Schools closed until February? (part 3)

jrosen

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Nearly every child in post primary has a smartphone, a device that can be used for remote learning.

Not really suitable. You could bet by in an emergency but it’s not a solution. Not every parent has the finances to buy either. If schools go remote then the dept needs to dig deep into those pockets lol

Icyseanfitz

khalessi wrote: »

Similar in senior end of primary. But it is difficult to hammer out an essay on a small screen.

Do the work in a copy and take a photo of it and send it via email, not ideal for sure, but it would work.

lulublue22

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Nearly every child in post primary has a smartphone, a device that can be used for remote learning.

Not sufficient at all - trying to learn / submit work on a smartphone is not acceptable. If we are going down the remote learning route the least we can do is ensure adequate equipment for it. I wouldn’t expect any teacher to try and use a smartphone for on line teaching and learning why should children be expected to.

wirelessdude01

is_that_so wrote: »

You'd be talking about well north of €100m, probably multiples of that.

Approximately 1 million students give or take. A rubbish tablet is about €100. No point providing the device without the ability access the internet so they you'd also have to be paying for their internet access.

Icyseanfitz

lulublue22 wrote: »

Not sufficient at all - trying to learn / submit work on a smartphone is not acceptable. If we are going down the remote learning route the least we can do is ensure adequate equipment for it. I wouldn’t expect any teacher to try and use a smartphone for on line teaching and learning why should children be expected to.

Because to be frank, the government will not help get devices for every child, they don't even have a plan in place for remote/hybrid learning.

lulublue22

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Because to be frank, the government will not help get devices for every child, they don't even have a plan in place for remote/hybrid learning.

Still doesn’t excuse it. The objective of remote learning is to continue to provide children with an education. Smartphones are not suitable and not an answer to the issue of lack of hardware.

Icyseanfitz

lulublue22 wrote: »

Still doesn’t excuse it. The objective of remote learning is to continue to provide children with an education. Smartphones are not suitable and not an answer to the issue of lack of hardware.

Smartphones may be inadequate as a learning device, but they are sure as hell better than nothing, which is exactly what the government will give.

lulublue22

wirelessdude01 wrote: »

Right then, they can all watch while we spend 30mins a day sorting out rubbish that happened at lunchtime, explaining the same concept for the 10th time because Mary was looking out the window, have to listen to William tell us about how mammy and sister were arguing and that's why he didn't get his homework done. At primary level so much of the day is spent on Mon curriculum stuff but it's all part of what makes being in school great.

and die of embarrassment when their little johnny who can do no wrong acts the bollix for the 5th time that day.

lulublue22

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Smartphones may be inadequate as a learning device, but they are sure as hell better than nothing, which is exactly what the government will give.

Not true money was provided to schools to buy equipment for those who had no access - my own child benefitted from it. We as a school also dropped laptops to children who had none.

Mrsmum

I wish people would give over about remote learning. The work involved would be done and put out there by the teachers but for endless reasons the learning of the information would not be done by a great many of the children. Teachers know more than anyone what the engagement and the quality of work from the whole class was like last time round. You would be better off splitting the numbers and have children in school half the time.

Icyseanfitz

lulublue22 wrote: »

Not true money was provided to schools to buy equipment for those who had no access - my own child benefitted from it. We as a school also dropped laptops to children who had none.

I wonder was that through a workaround in the SEN department somehow? I know children with additional needs can receive a laptop. I know money was allocated for building works, covid prep etc but i never knew anything was given for learning devices.
I just can't see the department sourcing devices for every student, if anything with the 40% cutback on the cleaning supplies it looks like they are trying to stop spending.

lulublue22

Mrsmum wrote: »

I wish people would give over about remote learning. The work involved would be done and put out there by the teachers but for endless reasons the learning of the information would not be done by a great many of the children. Teachers know more than anyone what the engagement and the quality of work from the whole class was like last time round. You would be better off splitting the numbers and have children in school half the time.

That was raised a long time ago and was not considered by the gov as they wanted all schools open for all children at all times- the situation has now developed into schools open versus remote learning.

wirelessdude01

Mrsmum wrote: »

I wish people would give over about remote learning. The work involved would be done and put out there by the teachers but for endless reasons the learning of the information would not be done by a great many of the children. Teachers know more than anyone what the engagement and the quality of work from the whole class was like last time round. You would be better off splitting the numbers and have children in school half the time.

This was previously suggested many, many times. Dismissed out of hand by the govt who seem to have an all in or all out strategy. Nothing Inbetween has or probably will be considered.

lulublue22

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

I wonder was that through a workaround in the SEN department somehow? I know children with additional needs can receive a laptop. I know money was allocated for building works, covid prep etc but i never knew anything was given for learning devices.
I just can't see the department sourcing devices for every student, if anything with the 40% cutback on the cleaning supplies it looks like they are trying to stop spending.

Not involved in ICT in the school so don’t know officially how the money was allocated - we were told in school it was an ICT grant. Child’s school said similar and asked anyone who had no access to lee them know. As I have more than one child and only 1 laptop I availed of the offer. Must say it was great.

Fade Into You

I think we can safely say that the school are not in a position to close, and I think that the fact that they are not closing is a bit of a red herring.

SusanC10

lulublue22 wrote: »

Not involved in ICT in the school so don’t know officially how the money was allocated - we were told in school it was an ICT grant. Child’s school said similar and asked anyone who had no access to lee them know. As I have more than one child and only 1 laptop I availed of the offer. Must say it was great.

Our Primary School sent out a message to all Parents in September asking anyone who has difficulty accessing devices to contact them in confidence. I know devices were given out but don't know where the money came from.

We bought a second Laptop over the Summer so that each of our children would have access to one but we are fortunate that we could afford to do that.

Icyseanfitz

Looking at the positive swab numbers (2867) today how can they justify opening schools as normal, it would be utter lunacy

hesaidshesaid

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Looking at the positive swab numbers (2867) today how can they justify opening schools as normal, it would be utter lunacy

Was just looking at this. Not good. If they open schools with these kind of numbers, that sends a very clear message to all education staff. The
next election will be interesting.

Should also add, the compromised version of close contacts is also in place for nurses in GP surgeries and carers in nursing homes. Heard this from a friend who's a nurse in GP practice. Seems insane. She's been answering phones all over Christmas to people who've been out mingling and now have symptoms. She said she's definitely not sending her kids back on the 6th.

khalessi

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Looking at the positive swab numbers (2867) today how can they justify opening schools as normal, it would be utter lunacy

Well some anon minister threw out a number last week of 2500, when asked by a journo if schools would close was on RTE radio 1 pm news.. I genuinely think he threw out a random number to get journo off his back never thinking we would never reach it. Well here we are :cool:

eviltwin

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Looking at the positive swab numbers (2867) today how can they justify opening schools as normal, it would be utter lunacy

Is that the positive cases in the last 24 hours?

MadYaker

Schools will have been shut for 2 weeks next Tuesday. I wonder will see an effect on case numbers?

Icyseanfitz

eviltwin wrote: »

Is that the positive cases in the last 24 hours?

Yes

Ninja edit: sorry i thought you said positive swabs as opposed to cases, this is the swab results for the last 24h

vid36

I don't think they will announce schools closures today but I cannot see them opening with case numbers running at current levels. Expect a u turn by Monday evening.

khalessi

MadYaker wrote: »

Schools will have been shut for 2 weeks next Tuesday. I wonder will see an effect on case numbers?

Depends on who you talk to. I have been told on here it takes x weeks, be that 2 3 or 5, depending on their argument and also told, they have been closed and what does that tell you etc.

Sure who knows but the mighty turtle whose back we travel on:D

Icyseanfitz

vid36 wrote: »

I don't think they will announce schools closures today but I cannot see them opening with case numbers running at current levels. Expect a u turn by Monday evening.

You know what, i said before in sarcasm that if cases where at 5k a day they would still keep schools open as normal, i still believe they won't change a damn thing.

eviltwin

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Yes

That’s an incredible increase. How can they recommend sending children and staff back to school? Utter madness

awec

Icyseanfitz wrote: »

Yes

No it isn't, it's positive swabs, not cases. There's a difference.

Icyseanfitz

awec wrote: »

No it isn't, it's positive swabs, not cases. There's a difference.

Sorry i thought he said swabs, obviously different but in the same ballpark as cases

khalessi

eviltwin wrote: »

That’s an incredible increase. How can they recommend sending children and staff back to school? Utter madness

Repeat after me x 10

Schools are safe:cool:

PPE budget decreased but schools are safe

hesaidshesaid

awec wrote: »

No it isn't, it's positive swabs, not cases. There's a difference.

Can you explain this please? Have wondered about the difference.