Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

NFL Offseason 2020

  • 15-03-2020 10:49pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Apparently 49ers 'out' on making a run at Brady in FA. In my opinion they were never 'in' on him and it was all coming from Brady's camp.

    With the Titans out too, there is a dwindling number of teams looking like they'll be interested, so likely back to NE for Tom.


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ✭✭✭ScrubsfanChris


    Draft is being pushed to atleast May and wont be held in Vegas
    Hotels being given heads up it's not happening.

    https://twitter.com/AndySlater/status/1239213019172872192?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Yes. 2021 is when it will move to 48% share, 48.5% if they go to 17 games. Saw estimates of up to 240m.

    It helps not only with restructuring, teams can just back load contracts for new players to sign. Would have been hard to risk either not knowing what the CBA was going to end up as.

    Thanks, 30% rule prevented the backloaded contracts up to now in any case, I just wasn’t sure what year the new deal kicked in.

    Will be odd to see all this money swilling around with everything else that is going on. Surprised they didn’t postpone the start of the league year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I'm enjoying the tag process going right up to the wire.

    Latest being Dak tagged meaning Cooper hits FA


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    The Patriots have franchise tagged Joe Thuney which means they wouldn't have a whole lot of money around to keep Brady.

    I suspect however that they may well trade Thuney and get a draft pick back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    15 Franchise Tags used:
    Yannick Ngakoue - Jacksonville Jaguars
    Chris Jones - Kansas City Chiefs
    Leonard Williams - New York Giants
    AJ Green - Cincinnati Bengals
    Bud Dupree - Pittsburgh Steelers
    Matthew Judon - Baltimore Ravens
    Shaq Barrett - Tamba Bay Buccaneers
    Brandon Scherff - Washington Redskins
    Justin Simmons - Denver Broncos
    Hunter Henry - LA Chargers
    Derrick Henry - Tennessee Titans
    Dak Prescott - Dallas Cowboys
    Joe Thuney - New England Patriots
    Anthony Harris - Minnesota Vikings

    Free agency has now begun.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,599 ✭✭✭ScrubsfanChris


    Reports now saying the draft will go ahead on time and as scheduled.
    No public events will take place and I assume that means no geering crowds either.

    Still hundreds of nfl and team staff plus media. Seems a bit dim witted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭letowski


    Austin Hooper to the Browns per himself, unless someone comes in late. A lot of high profile skill position players in Cleveland next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Interesting. Wonder what that means for Njoku?

    Or is it a case of seeing Mayfield's regression without his TE last year and giving him an insurance blanket.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Knex. wrote: »
    Interesting. Wonder what that means for Njoku?

    Or is it a case of seeing Mayfield's regression without his TE last year and giving him an insurance blanket.

    Stefanski used 2 or more Tight-ends than other team last season with Minnesota, so I expect Njoku to stay. Since Njoku is on his rookie deal, it doesn't make much sense to trade him unless they obviously don't rate him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    Never thought I'd see Flowers make decent bank in the NFL again, I have to say.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Bill O'Brien! Texans need a GM ASAP.

    https://twitter.com/PFF_Sam/status/1239603411974262784


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1239604333836206082

    Awful deal for the Texans.

    Peter King called it this morning in his column.
    It might be just pre-draft chatter, but two teams over the weekend told me to watch Houston and DeAndre Hopkins, who has three years and a reasonable $40 million left on his contract, and who’d cause only a $3-million cap hit to the Texans if they traded him. Houston is currently in draft hell, without a top-50 pick in 2020 and 2021, and coach Bill O’Brien has huge needs to fill on his offensive line, in the secondary and overall youth on the front seven; J.J. Watt and Whitney Mercilus will play this year at 31 and 30.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    All chat relating to Free Agency and offseason here...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    There's got to be more to the Hopkins trade. On paper this is an awful deal for the Texans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,064 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Cardinals fleeced them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    What always shocks me by these one sided trades is how no other team offered slightly more. Do these GMs not even try to shop the player around to see if they can get a better deal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭letowski


    Its crazy aswell as the Carlos Hyde/Duke Johnson combo was quite solid.

    Texans are taking on all of David Johnson's salary too.

    Mad stuff.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    Not sure I like this to be honest.

    Really depends on the fine print. I don't think anyone in the squad could fill his shoes but with the DL so loaded it would still be one of the best in the league without him.

    If they keep him they should do all they can to ship off Thomas to create some cap space, even for a minimal return.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    As long as this doesn't mean moving on from Ford or Buckner I guess its ok. The problem is that for this contract to be worthwhile he needs to play to 2019 levels consistently. It's not possible for him to out perform that contract really.

    Agree though, we need to see the breakdown per year and the guarentess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭OOnegative


    Ramon Foster retiring after 11 seasons with the Steelers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    Looks like Stefon Diggs could be moving as well.

    https://twitter.com/stefondiggs/status/1239624004345958400


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    VillaMad wrote: »

    Basically the same value as Hopkins... :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    I’m stunned at that Hopkins trade, absolutely stunned. That’s a game changer for the Cardinals who were trying to offload Johnson anyway. Well done Cardinals.

    Cannot see any upside for the Texans on the face of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,470 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    About an hour ago the Bears were working on a deal to sign Bridgewater and now the reports are saying it's not happening and we're focused on Andy Dalton.


    And I'm ready to be taken out behind the shed and shot. What's the point anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Oat23 wrote: »
    About an hour ago the Bears were working on a deal to sign Bridgewater and now the reports are saying it's not happening and we're focused on Andy Dalton.


    And I'm ready to be taken out behind the shed and shot. What's the point anymore.

    I never expected Bridgewater. A player of his level is not signing to 'compete' with Trubisky. If Trubisky is benched the entire front office is getting the sack.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    Last season the Ravens traded their backup kicker who they were never going to put on the roster to the Vikings for a 5th rounder.

    Gave that 5th rounder to the Jags for Calais Campbell.

    I love this move. Our most obvious position of need and he will be a super addition even if he will be 34 in Week 1. 2 years 27 million is a fair contract


    Hayden Hurst was drafted before Lamar Jackson, sometimes forgotten. Hurst and a 4th to the Falcons for a 2nd and a 5th. I also like this move

    Hurst was injured his first year and never quite showed what a first round pick should but he certainly is not a bust. Just he has been outperformed by the 3rd rounder in the same draft Mark Andrews. There is also Nick Boyle who is more of a blocking type.


    Two good moves, Eric DeCosta doing his stuff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    As long as this doesn't mean moving on from Ford or Buckner I guess its ok. The problem is that for this contract to be worthwhile he needs to play to 2019 levels consistently. It's not possible for him to out perform that contract really.

    Agree though, we need to see the breakdown per year and the guarentess.

    Buckner gone to the Colts... :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Buckner gone to the Colts... :(

    Pick #13 and Buckner getting $21m a year.

    Will need to start researching the draft again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,776 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    I’m stunned at that Hopkins trade, absolutely stunned. That’s a game changer for the Cardinals who were trying to offload Johnson anyway. Well done Cardinals.

    Cannot see any upside for the Texans on the face of it.

    Is it though?? There defence needs serious work and they got good of a pretty decent rb. They are literally putting everything in the score what ye want we will score more basket


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭the baby bull elephant


    Oat23 wrote: »
    About an hour ago the Bears were working on a deal to sign Bridgewater and now the reports are saying it's not happening and we're focused on Andy Dalton.


    And I'm ready to be taken out behind the shed and shot. What's the point anymore.

    I'd be more worried about the Bears if they had Dalton over Bridgewater.
    VillaMad wrote: »
    Looks like Stefon Diggs could be moving as well.

    https://twitter.com/stefondiggs/status/1239624004345958400

    Diggs seems to pull this type of crap a lot. Loves an ambiguous tweet.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Pick #13 and Buckner getting $21m a year.

    Will need to start researching the draft again

    F**k this. Seriously. He had another year on his rookie deal and is superior to Armstead, has been good every year and never seems to be injured.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    Is it though?? There defence needs serious work and they got good of a pretty decent rb. They are literally putting everything in the score what ye want we will score more basket

    It’s a stretch to call Johnson a decent RB at this stage given his injury history and contract, they will be thrilled to have him off the books. Their passing attack should improve with Hopkins on board and Murray in year two which is what they are very openly going for. It’s a very good trade from the Cardinals perspective imo.

    I’m not saying it puts them in the championship conversation, or that they don’t have other needs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    I'd be more worried about the Bears if they had Dalton over Bridgewater.

    I’d take Dalton over Bridgewater too, Dalton has been in a bad spot with a bunch of turnstiles blocking for him. He is not that bad, and is an upgrade over Trubisky


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    SF now hold #13 and #31.

    Does the Jimmy G trade talk start now? Those two picks are a decent start for a trade up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    adrian522 wrote: »
    F**k this. Seriously. He had another year on his rookie deal and is superior to Armstead, has been good every year and never seems to be injured.

    They can’t pay everyone on that line. I can see the logic of taking the first round pick for Buckner while they can, but always tough to see good players leave.

    Good trade for the Colts, they have loads of cap room and get an instant star that can slot in to an area of need


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    adrian522 wrote: »
    F**k this. Seriously. He had another year on his rookie deal and is superior to Armstead, has been good every year and never seems to be injured.

    I've gotten over the surprise and have come to terms with it a bit now. It does make that Super Bowl loss hurt even more, knowing it was the last game he played for the team.

    I think Buckner is a superior player, a great leader and person but is his impact worth Donald money?

    The maths were paying him ~$21m per year and potentially getting a 3rd round comp pick in 2021 or keeping Armstead for ~$17m per year and #13 this year. I'd have preferred getting rid of someone like Thomas but anyone we want to get rid of has little to no trade value.

    As all draft pick trades, it all rides on what they do with the draft capital. We're suddenly in a place where Kyle could get his hands on one of the top WRs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,171 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    SF now hold #13 and #31.

    Does the Jimmy G trade talk start now? Those two picks are a decent start for a trade up.

    No.

    The guy came off an ACL injury and led his team to 13-3 record and a Super Bowl appearance. Yes, he had a bad half a quarter, while likely concussed, but the hyperbole around him is crazy. At this point the 49ers are in a Super Bowl window and he has a good grasp of a very difficult system and is on a relatively cheap deal. Talk of trading him is madness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭VillaMad


    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1239658577914146817

    My Browns are getting things done again in the off-season. Draft a left-tackle and no excuses for Baker Mayfield.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    SF now hold #13 and #31.

    Does the Jimmy G trade talk start now? Those two picks are a decent start for a trade up.

    No, it does 2 things, frees up $12m in cap and gives them some draft capital. I would see a WR being a target at 13 or maybe a DB.

    I don't think they are in the market for a QB, they could even trade down from 13.
    They can’t pay everyone on that line. I can see the logic of taking the first round pick for Buckner while they can, but always tough to see good players leave.

    Good trade for the Colts, they have loads of cap room and get an instant star that can slot in to an area of need

    They can't pay everyone, but they paid Armstead, who is not as good, had only 1 really good year etc. Also Buckner was under contract for 2020 so there was no urgency to pay him.

    I get it, better get a first round pick now then a 3rd comp pick in 2022 and they got good value for him but I'd have preferred him to stay.

    I guess they also need to pay Kittle this season so something had to give but I'm not real impressed with this move.
    Foxtrol wrote: »
    I've gotten over the surprise and have come to terms with it a bit now. It does make that Super Bowl loss hurt even more, knowing it was the last game he played for the team.

    I think Buckner is a superior player, a great leader and person but is his impact worth Donald money?

    The maths were paying him ~$21m per year and potentially getting a 3rd round comp pick in 2021 or keeping Armstead for ~$17m per year and #13 this year. I'd have preferred getting rid of someone like Thomas but anyone we want to get rid of has little to no trade value.

    As all draft pick trades, it all rides on what they do with the draft capital. We're suddenly in a place where Kyle could get his hands on one of the top WRs.

    Yeah, I get that, it probably points more towards long term building than going all in in 2020.

    They better get this draft right though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭letowski


    Foxtrol wrote:
    I've gotten over the surprise and have come to terms with it a bit now. It does make that Super Bowl loss hurt even more, knowing it was the last game he played for the team.

    I think Buckner is a superior player, a great leader and person but is his impact worth Donald money?

    The maths were paying him ~$21m per year and potentially getting a 3rd round comp pick in 2021 or keeping Armstead for ~$17m per year and #13 this year. I'd have preferred getting rid of someone like Thomas but anyone we want to get rid of has little to no trade value.

    As all draft pick trades, it all rides on what they do with the draft capital. We're suddenly in a place where Kyle could get his hands on one of the top WRs.

    I think its a win win for both teams. The 3tech position was the second biggest need for the Colts, so were delighted to get an elite player there. SF will still get top dline play next year and the #13 pick will give SF a great asset to improve in whichever area they feel needs a significant upgrade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,470 ✭✭✭✭Oat23


    Desperation signing from Pace. We have 10TEs under contract currently and they are all either injury prone or useless/over the hill.

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1239698652412760064


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Ugh that's a pretty grim signing to add to a very underwhelming TE group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,174 ✭✭✭✭kmart6




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,405 ✭✭✭el Fenomeno




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,638 ✭✭✭phatkev


    That Diggs trade makes what the Texans got look a whole lot worse!


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    phatkev wrote: »
    That Diggs trade makes what the Texans got look a whole lot worse!

    How may teams would give up a first round pick for Hopkins? At least 20 probably.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement