Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Options
1…959698100101…150

Comments

  • Options
    #2912
    SoundsRight
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Likr sacrificial lambs?:confused:

    What do you mean "common sense prevailed"?

    Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.


  • Options
    #2913
    francois
    Registered Users Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭francois


    AndrewJRenko wrote: »
    Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children

    I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event. :confused:


  • Options
    #2914
    Penn
    Registered Users Posts: 33,249 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    What law do you think it might break? Genuine question.


  • Options
    #2915
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,426 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    francois wrote: »
    I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event. :confused:

    My mistake - I meant to reply to the other lad


  • Options
    #2916
    kunst nugget
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2917
    circadian
    Registered Users Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭circadian


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    Either trolling or ****ing thick.


  • Options
    #2918
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,409 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    What?


    Why would it be illegal? So thats it kids, no more Panto at xmas cos we cant be having a man dress up as the wicked stepmother or evil queen :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #2919
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,426 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    Is this legal?

    IMG_1680.jpg


  • Options
    #2920
    circadian
    Registered Users Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭circadian


    G'wan, sure post it one more time there.


  • Options
    #2921
    gmisk
    Registered Users Posts: 31,863 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    AndrewJRenko wrote: »
    Is this legal?
    :D


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2922
    SoundsRight
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    kunst nugget wrote: »
    Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...

    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.


  • Options
    #2923
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,426 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

    Why would you think there was sexual content involved?


  • Options
    #2924
    gmisk
    Registered Users Posts: 31,863 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.
    Any idea what the proposed "sexual content" was going to be?
    As far as i am aware it was just going to be a reading of a kids story?
    I think its a total storm in a teacup, it isnt as if anyone was being forced to bring their bloody kids to it but hey its cancelled now.


  • Options
    #2925
    Birneybau
    Registered Users Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

    The lady doth protest too much (and we generally know what that's hiding)


  • Options
    #2926
    SoundsRight
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    AndrewJRenko wrote: »
    Why would you think there was sexual content involved?

    The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.


  • Options
    #2927
    gmisk
    Registered Users Posts: 31,863 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.
    yes a man in a dress is exactly the same thing as watching pornhub :rolleyes: your just being ridiculous now.
    I have seen some drag queens who look more like someone who would fit your boiler...just in a dress, not exactly hyper-sexualised.
    Also I am not sure what this has to do with Gemma O Doherty....
    How would you feel if the story was being read by people dressed as unicorns?


  • Options
    #2928
    Penn
    Registered Users Posts: 33,249 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

    Interesting that you find drag queens to be so sexual... Very interesting...


  • Options
    #2929
    circadian
    Registered Users Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭circadian


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

    Here's something that'll blow your mind. My wee man went into crèche last week in his sister's dress because he was adamant he wanted to wear it. **** it I thought, if that's what he wants so be it. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fella wearing women's clothes. It's only sexual if you think it's sexual.

    It's like people who are homophobic. I can't think of something more gay than concerning yourself and obsessing over what two people do with their genitals.


  • Options
    #2930
    kunst nugget
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

    The safety risk was the performers being beaten up by people who want to 'protect the children'. Nothing to do with the content of the show...


  • Options
    #2931
    Hurrache
    Registered Users Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

    You've plenty of time to prep for your campaign come panto season. Don't say you weren't given the heads up.

    Oh yes you were....


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2932
    AndrewJRenko
    Registered Users Posts: 28,426 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

    Have a look at the photo and see if you want to take another go at that post

    https://twitter.com/GlitterHoleDub/status/1117702595240501248?s=19


  • Options
    #2933
    CosmicFool
    Registered Users Posts: 492 ✭✭CosmicFool


    It's a pity it cancelled but come on lads, glitterhole? Not exactly a great name for a kids story telling.


  • Options
    #2934
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,409 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

    And do you know why there was a safety risk? Wanna take a guess as to what the safety risk was?


  • Options
    #2935
    SoundsRight
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

    And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

    RIP Ireland.


  • Options
    #2936
    Bannasidhe
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 19,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Ragerage wrote: »
    It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

    Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

    Hello new user.
    Welcome to the Gemmadome.


  • Options
    #2937
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,409 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Ragerage wrote: »
    It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

    Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

    Says the chap who took time to rereg just so he could post a few words of utter scutter :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #2938
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,409 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

    And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

    RIP Ireland.

    Jaysus you even know all the words! Is your address somwhere in Narnia by any chance?


  • Options
    #2939
    Bannasidhe
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 19,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

    And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

    RIP Ireland.

    You ok hun?

    I would say tell Aunty Dyke all about it but I can't be bothered with your shyte.


  • Options
    #2940
    B0jangles
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    How tremendously, unbelievably insecure do you have to be to feel that masculinity is threatened because a man wears a dress?

    Like, do you cover your eyes and say a wee prayer for protection from Satan every time you see a woman in trousers, or is that just 'different' for some reason?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2941
    Bannasidhe
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 19,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    B0jangles wrote: »
    How tremendously, unbelievably insecure do you have to be to feel that masculinity is threatened because a man wears a dress?

    Like, do you cover your eyes and say a wee prayer for protection from Satan every time you see a woman in trousers, or is that just 'different' for some reason?

    About as insecure as if you are in a panic about your culture disappearing because .01% of the population might do things belonging to their own foreign culture in a public place.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement