Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WTF.A minutes silence for the death of Queen Elizabeth in the Dail today. Micheal Collins and Dev

Options
1235789

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 67,114 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Disagree. He'll attempt to rehabilitate him by degrees. The first one being named as a stand in or whatever it was.

    I will be amazed if Charlo hasn't the throne mired in controversy within a year. He will constantly be compared to his mother and come up well short.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,892 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I’d say he’ll just keep his head down and do whatever is required of him in the role… he’s mid 70’s now and starting to look it…

    I don’t think he’ll have the appetite to start revolutionising the monarchy. I’d say he’ll stick very much to the template that his old dear provided… turn up, smile, shake hands, look interested even if he isn’t and say all the right things when he needs to….

    he might play up a little more to the cameras and be a bit freer with emotion and personality which has always been his way…

    ” ohhh jolly good, you erm, made an operating theatre out of Lego, however long did it take you ? Really ? My goodness, yes, yes, his foot felll off, poor fellow, he must feel like a bit of a brick, hah hah hah, right, next ! “



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,613 ✭✭✭Feisar


    Can anyone imagine if the Third Reich was still on the go and telling Jews to have a mature attitude, the past is the past and all that. As much as I admire the woman I cannot forget she was head of a regime that had us on our bellies for so long.

    And OP, Dev isn't fit to be in the same sentence as Collins.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Over 100 years ago seriously. You would want a degree to search through the archives to find a mention in Ireland Or the UK. The UK archives could have been bombed in the war. BBC world service may have something but no idea. Must have been deemed important enough by the Brits to send over a Minor royal.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    I don't think Michael Collins would actually be in favour of holding on to bitterness, and viewing the queen as an enemy. After all, he was a reasonable man... that's why he signed the treaty. You however, seem more like the sort who'd be on the other side of the civil war.

    And Dev was the one who caused Collins to die. He sewed the seed for a civil war.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭Riddle101


    It was a small gesture of goodwill and a show of respect to our closest neighbor and I wouldn't expect any less from our Government. As for Collins and Develera turning in their grave, who knows what they might think now, but it doesn't really matter at this point, times are different now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    dev had no choice, collins went against him and signed a treaty creating one of the most sectarian, racist, failed states known to man.

    a state who's creation is an empirialy motivated, sectaria agrevated hate crime, which was not created due to care about the unionist community, who are constantly thrown under the bus once finished being used for whatever purpose.

    a treaty that has created 2 wars on this island, and which, if not signed would only have created one and all communities on this island would be now living together as has been and is the case in the south.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    I thought a one country Ireland has never existed in history outside of being an Imperial colony. You would have to split the place up into kingdoms to create something that was similar before the british arrived. Are there any descendants left of the high kings ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    no, a 1 country ireland has always existed but split into multiple kingdoms.

    but it was all ultimately ireland.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Ruled independently overseen by a high king so like the UK separate kingdoms. There were no parliaments or counties as we know them now. Entirely different. You want to continue to Have a state that was created artificially by a foreign power. Based on systems setup by that foreign power laws even. Counties setup by a foreign power.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Michael Collins got most of our country back, he got the best deal possible, Dev knew nothing better was on the table. It we left it to Dev all 32 counties might still be under UK rule today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    different yes but still ultimately ireland in full.

    i want ireland in full back, unpartitioned as it was until the hate crime treaty was forcibly signed via blackmail.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    it wasn't the best deal, he was blackmailed into signing it via the threat of violence, violence which happened anyway all be it in a different form.

    he could have refused to sign it and we would have got the country back eventually as the IRA would have engaged in a continued campaign of violence and it would have been eventually unsustainable for britain to keep poring resources into it.

    at worst we would have got it back by the 1950s.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Not huge on Irish history not from here. But What was the country you refer to called. Not the land mass As IIRC that changed over time the actual country name. It's a bit like the Normans reappearing and wanting land back that no longer exists. Do the Vikings "Pick nordic country" have a claim ? Romans/Italians in the UK. Ireland only existed as an artificial state. Not trying to annoy anyone here but it's simple fact. What seems to be wanted is the Colony as it was set up. That was never part of the Republic of Ireland. Is Crimea Russian ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,244 ✭✭✭Brid Hegarty


    It is strongly suspected that Collins wanted to take the north by force, and he apparently made comments of such nature at the time. If the goal was to get all 32 counties, then the best way to go about it would be to let the treaty be a stepping stone towards the 32 counties. It was a miracle to get the 26 counties at that. And then instead fighting the British, they fought their own... thus making sure that the remaining 6 counties would never be got back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    It was, and signing it meant less violence. Do you have any evidence to show that the other 6 counties was on the cards at the time?

    You are now using your imagination rather than facts. Nobody knows whether or not we would of eventually got the 32 counties back, all we know for sure is lots more innocent people would of died in the attempt.

