My €100m BEAM scheme

High bike

jntsnk wrote: »

It just goes to show how disconnected they are with farmers.

and 40e per sucker cow , what a ****ing joke of a scheme

Coolfresian

wrangler wrote: »

IFA are looking for €1bn now so it can be extended, that's he reason they were pushing farmers to apply for BEAM.

Any chance they d extend it to us beef finishers that also milk cows? I'd gladly reduce 5 or even double it to 10% nitrates reduction if they d allow me to apply.

If the beam scheme is undersubscribed it reflects very poorly on the icsa and the farm organisations that sought to exclude beef finishers that also have a dairy herd.

coolshannagh28

jntsnk wrote: »

It just goes to show how disconnected they are with farmers.

This is a deliberate policy to force farmers off the land.

wrangler

High bike wrote: »

and 40e per sucker cow , what a ****ing joke of a scheme

Going by Adam Woods of IFJ weanlings are doing alright, probably didn't need a top up

Heavier calves in the 400kg to 500kg bracket are harder to shift.

These calves would have been traditionally scooped up by specialist bull finishers, but the appetite for these heavier calves has dampened a little.


The general run of good-quality bulls in the 300kg to 350kg bracket was €2.50/kg to €2.80/kg.

Lesser-quality lots were back at €2.40/kg.

Heavier bulls in the 400kg to 500kg bracket were back at €2.00/kg to €2.20/kg.

Limestone Cowboy

It's not worth it for me anyway. I think the uptake is poor because some fellas think it's like a new quota and 40e a cow isint enough to sway suckler farmers into joining it.

High bike

Limestone Cowboy wrote: »

It's not worth it for me anyway. I think the uptake is poor because some fellas think it's like a new quota and 40e a coiw isint enough to sway suckler farmers into joining it.

it's an insult to suckers they'r obviously at the bottom of the pecking order

Bass Reeves

wrangler wrote: »

Going by Adam Woods of IFJ weanlings are doing alright, probably didn't need a top up

Heavier calves in the 400kg to 500kg bracket are harder to shift.

These calves would have been traditionally scooped up by specialist bull finishers, but the appetite for these heavier calves has dampened a little.


The general run of good-quality bulls in the 300kg to 350kg bracket was €2.50/kg to €2.80/kg.

Lesser-quality lots were back at €2.40/kg.

Heavier bulls in the 400kg to 500kg bracket were back at €2.00/kg to €2.20/kg.

Friesians weanling at 1.1/kg no amount of AA or HE weanlings yet neither any sign of runners

Sugarbowl

Closing date is tomorrow night right? Not midnight tonight?

wrangler

You'll see them there five or six posts down after the Skidoo report.

https://twitter.com/ajwwoods?lang=en

Hurling Hereford

T & Cs of the Beef Exceptional Aid Measure (BEAM), Farmers are asked if they are a member of the Bord Bia Sustainable Beef and Lamb Assurance Scheme (SBLAS).

If they answer NO (N), a new check box is displayed providing prospective applicants with the option to commit to becoming a member of Bord Bia Sustainable Beef and Lamb Assurance Scheme prior to 01-Dec-2019.

Farmers must answer these before they are allowed to submit their application.

In light of what has transpired over the past few days how do ye now feel about Bord Bia's involvement in this scheme?

High bike

Hurling Hereford wrote: »

T & Cs of the Beef Exceptional Aid Measure (BEAM), Farmers are asked if they are a member of the Bord Bia Sustainable Beef and Lamb Assurance Scheme (SBLAS).

If they answer NO (N), a new check box is displayed providing prospective applicants with the option to commit to becoming a member of Bord Bia Sustainable Beef and Lamb Assurance Scheme prior to 01-Dec-2019.

Farmers must answer these before they are allowed to submit their application.

In light of what has transpired over the past few days how do ye now feel about Bord Bia's involvement in this scheme?

would really fill u with confidence

SuperTortoise

Bord Bia = More jobs for the boys.

Lime Tree Farm

Last chance saloon - Dept of Agri Tent - National Ploughing.

The Department offices in Portlaoise, Co. Laois will also have a team available to meet with farmers every day from now until the BEAM closing date.


https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/beef/minister-creed-announces-reopening-of-beam-application-facility-38501933.html

High bike

Lime Tree Farm wrote: »

Last chance saloon - Dept of Agri Tent - National Ploughing.

The Department offices in Portlaoise, Co. Laois will also have a team available to meet with farmers every day from now until the BEAM closing date.


https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/beef/minister-creed-announces-reopening-of-beam-application-facility-38501933.html

creed would be better off sorting out mii than trying to push this scheme down people's necks.Itsunder subscribed for a reason .

Dinzee Conlee

High bike wrote: »

creed would be better off sorting out mii than trying to push this scheme down people's necks.Itsunder subscribed for a reason .

Why would you not apply though?
Even if it was as others have said, to hedge your bets. You could always pay it back if need took off again, could you not?

High bike

Dinzee Conlee wrote: »

Why would you not apply though?
Even if it was as others have said, to hedge your bets. You could always pay it back if need took off again, could you not?

Because it's another half arsed effort to shut people up, if they put a proper scheme on the, table to reduce nitrates and no's I'd gladly take it but not that ****e

Dinzee Conlee

High bike wrote: »

Because it's another half arsed effort to shut people up, if they put a proper scheme on the, table to reduce nitrates and no's I'd gladly take it but not that ****e

What would a proper scheme look like?

Danzy

Dinzee Conlee wrote: »

What would a proper scheme look like?

If it was spent making sure that grading machines were legally compliant, a common standard, enforced as it shoyod be, it would be money well spent and if happily walk away from it.

Dinzee Conlee

Danzy wrote: »

If it was spent making sure that grading machines were legally compliant, a common standard, enforced as it shoyod be, it would be money well spent and if happily walk away from it.

That’s not really a scheme to reduce nitrates and numbers, which I think is what high bike referred to?

That’s really just spending money on something you’d like to spend money on Danzy

Danzy

Dinzee Conlee wrote: »

That’s not really a scheme to reduce nitrates and numbers, which I think is what high bike referred to?

That’s really just spending money on something you’d like to spend money on Danzy

My second choice was something nice for yourself.

In fairness though 8t would just be enforcing legal requirements but in Ireland's beef industry that is a fantasy spend.

kollegeknight

If I want to get out of the scheme before payments are made, how do I?

I just barely have enough for the beef genomics scheme. And if anything happened, I’ll have to buy something. So I could be in breach of one or the other.

Bass Reeves

kollegeknight wrote: »

If I want to get out of the scheme before payments are made, how do I?

I just barely have enough for the beef genomics scheme. And if anything happened, I’ll have to buy something. So I could be in breach of one or the other.

If you breach the scheme all that will happen is I. 2021 they will take all the BEAM money back. It will have no other implications. If you do not breach the scheme you hold onto the BEAM money. It a case of take the money now and if you have to give it back do if not you win if you give it back you have lost nothing you did not have

Hurling Hereford

kollegeknight wrote: »

If I want to get out of the scheme before payments are made, how do I?

I just barely have enough for the beef genomics scheme. And if anything happened, I’ll have to buy something. So I could be in breach of one or the other.

Brother in law quit BEAM yesterday. He emailed beam@agriculture.gov.ie and told them he wanted out

High bike

Hurling Hereford wrote: »

Brother in law quit BEAM yesterday. He emailed beam@agriculture.gov.ie and told them he wanted out

did he get a reply, not that it matters he can just carry on and give back the money

Bass Reeves

High bike wrote: »

did he get a reply, not that it matters he can just carry on and give back the money

Why would you quit it. The max penalty is the same as the sum you get there is only an upside if you manage to qualify even by accident. Too many farmers try to out think themselves.

Hurling Hereford

High bike wrote: »

did he get a reply, not that it matters he can just carry on and give back the money

He phoned the day after he sent the email & was told he was out of the scheme

Hurling Hereford

High bike wrote: »

70% uptake according to AgriLand today, poor aul Phil is embarrassed by us

70% was a 'bit' high, based on the figure released by the Dept very recently. Wouldn't worry about Hogan too much tbh

Hurling Hereford

High bike wrote: »

Because it's another half arsed effort to shut people up, if they put a proper scheme on the, table to reduce nitrates and no's I'd gladly take it but not that ****e

I agree with you. What sort of a scheme would you like to see HB?

Hurling Hereford

https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/left-over-beam-funds-should-be-given-to-dairy-farmers-icmsa/ Weren't they 'fast out of the traps' now!!!

wrangler

Hurling Hereford wrote: »

https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/left-over-beam-funds-should-be-given-to-dairy-farmers-icmsa/ Weren't they 'fast out of the traps' now!!!

they should get it now that it's not wanted by beef farmers, there's still a lot of dairy beef farms
€50m coming into the country has to be an advantage even if the Government has to match it. They'll get their €50 back in taxes. I really don't think the civil service have the cop on to work that out though