Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Random EV thoughts.....

1401402404406407421

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,162 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    See easy go have a night rate trial on some public chargers.

    https://easygo.ie/30-off-on-easygo-night-rate/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,315 ✭✭✭zg3409


    I would also be worried medium to long term that cheap used EVs may encourage people to ditch the bus or train or bike or scooter to use a car with low fuel costs. Think of service jobs, cleaners etc who get the bus to work instead commuting long distances for nearly bus like costs. You also have those who want a brand new reg number say 151 even if it's the cheapest if the cheap car. Good for the used market but may end up with more traffic on the roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,162 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They won't because EVs get stuck in traffic the same as everyone else.

    Once the Public transport, or bike become a lot faster or easier people will eventually switch. You just have to make driving so much harder. Some people will still drive even where walking is quicker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I'd be similarly worried, particularly since our new overlords have adopted a kick the can down the road attitude towards public transport and cycling infrastructure

    I used to commute into Dublin from the suburbs and the fastest route is to cycle. There's no continous cycle path and in many places I'm sharing a busy main road with grumpy car drivers

    There's a plan to open a dedicated cycleway all the way to the city, it'll be interesting to see if that gets shelved

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭prosaic


    I use the bus when necessary, twice or 3 times a week usually. They are so so unreliable timewise, you have to allow an extra 30 mins, which is a lot of time wasted.

    If buses could be 98% relied upon to be there within 5 minute window (allowing for traffic troubles), I'd use them all the time. They seem to have no authority to make sure buses leave at appropriate times, often one will go chasing another one rather than waiting for the next departure slot, and this is in very quiet off peak times.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    It's a funding issue. Take the 41 bus as an example, it starts in Swords, goes through Swords, past the airport, then Santry, Whitehall, Druncondra and finally through the city to Abbey Street

    Okay cool, it's covering a lot of the city, but that's a lot of stops, so anyone getting on in Swords is going to have to deal with a long bus journey and anyone looking for a bus in Drumcondra is going to find the bus jam packed

    You've a few options, you could run more buses, or you could split the route so each bus isn't at full capacity and the Swords end gets a faster service

    Unfortunately you've created a new problem which is that you've more buses heading into a city with a fixed amount of road space, so now you need to invest in bigger bus corridors and more efficient use of the roads you have

    Or you can take the minimal spend option which is to make a few express buses from Swords at peak times, and not invest much in infrastructure leading to a poorly optimised system

    That's not to say all the changes are bad, I think the bus gates on the quays are a great idea for example. But I do get the idea that a lot of the potentially great solutions are hamstrung by an unwillingness to invest more than the bare minimum

    EDIT: Also running more buses requires more buses and drivers, both cost money. You can fund this with increased fares but then you aren't competitive with driving. Or the government can shoulder the cost and try to keep the fares low

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,182 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The Luxury Tax is not based on the perceived premium of the car, its basically the price point. For example, you can have a particular car that does not fsll into the tax bracket, but if you spec certain items, then it brings you over it and thus, into the luxury tax bracket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,315 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Indeed, even though cars may be slower than bikes many will choose the car, as they don't get wet, cold, can bring children to childcare, and have much more certainty over trip times than waiting on a bus, and ghost busses are common and show up on bus real time information systems. Long term there will be more disincentives to 4 wheel travel, there is new gantries on the M50 to allow junction by junction barrier free tolling, but government has that on hold for now, but gantries have been installed. Even peak and off peak tolls are a thing already on some roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭Ev fan


    I get you and maybe I'm being pedantic here but it is called the "luxury' tax which suggests that it refers to higher end product - and that more affordable and reasonably specced cars are (or should be) costed comfortably below the 40k threshold.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,650 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    I think after 3 years of PHEV, i'm seriously looking at making the jump to BEV.

    Does anyone have recommendations for a BEV under 40k ?

    I'm seriously looking at the Ioniq 5 but wondering is there anything else I need to research?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,182 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Ioniq 5

    Model 3

    ID4 I think

    BYD Atto

    MGZS/4

    Really

    Depends what you like and what’s important. Range, efficiency etc

    For example, would you buy a second hand car over brand new?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,430 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    What PHEV do you have and are you looking for similar? Pretty much every EV launched since 2020 has a used example sub 40k now so if you're happy with used them huge options.

    Some really good new options too under and around your budget



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,650 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    I have a RAV 4 PHEV on PCP and hope to continue with the same direction with a new BEV.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,182 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Model Y

    Atto

    ID4

    BZ4X

    MG ZS

    Narrow down what you like and drive them all. Make a decision then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 135 ✭✭yermanthere


    Get a price off Toyota dealer to change. But be aware bz4x has 20% smaller battery than id4/ev6/ioniq5.

    If long range is a regular requirement, maybe Toyota not the best option ( still not awful).

    Under 40k new, you'll struggle to get the size of RAV4, probably look at used. But RAV4 phev is like 56k isn't it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Its some easy politicking

    Set a tax on new vehicles, call it luxury car tax and set the value fairly high in 2017 (£40k).

    Because it's a luxury car tax only affecting wealthier people then it's an easy win

    Do not alter the band to account for inflation over the next 7 years, so more cars come into the tax band

    Also remove the exemption for EVs and you've magically increased tax revenues without increasing taxes

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    The 8years emanate from California and the US and was repeated pretty much worldwide so nothing to do with battery tech.

    Also, LFP or not, cars can use way more power than their battery size, Model 3 on the Autobahn will be well over 60kW in power usage



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,722 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Just on the BZ4X (saw somebody call it the buzzy forks 🤣), is it still the case that you're limited to three DC charges in a 24 hour period?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,028 ✭✭✭✭CoBo55


    In all realism would anyone driving in Ireland manage to do enough driving to actually need to DC charge their car 3 times in one 24hr period? Two lads working flat out in a taxi back in the Tiger days would be hard pressed to need that much juice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,103 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I fast charged 9-10 times a day a few times in my leaf 24 back in the day! But yeah, 3 times would be fairly rare now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 566 ✭✭✭DrPsychia



    I think it's important to give some real world context to battery cycles, when talking about X more cycles it becomes somewhat meaningless unless we put it in real world context.

    Let's assume we have two batteries, LFP and NMC, which has 77kWh usable capacity, assume efficiency of 170Wh/km for each, and assume 25,000 kilometers per year average driven.

    LFP battery:

    Minimum energy throughput: 77 kWh × 3,000 cycles = 231,000 kWh

    Maximum energy throughput: 77 kWh × 5,000 cycles = 385,000 kWh

    NMC battery:

    Minimum energy throughput: 77 kWh × 1,000 cycles = 77,000 kWh

    Maximum energy throughput: 77 kWh × 2,000 cycles = 154,000 kWh


    Using the cars efficiency figures, I can estimate how many kilometers can be driven over the battery lifespan.

    Energy consumption per km: 170 Wh/km = 0.17 kWh/km

    LFP battery:

    Minimum distance: 231,000 kWh ÷ 0.17 kWh/km = 1,358,824 km

    Maximum distance: 385,000 kWh ÷ 0.17 kWh/km = 2,264,706 km

    NMC battery:

    Minimum distance: 77,000 kWh ÷ 0.17 kWh/km = 452,941 km

    Maximum distance: 154,000 kWh ÷ 0.17 kWh/km = 905,882 km

    Using the annual mileage of 25,000 km/year, here's the estimated lifespan at face value:

    LFP battery:

    Minimum lifespan: 1,358,824 km ÷ 25,000 km/year = 54 years

    Maximum lifespan: 2,264,706 km ÷ 25,000 km/year = 91 years

    NMC Battery:

    Minimum lifespan: 452,941 km ÷ 25,000 km/year = 18 years

    Maximum lifespan: 905,882 km ÷ 25,000 km/year = 36 years


    So when you consider the real world lifespan for most cars is 15-20 years, I don't think it really matters whether it's LFP or NMC, but environmentally speaking LFP is better. I guess you could also consider what uses repurposed LFP batteries could have once a car is scraped due to wear & tear.



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    And to add to that.

    The cycles of a battery is reached, the battery isn't dead. It's usually at 70-80% of design capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,722 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    It knocks out the splash and dash approach on long journeys though. Annoying. Especially since it has such a dismal charge curve.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    That's an excellent analysis, pretty much puts to bed the idea of batteries being dead after 8 years (not that I was a great believer in that anyway)

    I'm still struggling to see the advantage of NMC for most cars. Performance vehicles I get the idea, you've more power density so you save weight

    For most hatchbacks and family wagons power isn't as big a deal so they should be fine with LFP cells. I also like the idea of the cells not having any risk of a battery fire. I know the risk isn't that much to start with but zero risk is better than low risk

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    So what happens if you plug in 3 times to a fast charger because it failed the first two times? Does it still charge or does computer say no?

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,722 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    No idea, but would assume if no charge started, you'd be fine. Would be very nervous going for a fourth though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    There's enough times that a charger has started and then sharted the bed after 1 minute that I'd be worried

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,182 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    No, like all EV’s I’d say it’s thermally managed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Yeah probably, it does sounds like the kind of dumb idea that a car manufacturer with almost zero interest in EVs would come up with

    It reminds me of Nissan's defense of the Leaf rapid gating, they'd only ever considered one fast charge per day so determined it didn't need any active cooling (and the bloody thing still overheats)

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,222 ✭✭✭creedp


    You would hope that is the case, otherwise its a joke. When I had my L30 first, and the range was still decent, I attempted a 350km journey on a few occasions. By the time I plugged into a dc charger for the 4 time the battery temp was in the red zone. I'd shudder the thing the battery temp if I was on my 10 charge. In any case I quickly gave up on the adventure when the last such journey took 7 hours and a considerable about of range anxiety



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement