Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Schools and Covid 19 (part 5) **Mod warnings in OP**

1373840424389

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,072 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I dont think it’s irrational to at least be informed if your child is a close contact . They can then choose to do what is right for their situation . For example choose not to visit an eldery relative or choose to do an antigen test before they go to dance class etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    And why should they not have the right to pull their kids out of school if they don't think it's safe?

    It would seem very rational to me.

    "Not telling people" isn't transparent and neither is it honest. It's deceitful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Any parent has the right to pull their child out of school if they feel it is unsafe, or if they feel that they are being misled by the authorities as to facts and policies regarding Covid in Schools.

    Foley and her Dept have not acted in a trustworthy manner and it is wise to question their intentions. NPHET's imminent changed strategy in respect of close contacts flies in the face of previous strategy and also ought to be questioned. The "Trust Me" attitude that worked 12-18 months ago no longer prevails today .

    That said, the morbidity/mortality landscape has changed utterly. 73% of the population is fully vaxxed, which massively reduces the overall risk of serious illness or death. The 2020 strategy of keeping kids out of school was not as much about preventing Covid infecting the kids - it was more about preventing spread among older and vulnerable cohorts. The kids were never hugely affected by the disease, and this has only changed marginally with Delta, although transmissability has increased many fold. At this stage, most/all of those at risk of serious illness/death have been fully vaxxed, IF they chose to be so. Similarly, most/all teachers have also been fully vaxxed, if THEY chose to be. Accordingly, the school landscape has changed a lot. However, Foley's assurances around safety in schools are largely empty - witness the promises around CO2 monitors... What an absolute faff- whats going to happen when the cold weather hits and windows cant be left open all day???

    So, now anyone with kids in school and vulnerable/immuno-compromised ppl at home is very wise to remain on high alert. Indeed, with the contact tracing changes incoming, they'd need to be even more alert. For everyone else, its a matter of risk tolerance and balancing risk vs reward. I do feel the authorities have quietly decided that the general population is as well- protected as possible, so testing & isolation among school-going children is no longer viable. Its now up to ppl to decide for themselves. IMO, it is a poor approach given the continued unforgivable lack of State support for antigen testing, and that is definitely a NPHET failing. The reliance on a PCR-only strategy, with a 'one per county' testing centre is simply wrong and arrogant!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would you have argued that children should not go to school if not vaccinated against influenza. Because that is more serious in kids as per the data from @seamus



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,753 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    whats the risk of hospitalisation and death from flu for _all ages_ vs delta variant of covid?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So basically you want to compare apples with oranges. The rate of hospitalisation and deaths in unvaccinated kids is lower with Covid than influenza. The rate of hospitalisation and death in vaccinated non medically vulnerable adults is lower with Covid than influenza

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,015 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    While I agree with this , I do think it is a little previous to be stopping notifying close contacts of school cases and monitoring levels in school , with cases riding in this only unvaccinated age group .

    It is probably only going to get worse in the next while , especially as @TomOnBoard says with the lack of proper ventilation in schools going into the colder months .

    Foley is an incompetent who has not managed to get CO monitors installed even with the summer break .

    My youngest is in secondary and vaccinated .

    I would not be happy if my youngest was in primary and being disregarded as of any consideration , as appears that the HSE and Minister of Education ..AND NPHET ...are doing at present .

    The only reason testing of close contacts is being stopped so abruptly is not reduced transmission, raind, because that has increased, and from an already high level going back in August , but because they are not ready ideologically to propose vaccination in children , or economically to keep them ( and their now back to work parents) at home isolating .

    This is learning from the pingdemic in the UK , fair dues but at what risk to children ?

    Cases will be rising , but it won't be obvious until there are high numbers , because they won't be tested . Parents who don't or can't keep their kids at home will allow them go in even with mild symptoms which will exacerbate spread further .

    But sure it's only a 'mild illness in children '?

    I hope so or there will be a lot of trouble down the line from parents after this .



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    If that's the rationale it's scandalous. They don't know people's circumstances. I mind my grandmother on Fridays when I get home from work through til Sunday mornings to give my mam respite. I don't want to go near her if there's been a case in my class or my children's childcare. Leaving me in the dark takes away my opportunity to make an informed choice. I'm sure that there's lots of people in similar or more challenging circumstances than us.



  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭The HorsesMouth


    But you do realise that you could bring home flu or RSV or any other random virus to your grandmother? She is protected as much as she can be from covid (provided she's vaccinated). So why are you so worried about bringing covid in particular back to her?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Absolutely. So if anyone in contact with me has RSV or the flu I don't go near my grandmother. I want to do the same thing with Covid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭The HorsesMouth


    But how do you know if its flu or rsv? People don't get tested for these things. Kids come into school with coughs etc that could be a flu or another virus but we never know. That's the way we've been living for years and years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Well I don't know if you've cared for a vulnerable person before but how we handle it is we don't go near her if we've been in contact with anyone with symptoms of cold/flu/ has a known illness etc or have symptoms ourselves. Not a perfect system but it's the best we can do. Not unreasonable to want to do the same with covid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭The HorsesMouth


    I'm a teacher and yes I have vulnerable family members. But if a child in my class has a cough and I didn't go see them...I would probably never see them! The point I'm making is you don't have a clue what you encounter everyday and spread around. It's not unreasonable to want to do the same with covid if that's how you want to live but I believe now it's unreasonable to single out one virus to be tested when there's a load of other ones out there equally dangerous to vulnerable or elderly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Why single out measles/mumps/chickenpox/slapped cheek etc? Covid is absolutely dangerous to the vulnerable and known to be in wide circulation at the moment. Why not let people know of cases and let them risk assess themselves according to their particular circumstances? What harm does that do?



  • Registered Users Posts: 489 ✭✭The HorsesMouth


    Massive difference between measles mumps etc and the virus's we're talking about. It doesn't do any harm but every test costs €100. That's near 2 million a day we're spending on testing. It's not sustainable and people need to move away from the fear of covid and start living life as you normally did before.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    I'll happily pay for my own testing given a choice. We regularly use antigen tests. Pretending the problem isn't there won't make it go away.

    I think it's fair to say we are coming from completely different perspectives and won't agree. I see your perspective I just fundamentally disagree with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,072 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Not ideal but maybe an idea for you would be to do antigen test once finished school on Friday and before you go to mind your gran .You will have some peace of mind then ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 854 ✭✭✭beveragelady


    Can anybody tell me how to stop getting notifications from a particular thread?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Ya that's the conclusion we've come to. Better than nothing, but just don't understand why the secrecy around positive cases. Think I'm going to give mam respite from Saturday afternoon through to Sunday night now instead, and take an antigen test Saturday morning.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Question !

    If a fully vaccinated 12 year old gets a cold, stays out of school and gets a PCR Test with a negative result - at what point can s/he return to school ?

    Is it straight away after the negative result ? Or is it 48 hours after the symptoms disappear ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭the corpo


    Pretty sure it's always been the case to wait 48 hours after symptoms disappear for returning to school, even in the before times



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    But kids would have gone to school with a cold pre-Pandemic



  • Registered Users Posts: 389 ✭✭Vaccinated30


    Kids who just have a cold with no temp or cough are fine to go to school as per the hse advice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭the corpo


    Sorry yes, meant anything possibly viral, so with an accompanying temp etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    Any word on muzzles being dropped for teachers on October 22nd? I’m assuming they won’t be But would love to know.

    Fecking hate the mask, it’s impossible to do my job right. Just let us make the choice now, get in with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 389 ✭✭Vaccinated30


    My school said Schools will be keeping the covod response plan in place which includes masks, although my son has a speech delay and I feel he would benefit greatly feom seeing his teachers mouth as they talk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    There has been nothing about it at all. But I totally agree with you. Anyway they are sort of pointless when everyone else in the classroom isn't wearing one and I am fully vaccinated. It's not possible to teach younger children phonics and sounds without showing them your mouth. Would love if it was up to each teacher to decide for themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Health measures in schools will be a matter for the DoE. While the proposed guidelines on 22nd October say that masks aren't required, that doesn't mean the DoE will drop the requirement.

    That said however, I'm expecting them to use the Halloween break as an opportunity to change the rules so that schools arrive back with new rules/guidelines in place.

    With almost everyone over 12 vaccinated, it seems unlikely that the mask requirement in schools will be maintained.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,789 ✭✭✭appledrop


    1st Covid test for our child, one month into school for a cough, no other symptoms.

    Hopefully it comes back clear, but if not I'll be informing school and parents so they can keep an eye on their child despite government not caring about close contacts.



Advertisement