Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Darklord Hacker group is threatening to unleash 9/11 documents

Options
12345679»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,893 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Images and some footage of WTC 7 that truthers avoid

    maxresdefault.jpg
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXa5uATKrwY

    db_WTC7_smoke_a1.jpg

    db_Magnum21.jpg

    www.debunking911.com_wtcc.jpg


    Don't avoid them. You posting images of dust clouds after the tower fells down, can you not see the debris?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,588 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Lack of understanding. Three of the buildings came down on 9/11 by fire and never happened in history previously.

    Overheal least showed some honesty and admitted the NIST model is not accurate. You guys have been claiming differently for years.

    You are fixated upon the NIST simulation not mirroring the actual collapse.
    That is not the purpose of the simulation, that has been explained to you multiple times across multiple threads.

    When challenged you repeatedly pull this stroke of claiming you guys don't understand"!
    To be quite honest, I'm not going to have my understanding impugned by someone who by their own admission confuses acceleration and speed!
    Someone who has a demonstrably poor grasp of basic arithmetic let alone physics!

    You are one of the reasons that conspiracy theories are held in such low regard on this particular forum.

    You argue in soundbites and copy and paste without actually comprehending what any of it means.
    When your arguments are refuted you resort to parroting previous replies even of already debunked.

    A wise man once told me that constant repetition is a sure sign of a moron...
    Funnily enough the proof is becoming more and more apparent on this sub forum.


  • Registered Users Posts: 82,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Lack of understanding. Three of the buildings came down on 9/11 by fire and never happened in history previously.

    Overheal least showed some honesty and admitted the NIST model is not accurate. You guys have been claiming differently for years.

    He then discusses the root cause of the collapse. Overheal would you model a collapse and just ignore the construction drawings? Say you trying to replicate it? Would your university professor give you an A or E grade ( he might give you a few marks for writing your name?

    Dude I’ve modeled pressure regulators for compressed natural gas and not bothered to include the bolts that keep the bonnet attached to the regulator body: it just depends on what you’re looking at, which determines what is relevant. In those studies the mating surface that is held by the bolts was just defined as a fixed mate, since we overengineered the bolt pattern to withstand 4x the service pressure and it was a waste of compute time to include them, when the point of the study was to determine the design strength of the bonnet, which was an aluminum forging.

    Now on this meme since you’ve posted it, surely dozens of times:

    Windsor building: partial collapse:

    https://youtu.be/eKvgD9NyIi4

    The TVCC building in Beijing was responded to by over 600 firefighters, who had the bulk of the blaze under control inside of 3 hours and fully out in 5 hours. The TVCC building also, demonstrably, not designed the same way the WTC buildings were. The fire also started from the top floor and traveled down, oddly enough.

    The Chechnya fire blazed up the outside of the building (a flammable wall facade) and did not damage the interior:

    “Although flames enveloped the outside of the 475-foot tower — the tallest Russian dwelling outside Moscow — Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov said the interior was not seriously damaged, RIA Novosti reported.

    About 30 people were evacuated from the "Olympus" tower, one of seven residential skyscrapers in the Grozny City complex. Initial reports indicated that an electrical short-circuit may have ignited insulation around the fourth or fifth floors about 6 p.m. local time.

    Flames and black smoke spread rapidly up three sides of the building because of its plastic trim, the RT television network reported.”

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/03/russia-chechnya-high-rise-fire/2050713/

    And FEMA’s 1988 report of the first interstate bank fire makes special attribution to the “Unusually good application of fire resistive coating helped maintain structural integrity in fire.”

    Edit: FEMA 1988 report https://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lafire.com%2Ffamous_fires%2F880504_1stInterstateFire%2FFEMA-TecReport%2FFEMA-report.htm&date=2010-07-13


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,813 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Three of the buildings came down on 9/11 by fire and never happened in history previously.

    Multiple jetliners didn't fly into buildings before in history. This is the "appeal to history" fallacy (it hasn't happened before, therefore it couldn't happen)

    This has been explained to you several times now, like someone would explain to a child. It's getting to the point where the only explanation is you are deliberately refusing to understand simple concepts, and rehashing stuff from the past (whack-a-mole technique)


  • Registered Users Posts: 82,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Multiple jetliners didn't fly into buildings before in history. This is the "appeal to history" fallacy (it hasn't happened before, therefore it couldn't happen)

    This has been explained to you several times now, like someone would explain to a child. It's getting to the point where the only explanation is you are deliberately refusing to understand simple concepts, and rehashing stuff from the past (whack-a-mole technique)

    Yep like back to the Columbia disaster: ‘never in history had a shuttle disintegrated on re-entry,’ does not mean that Columbia was blown up maliciously.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,813 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    A dishonest answer for everything, or a "I don't get it" or "I can't believe it"

    It's like dealing with someone in a religious cult


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,457 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    How has CS been allowed to hijack this thread and turn it into a mirror of the other thread where he has posted the same lies?


  • Registered Users Posts: 82,033 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    True, this tangent has been given too much oxygen.

    No more posts unless it’s about the Darklord hack please.


Advertisement