Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

N40 - Cork South Ring Road upgrade [early planning underway]

  • 20-04-2023 12:54pm
    #1
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I have been meaning to create this thread for months but TII have this listed as a major scheme now so it definitely merits a thread.

    To sum it up, this scheme seeks to identify opportunities to improve/streamline the N40 after two major changes:

    1. The completion of the Dunkettle Interchange upgrade
    2. The construction of complementary infrastructure from CMATS (mainly the Cork Southern Distributor Road)

    It'll be interesting to see what's proposed here. Anyone pro-road infrastructure will likely suggest a third lane between J9 and J6 westbound, simply because there will be 2 freeflow lanes coming from Mahon/Dunkettle and 2 freeflow lanes coming from the M28.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    "Anyone pro-road" isn't quite right here Marno. I'd wager anyone pro-road would be in favour of an N40 North. Another N40 South lane is just a sticking plaster.

    N40 south is now a single point failure for all citywide traffic. Another lane will work fine until a crash and the whole city will gridlock again. We need alternative routes, not slightly more capacity on the current route.

    We also desperately need modal shift, but that's a much bigger topic. And woe betide anyone who suggests it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I should watch where I put my punctuation, I meant pro-road infrastructure as part of this solution. IMO widening the N40 anymore along the mainline would be a futile exercise, but I can't not suggest widening a 2 lane section sandwiched in between a 4 lane (N40 + M28 terminus) and 3 lane section. IMO it's a clear lane drop equivalent to having a lane drop on a busy section of the M50.

    IMO N40 North is important, but the Southern Distributor Road would be even better. Removing local traffic off the N40 would be a great start

    Modal shift would be fantastic but it's a lot to ask for in a city like Cork on a road like this, much of the traffic is going nowhere near the city centre which is where the modal shift will be best achieved. PT from Ballincollig to Mahon for example will never beat the journey time for a car travelling along the N40.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I am pro road infrastructure, but I would oppose any further widening here unless it was as a part of a complete redesign of the Douglas junctions - any widening here would be really expensive, and that money would be wasted without also (or first!) addressing the root cause of the problem: that the N40 is double-jobbing as a relief road for Douglas along this stretch. The problem needs a more adventurous approach than just throwing more lanes at a crap design.

    The Southern Distributor is essential for any improvement here, and I guess it’s the main thing they’re referring to by “complementary infrastructure”.

    As for Public transport Ballincollig to Mahon, if you include the time taken queueing on the exit roads from M40 and then finding parking around Mahon, a bus heading cross-city on its own dedicated way would be in with a good chance of being a better option. Unfortunately (if you’ll excuse the brief off-topic) Cork BusConnects has proposed exactly zero corridors that could facilitate an orbital route:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep I think we're all roughly on the same page. A Southern distributor is critical. But don't discount a Northern N40 either. A lot of people are commuting from North of the river to Ballincollig and the West of the city via the N40. It's their only real option at the moment.


    And in terms of Modal Shift we probably should decamp to another thread, but the amount of city traffic on the N40 is likely very large. Almost anything going to Mahon uses the N40, almost anything going to UCC, CIT, CUH, Airport, Douglas (all large trip generators, all within the city) are using the N40 by default. I don't agree that much of the traffic is going nowhere near the city: I'd wager a high proportion of the traffic is going to the city. It could even be 50%. It would be great to get the analysis of this, but I'd be willing to wager that half (or less) of the traffic on the N40 is bypassing the city.

    The N40 double-jobbing as a distributor is THE problem. Another N40 lane cannot be the solution. Different roads and different modes are needed. If nothing else, the single point of failure is too significant now: when the N40 stops the city completely stops.


    And just pointing out that I'm not saying "no more roads" here at all, I'm explicitly saying Southern Distributor and Northern N40. But I really think that our efforts at modal shift to-date have been absolutely pitiful. BusConnects low-aspirations getting scaled back is kind of indicative of our current "moar cars" philosophy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Do we have a South distributor road thread?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't see one, and much of the talk of a Southern Distributor that I've seen has been in the anti-M28 groups' "alternate proposals"!

    Possibly worth setting one up?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,566 ✭✭✭kub


    Whatever became of the re designation from N40 to M40, does anyone know?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Unlikely until there’s a viable and safe East-West route for slower heavy vehicles. Right now, the only alternative route would involve going into the city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep seems to have quietly disappeared. That one seemed really crazy to me, at the time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Jayuu


    Moved this from the Southern Distributor thread as it seems more appropriate here.

    Can I ask has there ever been any consideration given to a link between Cobh and Passage West or Ringaskiddy in order to provide an alterative route to the N40? Either a bridge or a tunnel.

    The river is quite narrow all along here but are there particular geographical constraints that would make this impossible or costly that I'm not aware of, or simply not just enough traffic to justify a crossing?

    It just always feels to me that looking at a map of Cork and surrounds there is a huge problem in South -> East or West -> South traffic all having to use the N40/Dunkettle as their only option for travel. Maybe that's not a large amount of traffic but given the seemingly constant pressure on the N40 and given the M28 project is something like this viable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Did a thread on this a few years ago. Could easily be tied in with the construction of a tidal barrier.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2057819773/monkstown-to-rushbrooke-bridge#latest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't think a tidal barrier is workable there. I read the OPW analysis paper which was trying to discredit the idea of tidal barriers of the Lee. They said that the channel there is too deep and narrow and fast so a tidal barrier would be very difficult if not impossible.

    They pointed at a tidal barrier from Little Island to Passage instead, with supporting works to the North of Little Island. I know we're very much cross-threading here, but I like this idea, and think it could be powerful. The amount of greenway commuters who would cross to Little Island via such a route would be reasonably large, and I'm confident it would take N40 users off the road. The OPW analysis paper said that it would cost approx. 1 billion euro (this was maybe 5 years ago, so probably a good bit more now due to inflation).

    For the link directly to Cobh, I'd prefer to see the roads and footpaths on either side of the river upgraded first, they're narrow and in very poor condition. Next I'd prefer to see the new Belvelly/Rossleague bridge and Fota Road done. With that complete, the existing ferry could potentially begin to operate more hours a day and the logical case for a down-river bridge could be made. But it would need to be something like the New Ross bridge in terms of scale, and I don't think the traffic movements warrant it unfortunately.

    But on the other hand, and I apologise in advance for the off-topic section below, there's so much low-hanging fruit in terms of sustainable transport in the Cork area I think if we're seriously looking at tidal barrier bridges and large extradosed cross-river bridges etc (I still want these!) then we should surely also at least start a more honest conversation about modal shift.

    On that note a really simple low-cost consideration to alleviate some tunnel traffic could be a small passenger ferry from Mahon to Little Island. I see lots of these little passenger ferries crossing the canal/river in Amsterdam and it seems like a really simple cheap thing to do. The existing "tour" boats on the Lee could almost do it if jettys were made. Hopefully my link works, but here's what it looks like in practice: https://www.google.ie/maps/@52.3824052,4.9031825,3a,60y,220h,86.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swWqjimi1f2Uj-bBhD0-Yjw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    You could do something similar from Cobh to Ringaskiddy maybe. But even then, and as I said above, I'd prefer to simply see the roads and footpaths on either side of the river upgraded first. It's actually extremely uncomfortable to walk or cycle in Cobh/Passage/Monkstown/Raffeen. We're forcing people into cars by making every other mode so difficult. Even a really simple thing: Carrigaloe train station from Carrigaloe ferry is a very uncomfortable 700m walk/cycle. Why not link these two, and try and entice Passage/Monkstown/Ringaskiddy commuters onto the train? Why not properly link Little Island train station to the employment centres by footpath and cycleway and maybe even shuttle bus?

    Each of these takes a small % of end users out of the tunnel, or off the N40 or both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    As mentioned previously, the N40 was built as an east to west link, from Mahon to Bishopstown, using a lot of existing land from the Bandon Railroad. The name South Ring suggests a bypass (and the tunnel now allows for a reasonable bypass of the city centre for some N-S traffic), but ultimately it isn't a bypass. As someone else said, I bet most users of it are those living in the city and just commuting to other parts of it. That person mentioned trips to Mahon and Wilton - how could you do this journey in a reasonable way without the N40? I live in Maryborough, south of the N40. To go to Wilton, I'd have to go down to Douglas, over to Turner's Cross, Ballypheane and then Glasheen. To get to Mahon, I'd have to go down to Douglas and use the congested, relatively residential Well Road and Skehard Road. Realistically, no one in the south city outside the N40 is going to do that. Therefore, the N40 does act as an East - West link, but instead of being for HGV coming from the tunnel onwards to the west of the county/Kerry or east of the county/Waterford/Dublin and wishing to avoid driving local city roads like Douglas Road, Skehard Road, Western Road, etc, the N40 is primarily (I would argue) a local distributor road. I'd like to know how many routes start within the city (I mean the urban city, not City Council area) and end in it. Probably a lot.

    First things first, they need to limit the number of junctions onto the road from within the city. Some can't be removed, like the Rochestown junction (as the R610 is already congested enough as is). However, J9 Douglas (West) comes to mind straight away. Commuters using that don't have to travel far to access the three destinations I would consider the primary destinations of the N40: the City Centre, Mahon and Wilton/CUH. For cars coming from Mahon, close the eastbound exit, meaning cars coming from Mahon will only use the N40 to access the tunnel. Close the on ramps at J6 Togher, J3 Bishopstown (East) and J2 Bishopstown (West) for the same reasons as J6. Yes, that will push a lot of cars that would have been using the N40 onto local roads, however this should be done with two changes: the Southern Distributor and BusConnects. I don't believe the Southern Distributor should follow the R610/R853/R641, mainly because the neccessary link at The Mangala will never happen. It should start at Mahon/Jacob's Island, cross a new bridge from Jacob's Island to Rochestown Road, run from an ugpraded L2474 Monastery Road, along a new road to the Carr's Hill interchange, to Elm Hill, meet N27 Airport Road at an upgraded interchange and run along a new road connecting to the N71. This would be a true bypass of the southside, as well as being a distributor road that HGV wouldn't be using. The N40 then can return to what its primary function is (an inner city bypass for E-W traffic)

    This provides direct local access to the main trips the N40 is used for - Mahon, Wilton and the airport, as well as the City Centre via the N27 Airport Road Interchange, West Cork via N71 Viaduct Interchange and Carrigaline/Ringaskiddy via the N28 Carr's Hill Interchange. As mentioned above, this could also tie in with a ferry service from Mahon/Jacob's Island to Little Island. Thoughts?




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't like the Easternmost piece of this, because I think it's possibly too near the N28 to be of significant value, considering the effort.

    What you're drawing here seems to be more like a Bypass which is easier to map out but much harder to use as a distributor unless you basically zone all the land around it for development. Not necessarily a bad thing to do a Bypass instead of a Distributor, but I think the bang-for-buck with a distributor will come from routing it closer to the urban areas. And I don't think the cost/benefit for a southern orbital bypass is going to be good.

    I guess I'm saying: it needs to be a distributor, leaving N40 as the "bypass" whereas what you're proposing will work quite well as a bypass. This would potentially be a desirable HGV link from the West of the city to Ringaskiddy, so I'd worry about that for instance.

    I think you're calling it perfectly though, N40 is used for Little Island/Mahon/Douglas/Airport/Wilton urban traffic. That's definitely the primary job it's doing right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,330 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If going to the trouble of building a new road further south, then it has to be the bypass, not the distributor road. The distributor road also has to cater for active and public transport which would be pointless so far south. If you had a new bypass, the the existing N40 could be reengineered with reduced traffic lanes and possibly even accommodate a light rail system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    The City Council has begun a consultation to extend the westbound off ramp at J10 Mahon/Blackrock/Jacob's Island by converting ~750m of the existing hard shoulder. They state that this is needed as the hard shoulder is used as an informal off ramp lane during busy times, and they expect this to increase after the Dunkettle Interchange works

    https://consult.corkcity.ie/en/consultation/extension-n40-south-ring-road-ramp-westbound-approach-mahon-junction-10



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,566 ✭✭✭kub


    I thought a project like that, on a National Road would be the responsibility of the NRA ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus



    I think they’re expecting bigger queues back from Bloomfield and this will allow better Mahon to Rochestown movements when traffic is queuing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think this also speaks to what most of us believe on here, and the purpose of this thread: Dunkettle will likely allow more traffic to reach the Douglas area and we're not going to "More N40" our way out of this in the near future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 423 ✭✭legend99


    Difficult to disagree with the view that says 2 lanes from M28 and 2 lanes from tunnel will simply lead to huge problems at Douglas flyovers and indeed at Kinsale Road given that so much traffic exits at the roundabout there?

    Do I recall that footings were put in when Douglas Village Shopping Centre was rebuilt to allow for a third lane heading West? And the flyover is build for 3 lanes (it has the 3 if going East) so I assume there was a plan in that case to widen to 3 for Westbound?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    First part of this jigsaw approved

    https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/arid-41184922.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,001 ✭✭✭cantalach


    And of course The Echo shows a photo of the western side of the junction which has almost no relevance to the story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,738 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    So the cost of road building now is 3.3million per km plus land purchasing cost of which there are none here.

    Great little country this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't know for sure, but I believe you may be mistaken. I don't believe that the space is available, nor do I believe that the infrastructure you mention was put in place. Again, I'm not speaking from a position of any certainty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Looks like this is no longer being referred to as the South Ring, instead just being called N40. TII are in the process of updating directional road signage in the city, including updating old N25 signage to N40. Signs that once said N25 South Ring, such as the N20 on Carrol’s Quay, now just say N40. Even new signs that said N40 South Ring at Albert Quay and Victoria Cross have been replaced by just N40 with ferryport and airport symbols. It will be interesting to see what they do with the “Use South Ring Route” signs on Horgan’s Quay, Cathedral Walk and Carrigrohane Road (which still refer to the N71 as for West Cork, and the R610/N28 as the R609)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Open to full correction here, but that type of destination signage was done away with when the TSM was updated about 10/15 years ago. So called "super destinations" were removed (you see similar signage around the Quays in Dublin with the N4/N5/N6 signed as "The West" and the N7/N8/N9 signed as "The South"). The N40 is signed by its number only now (it was more difficult to sign accurately when it was the N25 as this was both the South Ring and the road to Waterford/East Cork), and the N71 is signed as "Bandon" or "Skibbereen".

    The destinations to which these roads are to be signed can be found in the TSM/Roads Act.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,115 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I also look forward to seeing what they do with this disaster.

    Clean it, hopefully.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    At a guess, that sign is a relic from when the "South Ring Route" went from Bishopstown to Rochestown and N8/N25 traffic had to use Horgans Quay & the South City Link Rd to access the 4 destinations above. The R600 & R609 route numbers being used would indicate its a mid 1990s sign at the latest.

    It could be debated that there is no such need for a sign like that anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    There was N40 South Ring signage added between 2014 and 2017 that has now been replaced by signs just as N40. Would that be considered a super destination too?

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/o3ka34Xh8GEQkyZq5



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,566 ✭✭✭kub


    I don't mean to derail the above discussion, but just the reappearance of this thread in the forum reminded me of something.

    Some time ago, the talk was that the N40 was going to get motorway classification, is that now gone ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭TheSunIsShining


    Mentioned this in the Dunkettle Thread I think. But would it be well to simply abandon the N40 to being the distributor road - it already seems to connect everything on the Southside already and hence everyone uses it as a local road anyway (!) - and build the outer road as an actual bypass road?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think it must have quietly been killed off. There's no appropriate alternative for slow-moving heavy traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't disagree with you but: it would be so far south as to be less desirable, and the current N40 isn't a distributor.

    There's no sustainable transport section of it, it's a magnet for cars. It's not what you'd want a distributor to be.

    Post edited by hans aus dtschl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭TheSunIsShining


    Fair point actually. It's a bit of everything and nothing right now so falling between lots of stools- but what it definitely is, is a massive problem in terms of failing cause when it goes wrong, the traffic of the entire city shuts down with it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Another difficult decision: closing Douglas N40 ramps during provision of the Southern Distributor?

    A lot of people on the Southside wouldn't like that but it would possibly be a good decision. Only giving Douglas access via the N27 and Grange Road and M28 via the new distributor.

    And also perhaps multi-point tolling once N40 North and Southern Distributor are done? That would be fought tooth and nail too.

    And sustainable transport routes: there needs to be a continuation of the greenway to Douglas, a down-river sustainable transport crossing and bus priority everywhere etc. Long way to go before N40 starts to become a true bypass.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,618 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Closing the ramps at Togher and Douglas East/Douglas West was proposed in CMATS. Given that they mostly cater to local traffic.

    However, such a proposal has absolutely no congruence with the realpolitik of such an endeavour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I think it'd be fought tooth and nail.

    Once you allow car access somewhere, people quickly become dependent and it's extremely difficult to remove. It's why it's so important to get "bypass" roads right. AKA not all-purpose "ring roads".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Yes for one of the Douglas exits, but the Togher exit serves the largest industrial zone in Cork City.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    The issue with the N40 is that there aren’t enough north - south bridges without access to the N40. Mad to think you will need to battle with N40 traffic unless you take the bridge going into Togher village or the bridge in the Waterfall Road.

    At least one of the Douglas exists should be closed. The Togher one would be problematic. The Kinsale Roundabout would be st breaking point without it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I think the exit onto the Douglas Road is fine, but they'd be better off closing the one onto the South Douglas Road, given how much it affects the traffic at the junction of South Douglas Road and West Douglas Street. Maybe close the Rochestown exit on the N28 too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,001 ✭✭✭cantalach


    And then people travelling east on N40 wanting to access the estates (sorry, “parks”) along the Rochestown Road and beyond to Passage would have to exit at the Douglas Road and go through the well established clusterfcuk that is Douglas village. Not seeing how that would improve traffic off the N40.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Why would they not use the N28 junction? People West of Douglas use KRR, East use N28 is the idea. Again though, there is no question that it would be fought tooth and nail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I suggested the N28 junction to Rochestown be closed. I think money could be spent on fixing the Douglas Road junction and the capacity of Douglas Relief Road to allow for all traffic to exit there instead of the three current exits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    Not sure how eliminating access from N28 to Rochestown Road could improve things in any sense. It would cause utter chaos in the centre of Douglas.

    What screws Douglas truly and utterly is that there is no access point going North - South between Douglas and Frankfield. All the traffic is channeled through 2 access points which is disasterous. This sort of layout appears to be loved in the suburbs of Irish cities. It’s dreadful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Oh, it would cause chaos. But I feel any change will, and maybe the chaos will encourage some to bus or cycle instead

    The lack of N-S routes outside of the N40 are definitely really bad. I wonder if there is scope to provide a connection between the Well Road and Churchyard Lane junction through Mahon Golf Course and Douglas Court to connect to the Rochestown Road. Likewise, another connection in the form of a bridge over Lough Mahon to connect the end of the R852 to the R610 at the junction of Rochestown Road and Monastery Road. The former allows for travel between Ballinlough/Ballintemple to Rochestown without going through Douglas or the Well Rosd. The latter allows for Rochestow to Mahon traffic without having to travel the entire length of the Rochestown Road to get to the N40 or Well Road. It also allows access to the tunnel and N40 for people coming from Passage and Monkstown. A N-S connection between Frankfield and Douglas isn’t really possible other than where the new walkway is to Tramore Valley Park, so I think the goal should be to reduce the amount of people coming from the east side of the city like Mahon, Rochestown and Passage to Douglas in order to get to the city centre or N40, or each other



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    I believe that N-S transit points across the N40 is now more important than a south distributor road. I seriously doubt anything will happen however due to the sheer cost of doing something about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭Corkladddd!!


    I don't want to go back over old ground but is there any case to be made for the shutting of the "Tesco" road or at least making it one way? The benefit to Douglas village traffic was immense when it was closed for the fire repairs. With busconnects, potential M28 works etc. it's difficult to figure out how they are not going to compound the traffic issues in Douglas without the additional N/S connection mentioned above and it's certainly clear to me that when Douglas traffic is bad, the SRR is bad. (Also remember the hoarding/netting to stop the onlookers, bring it back and keep peoples eyes on the road!).

    Would we have the foresight to put in an additional bridge with the space for the potential "LUAS" to be tracked onto it in years to come?

    Add in some kind of pedestrian/bicycle connection to Tivoli/Little Island from the Blackrock/Mahon loop and I'd be a commuter gone off the road, now there's an indirect way of making an upgrade!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Add in some kind of pedestrian/bicycle connection to Tivoli/Little Island from the Blackrock/Mahon loop and I'd be a commuter gone off the road, now there's an indirect way of making an upgrade!!

    The pathfinder scheme hopes that Tivoli to town will be done by the end of 2025. You'd need to go from Blackrock to Parnell Bridge and Mary Elmes Bridge at that point. A nice bit of a detour but at least safer. The longer-term plan then is for a new cross-river bridge at around Tivoli.

    But ultimately your point here is exactly what the likes of me has been bleating on about for ages: you can definitely tempt a good few people out of the tunnel. You could do it with a cheap small ferry and two new slips to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Closing Riverwalk, the road next to Tesco, would be huge. I think the only way onto the road should be by turning left off East Douglas Street/Douglas Relief Road, and the only way off via West Douglas Street/South Douglas Road. They need to get rid of that right turn lane under the bridge. There isn't enough room for five lanes, and the right hand turn holds up traffic heading to town. For people coming from town/Well Road, they can go down Douglas Relief Road and use the Douglas Court Roundabout. It might be chaos at the start but surely it would end up better than what it's like now, or a full closure like when the fire happened

    Also, a guard policing the yellow box at the Douglas Road/Well Road junction would make a huge difference to traffic, as people coming off the link always block it

    And while we're at it, remove the ridicuously large footpath on the Well Road side of under the bridge. It's huge! Add in a cycle lane so the one from Douglas Road doesn't just end out of nowhere. CPO some of the land for that generator too, and by KFC, and narrow the Douglas Relief Road. Then you'll have a continuous cycle lane all the way from UCC to the top of Maryborough Hill save for a few small spots



  • Advertisement
Advertisement