Supernatural Werewolf GAME THREAD

Jake WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Sorry peeps, my partner is in hospital and I am running between work/home/hospital. Don't want to give the mods a headache. But here I am for now anyway.

Read over the rest of the day. We have 2 new recruits and Abigail is looking a bit on the suss side. Emily as well. People are evading direct questions, not sure if it is their role constraints or they can't come up with a good answer.

Hoping to have more time from now to keep on top of the thread as I don't want to skim in case I miss something important.
Haven't looked at the lynch thread yet, but I would be expecting to go with either of the ones I mentioned. I feel Tegan is just finding her feet after being subbed in. Not sure about Nigel.

Hope partner is better soon

Patrick WW

Jake WW wrote: »

Nigel I am trying to decide whether you are TWTBAW, maybe it is just the strong presence, or lack of sleep still mulling

Honestly jake, if i hadn't peeked you, you'd be on top of my list after your posts today.

Jake WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Honestly jake, if i hadn't peeked you, you'd be on top of my list after your posts today.

What can I say I have been up since 3 and am knackered need sleep.

Patrick WW

Jake WW wrote: »

What can I say I have been up since 3 and am knackered need sleep.

and now i'm starting to focus on the 'be careful what u wish for'...

maybe one was real and one was fake? or both were fake?

i hate this upside down game

Nigel WW

i wonder does the lack of activity means the hunters are happy where the current votes are?

Derry WW

Do other people believe Patrick's peek?

Nigel WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Do other people believe Patrick's peek?

its very hard to know. maybe that angel in question will clarify at some point in the future

Patrick WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Do other people believe Patrick's peek?

the peek is real. whether the results are is a different kettle of fish

Nigel WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Do other people believe Patrick's peek?

but then there is also the question, if the peeks were real, were the results announced on thread real? whether by false peeks or BS from patrick

Phil WW

Jake WW wrote: »

Hope partner is better soon

Thanks! emergency surgery. You would think they would have been more considerate when I had a WW game planned :rolleyes:

As for Patricks peeks as someone asked. Since we were told about the wishes not always being. Is it possible one was right and the other wrong? I can't and won't clear either of them. 1) They could be made up and he is playing us. 2) How can he get to know if they are shifters or not. Unless he has knowledge himself and he is the SS. 3) He was the second to ask for that wish.

Tegan WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Do other people believe Patrick's peek?

I find it odd that he received two peeks and picked 2 people that he hadn't mentioned much before tbh. Patrick was on my ffa earlier

Angus WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

@angus, why the vote on me?

Was you or Nigel most likely based on ffa I posted. You hadn’t explained Yourself at that point

May well move to Wendy yet though

Patrick WW

why would i announce fake peeks? what does that get me?

I could have just stayed quiet and kept them to myself...

Angus WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Thanks! emergency surgery. You would think they would have been more considerate when I had a WW game planned :rolleyes:

As for Patricks peeks as someone asked. Since we were told about the wishes not always being. Is it possible one was right and the other wrong? I can't and won't clear either of them. 1) They could be made up and he is playing us. 2) How can he get to know if they are shifters or not. Unless he has knowledge himself and he is the SS. 3) He was the second to ask for that wish.

I’m biased but I suspect in this case he asked for a peek too and got a peek two so not as he quite asked

Patrick WW

One Angel can grant wishes - simply post in bold on thread - but be careful what you wish for - they may not be exactly as you had envisaged...

it's blatantly clear here.

The angel chooses who to gift the wishes to.

whoever it was obviously trusted my judgement more than clodaghs...

Patrick WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

good idea! Completely forgot about this.

I wish for correct alignment peeks too

i wished for 'correct' 'peeks'

Nigel WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

why would i announce fake peeks? what does that get me?

I could have just stayed quiet and kept them to myself...

as in you wouldnt know if the results you received are real or fake

Patrick WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

as in you wouldnt know if the results you received are real or fake

yeah i agree with that now. I hadn't thought of that when i made the peeks, and was just happy to have some information, so i shared it.

Patrick WW

Jake, your vote on the lynch thread wont be counted as it's not in the correct format

Jake WW

i should just go to bed

Angus WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Hmm but uncertain on tonight’s vote

Nigel still worries me- talks lots does little so far
But tegan looking to get detailed details is not a good thing in this game
And clodagh is making me nervous but I don’t quite know why

guess it’s sort of #ffa2 but it may change if I get time to work through things a bit pre lynch

Going to move clodagh off this and replace with Wendy for now. Just enough posts but says nothing really. Lazy village or wolf?

Abigail WW

I'm hoping Phil's vote won't count as it's not in the correct format

Clodagh WW

Derry WW wrote: »

She kinda did rock up at first mention though.
And she's only made 10 posts which are all entirely filler

She arrive twenty minutes afterwards, coincidentally around a time people finish up work.

Her first mention today was 4/5 hours previously (I think, it's the posted I quoted) and she didn't appear. Didn't appear then, but did shortly enough after the second time. Is that really suspicious?

Patrick WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

She arrive twenty minutes afterwards, coincidentally around a time people finish up work.

Her first mention today was 4/5 hours previously (I think, it's the posted I quoted) and she didn't appear. Didn't appear then, but did shortly enough after the second time. Is that really suspicious?

it is when she genied the previous day too...

i assume we're talking about the genie queen abigail/?

Patrick WW

bit of a wagon forming there on derry now.

interesting development, i had him leaning village

Gabriel WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

Nigel? Going to explain why you didn't shot Senan? We'd have had some wagonomics to discuss today if you did.

back again hello, so to be clear nigel had a shot since yesterday but did not use on senan who was outed

Angus WW

I noticed something odd from yesterday

When Oisin was playing with des on his slip

Three players completely missed his (fairly obvious) task reference

Nigel Emily Katie

And they all sort of link their asking about it

It’s only looking back I wonder how could someone who was village miss that. I’m switching #ffa2 to those three cause I’m pretty confident there’s a baddie in there

Gabriel WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Gabriel, Conor and Wendy are coasting.

im here now catching up again

Abigail WW

Surely Gabriel must be an Angel

Tegan WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

i cant really remember tbh.

i prob want to go for the hail mary to save the day and be the hero, rather than blasting someone already outted :P

Nigel, I'm not buying this. Here are two of your posts from yesterday where using a shot on Senan was being discussed:

Nigel WW wrote: »

not a bad idea. i'm terrible at these games and wagonomivs are always a welcome help.

Nigel WW wrote: »

why would there be a shot?
if the vig is going to kill senan, better it it well in advance of much so its not a cluster****. though, that may not be a bad thing

Your failure to shoot Senan robbed the village of wagonomics today. Not the actions of a villager