Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

18889919394757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,260 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Tanden was a stupid nominee, completely out of her depth. Hopefully she doesn't end up squeaking through.

    Overall the Biden administration has been desperate for doing anything meaningful, like not doing away ICE's policies despite promising reform, clearing student debt, and obviously the debacle with the relief cheques.

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss and all that...

    Sorry, yawn I think it's bedtime for me. Aren't you so lefty and trendy. Biden has acted quickly to bring relief to Texas, even if it was their own fault and their GOP leaders. Trump would visit in two weeks time and throw paper towels at them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭The Floyd p


    Water John wrote: »
    Sorry, yawn I think it's bedtime for me. Aren't you so lefty and trendy. Biden has acted quickly to bring relief to Texas, even if it was their own fault and their GOP leaders. Trump would visit in two weeks time and throw paper towels at them.

    Leftist, for sure. Biden is a terrible choice to be president and if the DNC are pinning their hopes on Harris they're barking up the wrong tree.

    It's not the people of Texas' fault, not sure why you're implying that. :confused:

    Biden will continue a neoliberal path for the USA, something which damages the world as a whole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Water John wrote: »
    Sorry, yawn I think it's bedtime for me. Aren't you so lefty and trendy. Biden has acted quickly to bring relief to Texas, even if it was their own fault and their GOP leaders. Trump would visit in two weeks time and throw paper towels at them.

    trump is in the past. lets focus on the now, and the future


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tanden was a stupid nominee, completely out of her depth. Hopefully she doesn't end up squeaking through.

    Overall the Biden administration has been desperate for doing anything meaningful, like not doing away ICE's policies despite promising reform, clearing student debt, and obviously the debacle with the relief cheques.

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss and all that...

    Definitely. I mean look at all this pointless nonsense.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/all-of-president-bidens-key-executive-orders-in-one-chart-2021-01-21

    And most of the stuff you mention is being held up by Congress, not by Biden.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,260 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Leftist, for sure. Biden is a terrible choice to be president and if the DNC are pinning their hopes on Harris they're barking up the wrong tree.

    It's not the people of Texas' fault, not sure why you're implying that. :confused:

    Biden will continue a neoliberal path for the USA, something which damages the world as a whole.

    Texan politicians, elected by the people. Just have a look at El Paso. A few hundred out of power for a few hours. Two things, when they had something similar happen 10 years ago, they moved to upgrade the electricity infrastructure and secondly, they are part of the Western US Grid, not connected to the rest of Texas.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    trump is in the past. lets focus on the now, and the future

    How convenient to say he's in the past when his supporters that gave him a free pass on all his disgusting behaviour are here every day trying to undermine Biden for a lot less. Nobody takes hypocrites seriously.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Leftist, for sure. Biden is a terrible choice to be president and if the DNC are pinning their hopes on Harris they're barking up the wrong tree.

    It's not the people of Texas' fault, not sure why you're implying that. :confused:

    Biden will continue a neoliberal path for the USA, something which damages the world as a whole.

    Just a small thing, but it's best to say "I think that" or "in my opinion" when making such statements, otherwise many people won't take you seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Leftist, for sure. Biden is a terrible choice to be president and if the DNC are pinning their hopes on Harris they're barking up the wrong tree.

    It's not the people of Texas' fault, not sure why you're implying that. :confused:

    Biden will continue a neoliberal path for the USA, something which damages the world as a whole.

    i do think, but for a few exceptions, republicans are happy about this.

    it probably happens in most places...you dont have to run on your own policies, but just criticise the sitting government. if they do enough wrong, you reap the rewards come election time.

    it is a flaw. i often thought (in Ireland) the minister for finance (as an example) should not be elected, but an expert in finance.
    minister for health, should be a hard core business person, that will cut the fat that is not needed, and have no allegiance to party.

    thats off topic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    How convenient to say he's in the past when his supporters that gave him a free pass on all his disgusting behaviour are here every day trying to undermine Biden for a lot less. Nobody takes hypocrites seriously.

    everyone is a hypocrite. once you accept that, you can move on.

    if biden is deserving of criticism he should get it regardless of who came before. a cricket term, play every ball on its merits. judge him on what he does, the rest is irrelevant.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭12gauge dave


    trump is in the past. lets focus on the now, and the future

    Oh no you didn't say that did you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Oh no you didn't say that did you.

    he's the ex president. unless he runs in 2024 he's in the past.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    trump is in the past. lets focus on the now, and the future
    everyone is a hypocrite. once you accept that, you can move on.

    if biden is deserving of criticism he should get it regardless of who came before. a cricket term, play every ball on its merits. judge him on what he does, the rest is irrelevant.

    Of course he should be compared to past presidents.

    Is Biden working hard? Is Biden making a big enough difference? Is the economy doing well under Biden? Is his approval rating high? Are international relations good under Biden? etc.

    Those questions can only be answered relatively, not absolutely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,322 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    everyone is a hypocrite. once you accept that, you can move on.

    if biden is deserving of criticism he should get it regardless of who came before. a cricket term, play every ball on its merits. judge him on what he does, the rest is irrelevant.

    You left a word out - "valid" criticism. We have posters here losing their minds over a verbal gaffe, posting videos of him with children, saying he's doing too much, saying he's too doing little. It's just embarrassing and very obvious that it's being done in bad faith.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭The Floyd p


    Just a small thing, but it's best to say "I think that" or "in my opinion" when making such statements, otherwise many people won't take you seriously.

    Given that this is a personal account, surely it can be inferred that I'm only speaking on behalf of myself?


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given that this is a personal account, surely it can be inferred that I'm only speaking on behalf of myself?

    There are many in this thread who like to state their opinions as if they are facts. It's best to not fall into that category. Otherwise, many will assume that you are incapable of changing your mind and so will not spend their time debating with you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭12gauge dave


    You left a word out - "valid" criticism. We have posters here losing their minds over a verbal gaffe, posting videos of him with children, saying he's doing too much, saying he's too doing little. It's just embarrassing and very obvious that it's being done in bad faith.

    That gaffe claimed that president Trump didn't have any vaccines in place leaving the office which wasn't true as millions of American citizens had been vaccinated including Joe Biden himself.

    Not just any old gaffe as you can see and worthy of attention.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That gaffe claimed that president Trump didn't have any vaccines in place leaving the office which wasn't true as millions of American citizens had been vaccinated including Joe Biden himself.

    Not just any old gaffe as you can see.

    No it didn't. Please stop ignoring people's replies.


  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm finding it pretty funny that a poster is asking for an apology after they were called out for posting a modified quote that misrepresented a statement.... They even admitted they had misrepresented at time... Bad faith postings tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭The Floyd p


    There are many in this thread who like to state their opinions as if they are facts. It's best to not fall into that category. Otherwise, many will assume that you are incapable of changing your mind and so will not spend their time debating with you.

    I'm not overly concerned with people not believing me tbh. There are some in this thread who will extol the virtues of Joe Biden, whom history will forget as very much an inconsequential president. He will appease the "If Hillary won we'd all be at brunch by now" types, those who prefer to treat politics as something best ignored until something cataclysmic happens.

    It is what it is. Trump was one of the worst presidents in modern USA history. Biden has shown no desire in his whole career to be anything except a peacemaker between Republicans and Democrats, which only results in moving the democrats further right. The USA ends up with no left wing and people on that side are forced to neuter themselves or risk excommunication. It's sad really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,272 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    eagle eye wrote: »
    So it looks like Neera Tanden won't get nominated by the Senate.
    Joe Manchin definitely voting against her and Bernie Sanders might too.
    I'm surprised they haven't pulled her yet

    Manchin voting against her for stupid reasons like her "mean tweets".

    It doesn't reflect well on Bernie if he votes her through, but not impossible she has a few Republican votes to get her through.

    I find it odd Manchin been the decisive vote on anything tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Of course he should be compared to past presidents.

    Is Biden working hard? Is Biden making a big enough difference? Is the economy doing well under Biden? Is his approval rating high? Are international relations good under Biden? etc.

    Those questions can only be answered relatively, not absolutely.

    i had a whole thing written here (about how you cant compare one president to the other), and then i read your last line.

    ultimately, he will be judged on job creation (not wealth creation). i dont think the average American cares about the environment as much as people make out; immigration; power of big tech; and fighting or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    You left a word out - "valid" criticism. We have posters here losing their minds over a verbal gaffe, posting videos of him with children, saying he's doing too much, saying he's too doing little. It's just embarrassing and very obvious that it's being done in bad faith.

    criticism is criticism is it not? whats valid criticism? are there some things we cant criticise?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭12gauge dave


    No it didn't. Please stop ignoring people's replies.

    Just the facts:
    President Biden said: “we didn’t have [the coronavirus vaccine] when we came into office”.

    He got vaccinated LIVE ON TV.
    First dose on Dec 21, 2020.


    Second dose on Jan 11, 2021.

    His first day in office, January 20, 2021.

    While I agree it was a mistake he said it all the same and I was made to feel that he didn't say it last night when actually he did.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Just the facts:
    President Biden said: “we didn’t have [the coronavirus vaccine] when we came into office”.

    He got vaccinated LIVE ON TV.
    First dose on Dec 21, 2020.


    Second dose on Jan 11, 2021.

    His first day in office, January 20, 2021.

    While I agree it was a mistake he said it all the same and I was made to feel that he didn't say it last night when actually he did.

    Please stop ignoring replies. That's all have to say to you. Repeating the same statement over and over doesn't make a difference. There have been detailed replies to that statement. What you should next do is reply to one of those replies. There is no benefit to repeating the same statement over and over like a seal. It makes it look like you cannot reply to our replies and therefore weakens your credibility.

    And the additional info you added is incredibly cringey. Are you suggesting that he actually forgot that he was vaccinated? That he forgot that he said a minute beforehand during the Q&A that millions of Americans had been vaccinated? Not even the other Trumpists in this thread are suggesting that. That's just, ugh...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Please stop ignoring replies. That's all have to say to you. Repeating the same statement over and over doesn't make a difference. There have been detailed replies to that statement. What you should next do is reply to one of those replies. There is no benefit to repeating the same statement over and over like a seal. It makes it look like you cannot reply to our replies and therefore weakens your credibility.

    And the additional info you added is incredibly cringey. Are you suggesting that he actually forgot that he was vaccinated? That he forgot that he said a minute beforehand during the Q&A that millions of Americans had been vaccinated? Not even the other Trumpists in this thread are suggesting that. That's just, ugh...

    he lied or forgot.

    washington post, one of the biggest democrat publications, fact checked it as a 'verbal stumble'.

    whats worse in your opinion? lying or forgetting?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭12gauge dave


    Please stop ignoring replies. That's all have to say to you. Repeating the same statement over and over doesn't make a difference. There have been detailed replies to that statement. What you should next do is reply to one of those replies. There is no benefit to repeating the same statement over and over like a seal. It makes it look like you cannot reply to our replies and therefore weakens your credibility.

    And the additional info you added is incredibly cringey. Are you suggesting that he actually forgot that he was vaccinated? That he forgot that he said a minute beforehand during the Q&A that millions of Americans had been vaccinated? Not even the other Trumpists in this thread are suggesting that. That's just, ugh...

    Please stop ignoring replies.

    Aren't i replying to you ya mad man I don't see how you can say I'm ignoring your replies when I'm directly replying to you?


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    criticism is criticism is it not? whats valid criticism? are there some things we cant criticise?

    Yes, and he gave you some examples in his post. People have criticised him for signing too many execute orders, people have criticised him for not signing enough executive orders, people criticised his press secretary for staying she would answer next time instead of making up something on the spot etc.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Please stop ignoring replies.

    Aren't i replying to you ya mad man I don't see how you can say I'm ignoring your replies when I'm directly replying to you?

    You are repeating the same statement over and over. This statement has been debunked already in detail several times. Reply to one of those detailed responses.


  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    he lied or forgot.

    No he didn't. Those are not the only options, nor are they the most likely options, as I've already explained to you. You seemed perfectly okay to accept that until you found someone who you believe said otherwise (which he didn't. A verbal stumble doesn't imply someone lied or forgot.)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,414 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Yes, and he gave you some examples in his post. People have criticised him for signing too many execute orders, people have criticised him for not signing enough executive orders, people criticised his press secretary for staying she would answer next time instead of making up something on the spot etc.

    i completely agree.

    lets focus on the actual policies. if i was the texas governor (or whoever is responsible for this), every catch and release, i would put on a bus and release to Washington (or Delaware).

    would JB support that do you think?


Advertisement