Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Site is a graveyard - How can boards save itself? [Threadbanned users in 1st post]

1333436383946

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭PmMeUrDogs


    Genuinely think that's a great idea.

    There's definitely a place and a need for serious discussion, and I've often read CA threads in their entirety because some make for really good reading and knowledge. But AH seems to have been in decline since the separation a few years back or whenever it was.

    I agree with the need for a "serious" space like CA, but plenty of people want to discuss current affairs in a way that isn't quite so severe in manner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It will just evolve as it did before.

    There is already the politics forum yet most of the chat happens in CA. CA isnt even the 'serious' space.

    Hide CA away and AH will just end up as CA. You will have the same posters and topics that are on CA today but on AH.

    Thats why CA was split off from AH.

    Look at the top threads in CA. How could they be discussed in a less 'serious' / severe manner? You either couldnt discuss it or they would just end up becoming exactly as they are now. Because inevitably serious / severe points would be made.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    What I like about Boards is that no matter what the subject. No matter how black and white one believes an issue to be there will always be someone with a different, often well considered opinion.

    I think this is the value of the site for me. It should be allowed to be opposite of an echo chamber. Heavy handed modding makes this much more difficult.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,555 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    Just a note regarding viewing "Thanks".

    On the mobile site if you tap the 3 dots at the top of a post and select "Log" you should be able to see all the thanks.

    On desktop it's a little more restricted. You can hover over the "Thanks" button and it shows you I think 6-8 of the thanks.

    Can a poster other than a mod test this for me? I know it's visible to us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,269 ✭✭✭con747


    On desktop if you go to the profile of the user you want to check who thanked their post go to "reactions" and you can see more if not all those who thanked the post AFAIK.

    Edit

    I think it's restricted to 10 thanks.

    Don't expect anything from life, just be grateful to be alive.



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,868 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    There is no 'log' option on mobile on chrome, just a 'flag' option

    Screenshot_2024-04-10-08-09-57-764_com.android.chrome.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,378 ✭✭✭archfi


    On iOS mobile, the three dots on a post when tapped gives only the option to flag a post.

    A thing isn't what it says it is.

    A thing is what it does.



  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,555 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    Thanks both. @sydthebeat are you on Android or iPhone?



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,868 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Android.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,426 ✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    This is it for me too. I think it was the Irish Independent who had the tag line 'Before you make up your kind open it' and this is what boards does for me anyhow. Sometimes I read a news story and I think you have all the angles to allow me make a decision and then I come on boards and you'll have people explain their experiences, or knowledge that fill in the in between the lines bit. It makes it very interesting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    AH/CA were excluded from POTD back in the day. But it was usually some meme in CVPL that won it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭Tork


    I don't understand why there are separate Politics and Current Affairs forums. Sometimes there are threads on the same thing running in both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,322 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    The key to this question is what SEO data is being used to attract advertisers and other revenue sources.

    IMO, the platform is far too indulgent of open brackets ( racists….)

    The other problem with modern discourse today is that if I take issue with whats happening in Gaza you are flagged as anti Jew

    eg inside paywall but enough visible

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/educate-together-row-after-antisemitism-allegations-in-wake-of-ceos-protest-post-and-call-for-boycott-of-israel/a489962002.html

    We had the same with the gay marriage/recent referendums etc

    Its all reduced to a binary argument: for or against.

    BB over on AM just deletes sh$t he does not want on his site, end of.

    A lot to be said for it

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    Politics is the “high brow” forum, they won’t tolerate CA-style posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,026 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I don't think CA is the serious place, it is the 'heated' place. But the heated discussions are the ones that I think need some sort of space, but try to limit their negative impact while allowing them to serve their need better than what is currently happening. The politics forum is indeed the place for serious discussions and works well in this way I feel.

    CA being hidden from all except those who requested access may influence this.

    And if contentious threads were polluting AH, move them to CA and inform the OP or users that they need to request access to the forum if they want to take part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So you could have threads on the same topic, say Russia-Ukraine war Or say Hate Crime Bill.

    On Politics, CA, and AH.

    And the same posters potentially posting on all three? With the same standard of posting in CA and AH.

    I can't see it working. It will be very obvious from the outset of most threads that it will end up heated.

    if contentious threads were polluting AH, move them to CA and inform the OP or users that they need to request access to the forum if they want to take part.

    That's exactly what was happening and why CA was created. This will just restart and repeat the cycle.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,817 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    It would be great if a ban from CA could extend to AH or, even, “Social & Fun” in its entirety.

    EmmetSpiceland: Oft imitated but never bettered.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,026 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    With the same standard of posting in CA and AH

    No. That is the point.

    And it might seem so much like things becoming heated, that people just stay away. I'd imagine it would become an echo chamber of sorts for some discussions. But that might be a price you have to pay if it means allowing more of the platform to function as it is intended. Its a room with no windows and you have to ask to enter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,026 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    People can stay away from Current Affairs as things stand today.

    If you pitch this new CA forum to have a lower\looser standard of posting than CA does now, it will presumably still need a lot of moderation for personal abuse, trolling, threadbans etc. And CA is one of the most actively moderated forums I imagine given volume of posts.

    I don't think the platform intended to function as an echo chamber either nor as an unmoderated free for all for such discussions.

    And then seemingly you have AH discussion of current affairs moderated to the same standard CA is now. Or else the topics not discussed at all. So even more heavily moderated actually.

    Doesn't add up for me at all, but you have made your case so it is for the powers that be to assess.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,817 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    A much “lighter touch” form of moderation in CA would be great. Let posters know that reported posts, short of abuse, won’t be actioned.

    This would keep the CA “types” away from the, more, normal parts of the site and you could have, somewhat, serious discussions in AH while, also, having a laugh.

    EmmetSpiceland: Oft imitated but never bettered.

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I don't see the benefits. Based on what you have outlined, you would just have the CA discussions that are happening now in CA in AH. And possibly some free for alls in CA with lighter touch moderation - maybe that would appeal to some.

    But nothing to stop the CA "types" from "moonlighting" on the corresponding AH threads, posting to the same standard they are currently posting to in CA right now. So why wouldn't they?

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,996 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    CA was created to keep some of the more troll like dregs away from AH iirc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,365 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It seems like shuffling the problem posters around rather than tackling root cause.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Administrators Posts: 55,019 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    @Gusser09 this isn't a place to moan about specific mod actions against you. Take it to DRP.

    Post deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,656 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    It's however many years later and they still can't even stop PI/RI threads appearing on the front page. So I can 100% guarantee that all of the above is utterly beyond Vanilla.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,833 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Then how is it decided who takes part in the discussion?

    Another can of worms!

    While I agree with you that the discussion needs to be allowed to flow, the problem with that is how far , as some will take that as am excuse to troll and be uncivil and it will still end up being moderated then in the end ?

    I also agree with what you said about moving CA so it's less visible but not with making it a private group .

    It'll end up as a group of the same posters with similar views and most likely just an echo chamber so that there won't be any inconvenient disagreements.

    I think the contentious CA threads need more moderators than a lot of the hobby sites and the charter needs to be updated to limit repetitive arguments , spamming and low level trolling

    Also @Big Bag of Chips are banned posters rereg-ing more common now since Vanilla or is it the same as it always was or more difficult to spot ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    "I think the contentious CA threads need more moderators than a lot of the hobby sites and the charter needs to be updated to limit repetitive arguments , spamming and low level trolling"

    Be careful what you wish for!!! It'd certainly reduce the post count from a good few.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,833 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I am fully aware and think that may be a positive in some threads .

    If it makes for a more constructive and pleasant experience for all or certainly for those who just want to discuss freely without constant bickering or without being got at personally I am completely on board ,no pun intended .

    Would be some of the other fora that need more post traffic .



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement