having children with in the last year. I think the reasons for this are multifaceted- but my generation moved around a lot in the recession, and lots of us only came back to Ireland at around 30. A lot of men in their 30s simply do not seem to feel up to the responsibilities of having children- they don't think they can provide for them financially or emotionally, and don't seem to have much interest. Lots and lots of them are also living at home until their late 30s and beyond.

    The financial aspects of having children are really concerning to me. I already worry about money so much. If my house had cost even 20-30% less than it did, and I didn't have to take out a home improvement loan, this wouldn't matter so much. Everything comes back to the astronomical cost of housing. Then you add creche fees and all the items kids need on top of that, and it's really worrying. I feel less well off on a day-to-day basis at 36 than I did at 26, and I think that's the case for lots of people.

    I froze my eggs last year- another €5k. Another cost men don't have to think about. Basically, I don't see how anyone of my generation, or any of my friends, can have more than 2 kids max, because even if you're financially sound and killing yourself in work to afford the house, the window of fertility will close by the time you can do it all.

    So yeah, it's going to be an absolutely enormous problem in coming years, for pensions etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,086 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    This is a very good post, and in a few simple paragraphs it illustrates the social, economic and political challenges facing many societies.

    The state and role of young men in the last decade / the housing crisis / cost of childcare, etc.



Advertisement