South Park WW ROLE MADNESS - Game Thread

Wendy WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Again, why wendy? Whats with this reign of terror?

Ah Jaysus Des I’ve explained it enough times now. Will you ever cop on. If you have something better to go on please share. You wasted your vote yesterday voting for me, make it matter today.

Ewan WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Good Morning fellow villagers. Are we ready to lynch Lucy now after yesterday’s wasted opportunity?

Can you gimme a quick recap as to why chief?

Wendy WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

Sorry for missing yesterday mostly folks, couldn't be helped. Doing my catching up now.

Good morning Ewan. You posted 7 times yesterday so you had a good idea what was going on. What was your reasoning for your no lynch vote? Smells wolfie to me.

Wendy WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

Can you gimme a quick recap as to why chief?

Why? You’ll probably vote no lynch again.

Ewan WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Good morning Ewan. You posted 7 times yesterday so you had a good idea what was going on. What was your reasoning for your no lynch vote? Smells wolfie to me.

While I was in the thread I couldn't see much going on. Steve maybe role hunting but felt villager tree shaking to me. After that I wasn't able to keep up with what was going on for my own reasons. Better to vote no lynch than lynch without doing the proper research with a jester in play.

Gertrude WW

Desmond WW wrote: »

Morning all. So if everyone one has a role, they have at least one power to use? Or does it just mean they have a character name? Either way, everyone revealing will ruin the game imo. Reveal if you must to save yourself, thats different.

I would assume characters and roles are different things.

Ewan WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

I voted for Steve because I don’t like his constant questioning of people about their roles and how quick he was to agree with the possibility that everyone could be baddies

But everyone has roles, you think thats lynch worthy?

Ewan WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

I would assume characters and roles are different things.

From the OP:

Note: Characters and roles are not indicative of alignment - any character, or any role can be good, and likewise any role or character can be evil.

Desmond WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Ah Jaysus Des I’ve explained it enough times now. Will you ever cop on. If you have something better to go on please share. You wasted your vote yesterday voting for me, make it matter today.

You explained they are the same person, you didnt explain why their allignment is bad. Keep it up tho and you may get enough on board.

Phil WW

Morning all.

Woke up thinking of ya, Wendy

32 sign ups and 32 anon accounts so there can’t be one player using two anons. The only way Wendy’s theory is possible is if Lucy and Orla have the use of two anon accounts. I don’t see that happening.

Could Wendy be the jester?
If Lucy or Orla were lynched last night and one flipped green, the spotlight would turn to Wendy. But a jester Wendy wouldn’t know who the wolf team are so it’s a gamble. At start of game though the odds of lynching a villager must be greater.

Could Wendy be a wolf?
Having players think you could be the jester is definitely a great way to save yourself from lynching.

Desmond WW

Ewan WW wrote: »

From the OP:

Note: Characters and roles are not indicative of alignment - any character, or any role can be good, and likewise any role or character can be evil.

Yeah but say you were the seer, and not on the wolf team (im sure they have a shared room so would know) I wouldnt advise revealing that on thread. Likewise for any good role that can work against the baddies.

Wendy WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Morning all.

Woke up thinking of ya, Wendy

32 sign ups and 32 anon accounts so there can’t be one player using two anons. The only way Wendy’s theory is possible is if Lucy and Orla have the use of two anon accounts. I don’t see that happening.

Could Wendy be the jester?
If Lucy or Orla were lynched last night and one flipped green, the spotlight would turn to Wendy. But a jester Wendy wouldn’t know who the wolf team are so it’s a gamble. At start of game though the odds of lynching a villager must be greater.

Could Wendy be a wolf?
Having players think you could be the jester is definitely a great way to save yourself from lynching.

Desmond WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Morning all.

Woke up thinking of ya, Wendy

32 sign ups and 32 anon accounts so there can’t be one player using two anons. The only way Wendy’s theory is possible is if Lucy and Orla have the use of two anon accounts. I don’t see that happening.

Could Wendy be the jester?
If Lucy or Orla were lynched last night and one flipped green, the spotlight would turn to Wendy. But a jester Wendy wouldn’t know who the wolf team are so it’s a gamble. At start of game though the odds of lynching a villager must be greater.

Could Wendy be a wolf?
Having players think you could be the jester is definitely a great way to save yourself from lynching.

Well both those theories are as plausible as wendy's tbf.

Gabriel WW

Apologies to mods and players for my late arrival, likewise to the village for missing my vote last night.

Clearly I have some reading to do, but is there any game developments this lost player should be made immediately aware of?

Winifred WW

Morning all, smothering with a head cold, so won't be as active as I would like.

There was 3 that hadn't posted when I last checked yesterday.

I can somewhat understand voting No Lynch on D0 as it is a shot in the dark. Anyone who uses it in the future is very suspect.

Eva WW

Wendy WW wrote: »

Ah Jaysus Des I’ve explained it enough times now. Will you ever cop on. If you have something better to go on please share. You wasted your vote yesterday voting for me, make it matter today.

Same as when Regan said I wasted my vote, there is NO wasted votes in wagonomics.

Other than "No Lynch", but even that gives us info.

Senan WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Apologies to mods and players for my late arrival, likewise to the village for missing my vote last night.

Clearly I have some reading to do, but is there any game developments this lost player should be made immediately aware of?

The bang of wolf off this post is overpowering

Holly WW

No lynch is too easy a place to hide in but given I didn't vote at all I can't cast any aspersions. It is a slightly unusual timeline so can understand people's slow starts (including mine).

Are we doing FFAs? I won't be able to collate but I think someone else mentioned that on thread voting usually results in people not doing them but I think they are a good thing for information building.

Winifred WW

Winifred WW wrote: »

Morning all, smothering with a head cold, so won't be as active as I would like.

There was 3 that hadn't posted when I last checked yesterday.

I can somewhat understand voting No Lynch on D0 as it is a shot in the dark. Anyone who uses it in the future is very suspect.

Derry & Fiona still to check in.

Gabriel has just arrived with first post.

Gabriel WW

Senan WW wrote: »

The bang of wolf off this post is overpowering

The bang of inane predictability off this post is disappointing.

Senan WW

I think we’re fixating on the Jester too much cause it’s a new role and it’s in danger of overshadowing the wolf hunting

I’d like to see some FFAs later in the day. I predict carnage today, with so many players they have to have factored in additional kills. I’d like the vig to hold off if they can for a while

Oisin WW

Senan WW wrote: »

I think we’re fixating on the Jester too much cause it’s a new role and it’s in danger of overshadowing the wolf hunting

I’d like to see some FFAs later in the day. I predict carnage today, with so many players they have to have factored in additional kills. I’d like the vig to hold off if they can for a while

Its not new. Its been done before.

Best strategy is to ignore it and keep an eye out for anyone being TWTBAW.

Unless we peek the jester, or take them out with a RV power, or wolves do us a favour, not much more than we can do than that.

In work now. Can do proper reading.

Conor WW

Anybody wolfy who the wolves don’t kill should prob be lynched. I don’t think the wolves want the jester lynched anymore then we do. However anything too obvious we may have to either shoot or hope some other power is used to kill jester or we wait until munch in morning. If wolves suspect a jester aswell they will surly munch for self preservation and if they don’t we lynch the next night assuming the potential target was a wolf.

So something obviously suspicious that makes a lynch target kind of easy we either kill with some other power or pass responsibility to wolves next morning. I think that’s a decent plan.

We also need to be careful for CFD although I’m not sure the wolves will even try this while one player could theoretically win the game with a panic lynch.

Gabriel WW

Senan WW wrote: »

I think we’re fixating on the Jester too much cause it’s a new role and it’s in danger of overshadowing the wolf hunting

"I think we should focus on wolf-hunting" - No way!

Senan wrote:

I’d like to see some FFAs later in the day. I predict carnage today, with so many players they have to have factored in additional kills. I’d like the vig to hold off if they can for a while

I'm having a problem with my browser here - The name being displayed is 'Senan' when clearly it should be 'Einstein'.

All joking aside though, unless I see something different in my catch-up, you're a wolf in trying to pull the strings early in the day and throwing out 'Werewolves Top 5 Soundbytes' in the process. Absolutely nothing you've said there is unique, I thought fluff usually ends by Day 1.

Brendan WW

Regan WW wrote: »

yes

I would have them pegged as potential Jester where as I didnt believe you are yet.

Doris WW

Morning all

Monday, yay

Vernon WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Morning all.

Woke up thinking of ya, Wendy

32 sign ups and 32 anon accounts so there can’t be one player using two anons. The only way Wendy’s theory is possible is if Lucy and Orla have the use of two anon accounts. I don’t see that happening.

Could Wendy be the jester?
If Lucy or Orla were lynched last night and one flipped green, the spotlight would turn to Wendy. But a jester Wendy wouldn’t know who the wolf team are so it’s a gamble. At start of game though the odds of lynching a villager must be greater.

Could Wendy be a wolf?
Having players think you could be the jester is definitely a great way to save yourself from lynching.

I disagree with this. Wolf hunting does not make you a wolf if your target goes green, especially, especially this early in the game.

Henry WW

Isla WW wrote: »

If Steve is one of the most voted for why is he vocal against a no lynch? Maybe he wants to be lynched.

I think you need to look at the time stamps again - Steve had no votes when he made that comment.

Having said that, I could see him being jester with all the role pushing, but then why would that be a reason for people to vote him if Jester needs lynched to win? Makes no sense.

Doris WW

Senan WW wrote: »

I think we’re fixating on the Jester too much cause it’s a new role and it’s in danger of overshadowing the wolf hunting

I’d like to see some FFAs later in the day. I predict carnage today, with so many players they have to have factored in additional kills. I’d like the vig to hold off if they can for a while

This makes sense. If the vig has a shot near lynch they could maybe act as a control on the jester trying to panic us into a lynch

Vernon WW

Winifred WW wrote: »

Morning all, smothering with a head cold, so won't be as active as I would like.

.

Are you kidding me?