Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Shoulder to Shoulder - BT Sport Documentary

  • 12-10-2018 10:17pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,640 ✭✭✭✭


    Anyone watching this on BT Sport 2 at the moment? Brian O'Driscoll presenting this as it describes the political backdrop of rugby throughout the Troubles.

    I'm enjoying it. Amusing to hear the chain of events leading to the Rose of Tralee being used as the anthem.


«13

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Yep. I heard him mention it on Off the Ball a few weeks ago. Only saw the ad for it as I was turning off the Leinster match so I nearly missed it.

    I liked it. I knew a lot of the history but I still learned a few things and it was great to get the perspective of the players.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,291 ✭✭✭techdiver


    Excellent documentary. Really enjoyed it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,050 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    Really good documentary. Although I was a bit surprised at BOD's lack of understanding of the unionist viewpoint before going up there. Would have thought it would have come up more for him given how many unionist players he would have toured with during his career.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,738 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Really good documentary. Although I was a bit surprised at BOD's lack of understanding of the unionist viewpoint before going up there. Would have thought it would have come up more for him given how many unionist players he would have toured with during his career.

    I'd imagine it was something that was never really spoken about. As a united Irish team I would say it was more than likely an out of bounds discussion point given how it could lead to contention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Goes a very long way toward highlighting the nuance and complexity of Ireland (North and South) and it would be lovely if a Brexiteer or two might consider giving it a squiz.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,874 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    There are probably aspects of the programme we can't really talk about here.

    However watching it made me realise just how important a figure to Irish rugby Willie John McBride was and is. Without him it's possible England may not have come over in 1973 and maybe then we wouldn't have an all island team now.

    One very tiny political point to make...I'm a Northern Prod...I'm also a Unionist (albeit very liberal compared to some!) but for my situation I don't see a contradiction in being Irish, Northern Irish/Ulsterman and British. That is probably difficult for people south of the border to get their head around. So I can relate to the Orangemen that BOD spoke to in Loughall. I suppose it shows there are different definitions to Irishness.

    Hopefully that's not too political MODs, if it is delete away!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,271 ✭✭✭A-Train


    I watched this after I got home from the match last night, I thought it was great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    bilston wrote: »
    There are probably aspects of the programme we can't really talk about here.

    However watching it made me realise just how important a figure to Irish rugby Willie John McBride was and is. Without him it's possible England may not have come over in 1973 and maybe then we wouldn't have an all island team now.

    One very tiny political point to make...I'm a Northern Prod...I'm also a Unionist (albeit very liberal compared to some!) but for my situation I don't see a contradiction in being Irish, Northern Irish/Ulsterman and British. That is probably difficult for people south of the border to get their head around. So I can relate to the Orangemen that BOD spoke to in Loughall. I suppose it shows there are different definitions to Irishness.

    Hopefully that's not too political MODs, if it is delete away!
    Having spent a lot of time in my younger days across the border, I can fully understand your position. Great to have you express it here and it's always been my experience that people of your background can be open about your loyalties, yet at the same time be able to take and give monumental slagging about it. :)


    Remember being at a business meeting in Armagh years ago and the MD asking "why are we dealing with the free state?". And I replied "because we're cheaper". He laughed at that and gave me the order. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I think folk from other places find it hard to get their heads around the fact that we can be cheerfully British and Irish. A lot of people have a much simpler, more straightforward sense of identity, and consider it a binary thing. I don't. It took me a long time to get to the stage of being comfortable telling people, and dealing gracefully when they were often quite dismissive- "you can't be both!!"

    Yeah, I can. Ironically, what brought me to that conclusion is that fact that one of my best mates is a second generation British Indian. I always considered his sense of Inidain/British identity as much more complicated and nuanced than mine, and then realised that maybe that sense of not having one "off the shelf" identity was valid for me too. I grew up with him and it literally took years until I thought maybe there was a similar duality there.

    Haven't seen the doc. Not sure I'll bother. BOD is obviously the biggest name in recent Irish history, which is why he's presenting it. But I don't know why you wouldn't get an Ulster player who knows firsthand about how complicated those loyalties are that pull you in different directions. He's kind of an everyman for the audience "I don't understand this any more than you, so you'll learn as I learn". It's the standard approach (he's the IRFU's Stacey Dooley!) But a more personal take would have been interesting. Tommy Bowen wants to do TV - a Northern Catholic Nationalist, playing for Ulster, and then Ireland. He must have some thoughts on it. Or Andy Trimble, who is very open and naturally funny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Haven't seen the doc. Not sure I'll bother. BOD is obviously the biggest name in recent Irish history, which is why he's presenting it. But I don't know why you wouldn't get an Ulster player who knows firsthand about how complicated those loyalties are that pull you in different directions. He's kind of an everyman for the audience "I don't understand this any more than you, so you'll learn as I learn". It's the standard approach (he's the IRFU's Stacey Dooley!) But a more personal take would have been interesting. Tommy Bowen wants to do TV - a Northern Catholic Nationalist, playing for Ulster, and then Ireland. He must have some thoughts on it. Or Andy Trimble, who is very open and naturally funny.
    I think Tommy is still learning his trade, but when he gets more confortable, himself and Andy Trimble would be brilliant. Really like Andy's understated sense of humour and infectious laugh. Actually surprised me because he often struck me as being quite withdrawn. He seems a natural for broadcasting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    I don't struggle with the Irish/British identity thing. What I can't get my head around is the antipathy toward England amongst Unionists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,874 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I think folk from other places find it hard to get their heads around the fact that we can be cheerfully British and Irish. A lot of people have a much simpler, more straightforward sense of identity, and consider it a binary thing. I don't. It took me a long time to get to the stage of being comfortable telling people, and dealing gracefully when they were often quite dismissive- "you can't be both!!"

    Yeah, I can. Ironically, what brought me to that conclusion is that fact that one of my best mates is a second generation British Indian. I always considered his sense of Inidain/British identity as much more complicated and nuanced than mine, and then realised that maybe that sense of not having one "off the shelf" identity was valid for me too. I grew up with him and it literally took years until I thought maybe there was a similar duality there.

    Haven't seen the doc. Not sure I'll bother. BOD is obviously the biggest name in recent Irish history, which is why he's presenting it. But I don't know why you wouldn't get an Ulster player who knows firsthand about how complicated those loyalties are that pull you in different directions. He's kind of an everyman for the audience "I don't understand this any more than you, so you'll learn as I learn". It's the standard approach (he's the IRFU's Stacey Dooley!) But a more personal take would have been interesting. Tommy Bowen wants to do TV - a Northern Catholic Nationalist, playing for Ulster, and then Ireland. He must have some thoughts on it. Or Andy Trimble, who is very open and naturally funny.

    Tommy is in the documentary...albeit relatively briefly.

    To be honestI think it's the interviews with the likes of Willie John, Davy Irwin, Nigel Carr, Trevor Ringland and Donal Lenihan, who is very interesting, that are the most interesting part of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Mrcaramelchoc


    Any idea where this can be watched?

    Going mad i missed it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭OldRio


    People complain about BT and Sky TV coverage playing to its audience. Unfortunately this did the same. A hell of a lot of history unsaid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Well, most would see themselves as closer to Scottish. And their attitude to a lot of the English would be similar to the attitude of those from the People's Republic of Cork to D4. Or Mancs to Londoners. Or Derry wans to Belfastians. You can resent those you feel are part of your national family, as it were.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭markc1184


    Any idea where this can be watched?

    Going mad i missed it.

    Repeated tonight after the Ulster game. BT Sports 2 at 7.45. I missed it myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    That was to Neil, by the way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    It was good, I thought the contributors were excellent, particularly Lenihan who always speaks very well.
    I think the fact the players don't seem to talk about the issues anyway shows how far the situation has come, back in the 80s they seem to have lots of chat with each other about it. Or maybe they spend too long on their phones nowadays!!!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue



    Haven't seen the doc. Not sure I'll bother. BOD is obviously the biggest name in recent Irish history, which is why he's presenting it. But I don't know why you wouldn't get an Ulster player who knows firsthand about how complicated those loyalties are that pull you in different directions. He's kind of an everyman for the audience "I don't understand this any more than you, so you'll learn as I learn". It's the standard approach (he's the IRFU's Stacey Dooley!) But a more personal take would have been interesting. Tommy Bowen wants to do TV - a Northern Catholic Nationalist, playing for Ulster, and then Ireland. He must have some thoughts on it. Or Andy Trimble, who is very open and naturally funny.

    I haven't seen it but I do know it was BOD's and Craig Doyle's idea to do the doc. They set up a production company to make it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    CatFromHue wrote: »

    Haven't seen the doc. Not sure I'll bother. BOD is obviously the biggest name in recent Irish history, which is why he's presenting it. But I don't know why you wouldn't get an Ulster player who knows firsthand about how complicated those loyalties are that pull you in different directions. He's kind of an everyman for the audience "I don't understand this any more than you, so you'll learn as I learn". It's the standard approach (he's the IRFU's Stacey Dooley!) But a more personal take would have been interesting. Tommy Bowen wants to do TV - a Northern Catholic Nationalist, playing for Ulster, and then Ireland. He must have some thoughts on it. Or Andy Trimble, who is very open and naturally funny.

    I haven't seen it but I do know it was BOD's and Craig Doyle's idea to do the doc. They set up a production company to make it.

    Doesn't mean BOD had to present it. Suppose it means they didn't have to pay for a presenter.

    But I haven't seen it, so I'll reserve comment til I do.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Heres Johnny


    It was very good. One of my earliest rugby memories was the peace international in 1997. And croke park 10 years later was unbelievable. Good to see some earlier stuff. My dad told me about 73 and the ovation for England so good to see footage which I never had before. And the lovely phrase
    'We might not be any good but at least we turn up'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,795 ✭✭✭Mrcaramelchoc


    Its just started on bt2 now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 553 ✭✭✭Elvisjuice


    Doesn't mean BOD had to present it. Suppose it means they didn't have to pay for a presenter.

    But I haven't seen it, so I'll reserve comment til I do.

    maybe watch it , the whole idea of it is someone from the south looking north so why have trimble or bowe


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Doesn't mean BOD had to present it. Suppose it means they didn't have to pay for a presenter.

    But I haven't seen it, so I'll reserve comment til I do.

    It's supposed to be from the perspective of someone from the outside looking in. I think it resonates with most British and Irish viewers who don't really know much about life in Northern Ireland during The Troubles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    Well, most would see themselves as closer to Scottish. And their attitude to a lot of the English would be similar to the attitude of those from the People's Republic of Cork to D4. Or Mancs to Londoners. Or Derry wans to Belfastians. You can resent those you feel are part of your national family, as it were.

    Tbh I find Scotish Unionist antipathy to England equally puzzling. Cities forced to coexist within a country is one thing, but nations voluntarily existing within a union with a clear main player (England), and a portion of each nation feeling so passionately in support of the union, but deeply disliking said main player? Just don't get it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭its_phil


    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.

    In the entire time you’ve spent debating about who’s presented it, you probably could have watched it.

    Book and cover metaphor never more apt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,738 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.

    It's a fluff piece for a sports channel. It's not an in-depth study into the political relations, more a broad overview of it to anyone who doesn't know the background.

    If it was on the History channel then yes, but it's literally just there for a few views and give an overlook of the history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,442 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Anywhere to watch this for non BT Sport customers ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    its_phil wrote: »
    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.

    In the entire time you’ve spent debating about who’s presented it, you probably could have watched it.

    Book and cover metaphor never more apt.

    Sorry, amigo, I don't have access to it. I'm not sitting around in the house this weekend.

    If I watch it and feel underwhelmed, does this debate rumble onward? Or can we put it to bed? Because for my part, I'm not interested. I do, however, feel compelled to reply when people ask questions of me (which is why I'm still posting), or correct someone when I think they've made a lazy assumption.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.

    It's a fluff piece for a sports channel. It's not an in-depth study into the political relations, more a broad overview of it to anyone who doesn't know the background.

    If it was on the History channel then yes, but it's literally just there for a few views and give an overlook of the history.

    Duh. That's why I'm not overly fussed.

    And if you think the History channel would give a ****e about the topic, you're insane.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Heres Johnny


    Why people post about things they have absolutely no interest in, just to say they've no interest in it, I'll never know.

    It doesn't make you cool or edgy or hip to be disintegrated. It was a good show. Well made and good collaborations with BOD and those more in the know that lived through it.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,722 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Duh. That's why I'm not overly fussed.

    And if you think the History channel would give a ****e about the topic, you're insane.

    History Channel website, first show on the list:

    Al Murray: Why Does Everyone Hate the English?
    Famous for his comedy alter ego, “The Pub Landlord”, the award winning comedian and history fanatic will find out what lies behind England's greatest feuds with its closest neighbours: Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Germany and France.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    An here lads, I didn't say I'd no interest. I said I thought they'd get more out of the topic by addressing it in a different approach. Despite outlining fairly clearly why I thought it'd be more interesting to have a different kind of presenter, people were then literally asking me why I'd suggested other people. I mean, come on.

    And then, pickarooney proved that the History Channel would be interested in an Irish rugby star talking about Irish rugby by listing something the History channel actually is showing, which is a well-known English comedian and Oxbridge history graduate talking about England's relationship with its European neighbours. Wowsers.

    I'm might watch the doc, I might not. I apologise for having the temerity to suggest there might have been another way to do it. I've been pretty clear and specific. I didn't go "sounds rubbish".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    History Channel website, first show on the list:

    Al Murray: Why Does Everyone Hate the English?
    Famous for his comedy alter ego, “The Pub Landlord”, the award winning comedian and history fanatic will find out what lies behind England's greatest feuds with its closest neighbours: Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Germany and France.

    In fairness to him, Al Murray is a pretty articulate and intelligent bloke who is a history graduate from Oxford. The whole Pub Landlord thing is just a persona to market himself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Buer wrote: »
    In fairness to him, Al Murray is a pretty articulate and intelligent bloke who is a history graduate from Oxford. The whole Pub Landlord thing is just a persona to market himself.

    He's actually the ideal person to do a show like that, because he actually knows, far better than the vast majority of the population, what he's talking about and he has enough of a profile that the average Brit might watch it.

    But I'm sure there will be people out there who criticise that show before ever watching it, while saying they probably won't watch it :pac:


    As an aside, I forgot that show was coming on, cheers pickarooney!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv8G9yWccfg -> This is Murray talking about running against Nigel Farage, which was good craic


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,069 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I enjoyed the show. Found it very interesting especially the stories from the former players. I had never heard about those 3 lads getting hit by a bomb on the way to an Irish training camp. Incredible.

    I have often wondered about the whole NI and ROI thing in the Irish team so I thought it was great. I never knew who was Catholic and who was Protestant and wondered if that ever caused issues in the Irish or Ulster teams because religion is such a big part of life on this island.

    Also those black cab tours of Belfast are brilliant. I would highly recommend them to any visitors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Really good documentary. Although I was a bit surprised at BOD's lack of understanding of the unionist viewpoint before going up there. Would have thought it would have come up more for him given how many unionist players he would have toured with during his career.

    Personally I wasn't sure if his lack of understanding was genuine or an attempt to present the everyman presenter persona he was going for in order to get the questions across for the audience.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 6,525 Mod ✭✭✭✭dregin


    Yeah, look at my first post, I know exactly why it was done that way. I just don't think that always gives the best insights in documentary - it can lead to conclusions that lack nuance.

    The doc may well be made exactly as they intended it. Do BOD and Craig Doyle know the best way to deal with the issue?

    I'm no more interested in hearing BOD examine the Northern Unionist meaning of playing for Ireland than I am seeing a man interview women about what childbirth is like. Just give the authorship to the ones with the experience of the unusual.

    Don't BOD and Craig Doyle own the production company that made the doc? If so, I'd have been very surprised for them to give it to anyone else.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    cczH7kErUx3M.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,600 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yes. You can't move on TV for documentaries presented by the owners of production companies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,941 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I enjoyed the show. Found it very interesting especially the stories from the former players. I had never heard about those 3 lads getting hit by a bomb on the way to an Irish training camp. Incredible.

    I have often wondered about the whole NI and ROI thing in the Irish team so I thought it was great. I never knew who was Catholic and who was Protestant and wondered if that ever caused issues in the Irish or Ulster teams because religion is such a big part of life on this island.

    Also those black cab tours of Belfast are brilliant. I would highly recommend them to any visitors.


    It's never been a problem among those of us who can read and write and tie our own shoelaces. Rugby in N.I. is still almost exclusively a game that is subscribed to by the middle classes here who by and large couldn't give a dead rat's toenails for religion of any sort. I played the game for almost 40 years and only ever met two fecktards for whom it was something that created sparks in their otherwise dead brains. One got killed while defusing a landmine in S.A. and the other had trouble for kiddie fiddling. It's generally just an issue for morons, bigots and half wits who thankfully are rare in rugby circles.



    It's odd that many people easily understand Schrödinger's Nationality :D where a person can be both Scottish and British, Welsh and British or English and British but seem to stumble over the fact that some of us are Irish and British. A good friend of mine from Donegal who is a professor at QUB tried to argue with me one night in the pub that there was no such thing as 'British'. I left her to it......:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,738 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    jacothelad wrote: »
    It's never been a problem among those of us who can read and write and tie our own shoelaces. Rugby in N.I. is still almost exclusively a game that is subscribed to by the middle classes here who by and large couldn't give a dead rat's toenails for religion of any sort. I played the game for almost 40 years and only ever met two fecktards for whom it was something that created sparks in their otherwise dead brains. One got killed while defusing a landmine in S.A. and the other had trouble for kiddie fiddling. It's generally just an issue for morons, bigots and half wits who thankfully are rare in rugby circles.



    It's odd that many people easily understand Schrödinger's Nationality :D where a person can be both Scottish and British, Welsh and British or English and British but seem to stumble over the fact that some of us are Irish and British. A good friend of mine from Donegal who is a professor at QUB tried to argue with me one night in the pub that there was no such thing as 'British'. I left her to it......:o

    I think it's down to the perception of N.I protestants in the media down south. A lot of idiots sheltered people, whose only knowledge of Irish history is that taught by a christian brother's school at secondary level, see all protestants as people who adore the Queen and despise the idea of a united Ireland and all things catholic.

    So the thought is "if they don't want to be part of a united Ireland then they're not Irish".

    *NB these idiotic views are not those of my own, just views I've unfortunately heard way too often being from a part of North Dublin where everyone wears a Celtic jersey to their local and claims some distant member of their family was in the IRA or part of the Rising.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    jacothelad wrote: »
    It's odd that many people easily understand Schrödinger's Nationality :D where a person can be both Scottish and British, Welsh and British or English and British but seem to stumble over the fact that some of us are Irish and British. A good friend of mine from Donegal who is a professor at QUB tried to argue with me one night in the pub that there was no such thing as 'British'. I left her to it......:o


    The British thing is similar to situations like the former USSR in nationality terms.


    When the USSR was in existence you could be Soviet and you could be Kazakh, Russian, Latvian or any one of a host of nationalities. When the Union broke up the overarching designation of being a Soviet dissipated pretty quickly. They same thing will I believe happen with Scotland as it has done in south of Ireland and with many in the North. If you were now to tell a Ukrainian that he was somehow connected in nationality to Russians you would be laughed at unless of course you were a Ukrainian of Russian heritage. The same would be true in nearly every other part of the former USSR.Russian people made the choice as the USSR fell to either take up the nationality of the country they were in or to return to Russia.



    This will come to pass in Ireland,Scotland and maybe even Wales. No one in the 26 counties would declare themselves British now. With the help of the Tories and the DUP those decision on nationality will have to be made sooner rather than later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,941 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    The British thing is similar to situations like the former USSR in nationality terms.


    When the USSR was in existence you could be Soviet and you could be Kazakh, Russian, Latvian or any one of a host of nationalities. When the Union broke up the overarching designation of being a Soviet dissipated pretty quickly. They same thing will I believe happen with Scotland as it has done in south of Ireland and with many in the North. If you were now to tell a Ukrainian that he was somehow connected in nationality to Russians you would be laughed at unless of course you were a Ukrainian of Russian heritage. The same would be true in nearly every other part of the former USSR.Russian people made the choice as the USSR fell to either take up the nationality of the country they were in or to return to Russia.



    This will come to pass in Ireland,Scotland and maybe even Wales. No one in the 26 counties would declare themselves British now. With the help of the Tories and the DUP those decision on nationality will have to be made sooner rather than later.


    Well after 100 years they would likely all be dead.......... As for the USSR stuff, frankly ludicrous crud.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,738 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Well after 100 years they would likely all be dead.......... As for the USSR stuff, frankly ludicrous crud.

    But you're still around jaco? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    jacothelad wrote: »
    It's never been a problem among those of us who can read and write and tie our own shoelaces. Rugby in N.I. is still almost exclusively a game that is subscribed to by the middle classes here who by and large couldn't give a dead rat's toenails for religion of any sort. I played the game for almost 40 years and only ever met two fecktards for whom it was something that created sparks in their otherwise dead brains. One got killed while defusing a landmine in S.A. and the other had trouble for kiddie fiddling. It's generally just an issue for morons, bigots and half wits who thankfully are rare in rugby circles.

    It's odd that many people easily understand Schrödinger's Nationality :D where a person can be both Scottish and British, Welsh and British or English and British but seem to stumble over the fact that some of us are Irish and British. A good friend of mine from Donegal who is a professor at QUB tried to argue with me one night in the pub that there was no such thing as 'British'. I left her to it......:o
    Jaco's always the lad to cut through the bullcrap and get to the meat. :)

    The other side of that schrodinger's nationality paradox is the insistence by the above mentioned half wits who insist that Indians and Pakistanis are not British despite the fact that they were told they were when their country was invaded and added to the empire.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    jacothelad wrote: »
    Well after 100 years they would likely all be dead.......... As for the USSR stuff, frankly ludicrous crud.


    The USSR is only gone very recently when it went so did the idea of being a soviet citizen in all those countries. The idea of the British identity will also be gone when the UK breaks up, you may be one of the last few generations of Irish people who will embrace it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Watched this yesterday for the first time. I was dubious about it tbh, but on the whole it was pretty good. Particularly for the interviews with the likes of Willie-John, David Duckham and Davy Irwin. The bit about The Rose of Tralee being played at the RWC was hilarious.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 24,027 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    I enjoyed it, I'd have preferred if BoD didn't go on so much about banging the drum, felt like he was trying to make it about him, but it was a very good show, up there with a lot of the 30 for 30 series which I assume it was trying to emulate.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement