Greens demand improved public transport take priority over Cork/Limerick motorway

efanton

Have the Green party completely lost their senses?
The Green Party has insisted that providing for added public transport should take priority over the delivery of major new motorways including the M20 between Cork and Limerick in talks with Fine Gael.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/greens-demand-improved-public-transport-take-priority-over-corklimerick-motorway-985361.html

Do they not realise that not building that road will not stop the same number of vehicles still travelling along the Limerick to Cork road?

That in fact by having vehicle travelling at constant speeds and not caught up in traffic jams in towns and villages (the very places you would want to reduce pollution by the way) emissions would be reduced.

The fact that the N20 is one of the most dangerous national roads in the country and a motorway would significantly reduce the total number of road related deaths and serious injuries.

That the M20 is vital economically for the Munster region.

That building the motorway would reduce housing pressure in both Cork and Limerick cities.

And yet they claim that all that money could be spent on public transport that the towns and villages between Limerick and Cork do not have and are extremely unlikely to ever have.

Have they totally lost the plot? Can they seriously be considered a viable member of any government coalition?
It all well and good advocating measures to increase the use of public transport and reduce vehicle emissions, I think every party would agree to these. But to now hold to ransom those parties that might form a government with the scrapping of the M20 that will neither achieve those measures nor save lives is simply unacceptable.

Not one single measure in their manifesto was costed. It seems their game plan is to extract the money for their 'green policies' is to reduce government spending in other areas that are vital to both our economic growth and our health, and at the cost of lives?

Who would want to support a party that would do that? Who in the Green party can justify the above?

con747

efanton wrote: »

Have the Green party completely lost their senses?
The Green Party has insisted that providing for added public transport should take priority over the delivery of major new motorways including the M20 between Cork and Limerick in talks with Fine Gael.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/greens-demand-improved-public-transport-take-priority-over-corklimerick-motorway-985361.html

Do they not realise that not building that road will not stop the same number of vehicles still travelling along the Limerick to Cork road?

That in fact by having vehicle travelling at constant speeds and not caught up in traffic jams in towns and villages (the very places you would want to reduce pollution by the way) emissions would be reduced.

The fact that the N20 is one of the most dangerous national roads in the country and a motorway would significantly reduce the total number of road related deaths and serious injuries.

That the M20 is vital economically for the Munster region.

That building the motorway would reduce housing pressure in both Cork and Limerick cities.

And yet they claim that all that money could be spent on public transport that the towns and villages between Limerick and Cork do not have and are extremely unlikely to ever have.

Have they totally lost the plot? Can they seriously be considered a viable member of any government coalition?
It all well and good advocating measures to increase the use of public transport and reduce vehicle emissions, I think every party would agree to these. But to now hold to ransom those parties that might form a government with the scrapping of the M20 that will neither achieve those measures nor save lives is simply unacceptable.

Not one single measure in their manifesto was costed. It seems their game plan is to extract the money for their 'green policies' is to reduce government spending in other areas that are vital to both our economic growth and our health, and at the cost of lives?

Who would want to support a party that would do that? Who in the Green party can justify the above?

Mr Ryan and his 11 TD's. They think they should be back in government again. Not looking after the real issues affecting people outside the M50 in my opinion.

abcabc123123

efanton wrote: »

Do they not realise that not building that road will not stop the same number of vehicles still travelling along the Limerick to Cork road?

Building new motorways increases the number of cars on the road. It increases car dependency, increases emissions, increases pollution and increases sprawl.

The fact that the N20 is one of the most dangerous national roads in the country and a motorway would significantly reduce the total number of road related deaths and serious injuries.

So would making changes to the existing road, you don't need a motorway to make roads safer.

That the M20 is vital economically for the Munster region.

the evidence for this claim is very dubious imo.

That building the motorway would reduce housing pressure in both Cork and Limerick cities.

By creating unsustainable urban sprawl that will make many of the problems people claim the M20 will solve worse in the long term.

And yet they claim that all that money could be spent on public transport that the towns and villages between Limerick and Cork do not have and are extremely unlikely to ever have.

If you spend the money on roads rather than PT, then yes, they will never have PT.

The Green Party is entirely correct in advocating for switching the spending emphasis from roads to public transport. Transit Oriented Development is the future; the predict and provide model of motorway building is the past. The sooner the other political parties wake up to this, the easier the transition will be.

abcabc123123 wrote: »

So would making changes to the existing road, you don't need a motorway to make roads safer.

Have you ever actually driven the n20 from Limerick to Cork?

banie01

Some of the most dangerous stretches of N road in the country, Experimental layouts in 2+1 still in use despite contributing to fatal crashes and arterial link between the 2nd and 3rd cities that is at times reduced to little better than an R road, and aside from danger it is inherently bottlencked at multiple points.

Yet the information the road is economically viable is "dubious"?

Going back to the electorate with a view this Dublin centric will cost the Green's a lot of votes outside the Pale IMO.

abcabc123123

banie01 wrote: »

Some of the most dangerous stretches of N road in the country, Experimental layouts in 2+1 still in use despite contributing to fatal crashes and arterial link between the 2nd and 3rd cities that is at times reduced to little better than an R road, and aside from danger it is inherently bottlencked at multiple points.

Again, these are arguments for fixing the design of the existing road, not building a motorway.

The solution to congestion is public transport, not expanding road capacity as that just gets filled within a very short time.

Yet the information the road is economically viable is "dubious"?

Yes. Have you got peer reviewed evidence that shows otherwise? From what I've read, the economic argument for motorways is very weak.

Going back to the electorate with a view this Dublin centric will cost the Green's a lot of votes outside the Pale IMO.

It may well do, but someone has to make the argument. Motorway building is rapidly making way for transit internationally and as usual Ireland is way behind the curve.

It isn't a Dublin thing though, the Greens oppose the Dublin related motorways too.

LeinsterDub

We need to re-balance the budget , too much has been spent on roads and it's only led to increased congestion.

Chips Lovell

Mod Note

Hi folks. Please read the charter before posting. One-liners such as "Jesus wept" don't belong here.

Thanks

banie01

abcabc123123 wrote: »

Again, these are arguments for fixing the design of the existing road, not building a motorway.

The solution to congestion is public transport, not expanding road capacity as that just gets filled within a very short time.

Given that you have never driven the current road, your argument for "fixing" the current layout is rather poor.

If you can remove quarries and manage to find an economically viable way to straighten the portions of the road between charleville and mallow whilst meeting currwent road design best practice? have at it.

Or how about ensuring that on what is the main road between 2 of Ireland's main cities, that a hard shoulder is available?
That come any moment when a farmer with road frontage needs to move between fields that tailbacks, and increased risk don't ensue?

Should the traffic between those cities be routed through towns?

abcabc123123 wrote: »

Yes. Have you got peer reviewed evidence that shows otherwise? From what I've read, the economic argument for motorways is very weak.

Have the Greens? Because everything I've read on the matter refers to the separate conurbations?
It completely missed the point that in the South and Mid West, travel on the N20 is a daily occurrence.
It is the South's main artery for people who commute between a range of locations.

In Dublin centric terms, Cork to Limerick is for many people the same journey timewise as commuting from Swords to Dundrum and back.

I know many people living in Limerick who work in Cork and vice versa.

The mistake is assuming that Limerick and Cork are separate!
In real terms the commute is 70 minutes, people are basing themselves where housing is affordable, quite often in N20 accessible locations, and commuting both north and south to work.
Many students in UL/LIT/MI, live in Cork and commute daily and vice versa.
Add to that the normal flow of commerce and people between the 2nd and 3rd cities and the need becomes quite apparent.

It may well do, but someone has to make the argument. Motorway building is rapidly making way for transit internationally and as usual Ireland is way behind the curve.

It isn't a Dublin thing though, the Greens oppose the Dublin related motorways too.

What is the viable, affordable, safe and near term improvement then?
Trains? They're great! How many are there direct between cork and Limerick?
Buses? Again, I travel quite a bit on public transport.
Can be excellent, unfortunately on the N20 currently, all impacted by the issues already laid out.

correct horse battery staple

It's same arguments as made against Galway bypass, greens strawmaning that public transport should be prioritised and bypass not built.

Ignoring that without bypass those buses (and in case of some nutters a luas for Galway) would be stuck in same traffic as cars as roads can't be widened for bus lanes.

Also making it an either or debate when it could be both, bypass being built which frees up roads for bus lanes and buses

This is the trouble with political ideologues, zero pragmatism. We already seen greenpeace make nuclear such a dirty word the world ended up with thousands of coal/oil/gas plants increasing climate change.

LeinsterDub

banie01 wrote: »

What is the viable, affordable, safe and near term improvement then?
Trains? They're great! How many are there direct between cork and Limerick?
Buses? Again, I travel quite a bit on public transport.
Can be excellent, unfortunately on the N20 currently, all impacted by the issues already laid out.

Of course public transport is crap, we've constantly under invested in it.

LeinsterDub

correct horse battery staple wrote: »

It's same arguments as made against Galway bypass, greens strawmaning that public transport should be prioritised and bypass not built.

Ignoring that without bypass those buses (and in case of some nutters a luas for Galway) would be stuck in same traffic as cars as roads can't be widened for bus lanes.

Also making it an either or debate when it could be both, bypass being built which frees up roads for bus lanes and buses

This is the trouble with political ideologues, zero pragmatism. We already seen greenpeace make nuclear such a dirty word the world ended up with thousands of coal/oil/gas plants increasing climate change.

Galway is a the perfect city for public transport , small and compact for lots but due to nearly 0 bus lanes, cycle lanes or walking priority its a traffic nightmare. Buses are going to be stuck in traffic regardless of building the bypass or not due to induced demand. If you don't build for PT you get crap PT , we don't need to spend 600-700 on yet a other failed bypass in Galway.

LeinsterDub

One more lane !

One more lane right?

https://twitter.com/LiorSteinberg/status/1193051019070070784

Motoring is Ireland's version of gun control, the solution to too many cars? More cars :rolleyes:

satguy

Just wait till the GP starts bulldozing down factories becaues some snail or butterfly is in danger.

The GP would / will say how many cars a town can have, in fact their leader is already in hot water for this kind of thing.

LeinsterDub

satguy wrote: »

Just wait till the GP starts bulldozing down factories becaues some snail or butterfly is in danger.

The GP would / will say how many cars a town can have, in fact their leader is already in hot water for this kind of thing.

Yeah he never said any such thing. Jesus why do people repeat such nonsense?

PeadarCo

LeinsterDub wrote: »

One more lane !

One more lane right?

https://twitter.com/LiorSteinberg/status/1193051019070070784

Motoring is Ireland's version of gun control, the solution to too many cars? More cars :rolleyes:

A long distance/non urban motorway also benefits public transport. The motorway network built over the Celtic Tiger years has been of great benefit to bus services. I get your point about Urban motorways. But there is an argument for a motorway between Limerick and Cork that specifically benefits public transport. Private operators took advantage of this far quicker than Bus Eireann when they figured out that people just wanted to get from Cork to Dublin without all the stopping in between. The motorways allowed this and brought significant time savings.

I understand where the Green party is coming from and would agree when it comes to large urban areas like Dublin. However it isn't as clear cut when it comes to intercity motorways.

ancapailldorcha

satguy wrote: »

Just wait till the GP starts bulldozing down factories becaues some snail or butterfly is in danger.

The GP would / will say how many cars a town can have, in fact their leader is already in hot water for this kind of thing.

No more silly comments please.

sid waddell

correct horse battery staple wrote: »

It's same arguments as made against Galway bypass, greens strawmaning that public transport should be prioritised and bypass not built.

Ignoring that without bypass those buses (and in case of some nutters a luas for Galway) would be stuck in same traffic as cars as roads can't be widened for bus lanes.

Also making it an either or debate when it could be both, bypass being built which frees up roads for bus lanes and buses

This is the trouble with political ideologues, zero pragmatism. We already seen greenpeace make nuclear such a dirty word the world ended up with thousands of coal/oil/gas plants increasing climate change.

What's nuts about a Luas for Galway?

Galway is laid out almost in a linear fashion in an east-west direction. A light rail system along that east-west axis makes eminent sense.

LeinsterDub

PeadarCo wrote: »

A long distance/non urban motorway also benefits public transport. The motorway network built over the Celtic Tiger years has been of great benefit to bus services. I get your point about Urban motorways. But there is an argument for a motorway between Limerick and Cork that specifically benefits public transport. Private operators took advantage of this far quicker than Bus Eireann when they figured out that people just wanted to get from Cork to Dublin without all the stopping in between. The motorways allowed this and brought significant time savings.

I understand where the Green party is coming from and would agree when it comes to large urban areas like Dublin. However it isn't as clear cut when it comes to intercity motorways.

In an Irish contest Cork and Limerick are large urban areas.

Why not build a decent railway, build cycling and trams in Cork and Limerick. If after we done that and there is a still a demand for the demand and to be honest between Cork and Limerick there probably will be then build the motorway.

What have we done built motorways , the rest be damned .

markodaly

People are confusing two things.
The motorway between Cork and Limerick is an inter-urban link connecting the south to the midwest and onto the main Atlantic corridor that will eventually link Sligo and possibly Donegal/Derry.

It is not a public transport solution, it is a route to move goods, HGV, and people from one area of the country to another quickly and safely.
Believe it or not, there are motorways in the likes of Germany, Holland, Sweden etc..

Public transport is an urban/suburban issue. That is bus routes, Luas, cycleways and so on.
To have a modern sustainable economy we need both.

The thing with public transport is though is that politically its harder to get through. Just see the issues with Bus Connects and the Metro South line.

correct horse battery staple

sid waddell wrote: »

What's nuts about a Luas for Galway?

Galway is laid out almost in a linear fashion in an east-west direction. A light rail system along that east-west axis makes eminent sense.

It's a city of 70,000?

PeadarCo

LeinsterDub wrote: »

In an Irish contest Cork and Limerick are large urban areas.

Why not build a decent railway, build cycling and trams in Cork and Limerick. If after we done that and there is a still a demand for the demand and to be honest between Cork and Limerick there probably will be then build the motorway.

What have we done built motorways , the rest be damned .

Intercity motorways are an investment in public transport something which the growth of private bus companies attests to.

Two nobody is saying don't invest in public transport and related facilities in Cork or Limerick. The aims of both are very different.

Thirdly the Irish economy is very Dublin centric and this can be seen in the Irish transport infrastructure and services. A better connection between Cork Limerick and Galway helps build some sort of counterweight.

And fourthly judging from some posters here the current road is inadequate for a number of reasons.

Fred Cryton

abcabc123123 wrote: »

Building new motorways increases the number of cars on the road. It increases car dependency, increases emissions, increases pollution and increases sprawl.

So are you saying we should have left the M50 at 2 lanes instead of 3? Would the traffic be better or worse if we had? In fact, if it was up to you Greens the M50 would never have been built.



You greens have no concept of rural ireland. How do you suggest people commute into Cork or Limerick without using their car? There might be one bus a day going a single route at irregular times. What would you have, hundreds of buses in all directions? And where would they drive if there's no roads to drive on!

LeinsterDub

Fred Cryton wrote: »

So are you saying we should have left the M50 at 2 lanes instead of 3? Would the traffic be better or worse if we had? In fact, if it was up to you Greens the M50 would never have been built.

You say that like it's a bad thing. Imagine Dublin with Metro West instead of it's Motorway/carpark

Fred Cryton wrote: »

You greens have no concept of rural ireland. How do you suggest people commute into Cork or Limerick without using their car? There might be one bus a day going a single route at irregular times. What would you have, hundreds of buses in all directions? And where would they drive if there's no roads to drive on!

Cycle , walk , get the bus or train ? You're giving out about the lack of public transport , so are we . Let's do something about it!

Chips Lovell

Whatever about inter-city motorways, the M50 expansion is a classic case of Jevons' Paradox. If you look at the census data, it's evident that there's a huge swathe of commuters in Dublin who're driving to work not out of necessity, but out of choice.

osarusan

Cork-Limerick road is an artery for transport of goods as well as people, with trucks making sh!t of the existing roads - Buttevant being the prime example.

The road is needed - no reason that it can't come with increased public transport options.

sid waddell

correct horse battery staple wrote: »

It's a city of 70,000?

Why does it need an orbital dual carriageway then?

LeinsterDub

correct horse battery staple wrote: »

It's a city of 70,000?

How about we start with bus lanes instead?

abcabc123123

Fred Cryton wrote: »

So are you saying we should have left the M50 at 2 lanes instead of 3? Would the traffic be better or worse if we had? In fact, if it was up to you Greens the M50 would never have been built.

Indeed, a pity. The M50 has contributed enormously to the sprawl surrounding Dublin and towards making it one of the most congested cities in Europe.

How do you suggest people commute into Cork or Limerick without using their car

Between the two; ideally using rail infrastructure that we'd build/upgrade. Otherwise using BRT combined with extensive park and ride facilities.

@banie, I'm posting from my phone in work so I don't really have time to adequately respond to your points; I will try to do so later this evening if I can. Thanks.

PommieBast

banie01 wrote: »

Going back to the electorate with a view this Dublin centric will cost the Green's a lot of votes outside the Pale IMO.

Do the Greens actually have any TDs outside the greater-Dublin area?

LeinsterDub

PommieBast wrote: »

Do the Greens actually have any TDs outside the greater-Dublin area?

https://www.greenparty.ie/our-people/representatives/?filter=representatives&representatives=oireachtas
Yes