Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

everlast75

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I cant speak for someone else.

You just did - 1 page back.

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Americans on Twitter

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Unemployed from the pandemic people.

The Democrats didn't but it's an example of something that has because politicised in America. Trump taking his mask off on the balcony after coming out of hospital stands out. But it's one example of many. Throw in healthcare, gun rights or control etc. So many topics that either side wont budge on and have become so engrained

Eh, you're pretty much misrepresenting the politicisation of masks. He famously demanded for a journalist to remove his mask and accused him of being PC. That was when mask wearing became politicised. Not by the Dems.

ExMachina1000

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Eh, you're pretty much misrepresenting the politicisation of masks. He famously demanded for a journalist to remove his mask and accused him of being PC. That was when mask wearing became politicised. Not by the Dems.

Yes Trump did. I can remember his rallys and the debate on here wasn't on the content of his speech but on how many people in the crowd were wearing masks

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Unemployed from the pandemic people

Why would that be a hard pill to swallow? Are you saying that's the case because those who follow Sanders on Twitter, who is someone who disagrees with Biden on many issues, would be surprised to hear that there are a small number of democrats who disagree with Biden on an issue?

ExMachina1000

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Why would that be a hard pill to swallow? Are you saying that's the case because those who follow Sanders on Twitter, who is someone who disagrees with Biden on many issues, would be surprised to hear that there are a small number of democrats who disagree with Biden on an issue?

I dont understand your point here. Please rephrase it.

You asked about what people I was referring to I answered unemployed from the pandemic people. Nothing more nothing less

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I dont understand your point here. Please rephrase it.

You asked about what people I was referring to I answered unemployed from the pandemic people. Nothing more nothing less

What exactly is the political scandal you think you've exposed with the Bernie tweet? You treated it as some sort of a smoking gun..

ExMachina1000

[Deleted User] wrote: »

What exactly is the political scandal you think you've exposed with the Bernie tweet? You treated it as some sort of a smoking gun..

I didn't post the tweet. When questioned I stated I agreed with Sanders position.

You are just coming up with stuff that doesn't exist.

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I didn't post the tweet. When questioned I stated I agreed with Sanders position.

You are just coming up with stuff that doesn't exist.

You still appear to think it's some big issue for the Dems and Biden that politicians have expressed opinions. It pretty clearly isn't.

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I dont understand your point here. Please rephrase it.

You asked about what people I was referring to I answered unemployed from the pandemic people. Nothing more nothing less

Yes but you said that it would be a hard pill to swallow for such people. Surely people who follow Sanders on Twitter, a man who does not simply agree with everything that the Democratic party says or does, would not find it odd for a small minority of Democrats to disagree with a current policy in place? That they'd be fully aware that, besides the last four years, the existence of a small number of people within a party disagreeing on a policy of their party would be the norm?

extra gravy

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I can remember his rallys and the debate on here wasn't on the content of his speech but on how many people in the crowd were wearing masks

That's because his speeches were repetitive, nonsensical crap while a large crowd being completely irresponsible during a pandemic was always going to attract more attention.

ExMachina1000

extra gravy wrote: »

That's because his speeches were repetitive, nonsensical crap while a large crowd being completely irresponsible during a pandemic was always going to attract more attention.

I'll pass that on. Thanks

Edit: I'll pass on that one . Thanks

ExMachina1000

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Yes but you said that it would be a hard pill to swallow for such people. Surely people who follow Sanders on Twitter, a man who does not simply agree with everything that the Democratic party says or does, would not find it odd for a small minority of Democrats to disagree with a current policy in place? That they'd be fully aware that, besides the last four years, the existence of a small number of people within a party disagreeing on a policy of their party would be the norm?

They picked the wrong nominee. Again. That's what I think

Timberrrrrrrr

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Yes Trump did. I can remember his rallys and the debate on here wasn't on the content of his speech but on how many people in the crowd were wearing masks

Yeah, that's because

A: Trump said nothing of substance in his speeches

B: We couldn't believe how stupid the people at the rallies were to not wear masks during a pandemic.

ExMachina1000

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

They picked the wrong nominee. Again. That's what I think

I'm not quite sure what that has to do with what I said, but okay.

Timberrrrrrrr

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I'm not quite sure what that has to do with what I said, but okay.

Poster has yet again tied himself up in knots after realising his "gotcha" post in reference to Sanders and AOC's tweets were actually yet another damp squib. I'm sure he'll be back soon enough with another OMG look at this tweet/article/headline/opinion piece.

extra gravy

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I'll pass that on. Thanks

Edit: I'll pass on that one . Thanks

What a surprise.

randd1

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

They picked the wrong nominee. Again. That's what I think

He was good enough to win in a landslide. And that says something all the same.

ohnonotgmail

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

They picked the wrong nominee. Again. That's what I think

you're not still sore that the Dems picked a candidate that beat your guy are you?

Timberrrrrrrr

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you're not still sore that the Dems picked a candidate that beat your guy are you?

This from a poster who (if I remember correctly) stated that Biden wouldn't turn up for the debates

ExMachina1000

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

you're not still sore that the Dems picked a candidate that beat your guy are you?

I don't really have a guy in us politics. Leo varadkar is my guy here. As in I voted for fg.

This is just for amusement. I wouldn't be getting too into it.

Timberrrrrrrr

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I don't really have a guy in us politics. Leo varadkar is my guy here. As in I voted for fg.

This is just for amusement. I wouldn't be getting too into it.

Really? You defended Trump for nearly a year, no matter what he did or how badly he did it you were in here defending him. Didn't you (allegedly) have quite a large sum of money riding on a Trump victory in the election?

ExMachina1000

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Really? You defended Trump for nearly a year, no matter what he did or how badly he did it you were in here defending him. Didn't you (allegedly) have quite a large sum of money riding on a Trump victory in the election?

No that wasn't me. I remember the poster though. I told him to cash out or hedge the bet And as the tide started to turn he regretted it.

So you are incorrect.

Timberrrrrrrr

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

No that wasn't me. I remember the poster though. I told him to cash out or hedge the bet And as the tide started to turn he regretted it.

So you are incorrect.

Incorrect about the bet

Correct about your constant defence of Trump though.

ExMachina1000

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Incorrect about the bet

Correct about your constant defence of Trump though.

Not necessarily. Nothing comparable to the level of effort put in by anti trumper. But again you have dragged the conversation away from the Biden presidency (thread topic) and back towards Trump. Its over

Cody montana

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I don't really have a guy in us politics. Leo varadkar is my guy here. As in I voted for fg.

This is just for amusement. I wouldn't be getting too into it.

First time I laughed out load at one of your posts!

Timberrrrrrrr

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Not necessarily. Nothing comparable to the level of effort put in by anti trumper. But again you have dragged the conversation away from the Biden presidency (thread topic) and back towards Trump. Its over

Yeah...I wouldnt want to talk about it either, A very embarrassing time for all of Trumps supporters on here.

Ted_YNWA

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Not necessarily. Nothing comparable to the level of effort put in by anti trumper. But again you have dragged the conversation away from the Biden presidency (thread topic) and back towards Trump. Its over

Mod
If you feel the thread is moving off topic, report it. Leave it to the mods to steer it back on track.

Don't be dropping not so subtle hints on thread, this is backseat modding & can/does get sanctioned.

Overheal

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

I don't really have a guy in us politics. Leo varadkar is my guy here. As in I voted for fg.

This is just for amusement. I wouldn't be getting too into it.

So you don’t actually care about low income earning Americans? I for one am shocked

ExMachina1000

Joe Biden pre election:
I have a plan to handle the pandemic
(No details given)

Joe Biden post election:
We can't change the trajectory of this thing

Classic empty election promise from a career politician.

ExMachina1000

https://twitter.com/BluskyeAllison/status/1352220617727160321?s=20


Some real disappointed voters out there at the minute