    The facts say the English had a far superior army, its just as likely that all the future bloodshed could of been in vein



  • Registered Users Posts: 54,736 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Collins and Dev were as eager as any Irish Nationalists to have a 32 counties one Ireland. They simply negotiated and compromised with the cards that were on the table 100 years ago.

    anyway, it’s utter silly to be certain on how people from 100+ years ago would be feeling if they could see all that has happened since their times.

    people live in the present. They can remember and discuss the past, live in the now and plan for the future.

    in relation to this thread, it’s a very healthy sign of our country and its attitude to our neighbour, a neighbour that we have have been through so much with; good, bad and ugly. But by god, at least today and recently we have some semblance of harmony and peace. And not warring, killing and insane hostility. In saying and knowing this, a minute’s silence here should be viewed as nothing but another positive and mature and caring statement in how we progress further.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    letting the treaty be a stepping stone failed, so that was a stupid method.

    fighting the british would have got us the 32 around the 1950s because the british were bankrupt and were unable to sustain the empire much longer.

    we will get the 6 back, that is not in doubt, but we could have had it decades ago and there would be no issues on the island now.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    the signing of the treaty caused more violence, the civil war and the liberation of northern ireland war.

    the british had a far superior army yet they were forced out of india, forced out of africa and were brought to a stailmate in northern ireland, with more resources on the irish side they would have been eventually forced out because they were bankrupt after the war and squandered the martial aid money.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    more like an insecure statement in the aim of looking for a pat on the head from the british and a pat on the back from unionists.

    nonsense like this is not maturity or caring.

    send a letter of condolence is enough.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 978 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Take you also want to get rid of the county system, and return to using Gaelic? Or does your love of Ireland only go back to a certain time period?

    The holy grail of internet warriors, a single unified happy happy Ireland was never an option. There was always going to be a civil war post any form of independence, either between pro/anti treaty or unionist/republican.



  • Registered Users Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Oscar Madison


    We did actually!

    After Germany surrendered DeValera would not allow the British or Americans

    to enter the German Embassy until after he had visited them.

    I'm sure that gave them enough time to destroy what they had to!



  • Registered Users Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Oscar Madison


    To be fair it only right whatever the previous history between both countries.

    We can't live in the past & I'm not suggesting that we forget the past but move on!



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    It didn't, we've lived mostly in peace for the last few decades and the lives of those in the Republic improved. Also the Irish army wasn't all that impressive compared to how well trained the English were. Most Irish people don't have an appetite for committing horrible murders



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,124 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The whole protocol surrounding things like a minutes silence or lowering a flag to half mast is actually very informal. Those who oppose it are probably reading way too much into it. The Dáil for example can hold a minutes silence for the passing of anyone they deem fit - criticising it seems extremely petty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    irrelevant waffle.

    being against simpering westbrit nonsense is not living in the past and there is nothing to move on from.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    yes it did, 2 wars on the island would have been 1 had reunification happened and it would have been over by the 50s, 60s in the absolute worst case.

    again dispite it's superiority, the british army were forced out of many countries in the 50s and 60s and even before.

    the lives of the irish would have improved more had the treaty not been signed because the orange statelet would never have been created.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 34 maceoin.D.


    You're not taking into account what would have likely transpired over those 30 odd years. That was the first rebellion to get anything put on the table, don't forget, and although the IRA are not the give up type, you cannot expect to sustain another 30 years of pressure with lads being put to the firing squad left right and centre. By the time the fifties rolled around, you could have had no revolutionaries left, and a bunch of gombeens in a pro-Brit government conscripting the younger generations to go off and fight WW2 for the British, and getting used as cannon fodder. That's if the deal wasn't taken when it was offered, so after Dev's more peaceful solution was not an option.

    I don't think Dev was the worst lad from the start, but he seemed to let his ego get the better of him with Collins going off and making things happen on his own agenda. I believe Dev wanted the political revolution to be remembered as his. Collins' fighting may have gotten in the way of something better from a political perspective, and so Dev was pissed off that he ended up with the treaty as well- and all the glory despite being just a minister who caused a lot of 'mayhem' and not the republican governments leader.

    It might not have seemed like the best deal, but it may have been. If we gave the Brits the option of more fighting, they likely would have been able to stop the rebellion and install new people everywhere to try and force people to settle down. Their only real worry would have been whether or not they would get it done before WW2, which was as nailed on as they come after WW1. If they did, then I don't want to think of how bad things would have been for the lads who had to go off and fight WW2.



  • Registered Users Posts: 54,736 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Your labeling anyone a Westbrit because they don’t hold near the level animosity and hostility towards a neighbour is exactly the attitude and view that will see you never getting what you want. Even SF realise that times have moved on, and that all sides need to do things that aren’t directly in line with their agenda and end goal.

    divsive and hostile polarising rhetoric rarely gets results, and never harmonises.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,711 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Oh Dev had a choice alright. Go over to London and do the treaty himself. He didn't because he know what was the best deal and it was the one Collins got. He had a choice of looking at it rationally and starting the war but he didn't. In the end it is what he signed up to



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement