When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Likr sacrificial lambs?

What do you mean "common sense prevailed"?

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

francois

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Presumably you're against ALL scenarios of men in dresses telling fairy stories to children

I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event.

Penn

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not even sure if it's legal.

What law do you think it might break? Genuine question.

francois wrote: »

I'm not sure why you are having a pop at me, I disagree with the decision to stop the event.

My mistake - I meant to reply to the other lad

kunst nugget

SoundsRight wrote: »

I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Either trolling or ****ing thick.

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

What?

Why would it be illegal? So thats it kids, no more Panto at xmas cos we cant be having a man dress up as the wicked stepmother or evil queen :rolleyes:

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Is this legal?

G'wan, sure post it one more time there.

gmisk

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Is this legal?

kunst nugget wrote: »

Ah, put a bit of effort into your trolling...

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

Why would you think there was sexual content involved?

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

Any idea what the proposed "sexual content" was going to be?
As far as i am aware it was just going to be a reading of a kids story?
I think its a total storm in a teacup, it isnt as if anyone was being forced to bring their bloody kids to it but hey its cancelled now.

Birneybau

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

The lady doth protest too much (and we generally know what that's hiding)

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Why would you think there was sexual content involved?

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

gmisk

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

yes a man in a dress is exactly the same thing as watching pornhub :rolleyes: your just being ridiculous now.
I have seen some drag queens who look more like someone who would fit your boiler...just in a dress, not exactly hyper-sexualised.
Also I am not sure what this has to do with Gemma O Doherty....
How would you feel if the story was being read by people dressed as unicorns?

Penn

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

Interesting that you find drag queens to be so sexual... Very interesting...

SoundsRight wrote: »

Some people might think it's really progressive to have men dress up like women and put them in the company of little kids, but it's really not appropriate. I'm not even sure if it's legal.

Here's something that'll blow your mind. My wee man went into crèche last week in his sister's dress because he was adamant he wanted to wear it. **** it I thought, if that's what he wants so be it. Absolutely nothing wrong with a fella wearing women's clothes. It's only sexual if you think it's sexual.

It's like people who are homophobic. I can't think of something more gay than concerning yourself and obsessing over what two people do with their genitals.

kunst nugget

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

The safety risk was the performers being beaten up by people who want to 'protect the children'. Nothing to do with the content of the show...

Hurrache

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

You've plenty of time to prep for your campaign come panto season. Don't say you weren't given the heads up.

Oh yes you were....

SoundsRight wrote: »

The performers are the sexual content. They are a hyper-sexualised version of the female form. You may as well sit little Timmy down in front of Pornhub.

Have a look at the photo and see if you want to take another go at that post

https://twitter.com/GlitterHoleDub/status/1117702595240501248?s=19

CosmicFool

It's a pity it cancelled but come on lads, glitterhole? Not exactly a great name for a kids story telling.

SoundsRight wrote: »

The library said there was a safety risk. Who thought it was a good idea to push sexual content to little kids? It's creepy.

And do you know why there was a safety risk? Wanna take a guess as to what the safety risk was?

Next month: Singalong with the Cumbuckets. Followed by baby massage with Anal Destroyer.

And if you're not comfortable with that, you're a bigot.

RIP Ireland.

Bannasidhe

Ragerage wrote: »

It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

Hello new user.
Welcome to the Gemmadome.

Ragerage wrote: »

It really is sad to see the level of degeneracy in Ireland now. Sure, send your son to school in drag. What could possibly go wrong?

Liberal Ireland is on a self-hating suicide march.

Says the chap who took time to rereg just so he could post a few words of utter scutter :rolleyes: