Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

30k speed limits for all urban areas on the way

Options
14849515354

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    I did. I said you might need to have a footpath in your village and that sounds like an issue for your local authority.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,881 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    @Seth Brundle Well you mentioned schools in Dublin specifically. More broadly, the fact that people aren't dying like everywhere else in the world, means there isn't really much to complain about. Although the poster below may have some reason.

    So because kids aren't being killed going to school on foot or bike in the same numbers that they are elsewhere, it is safe for them. What an absolutely feckin cretinous response!!! Just shows how absolutely warped your sense of road safety is Sean!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    My view of road safety is informed by both the data and my personal experience as a routine pedestrian and motorist in Ireland. The data and evidence don't justify such a radical measure as wallpapering the country with 30kph speed limits. The danger some of you drone on about just isn't there.

    As a pedestrian, I don't see what the problem is, and as a motorist, I'm sick and tired of being demonised out of all proportion to reality for things I and 99+% of Irish motorists have nothing whatsoever to do with.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,851 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Informed by the data?

    I nearly got hit by a car during the week while cycling.

    Did I report the near miss? No, I didn’t cos I know I’d have been wasting my time.

    Enjiy your data. I’m sure it’s of great comfort to all the innocent victims of the vast number of couldn’t give a toss motorists out there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    And maybe I'm just sick and tired of being lumped in with the few numpties among the 3.3+ million motorists in this country. Because crapping on "motorists" as a group seems to be popular in certain quarters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    I experienced 30kph speed limits in small villages in France last summer- they were totally sensibly placed in the centre of these towns and often came with road design that favoured the pedestrian and slowed down the car further or ensured it was very easy to stick to the 30kph limit.

    Outside of these zones, there were equally sensible 50 and 60kph zones placed where they were needed.

    We won’t have any of that sensibility applied in Ireland - it will be a blanket 30kph zone for an entire area , with no additional work and effort on traffic calming road design - I’m not against 30kph zones per se, but I’m not looking forward to this at all.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,881 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What data? Most parents do not let their kids cycle to school because there is a perception that it us unsafe. Nonetheless, you have confirmed that you believe our roads are safe for kids to walk and cycle on because they are being killed in fewer numbers than other countries so your opinion on whether it is safe or not is now confirmed to be horse crap 🙄!

    Thanks for clarifying that 👍



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    It's your claim of widespread danger that is horse crap. As shown by the data, in both absolute and relative terms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    The prune juice-drinking sandal wearers have got their way this time.

    They’ll move on to some other form of pearl clutching exercise next - it doesn’t matter that we have some of the safest roads in Europe (and by extension, the world), they love to be nannied and that’s what matters.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,881 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You shoukd re-read what I posted because I didn't say that!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Yet for all the talk of perceived danger, the actual data suggest the exact opposite. Both in absolute and in relative terms.

    That's why those of us who drive have a right to ask if a radical and drastic measure like wallpapering the country with 24/7 30kph speed limits is actually warranted. For example, as to issues like the poster who can't send their children to school on foot because there is no footpath, the solution to that might just be to get a footpath built by the local authority.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,881 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The actual data is skewed because of what I already mentioned.

    And let's not lie to ourselves about it: the roads, as they are currently, are not suitable for letting kids cycle on which is why you won't give a straight answer on the matter!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Urban areas have footpaths and controlled junctions everywhere as a general rule in my experience, and most drivers are not maniacs, so pedestrians usually don't have much to complain about.

    As to cyclists, they have both de-jure cycle lanes, and footpaths that are de-facto cycle lanes. So they have little to complain about either. At any rate, the fact that people are not dying shows that at least some decisions are being made correctly, no?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    The logical conclusion here is that all cars must be banned. This is clearly the progression from the arguments being put forward by the pro 30 limit people. We will then have the safest roads in Europe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭loco_scolo


    @SeanW you did not comment on anything in this response. You prattled on about my village. I live in Dublin city centre.

    Care to respond to my response above, or just ignore someone challenging you with facts?



  • Registered Users Posts: 413 ✭✭BagofWeed


    Exactly these types want every breath we take regulated with rules attached. Fanaticism is what it is. There needs to be a co ordinated protest against this madness and the irony is we will be polluting more by crawling along at 30km.

    I agree though with Oscar Madison's post about the 30km limit in France as they do it right there but we're special we'll do it the 'Irish way' and make a balls of it leading to more frustration and road rage and more traffic jams.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Absolutely, we should all just sit at our kitchen tables wearing crash helmets in case anything happens.

    Best not go outside at all, it’s too dangerous - we just sit tight and wait for our government organised minders to come and feed us and wipe our arses for us. All at a safe speed of course.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    My apologies, the it was a different poster that was banging on about how there was no footpath between them and their local school, I got the posts confused. I'll refer now to your post from before.

    My understanding is that serious injuries, like fatalities, are also very rare in this country, though there are more of them. Hence, motorists have a right to question whether dramatic measures are necessary, warranted or proportionate. And the metric I used was "in the low single digits per billion vehicle kilometres" which obviously does not apply to Malaysia.

    As to the UK, you're really stretching the statistics there to find an issue, Ireland the UK have similar statistics in terms of both deaths per billion vehicle-km and deaths per 100,000 population, the difference in deaths per 100,000 vehicles doesn't seem to indicate very much, except perhaps some difference in vehicle ownership? In any case, both Ireland and the UK are near the bottom of all lists covering all metrics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭loco_scolo


    No worries on the mix up of posts!

    Not attempting to stretch data, but that stuck out to me. In any case, car ownership is only slightly higher in the UK, like 6%, so that data doesn't make sense. So I'll give you that one!

    AFAIK there are 10 serious injuries for every death, so that's 1500+ serious injuries every year. That's hardly nothing.

    I simply don't see the issue driving slower in urban areas. If it makes roads safer and encourages more people to walk and cycle, urban areas become nicer places to live. Not 100% of streets but certainly far more than now.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,072 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Yeah, being only able to drive at 30km/h on some roads and streets is exactly like banning all cars.

    Do you ever hear yourself? It sounds like the conspiracy theories gun owners have in the US... Just to be clear: nobody is coming to take away your cars. Many places with wider use of 30km/h have higher car ownership.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    It isn't a 'few numpties' who are driving irresponsibly. 99% of drivers are no way in hell obeying the rules of the road

    It is fairly constant speeding, phone use ignoring stop signs any signs.

    I drive home from work at 6.15 am most mornings and all through urban areas. Yes 50 limit and I'll admit I'm going slower simply because of the streets, junctions, poor lighting but the cars and trucks I encounter are doing well over 50 whenever they can.

    Ok there's little in the way of pedestrians at that hour but that is their 'attitude' and it doesn't change depending on the time of day.

    Its a mentality thing. An entitlement. A couldn't give a crap thing that doesn't change.

    They're willing to do 70ish in a 50 so lowering to 30 won't bother them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    And yet, all this supposedly dangerous driving isn't showing up in the statistics as fatalities. I suspect that if genuinely dangerous driving were commonplace, it would be showing up in road safety statistics like it does literally everywhere else on Earth.

    Well we are heading for a de-facto car ban. Our government plans to ban ICE cars by 2030 or 2035 and there isn't enough raw material by several orders of magnitude to make electric cars including batteries for everyone. So by the mid-late 2040s you'll have to be wealthy to own a car.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    This trend is already evident in Central London. Was there a few weeks ago and the only cars to be seen are taxis and high end marques clearly driven by the wealthy. Normal Joe and Josephine Soaps clearly don’t get to drive in London anymore; they’re priced out of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭loco_scolo


    I'm glad you mentioned limited resources. There are currently 1.5 billion cars on the planet or 1 car for every 5.5 people (versus 1 car for every 2 in Ireland). We'd need another 2.5billion cars just to even the balance between the developed and developing regions.

    So either:

    1) we start building better cities focused on people, instead of cars, with enhanced urban realms friendly to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport, and move towards shared ownership of cars where possible (especially in cities); or

    2) we continue with arrogant western privilege, expecting to own a car (very often 2 cars between a couple) and drive wherever we want including into the heart of urban areas, despite it's enormous impact on the planet, including the urban areas we live in but especially the poorer areas we don't care about who produce the materials we need to continue our western privilege.

    Are you a 1 or a 2?

    For the record, as a couple we downsized to one car last year and don't miss it for a second. We just plan better when we need the car. If we're stuck we use GoCar and I occasionally take public transport to my rural home village and then use my mum's car.

    Post edited by loco_scolo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,236 ✭✭✭Idleater


    >>>And yet, all this supposedly dangerous driving isn't showing up in the statistics as fatalities.<<<



    Snippet from one recent Irish times article (https://www.irishtimes.com/transport/2023/11/12/overhaul-of-driving-test-curriculum-on-the-cards-as-road-deaths-spiral/)

    "The number of deaths on the roads up to November 9th, 2023 had reached 165 which is higher than the total number of 155 deaths last year."

    Maybe a Christmas afternoon could be spent having a look at some variety of sources.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭amacca


    Yep, I agree...as usual they will make a total arsehole of it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭Consonata


    Fatalities aren't the only injuries caused by speeding. Their are folk in our emergency departments today from extremely serious incidents, such as those from motorcyclist incidents, that will be paralysed for the rest of their lives.

    You also mention that footpaths are de facto Cycle Lanes. If that's the case where are the pedestrians supposed to go? Very car centric attitude you've got there.

    Also regarding 3.3million "drivers" there might be 3.3million licenses issued but there aren't 3.3million drivers. 300k of those are learner permits for folk who can't drive on their own, and a bunch more are folk who have a license and no car, and pensioners who are too old to be driving any more. If you look at the registered cars, it gives a more accurate picture.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    I’ll take 3.

    Recognising that getting rid of one car and buying a cargo bike, or using GoCar, is a lifestyle choice that won’t make the slightest bit of difference to climate change or world poverty, but will play well with fellow socialists and Green fanatics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 457 ✭✭loco_scolo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,746 ✭✭✭SeanW


    I think you lost normal people when you started banging on about "Arrogant western privilege"

    Again, major injuries AFAIK are not exactly common. Even if we assume that serious injuries are 10 times more common than fatalities, that's still somewhere in the region of 98% of drivers who have nothing to do with it. As to my claim that footpaths are de-facto cycle lanes, that's just the reality I experienced as a daily pedestrian in Ireland's major cities. It would be nice if laws regulating the behaviour of cyclists were actually enforced, but as they say, it is what it is. Building more de-jure cycle lanes would be fine too, I have no issue with that.

    And yes, those 3.3 million are drivers. The learners will be on the road learning, and AFAIK a pensioner will find it difficult to keep a license if they are in ill-health. There are health questions in every drivers license renewal form, and a variety of special conditions for the over 70s including a requirement for a doctors certification and in some cases the license is only good for 3 years, maybe even 1.

    And while I do agree that not all drivers use their licenses as much, even those who currently don't have a car could rent or buy one at any time.



Advertisement