Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Random EV thoughts.....

Options
1296297299301302366

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I'm sure the firefighting systems on the ship were fully operational and the crew were well trained in emergency procedures. It definitely wasn't registered in Panama to avoid various taxes and safety or employee protection laws 😬

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 5,989 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    It's amazing what they can push into a container and ship off to India etc,(I know that's a RoRo though)

    We're changing our combine and an option for selling our old one is export.

    There's someone in Omagh that has a takeaway and also exports machinery, they land with a container, take off wheels/whatever they need to take off and push it into a container.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Easygo did a deal with eir to swap a few payphones for 50kW chargers and I have seen some photos of dual branded eir/easygo 50kW chargers like below in mayo.

    Looks like BT in NI are looking to do similar. I don't understand how a payphone translates to a good site for a 50kW charger but maybe they have good contacts with the council and maybe old ducting could be used to drag high power cable. Maybe eir put in new ducting to allow easygo to install the charger.





  • Registered Users Posts: 5,551 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    So I see alot of recommendations to only charge the car to 80 as its inefficient and slower to go beyond

    Does this principle apply to charging DC only or both types including home..



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    DC only, and to be absolutely clear the 80% rule isn't a rule, it's a very very broad recommendation

    Under ideal circumstances the charging speed of the car will have slowed to the point where it's better to move on to another charger

    However there's plenty of circumstances where that isn't true. For example if you have something like an ID.4 plugged into a 50kW charger, that'll pull everything the charger can give right up to around 90% SoC

    So if you're fully using the charger, and you need the juice then is there any point moving on?

    Yeah it's probably quicker overall to move on to a more powerful charger, but sometimes it's simpler to just grab a few extra kilowatt-hours and not break up the journey too much

    The 80% recommendation was created to stop people pulling 10kW from a 50kW charger when they didn't need to. In my view, as long as you're using a reasonable amount of power the charger can provide and you need the charge then you can go beyond 80% at your leisure

    I also haven't found many situations where I need or wanted to go beyond 80%. Last couple of times I used fast charging I unplugged before 70%, I had what I needed and since DC charging costs around 5x the cost of home charging (or infinity times if charging from solar) I didn't really see any reason to take on more than I needed

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,551 ✭✭✭veryangryman


    Yeah I'm getting better at just taking what I need plus 5 percent to get me home. Or goto 80 if a longer trip.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I tend to think of DC charging like a water seller in the desert who charges €10 for a bottle of water

    Yeah, you're gonna buy some water rather than die of dehydration. But you probably won't buy more than you need to get to the next stop

    Same logic for charging, it's the most expensive option so you'll probably only use what you need and no more

    We're in a position at the moment where we have EVs that can pull a lot of power beyond 80% SoC and the number of chargers is increasing dramatically

    The rollout is still slower than I'd like, but chargers aren't quite as rare as gold dust as they were a few years ago

    So I think the 80% rule is slightly outdated nowadays. I understand if there's a queue it can be incredibly frustrating seeing another car trying to charge to 90% or more, but if they need the charge then they have a legitimate reason to be using the charger

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Some manufacturers recommend 80% like VW and Tesla (depending on battery and car) even home charging. If you need the 100% then charge to 100%



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,229 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    Not really EV related but the seat in my car is wet. I'm going to buy one of those Unibond dehumidifier yokes for €15 in Woodies but I'm wondering in the mean time is it worth using remote AC or am I better off using heat?



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 5,989 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    Both, so you get hot, dry air which will help dry things out more



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,477 ✭✭✭eagerv


    I would just park the car with the sun on the wet seat outside my house with the doors open (If we get the sun again..😋)



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I've got both cars set to precondition to 16C with AC every morning in summer. I find it keeps some fresh air going into the car when they aren't being used and that stops any damp or mould

    I'm winter I'll gradually raise the temp, first to 20C and then maybe 23C in the really cold months

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,334 ✭✭✭✭fits


    We charged a couple of times over 80% in France but we were doing long long days driving. Saved visiting a charger a third time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Looks like the statement that an EV fire was the suspected cause wasn't true. It was attributed to an unnamed coast guard sportsperson by a single news outlet

    Looks like RTE got caught up in the BS as well

    Maybe it was an EV that started it, but that's currently unknown and there's been no official statement saying it was suspected

    I've emailed feedback@rte.ie to request they correct the article. They'll probably ignore me but all we can do is try

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,972 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    There was a horrific accident locally where a VW commercial vehicle went on fire, yep, within hours it was an electric car...



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Reading the AP article, the coast guard were saying the fire is difficult to extinguish given the number of cars ablaze in the hold

    It sounds like the cars weren't remotely made safe for transport before being loaded. They should have their fuel and fluids drained and batteries disconnected and removed

    The EVs should have been discharged and had HV batteries disconnected

    Sounds like none of that happened and the freighter was essentially a giant bomb just so it'd be quicker to load and unload the cars

    This is why maritime shipping is an absolute deathtrap 😬

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I imagine the situation went something like:

    Press: We understand there was a man from Cavan on the crew manifest.

    Coastguard: Yes, there was a man from Cavan on board

    Press: Could the man from Cavan have started the fire

    Coastguard: We have no information on how the fire started, we will investigate all possible causes including whether it was a man from Cavan

    Press Headline: Man from Cavan possible cause of fire.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Those damn Cavan men starting fires again 😂

    I agree, I'd say some junior member of the coast guard got cornered for a statement and was asked a question in a way where they could only say yes and then the press just ran with the EV fire line

    As I said, maybe it was an EV that caused the fire, but that isn't known yet and it's entirely inappropriate for the press to speculate like that, particularly when there were only 25 EVs onboard versus almost 3,000 ICE cars

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,701 ✭✭✭creedp


    While I'm sure it's safer to effectively decommission cars prior to transport, essentially thats the state all cars / trucks are transported on ferries. Was on a ferry from pembroke to rosslare last week and because Sealink had cancelled all sailings, the ferry was packed to the hilt with cars and trucks so I would hate to be on board had a fire occurred.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭zg3409


    How in practice are you going to drain tanks, then load cars, then fill tanks, bleed fuel system and unload cars? I assume new cars have minimal fuel and cars going for scrap or moving to third world have minimal fuel. Unloading needs to be fast as time is money and these ships typically load up and go asap.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Yeah true, I guess a ferry tends to go over shorter distances so there's lower risk

    It also makes you wonder about the firefighting gear aboard the ship. Even if the EVs didn't start the fire, they're probably contributing to the blaze now along with the other vehicles

    You'd think the firefighting systems would be designed to handle a vehicle fire and could essentially flood the hold with foam and water

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,912 ✭✭✭kanuseeme


    Got my car from japan 9th of june, followed it from japan, it stopped in Singapore, Cyprus , Malta , Spain and finally Belgium, there it got offloaded and put on another ship to Dublin,

    Picked it up with half tank of petrol and some trim in the back seat, drove it home and started putting the trim back , my guess was the 12 v was disconnected and the main traction battery also, as the cover was not replaced.

    My guess is, for short trips they do nothing, for the longer trips they have more time to open and disconnect things, some ports the stay was very short, less than a day, the ship was a few days in Belgium then onto Hamburg and Sweden, same ship is now off Wollongong https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/shipid:313143/zoom:10

    https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/shipid:313143/zoom:10 its amazing the number of ships at sea, you can see the shipping lanes if you zoom in a little, each colour is a different type of vessel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I get what you're saying but "takes too long" isn't an excuse for skipping on safety. If the vehicles can't be made safe before departure then the ship needs to be equipped to handle any emergencies en route

    This isn't an isolated incident, there was another fire onboard a car carrier in the Atlantic a few years ago

    And to be frank, EV fires are rare but they're incredibly intense and difficult to put out. If they can't handle a bunch of petrol cars then how's it going to go when a shop full of EVs goes up in flames?

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,661 ✭✭✭zg3409


    You abandon ship as was the case here.

    Once a fire has taken hold there is notyvh you can do. Smoke obscures visibility and even if crew are trained and have all the gear and the fire is detected quickly it can easily spread. They can't our out car fires easily in multi storey car parks, so on a ship things are far more difficult with a small crew like this ship. Try to tackle it, give up and call for help.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    EVs have been transported on ships from Teslas departure ports and also out of Korea and China for several years now.

    Is it known what the safety record is like on those other routes (ie not leaving Germany).

    If there hasn't been a major incident like Felicity Ace or this weeks incident with Tesla deliveries or Korea/China.

    Is there lessons to be learnt from that or is it just pure luck.

    Also might we eventually figure a link between particular models of car and particular incidents.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,889 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Imagine if this fire turns out to be another Zafira, they've been recalled 3 times for fire risk



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,123 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I was just thinking that myself, that car must have the highest kill/death ratio of any car ever made

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,278 ✭✭✭markpb


    I’m no maritime expert but it’s unlikely that any Zafiras had their engines running and PTC fans on while onboard the ship.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭sh81722


    That's the thing: The zafira that burnt the Cork shopping centre was not running either. The PTC heater on them have a permanent live from the battery probably due to cost cutting. High current DC relays are expensive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65,231 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Looks like there were 500 EVs on board and also hundreds of Mercedes cars. I think that supports my speculation that this is a shipment of end of life bangers to Africa. God knows how many safety shortcuts would have been taken on a shipment like that. I hope time will tell.



Advertisement