Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Most evil dictator

  • 06-09-2019 2:58pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭


    Now that Mugabe is in the news, it got me thinking.. He wasn't the worst, was he?

    You had Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and Genghis Kahn. I'm not even sure he was the worst living dictator seeing as Kim Jon Un is still alive. Moot point now.

    So who is the most evil dictator - living or dead - and why?


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭Minime2.5


    Bishop Len Brennan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,647 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    DeVore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭Infernal Racket


    My missus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭antix80


    OSI wrote: »
    Leopold II was a considerable dick. Didn't even do it out of some idealism or self idolisation, he just wanted money. "Didn't harvest enough rubber this week? Grand, I'll just chop of the hands and feet of your 5 year old as payment."

    Sounds like the quality over quantity of the evil exhibited by some of the competition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,856 ✭✭✭irishguitarlad


    Franco, absolutely ruthless, Hitler had a meeting with him and said afterwards that he never wanted to speak with that lunatic again.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Lil Sally Anne Jnr.


    Franco, absolutely ruthless, Hitler had a meeting with him and said afterwards that he never wanted to speak with that lunatic again.

    Absolute nonsense. Franco is not even close to being the worst.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    Mao or Stalin I think. Hitler is obviously up there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    OSI wrote: »
    Leopold II was a considerable dick. Didn't even do it out of some idealism or self idolisation, he just wanted money. "Didn't harvest enough rubber this week? Grand, I'll just chop of the hands and feet of your 5 year old as payment."

    Pure evil that guy. Ground his statues into dust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,856 ✭✭✭irishguitarlad


    Absolute nonsense. Franco is not even close to being the worst.

    Touch a nerve? Did a family member go over and fight for him? He obviously wasn't as bad as Hitler but he's definitely up there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Mao if you’re to go by the number of people who died because of his egotistical idea for how Chinese society should work. He also showed all the classic signs of being a psychopath, which you’d presume all dictators are.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    Touch a nerve? Did a family member go over and fight for him? He obviously wasn't as bad as Hitler but he's definitely up there.

    But you said he was the worst.

    Fun fact - the major exit countries for Jews fleeing Europe was via fascist Spain and Salazar’s Portugal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭Dr Strange


    Salazar’s Portugal.

    Wasn’t that the undead pirate hunter in the last Pirates of the Caribbean franchise?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    Dr Strange wrote: »
    Wasn’t that the undead pirate hunter in the last Pirates of the Caribbean franchise?

    That too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Do we measure by gratuitous cruelty or sheer numbers?

    As a % of the global population Kublai Khan is probably the winner.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Lil Sally Anne Jnr.


    Touch a nerve? Did a family member go over and fight for him? He obviously wasn't as bad as Hitler but he's definitely up there.

    Um no. You are just incorrect. France and America were responsible for far more heinous crimes throughout the world during Franco's reign than Franco was.

    Fun Fact: Franco was the only Western leader that Fidel Castro had any respect for, as he was the only one prepared to ignore the CIA blockade of Cuba.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭SnazzyPig


    Hitler; people shouldn't conflate failed policies with murderous policies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    Um no. You are just incorrect. France and America were responsible for far more heinous crimes throughout the world during Franco's reign than Franco was.

    Fun Fact: Franco was the only Western leader that Fidel Castro had any respect for, as he was the only one prepared to ignore the CIA blockade of Cuba.

    Well, as long as Castro liked him. That's all that matters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,418 ✭✭✭Infernal Racket


    Pol pot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,313 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Fcuk even thinking about them makes me wonder how the fcuk did they do what they did. And get away with it for the most part


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    Um no. You are just incorrect. France and America were responsible for far more heinous crimes throughout the world during Franco's reign than Franco was.

    Fun Fact: Franco was the only Western leader that Fidel Castro had any respect for, as he was the only one prepared to ignore the CIA blockade of Cuba.

    This is true. The democracies certainly have killed more people in the 20C than most dictatorships. Vietnam alone was about 3M.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,063 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot. Three of the worst most brutal dictators of the modern age.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Gerry G wrote: »
    Pol pot

    Probably wins for killing the greatest % of a countries population from within.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    Do we measure by gratuitous cruelty or sheer numbers?

    As a % of the global population Kublai Khan is probably the winner.

    Are you thinking of Genghis rather then Kublai?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭beejee


    Gerry G wrote: »
    Pol pot

    Your man off x-factor? Didn't hear a thing about this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,879 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I'm going to have to go with the anti-hipster choice and say Hitler.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    Probably wins for killing the greatest % of a countries population from within.

    And the kunt still managed to die of old age!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    This is true. The democracies certainly have killed more people in the 20C than most dictatorships. Vietnam alone was about 3M.

    No they didn't.


    USSR, Hitler, China. How many people killed? Against democracies? Not a hope. Unless you are going to consider WW2 the democracies fault?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,063 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    This is true. The democracies certainly have killed more people in the 20C than most dictatorships. Vietnam alone was about 3M.

    Think you will find the Chinese and Soviets also had a part to play. That said, America had no business in that country and did carry out many atrocities.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Fritzbox


    That said, America had no business in that country and did carry out many atrocities.

    True. Same could be said about Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭howamidifferent


    Leo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Fritzbox


    Leo

    Leopold II? Already mentioned...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    Hard to pick just one because unfortunately there have been an awful lot of evil men in charge of countries but for me the worst apart from Mugabe himself are;

    Pol Pot
    Mao
    Stalin
    Hitler
    Radovan Karadic
    Gaddafi
    Sadam Hussein


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭Cupp3r


    Surprised Idi Amin wasn't mentioned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8 KingNobit


    Do we measure by gratuitous cruelty or sheer numbers?

    As a % of the global population Kublai Khan is probably the winner.

    But then consider the way they governed too? Genghis was a nutjob who killed a whole town cause one man said something he didn't like but the governing structure was okay


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭Cupp3r


    Also Kai shek maybe not spelled correctly


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,077 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is true. The democracies certainly have killed more people in the 20C than most dictatorships. Vietnam alone was about 3M.

    This is totally false.

    That includes killings by both sides, in a much longer period, and also a absolute high sided figure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualties

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll#List_of_genocides

    Most of these were not democracies. For some reason they don't list Mao here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    This is totally false.

    That includes killings by both sides, in a much longer period, and also a absolute high sided figure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualties

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll#List_of_genocides

    Most of these were not democracies. For some reason they don't list Mao here

    Shur, it wasn't real communism.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    John Delaney ?

    what an a hole


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Pol pot, just for his devotion to demented levels of ideological purity.

    Apart from the much documented stuff of killing academics ( wearing glasses was deemed a major subversive threat) and sending them to work in the collective farms,

    He demanded the grass and plants be pulled up so as to complete year zero in its totality


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    When you compare population size, Mao would have needed to kill a hundred million in order to rival pol pot


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,034 ✭✭✭griffin100


    Emperor Hirohito. Oversaw the killings of tens of millions by the Japanese during their occupation of China and during WW2 in his name.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    A lot of people say Stalin, but he was a man who genuinely believed in what he was doing. He was a fanatic Marxist, who believed he was following the sacred texts of communism to a T.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Fritzbox


    A lot of people say Stalin, but he was a man who genuinely believed in what he was doing.

    So did Hitler - I'm sure all the great despots believed in what they did?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    A lot of people say Stalin, but he was a man who genuinely believed in what he was doing. He was a fanatic Marxist, who believed he was following the sacred texts of communism to a T.

    Yeah, you have to consider his political opinions. Makes the deaths a bit easier to swallow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 736 ✭✭✭Das Reich


    From the XXI century I would say Bush and Obama, many wars created by them two.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,995 ✭✭✭Ipso


    Das Reich wrote: »
    From the XXI century I would say Bush and Obama, many wars created by them two.

    Or the people who Saddam kept under control.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    No they didn't.


    USSR, Hitler, China. How many people killed? Against democracies? Not a hope. Unless you are going to consider WW2 the democracies fault?

    I said most dictatorships. But maybe not all. Juries out. Depends on how many people were killed by the US and British empires in total.

    Fun fact, fascist Spain was probably less racist than the US in the post war period.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 493 ✭✭Fritzbox


    Das Reich wrote: »
    From the XXI century I would say Bush and Obama, many wars created by them two.

    Which war did Obama start?

    Speaking of starting wars, how about Vlad Putin?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    A lot of people say Stalin, but he was a man who genuinely believed in what he was doing. He was a fanatic Marxist, who believed he was following the sacred texts of communism to a T.

    I think all dictators believe what they are doing is right. That doesn’t mean the things they do are acceptable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    Fritzbox wrote: »
    Which war did Obama start?

    Speaking of starting wars, how about Vlad Putin?

    Libya and Syria. Yemen.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement