Is Organised Child Trafficking in America for Real?

TaurenDruid

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I have provided primary evidence that Snopes have gotten it wrong, so i feel entitled to disbelieve them as fact checkers.

No.

No, you didn't.

Stop claiming things that are plainly untrue.

TaurenDruid

Wait. I'm fairly new to the CT board.

Is this actually some kind of RPG, or performance art?

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

You didn’t even present what claim snopes made in relation to Covfefe?

I'm never going back there.
I have given you a primary document.

Dohnjoe

TaurenDruid wrote: »

Wait. I'm fairly new to the CT board.

Is this actually some kind of RPG, or performance art?

Standard M.O. for conspiracies, you get used to it after a few years

Overheal

TaurenDruid wrote: »

Wait. I'm fairly new to the CT board.

Is this actually some kind of RPG, or performance art?

No LARP I’m afraid but you’re welcome to roll a character sheet the party could do with a Druid

Dohnjoe

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I'm never going back there.
I have given you a primary document.

This is it
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/covfefe-arabic-antediluvian/

I just used the same format to input it into translate and didn't get any translation. Looks like Snopes is correct in this case. Lucky I work with two Arabic colleagues, I'll check with them

Overheal

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I'm never going back there.
I have given you a primary document.

Then I trust the snopes link which summarily addresses the inaccurate google translation.

Spencerfreeman

King Mob wrote: »

Yes, that's what you claim. But when asked how your link substantiates the claim, you are unable to answer. Hence it probably doesn't.

The people who believe in fake shootings also believe they have things supporting their claims.

I've already posted the name of the CIA agent in charge. Go back and read.

I'm sure they do.

Overheal

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I've already posted the name of the CIA agent in charge. Go back and read.

I'm sure they do.

You haven’t outlined the conspiracy yet

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

Then I trust the snopes link which summarily addresses the inaccurate google translation.

Fine. I've shown an actual doc which disproves that.

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

You haven’t outlined the conspiracy yet

I never claimed a conspiracy except in the case of William Fain withholding film evidence.

Dohnjoe

Overheal wrote: »

You haven’t outlined the conspiracy yet

CIA, FBI redacted document, child trafficking, suspicious political suicides

What more do you need, it's clear as day!

King Mob

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I've already posted the name of the CIA agent in charge. Go back and read.

Ok. And the evidence for that is...?

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I'm sure they do.

Yup. So how is your conspiracy theory different?
Why does it really belong in the politics or current events sections?

Dohnjoe

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

I never claimed a conspiracy except in the case of William Fain withholding film evidence.

The uhh whole CIA trafficking children..

and the "murders" related to it..

Spencerfreeman

Dohnjoe wrote: »

This is it
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/covfefe-arabic-antediluvian/

I just used the same format to input it into translate and didn't get any translation. Looks like Snopes is correct in this case. Lucky I work with two Arabic colleagues, I'll check with them

The evidence has nothing whatever to do with the real meaning of the word.
I does however reflect what google translate said it was at the time Trump used it.

Better off asking them for a good recipe for a tagine.

ohnonotgmail

TaurenDruid wrote: »

Wait. I'm fairly new to the CT board.

Is this actually some kind of RPG, or performance art?

wait until we get to the interpretive dance round.

Spencerfreeman

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

wait until we get to the interpretive dance round.

No more dancing for you. You're shyte at it.

Overheal

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Fine. I've shown an actual doc which disproves that.

No you’ve shared a claim which Snopes incorporated into their fact checking.

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

No you’ve shared a claim which Snopes incorporated into their fact checking.

It's not a claim. It's a copy of an actual document from google.

ohnonotgmail

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

No more dancing for you. You're shyte at it.

My chassé has been commented on favourably.

Dohnjoe

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

And got wrong because they didn't check deeply enough.

Here is the article you posted
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/us/politics/covfefe-trump-arabic.html

The first line is literally "No, ‘Covfefe’ Was Not Trump Speaking Arabic"

As for google translate, that's a fake. I just ask an Arabic colleague, much to his amusement, no it doesn't mean anything in Arabic

So how did Snopes get it wrong?

Overheal

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

It's not a claim. It's a copy of an actual document from google.

Which conveys a claim which snopes soundly addresses in their factchecking.

Spencerfreeman

Overheal wrote: »

Which conveys a claim which snopes soundly addresses in their factchecking.

Covfefe to incorrect facts.

Spencerfreeman

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Here is the article you posted
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/us/politics/covfefe-trump-arabic.html

The first line is literally "No, ‘Covfefe’ Was Not Trump Speaking Arabic"

As for google translate, that's a fake. I just ask an Arabic colleague, much to his amusement, no it doesn't mean anything in Arabic

So how did Snopes get it wrong?

How was he amused at google changing their meaning of the word?

The real question is who was he telling it was time to stand up?

Lets start a new thread to reflect the new evidence.

Dohnjoe

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

How was he amused at google changing their meaning of the word?

It was a fake screenshot of google translate.

King Mob

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

How was he amused at google changing their meaning of the word?

The real question is who was he telling it was time to stand up?

So to be clear, you're claiming that both Dohnjoe's co-worker and also Trump are involved in another conspiracy involving coded Arabic?
If so, what does this have to do with your other conspiracy?

Can you at least understand why your thread was dumped here and how it's not any better than the fake shootings idea?

Spencerfreeman

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Here is the article you posted
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/01/us/politics/covfefe-trump-arabic.html

The first line is literally "No, ‘Covfefe’ Was Not Trump Speaking Arabic"

As for google translate, that's a fake. I just ask an Arabic colleague, much to his amusement, no it doesn't mean anything in Arabic

So how did Snopes get it wrong?

That link was between google employees discussing why they should assist the rabble that were trying to sucker punch Trump.

Dohnjoe

Spencerfreeman wrote: »

Lets start a new thread to reflect the new evidence.

No need. The evidence is that

a) The Snopes fact-check is indeed correct
b) The NY Times article you posted corroborates the Snopes fact-check
c) The Google translate image is fake
d) The example you gave of Snopes being incorrect is actually false

Spencerfreeman

Dohnjoe wrote: »

It was a fake screenshot of google translate.

No it's not.

Spencerfreeman

King Mob wrote: »

So to be clear, you're claiming that both Dohnjoe's co-worker and also Trump are involved in another conspiracy involving coded Arabic?
If so, what does this have to do with your other conspiracy?

Can you at least understand why your thread was dumped here and how it's not any better than the fake shootings idea?

No nothing and no.