OSI wrote: » Leopold II was a considerable dick. Didn't even do it out of some idealism or self idolisation, he just wanted money. "Didn't harvest enough rubber this week? Grand, I'll just chop of the hands and feet of your 5 year old as payment."
irishguitarlad wrote: » Franco, absolutely ruthless, Hitler had a meeting with him and said afterwards that he never wanted to speak with that lunatic again.
Lil Sally Anne Jnr. wrote: » Absolute nonsense. Franco is not even close to being the worst.
irishguitarlad wrote: » Touch a nerve? Did a family member go over and fight for him? He obviously wasn't as bad as Hitler but he's definitely up there.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Salazar’s Portugal.
Dr Strange wrote: » Wasn’t that the undead pirate hunter in the last Pirates of the Caribbean franchise?
Lil Sally Anne Jnr. wrote: » Um no. You are just incorrect. France and America were responsible for far more heinous crimes throughout the world during Franco's reign than Franco was. Fun Fact: Franco was the only Western leader that Fidel Castro had any respect for, as he was the only one prepared to ignore the CIA blockade of Cuba.
Gerry G wrote: » Pol pot
Harry Palmr wrote: » Do we measure by gratuitous cruelty or sheer numbers? As a % of the global population Kublai Khan is probably the winner.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Probably wins for killing the greatest % of a countries population from within.
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » This is true. The democracies certainly have killed more people in the 20C than most dictatorships. Vietnam alone was about 3M.
TheValeyard wrote: » That said, America had no business in that country and did carry out many atrocities.