Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XI *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

19394969899342

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Gormless, pathetic leadership. Pretty much everyone that needs to be vaccinated has been vaccinated by now. And now they want to push restrictions further until 2 months time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Indoor dining pushed back to mid July

    How can you say something is pushed back when it never got a date in the first place ??

    It was only ever given as sometime in July.

    Publicans wanted 1st July, they've essentially been told it wont be the 1st, why ?? Because it's usually 4 weeks between openings. Which will see them open either the week of the 5th or 12th.

    I don't like it, nor do I agree with a mid July opening but your wording of pushed back is completely inaccurate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Gormless, pathetic leadership. Pretty much everyone that needs to be vaccinated has been vaccinated by now. And now they want to push restrictions further until 2 months time.

    Where did you get 2 months?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 999 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Graham wrote: »
    :confused:

    huh

    Some on here like preaching to the choir about how great our willingness to take the vaccine is so high.

    Of course it’s a good thing. Perhaps you could point to anywhere I said it was a negative?

    However, theorising about the reason our willingness is so high sits uncomfortably with some. I’m unconvinced our high percentage of people willing to take the vaccine is because we are better in any way than other EU nations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57


    Gael23 wrote: »

    Hes is such an embarrassingly weak leader, absolutely paralysed over decision making - despite only 100 people in hospital, 2m vaccines done, claiming we will hit 80% "offered" the vaccine by end June (and before you even get to the economic destruction of wasting half the summer with no indoor dining outside hotel stays)

    A poll on the journal today shows 75% support indoor dining by july 1st or sooner. If MM can only stomach making popular decisions this seems a no brainer...but no,let's make sure Irish people book stays in the 6 counties instead of putting money in the pockets of irish tax paying businesses and make sure tourists know not to bother coming here at all.

    Weak embarrassing leader, and shame on catherine martin as tourism minister for supporting this destruction of hospitality.

    I hope FF and the Greens Lose every seat at the next election.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,756 ✭✭✭corcaigh07


    M_Murphy57 wrote: »
    Hes is such an embarrassingly weak leader, absolutely paralysed over decision making - despite only 100 people in hospital, 2m vaccines done, claiming we will hit 80% "offered" the vaccine by end June (and before you even get to the economic destruction of wasting half the summer with no indoor dining outside hotel stays)

    A poll on the journal today shows 75% support indoor dining by july 1st or sooner. If MM can only stomach making popular decisions this seems a no brainer...but no,let's make sure Irish people book stays in the 6 counties instead of putting money in the pockets of irish tax paying businesses and make sure tourists know not to bother coming here at all.

    Weak embarrassing leader, and shame on catherine martin as tourism minister for supporting this destruction of hospitality.

    I hope FF and the Greens Lose every seat at the next election.

    Don't fall into the trap that FG are not part of this awful government.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    M_Murphy57 wrote: »
    A poll on the journal today shows 75% support indoor dining by july 1st or sooner. If MM can only stomach making popular decisions this seems a no brainer.

    Personally I'm reassured that our government don't make decisions based on what's popular in a poll published by the journal.

    To each their own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,900 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    The funny thing is that a study was done against the new variant and it found the vaccines were around 80% effective against it with astra I believe being the worst with 60 something percent.
    Can't see their logic for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 999 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Graham wrote: »
    Read my posts again, you have obviously misinterpreted them.

    I don't expect there to be lockdowns this winter primarily because of the vaccination program, but yes there may be a slight risk which is why nothing is being rules out/guaranteed however unlikely it's looking.

    The ridiculous is the suggestion we'll be seeing flu lockdowns. It's pure conspiracy theory nonsense based on nothing.

    Conspiracy to what nefarious purposes? Protecting our shambolic health service? One that may need some extra protection this winter with wait lists at an all time high. Conspiracy indeed.

    Once more - I deliberately didn’t suggest lockdown but some of our lesser restrictions, and I did not mention flu.

    At least try not to appear to not purposely misrepresent posts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,458 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Some on here like preaching to the choir about how great our willingness to take the vaccine is so high.

    Of course it’s a good thing. Perhaps you could point to anywhere I said it was a negative?

    However, theorising about the reason our willingness is so high sits uncomfortably with some. I’m unconvinced our high percentage of people willing to take the vaccine is because we are better in any way than other EU nations.

    Well we have firmly established it's not because some vague "bandied" incentives that don't exist and certainly wouldn't be applicable to a poll conducted in the last week if they did.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭Sobit1964


    Boggles wrote: »
    Well we have firmly established it's not because some vague "bandied" incentives that don't exist and certainly wouldn't be applicable to a poll conducted in the last week if they did.

    Did I understand correctly that you think the high acceptance rate for the Irish when it comes to the vaccines is due to the population being much better 'educated' about the vaccine vs their continental counterparts?

    Was that a point you were making, or did i just misread someone elses inference?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Graham wrote: »
    Personally I'm reassured that our government don't make decisions based on what's popular in a poll published by the journal.

    To each their own.

    if all the vulnerable and over 70s who want the vaccine have it,.
    then what is the excuse?
    Sure people will catch covid but the people at risk aren't at risk anymore

    Open the niteclubs.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Conspiracy to what nefarious purposes?

    Don't know and to be honest don't care.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    paw patrol wrote: »
    if all the vulnerable and over 70s who want the vaccine have it,.
    then what is the excuse?

    The rest of the population don't..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Graham wrote: »
    The rest of the population don't..

    but the rest of the population run a minimal risk of serious covid or even hospitalisation.
    unless they have issues which would have them in those special cohorts and would have already had the vaccine (if they wanted)

    your statement sounds like it's more than just protecting the vulnerable which means there is another agenda....surely not...

    just who are you protecting from this killer virus?
    if not the groups in society where we see the deaths?

    I'm intrigued as to your thoughts

    are you a zero covid champion?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,458 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    Did I understand correctly that you think the high acceptance rate for the Irish when it comes to the vaccines is due to the population being much better 'educated' about the vaccine vs their continental counterparts?

    Was that a point you were making, or did i just misread someone elses inference?

    Nope. Commentating specially on Ireland and Ireland only.
    Our relationship predominately down to education around vaccinations has changed drastically in the mast 20 years, particular child vaccinations.

    That's not my just opinion by the way.

    You inserted the Vs.

    Vaccines hesitancy in other countries would come from a myriad of reasons, but education would be part of it.

    Vaccines hesitancy existed before Covid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    bear1 wrote: »
    The funny thing is that a study was done against the new variant and it found the vaccines were around 80% effective against it with astra I believe being the worst with 60 something percent.
    Can't see their logic for it.

    After fully vaccinated. Not after I dose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,458 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    paw patrol wrote: »
    but the rest of the population run a minimal risk of serious covid or even hospitalisation.

    You are in the vast minority lad, the vast majority of the population will take the vaccine.

    Good thing really, eh?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 999 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    Sobit1964 wrote: »
    Did I understand correctly that you think the high acceptance rate for the Irish when it comes to the vaccines is due to the population being much better 'educated' about the vaccine vs their continental counterparts?

    Was that a point you were making, or did i just misread someone elses inference?

    Yes that point was made. In black and white a few posts back. Same poster ironically referred to the digital travel cert as the digital travel vaccination cert - yet insists Irish people were in no way led to believe they were in line for bonuses for getting vaccinated.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    charlie14 wrote: »
    After fully vaccinated. Not after I dose.

    and after people actually get vaccinated, not before :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,458 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    yet insists Irish people were in no way led to believe they were in line for bonuses for getting vaccinated.

    Again there is none, poll which states 96% of Irish Adults willing to take the vaccine was conducted in the last week.

    The EU are rolling out the vaccine passport to the EU.

    Your theory has been blown out of the water.

    Accept it and move on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    paw patrol wrote: »
    but the rest of the population run a minimal risk of serious covid or even hospitalisation.
    unless they have issues which would have them in those special cohorts and would have already had the vaccine (if they wanted)

    your statement sounds like it's more than just protecting the vulnerable which means there is another agenda....surely not...

    just who are you protecting from this killer virus?
    if not the groups in society where we see the deaths?

    I'm intrigued as to your thoughts

    are you a zero covid champion?

    The only way these continued severe restrictions make any sense is if you forget about all the data that we know...

    We know who needs protection this virus. It is only a percentage of us.
    We know at this time of the year there is little to no risk to anyone.

    There will be clusters, it'll be fine.

    We know this from the data...but we've to pretend we don't!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Borderline disinformation on Today FM atm about the Indian variant. The UK has dismissed it as a threat to the return to normality but the positive news doesn't seem to have reached Irish shores yet. Funny how the concern about the Indian variant made it across the Irish Sea in jig time but the more positive elements of news come much slower.

    Lots of industry spokespeople on the radio today saying that there needs to be a firm plan, but there also needs to be an appreciation of how important it is economically to save the summer here. A week here or there matters little in public health terms but every week counts considerably for the industries that have been hung out to try here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,458 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    marno21 wrote: »
    A week here or there matters little in public health terms but every week counts considerably for the industries that have been hung out to try here.

    We are vaccinating a quarter of a million people a week.

    In public health terms and vaccinations during this pandemic, a week matters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Boggles wrote: »
    You are in the vast minority lad, the vast majority of the population will take the vaccine.

    Good thing really, eh?

    No sure the point here tbh

    fair play to them taking it , some of my best mates have taken it.
    I've no issue once consent is there.

    If you mean it's a good thing everybody is taking it, i guess.

    But I wasn't into the restrictions since June bank holiday 2020 so it's irrelevant to me. My view (and still is) there were better ways to handle it
    Let it rip and spend the money on protecting and supporting the vulnerable
    or "killing all the grannys" as my detractors would say...:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    The only way these continued severe restrictions make any sense is if you forget about all the data that we know...

    We know who needs protection this virus. It is only a percentage of us.
    We know at this time of the year there is little to no risk to anyone.

    There will be clusters, it'll be fine.

    We know this from the data...but we've to pretend we don't!

    you nailed it


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    The only way these continued severe restrictions make any sense is if you forget about all the data that we know...

    Nope.

    Restrictions are likely to remain in place at decreasing levels until we reach herd immunity.

    Nobody has ever suggested otherwise however much you'd like that to be the case.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Boggles wrote: »
    We are vaccinating a quarter of a million people a week.

    In public health terms and vaccinations during this pandemic, a week matters.

    It's even better than that Boggles.

    300,000 last week with the same predicted again for this week IIRC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    paw patrol wrote: »
    but the rest of the population run a minimal risk of serious covid or even hospitalisation.
    unless they have issues which would have them in those special cohorts and would have already had the vaccine (if they wanted)

    your statement sounds like it's more than just protecting the vulnerable which means there is another agenda....surely not...

    just who are you protecting from this killer virus?
    if not the groups in society where we see the deaths?

    I'm intrigued as to your thoughts

    are you a zero covid champion?

    Facts:
    The average age of death is 81-82
    Everybody above 80 has been offered the vaccine and has possibly been double jabbed.
    Everybody above 70 has been offerded the vaccine.
    Everybody above 60 has been offered the vaccine.
    Everybody above 50 has been offered the vaccine.
    The vulnerable categories under these ages have been offered the vaccine.

    Before they stopped publishing the ages, the recent average age of people contracting the virus were in their mid to late 20s. The chances of a healthy person in their 20s being hospitalised with Covid is absolutely miniscule.

    As you said, who are we protecting? Everyone that needs to be protected has been protected. Its over.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    RTE headline is saying Masks until october-November. Well after everyone has been vaccinated and just before winter flu season, so obviously they'll want to push it on until next March.

    No sane individual can defend this.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement