Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Theoretical Cork Suburban/Commuter Lines

  • 27-02-2021 10:11am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭


    I had my crayons out again this morning, thinking of ways sub-urban rail transport could be improved in Cork.

    One thought includes a 5km heavy rail tunnel - I know we don't have something like this in Dublin but hear me out - where it begins to the west of Kent station, before continuing on to St. Patrick St/Grand Parade, where there would be an underground station. It would then continue on to UCC, where there'd be another underground station, before turning south and end just south of South Side Industrial Station.

    There could be an above ground station here, which could coincide with redevelopment of the estate to residential. The line would then continue on to past east of the airport, where another station would be provided. There'd then be two options, continue on to Kinsale, or more likely continue on to Carrigaline. Preferably, two spurs to both locations could be provided.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭Zaney


    ncounties wrote: »
    I had my crayons out again this morning, thinking of ways sub-urban rail transport could be improved in Cork.

    One thought includes a 5km heavy rail tunnel - I know we don't have something like this in Dublin but hear me out - where it begins to the west of Kent station, before continuing on to St. Patrick St/Grand Parade, where there would be an underground station. It would then continue on to UCC, where there'd be another underground station, before turning south and end just south of South Side Industrial Station.

    There could be an above ground station here, which could coincide with redevelopment of the estate to residential. The line would then continue on to past east of the airport, where another station would be provided. There'd then be two options, continue on to Kinsale, or more likely continue on to Carrigaline. Preferably, two spurs to both locations could be provided.

    I admire your ambition and definitely something significant has to be done to improve public transport in Cork.

    But I don’t see the concentration of demand you’d need. UCC is near empty for a significant portáin of the year. Can’t see how it would work if you still let people drive around above ground. You might even have to close Patrick St anyway to build the station access.

    Would people bother to climb up and down escalators for relatively short trips?

    And if you stop people driving, why not just build a luas on the free’d up space. Much easier for passengers to access.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭ncounties


    Zaney wrote: »
    I admire your ambition and definitely something significant has to be done to improve public transport in Cork.

    But I don’t see the concentration of demand you’d need. UCC is near empty for a significant portáin of the year. Can’t see how it would work if you still let people drive around above ground. You might even have to close Patrick St anyway to build the station access.

    Would people bother to climb up and down escalators for relatively short trips?

    And if you stop people driving, why not just build a luas on the free’d up space. Much easier for passengers to access.

    Whilst I think trams would be much better for inner city transport, I was more concerned about suburban/commuter transport. Enabling individuals in Kinsale/Carrigaline to get to the city centre, or use rail for their whole journey to locations further afield (say Dublin) was the main purpose of the scheme. Hence the desire to connect these lines with Kent Station.

    To do so would require extreme rerouting, demolition or tunnelling. Tunnelling felt like the most appropriate, and the two underground stations serve only to provide more value from the scheme (they would be elsewhere), but they are in themselves, not the reason for the scheme.

    With city centre stops though in a number of locations, commuter services could run from say Kinsale to Cobh, making rail transport even more attractive for those living in local towns/villages with existing services, or travelling from further afield.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭thomil


    Leaving aside the fact that none of this would ever get built given the intransigence of the local population and the manifest incompetence of the city council & executive, any type of underground track through Cork city is foolhardy to put it mildly. The entire city centre sits on a deep layer of sediments that makes tunneling a pain in the neck, not to mention prohibitively expensive.

    If you insist on a suburban rail network for Cork, the Karlsruhe model would be the best option. Faced with a similar situation, the city of Karlsruhe opted to utilise existing heavy rail lines to run tram lines into the suburbs and rural areas beyond. This has since been adopted by other cities in Germany, such as Kassel or Chemnitz for example.

    With this model, you could still have your suburban lines outside the city, which would merge with the road system to traverse the city center, only for them to then connect to the existing suburban network at Kent Station. Google "Stadtbahn Karlsruhe" to see what I mean.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭Zaney


    thomil wrote: »
    Leaving aside the fact that none of this would ever get built given the intransigence of the local population and the manifest incompetence of the city council & executive, any type of underground track through Cork city is foolhardy to put it mildly. The entire city centre sits on a deep layer of sediments that makes tunneling a pain in the neck, not to mention prohibitively expensive.

    If you insist on a suburban rail network for Cork, the Karlsruhe model would be the best option. Faced with a similar situation, the city of Karlsruhe opted to utilise existing heavy rail lines to run tram lines into the suburbs and rural areas beyond. This has since been adopted by other cities in Germany, such as Kassel or Chemnitz for example.

    With this model, you could still have your suburban lines outside the city, which would merge with the road system to traverse the city center, only for them to then connect to the existing suburban network at Kent Station. Google "Stadtbahn Karlsruhe" to see what I mean.

    I too would think the geology would make it near impossible, but the Jack Lynch tunnel got built and I don’t know enough to say there wouldn’t be technical solutions.

    Would agree a tram/train approach makes more sense. The Luas green line is not unlike that and 25km long and planned to be extended more.

    But still pointless. Carrigaline with its cul de sacs of semi-d’s and dispersed trips to Ringaskiddy, and across Cork and beyond is built for the car.

    Kinsale is too small and too far removed (as in too much greenfield to get through)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The flooding Cork City suffers from would also pose many issues for underground stations.

    Keep in mind Cork City center is an island and once a partial swamp. Cork use to be like Venice with Patrick St etc. were canals until they were filled in.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭thomil


    Zaney wrote: »
    I too would think the geology would make it near impossible, but the Jack Lynch tunnel got built and I don’t know enough to say there wouldn’t be technical solutions.

    Oh, there are technical solutions, no doubt about that. Hamburg just finished building a fully-fledged underground line into what is essentially reclaimed tidal flats in the city's old port, in the shape of the extension of the U4 line into the "HafenCity" redevelopment. It's just very complex. Also, an underground line would require quite a bit more excavation than just a mere tunnel. You need stations with stairs/escalators & elevators, possibly emergency exits and all that, watertight doors to seal off tunnel segments or stations in case of flooding, I think you get the picture ;)

    For what would in effect be a very short line, this seems like overkill to me.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭rebs23


    We already have dedicated Cork commuter lines to Cobh and Midleton with a shared commuter line to Mallow. There are extensive proposals in CMATS for new stations along the network in Blarney, Blackpool, Dunkettle and Water Rock (I think) so lets use and maximise use on the existing network. This is not including the light rail proposed for the City in CMATS.
    Seems there are lots fanciful rail project proposals in this forum. Could we not concentrate on the ones that are feasible?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭ncounties


    rebs23 wrote: »
    We already have dedicated Cork commuter lines to Cobh and Midleton with a shared commuter line to Mallow. There are extensive proposals in CMATS for new stations along the network in Blarney, Blackpool, Dunkettle and Water Rock (I think) so lets use and maximise use on the existing network. This is not including the light rail proposed for the City in CMATS.
    Seems there are lots fanciful rail project proposals in this forum. Could we not concentrate on the ones that are feasible?

    It’s an infrastructure forum. We’re allowed to discuss theoretical or actual (many of which are theoretical anyway) infrastructure schemes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,850 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    A commuter line to Carrigaline with at least two stations in the Carrigaline area would be great, sharing track with a spur line to Ringaskiddy which would also accommodate Freight. Impose a toll for cars using the M28 from North of Carrigaline to discourage it's use as a commuter motorway and promote the rail alternative. Additional stations in the Douglas area would be most welcome.

    They're still building semi ds in cul de sacs on the edge of the mess that is Carrigaline, so prob not much point talking about it if this is what is considered sustainable development.

    https://www.google.ie/maps/@51.8050797,-8.3939641,3a,75y,119.36h,82.72t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sxO2pTo4gfOhLposvKEO6CQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DxO2pTo4gfOhLposvKEO6CQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D140.33888%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

    Long term Skib, Clonakilty and Bandon do need a rail connection to Cork, perhaps this would be less of a commuter and more of an intercity route though given the distance and lack of stops.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    While I enjoy thinking about potential improvements to Cork transport the fact that we can't organise a functioning bus lane on Patrick Street doesn't inspire confidence that larger scale projects will ever see the light of day or at least will take a ludicrously long time to deliver.

    It's a year since the final version of CMATS was published (nearly 2 years since the draft was published) and when you look at CMATS implementation timeframe the only element of an improvement to the Cork suburban rail network envisaged by 2026 is through running at Kent Station! That's it. All the important stuff like electrification, increased frequency and dual tracking to Midleton are kicked out to closer to 2040. The timelines in CMATS are utterly unambitious and disappointing.

    You're talking 30+ years for any possibility of rail lines to Carrigaline or West Cork to even be on the agenda for discussion. 50+ years for implementation (and that's probably being overly optimistic).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,701 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Carrigaline is currently the second biggest town in Ireland without a rail line or a rail line planned. It will almost certainly overtake Letterkenny’s population in the next few years, possibly by this years census, to take first spot. Douglas is the biggest suburb in Ireland without a rail line or a rail line planned. Both Douglas and Carrigaline are completely excluded from the planned light rail and commuter rail networks. If another line was to be added to plans for Cork it would have to be Carrigaline to the city centre via Douglas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,226 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There is no chance of it happening before 2050 but if a new commuter rail line was to be created in Cork, surely it would have to follow the South Link Road, either taking half the roadspace or under in a cut and cover tunnel. C'n'C would be so disruptive for so long that it may be better to just take the roadspace permanently.

    In the city, it may have to do a loop, up Eglinton Street then round by Kent before heading south again. At the southern end, it could swing east along the N40 to Douglas, etc. Potentially it could also split with a spur going to the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 457 ✭✭moceri


    The irony is that there was a railway line to Carrigaline up until 1932. Closed by the Great Southern Railways as it was not profitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭agoodusername


    I actually think that the tunnel idea has some real merit, as it would allow for potential links in a number of directions without needing to demolish much of the city centre. We also should note the huge number of towns to the south and west of the city that would be better served by trains than trams, and a more central station would be a reasonable requirement for serving these areas.

    I'd suggest that any route going south would be best off going towards Kinsale. There are several busy towns/villages and more importantly, the airport and the business park. It would also allow for the unlikely reintroduction of rail to the west Cork towns, as there would be little need to rebuild a second line through the densely population parts of the city.

    It really is ridiculous that there's never any mention of a proper network serving Douglas and that direction though, even by tram.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    There is a relatively easy win (heavy emphasis on 'relatively' here) and I've never heard it mentioned. Turn Kent station into a 100% through station. Build a new station at Victoria Road, smack bang in the middle of all of the new developments. Cork-Dublin mainline goes through Kent, and swings across the river further down Horgans Quay and into the new station. It will also allow for a future 'fantasy' line through the southside/city. Separately, the Cobh/Midleton line could follow the proposed new bridge from the skew bridge and come into the new station which would give options on that eastern corridor given that it is actually going to be developed.

    Total fantasy, but I do worry that we'll develop this huge Brownfield area and not incorporate nearly enough public transport provisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭thomil


    Cough Christ on a bike, it's dusty in here cough

    Irish Rail have just put a tender out for a new platform at Kent Station. They're selling it as part of the Cork Commuter Rail project.

    Tender process underway for Kent Station platform extension (irishexaminer.com)

    It looks like it will be built towards the eastern end of the platform rather than on the curved passing loop outside the old train shed.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Interesting. Can't find any plans for this but I hope they include some new pedestrian access to the new platforms instead of just relying on the existing underpass which brings you up to platform 5 at the northern end. Commuter rail needs to be quick and handy and not send people on a walkabout of Kent to get a train.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 655 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    I was wondering how they were going to manage the space on the passing loop side. Walls would have had to have been knocked and that might have been an issue. I genuinely hope that’s not the only reason though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Found a drawing of the new platform. Based on this the extended platform 5 will be over 400 metres long! 😳




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Am I reading that correctly, that they're effectively pushing the new platform to the East of the station?

    As has been said, I hope they don't rely on the existing subway if so. But I don't see any other way, if I'm honest.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭thomil


    To be honest, I don't think there'll be many people who actually change to other trains. Most of the commuters will likely either transfer to the buses departing from the south side of the station or heading to the new offices at Horgan's Quay and Penrose Dock. And for those, the existing subway is honestly the best option.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    The most common change I can think of would be a Cobh/Midleton to Dublin change, and that shouldn't be a big deal.

    A Cobh/Midleton to Mallow change would be a problem though.

    Perhaps they can have all of the Mallow trains running through the station, but they can't all go to both Cobh and Midleton. What I'm specifically thinking of here would be - for instance - a Midleton to Blackpool commute, or a Cobh to Blackpool commute. Having these people do a slow change in Kent would be annoying, possibly to the point of being impractical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭sheff the ref


    There is a similar situation in Dublin


    If a Cork passenger wished to travel to Belfast, that passenger must alight at Heuston and get the Luas across to Connolly. When booking, one cannot even choose to alight from Cork in a Kildare, Newbridge or a similar station, board a commuter to Connolly via Phoenix Park Tunnel and transfer again to Belfast.

    There should be direct trains to Connolly from Cork, just like there should be direct trains from the Mallow side to the Midleton side

    Journeys are unnecessarily longer than they should be which as you say is impractical



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Risoc


    I'm a little lost here.

    Isn't the Commuter line going to be a through-line so that you just stay in your seat at Kent if you're going to Mallow from Cobh or Midleton?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Surely, in the event of all trains not being through services, those passengers could change at Glounthaune or Little Island?

    I think that you're exaggerating this somewhat. With two branches in East Cork, people travelling to the individual legs will have to choose their service as needs be. That's what using a timetable is for.

    We have not even seen proposed service patterns yet in any case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer



    Sending Intercity services to trundle around to Connolly, and it would trundle, and then use up a path in both directions across the station throat to get into Connolly Station really isn't a good use of the available track capacity.

    Add to that, you would need additional rolling stock as the end to end journey time would be extended by having to loop around to Connolly and turnaround times would be impossible using the existing stock.

    Also adding stops at Kildare or Newbridge on the Dublin/Cork services would extend journey times further when the railway is trying to reduce end-to-end journey times.

    It is perfectly normal for people to use city transport such as LUAS between intercity stations in cities. People take the Underground between London stations and the Metro in Paris for example.

    Now perhaps a timetable recast could see the Portlaoise Commuters redirected to Grand Canal Dock in place of the Hazelhatch shuttles. But again, that would need work to see if its actually feasible in terms of available rolling stock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm not exaggerating at all, as one of the few people I know who has attempted the transfer! Little Island and Glounthaune are not easy places to transfer. Nobody is going to do it more than once or twice, realistically.

    You're talking about having people wait in the cold in Glounthaune or Little Island for a transfer to get to Blackpool: absolutely nobody will do it. They'll prefer to go direct to Kent and taxi/cycle/walk from there. At best. Or just drive, as most do currently. And accordingly the whole concept of a commuter network falls apart.

    For a specific example of how little I'm exaggerating, I recently ordered a Taxi from Kent to Little Island rather than to wait in Kent for 75 mins in Kent for a connection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Absolutely.

    But the Mallow trains can't all go directly to both Cobh AND Midleton!

    And Mallow has a roughly an hourly service. So you'd potentially be waiting 2 hours for a through-train to/from the Mallow line (Blackpool, Blarney, Mallow). Almost nobody will be willing to do that.

    So the alternative is a fast transfer in Kent. But if the subway is 100m or 200m away from the platform, you simply MUST schedule plenty of time for that change, to facilitate those people who can't move quite so quickly.

    So what I'm saying is that the subway placement could actually be a reasonably significant issue for some future commuters.

    Edit: thomil alludes to it above: with the closer proximity of a bus stop, and with a higher frequency of bus, they'll possibly lose passengers to the bus, at best. Lose passengers overall, at worst, if that subway is at the other side of the train station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    If it’s high frequency, and a same platform change, how are Little Island or Glounthaune difficult places to change?


    You seem to be basing all of this on current service levels. The whole point of the CMATS plan is to have a high frequency service from Mallow through Cork to either Midleton or Cobh. It certainly won’t be an hourly service.

    And passengers going to/from either of the east Cork branches would do exactly what people going to/from Howth or Malahide do - they check the timetable beforehand and get the train that goes to/from their branch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    OK, let's phrase it the opposite of what I think: It'll be a big success. People in East Cork will do what people in Howth or Malahide do. This new platform will provide the additional rolling stock, drivers, stations and schedule changes required to deliver the higher frequencies aspired to in CMATS. There's no reason the subway should be located close to the platform in Kent. And Glounthaune and Little Island are fine places to change trains.

    In fairness, neither station is absolutely terrible for changes, but there's no sheltered seating, no station master for mobility impaired access, no lifts to change platforms, not even toilets or vending machines. They're not absolutely terrible, but they're not currently good places to change trains.

    Does anyone else on this thread actually commute using the East Cork trains? Care to tell us whether mine is an isolated opinion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭sheff the ref


    Fair Comment

    However the broader future picture involves a need to find a way of getting a passenger from Cork/Kerry/Munster to Dublin airport at the easiest convenience

    Portmarnock is the closest station to Dublin Airport and there will be some form of light rail link to the Airport from there in time. Getting from Cork to Portmarnock on one journey for even limited services is surely something that can be worked into timetables

    The model of disembarking earlier in the journey to step onto commuter trains seems to the the solution, as it seems to be with Cobh/Midleton.

    As regards the Luas, it is not very user friendly at peak times for those who are travelling with heavy baggage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,008 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    What light rail link is this between Portmarnock and Dublin airport?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,188 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There is no actual plan for any link to the (existing, Northern) DART line; of any kind. Some vague kite flying is all there is. Metrolink will link it to DART+ at Glasnevin.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,158 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    There was a plan for Clongriffin to the airport. It required 7 km of Dart line over open countryside at a cost of €200 or so million, but was opposed because the 'real solution' was Metro North and the 'interconnector'. Of course nothing happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,188 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There was a kite flying exercise. It never got as far as being a plan



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭sheff the ref


    I was commuting to Cork briefly for a short period a few years back and decided to do Park and Ride from Little Island into Kent Station as my destination was in the City. It was excellent to be fair. Great Service and no hassle with having to park etc. in the City.

    I came across this excellent February 2022 Dail discussion on the future of Rail upgrades:

    Joint Committee on Transport and Communications debate - Thursday, 17 Feb 2022 (oireachtas.ie)

    To be fair, they are committed to improvement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's an excellent service. I couldn't possibly be more positive about it. I use it whenever possible, usually from Glounthaune and Little Island.

    And in saying that, I don't think the platform swap in Little Island or Glounthaune are a good idea in the current station form.

    Of the two, Little Island is more viable, as you could change platform by going up the N25 slip road and back down the old road, and back into the station from the other side. Whereas putting in a new platform overbridge in Glounthaune is a much bigger effort.

    It should be interesting to see if they do go for that.

    Again, my overall point was only that I'd have thought an easy platform change would be important in Kent for the "through" services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭sheff the ref


    I came across this. One of the last passenger trains to Youghal in 1963

    It was notable that there were very few disembarking from the train, so it is easy to see why the train was discontinued.

    Would there be demand for a train to Youghal today, or is the Greenway the correct use for the track?

    https://www.rte.ie/archives/2018/0206/938738-cork-to-youghal-by-train/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    This was discussed at length in another thread, possibly the thread relating to the Greenway.

    To re-state some of the points raised:

    Long distance between Midleton and Youghal: reasonably high cost line to deliver.

    No significant population centres in Mogeely, Killeagh (or even Youghal itself): reasonably low ridership.

    Some encroachment on the line: reasonably slow/legal effort to resolve.

    Greenway architecture is light and easy to deliver: no issues with reinstating the rail line in future if needed.


    My two cents: you could try to extend the line piecemeal by putting in a densely-zoned area and master plan in Mogeely, and extend to there first, but all the way to Youghal at once would not be good bang for buck right now. Better value to be had with East Cork commuter rail via new stations at Water Rock, Carrigtwohill West (IDA). Possibly if someone was being very adventurous and had lots of money to spend on East Cork rail, you could perhaps plan a P&R just East of the distillery, taking cars from both Dungourney and Castlemartyr directions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 618 ✭✭✭sheff the ref


    Personally I would feel that there is a future in a Luas Type transport, sharing space with a Greenway, not just Midleton-Youghal, but also Dungarvan-Waterford and the Midlands Greenway

    I guess there are other transit priorities for now though!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't agree with you based on the distances and population centres concerned.

    Definitely on - for instance - the Blackrock Passage greenway in Cork, sharing luas and Greenway makes sense but I think for the lesser density ones you mention then sharing space with the Greenway means the "luas" type system travels too slowly to be attractive to end users with long transit time between stops. For that slower "luas" type system I think you need more frequent stops. AKA a more urban area.

    I'm totally in favour of greenway and commuter rail sharing a corridor side-by-side though. Although I believe Irish Rail are not in favour of it, lest they be "hemmed in".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Risoc


    Re P+R, isn’t a station like Midleton P+R anyway? I presume you can park for free there all day if you’re getting to train to Cork for work or whatever?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It is a P&R but it's not heavily used really, probably because of the location.

    With traffic, if you can drive to the Midleton P&R then you can normally afford to drive much further. You'd really like that Easternmost P&R to take in traffic from East Cork (Killeagh, Mogeely, Castlemartyr, Youghal) but for them to get to Midleton train station is a bit messy. They'd be most of the way to Glounthaune by the time they would be at Midleton train station. From Glounthaune you also get higher frequency of trains. So Midleton is not doing a great job as a P&R in practice. Glounthaune is actually very popular, I've often seen all parking spaces full, and roadside parking outside the station. In my experience a lot of those seem to drive from the East, like I describe. Little Island is also quite popular as a P&R and has a lot of available parking.

    I'm not criticising Midleton station at all here, just that the P&R aspect isn't heavily used from what I've seen.

    As I say, the best way I see to expand commuter rail towards Youghal would be incrementally via development of Mogeely. You avoid the encroachment locations, it has comparatively low costs of line and station, etc. But the low hanging fruit in East Cork is Water Rock, Carrigtwohill West and maybe soon Tivoli.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Carrigtwohill IDA is ripe for a station now but there's nothing very much happening in Water Rock. It's a long way from being developed. I don't think there's an SHD or any form of planning in the works for that area at the moment. There'll be no station built there until there's some serious development happening.

    Tivoli is also years (decades) away from being seriously developed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    The Waterrock SHD was approved....... Edit: I think I'm wrong here: on the SHD approval, I think maybe only the transport infrastructure for development was approved, and that I conflated infrastructure and the housing in my head! The transport/water infrastructure is approved and funded in Waterrock. Work is theoretically underway, though I haven't seen anything on the ground. I see this area's development as being "real" and in the near future.

    Tivoli seems to way off alright. Unfortunately.


    Post edited by hans aus dtschl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I haven't seen any SHD application for Water Rock. Do you have a link to it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Struggling to find it myself! I'm beginning to think I conflated the detailed plan and the LIHAF approval. But I remember reading specifically that "Phase 1 has the approval to go ahead", and the units that would entail etc. I remember because I was disappointed that rail would not be in place for Phase 1. I will keep looking here, but am beginning to doubt myself!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Isn't phase 1 referring to the infrastructure activation works with Irish water, sewage, local roads etc? I'm fairly sure there's no plans in the works for actual houses yet. Unfortunately I think it's some way off yet before we are see a housing planning application there and an even longer time again before we see a station there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    The Phase 1 is definitely the housing too, the infrastructure being done "now" is to allow Phase 1 to commence. Housing phases 2 and 3 will need further infrastructure. I don't know if the infrastructure was described in phases but rather "Projects". Sadly no sign of the railway station as a "project" yet.

    You could be right about the length of time, I think the station won't happen until phase 2 at a minimum. But I see that as being "this decade". Tivoli, not so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Final paragraph: "A new footbridge is also being installed at Little Island station, which will have lifts for mobility-impaired passengers. "

    There you go, Little Island will be the most likely future "change" point we've been discussing. I suspect Little island will be the de-facto Dunkettle P&R too.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement