Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Connacht Team Talk Thread V - The Friend Zone

Options
1299300302304305332

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    This is such a short term point of view. Connacht players spending time in international camp is good for Connacht rugby because:

    a) The player gets exposure to the best players and coaches in the country and brings that experience back to the province with him.
    b) The player will be more likely to remain with Connacht, knowing that his provincial form will get him into the international squad.
    c) Players from other provinces will be more likely to sign for Connacht knowing that provincial form could be rewarded with international honours.
    d) Having more players in the international squad adds prestige to the Connacht brand and long term should generate revenue through bums in seats, additional sponsorship, etc.
    Totally agree And...
    e) Connacht get more games to play younger, less experienced players in less pressurised games where international players are not involved
    Having more players in international camp is totally win win win.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    I'm not really clear on the rules for the current Ireland bubble and releases etc but what I do know is these upcoming nations cup games have to played. If an outbreak costs Ireland one or two games it is potentially ruinous and the squad depth at the provinces will be the victim.

    I would guess movement in and out will be kept to an absolute minimum to ensure games are not lost. AFAIK (friend is an IRFU staffer) players have a short break from camp this coming week but have some fairly strict guidelines to adhere to.





    connachta wrote: »
    I 100% want them to be released rather than being 4th choice and not playing a minute with Ireland

    If (as Dillane today), one of them is 3rd choice so on the bench, good, I'm happy
    If Baird is back, it's not the same situation, at least for 1 of Roux or Dillane

    So your basically taking the next few weeks as more important then the next 2, 5, 10 years for connacht rugby. Your also ignoring that the players will have international ambitions and not being in camp hinders them.

    And as Thomond pointed out, financially these games are bringing in revenue that's badly required.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    I still say all of you may regret a loss against Dragons if we miss few points in the end of the season and we don't qualify for Europe
    that's the massive aim.

    Yes playing Racing 92 is more important than having 4th choice non-playing guys kept in an extended squad.
    But again it was about one of our locks released if, and only if, Baird is back as he was initially


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »
    I still say all of you may regret a loss against Dragons if we miss few points in the end of the season and we don't qualify for Europe
    that's the massive aim.

    Yes playing Racing 92 is more important than having 4th choice non-playing guys kept in an extended squad.
    But again it was about one of our locks released if, and only if, Baird is back as he was initially



    R92 game doesnt clash with any Ireland game


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »
    I still say all of you may regret a loss against Dragons if we miss few points in the end of the season and we don't qualify for Europe
    that's the massive aim.

    Yes playing Racing 92 is more important than having 4th choice non-playing guys kept in an extended squad.
    But again it was about one of our locks released if, and only if, Baird is back as he was initially

    We'll regret it more if players don't want to move to/stay at Connacht because Connacht players seem to be less likely to be in Ireland squads.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    R92 game doesnt clash with any Ireland game




    I was using Racing as an great example of what is at stake for qualification in next European season
    (not for the game this season)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    Bazzo wrote: »
    We'll regret it more if players don't want to move to/stay at Connacht because Connacht players seem to be less likely to be in Ireland squads.


    I doubt any player would move to Connacht mainly because he's (not even 4th but) 5th choice Irish squad player (which is what Dillane was until Baird+Roux got injured)


    Look I've never ever said I wasn't happy to see Dillane play tonight for example, and I do hope he becomes 3rd choice for RWC who knows.
    I'm saying that, at the moment, when 3rd and 4th choices are back, which seems the case for next game, I hope him released!
    No more than that in my intial words:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Some Like It TOH
    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    I would guess movement in and out will be kept to an absolute minimum to ensure games are not lost. AFAIK (friend is an IRFU staffer) players have a short break from camp this coming week but have some fairly strict guidelines to adhere to.

    35 odd players have to be retained for a reason.
    Look how close Wasps were to not fulfilling the Premiership Final fixture. If a few players had to suddenly self-isolate then the backup players have to already be in the bubble. Look at the disaster of the Barbarians fixture. Ireland cannot afford to call off matches.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »
    I was using Racing as an great example of what is at stake for qualification in next European season
    (not for the game this season)

    And the IRFU are struggling for cash. Cash which keeps the provinces going.

    The games in the next 5 weeks have to be played. Look at last week. RFU lost £1,000,000.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    35 odd players have to be retained for a reason.
    Look how close Wasps were to not fulfilling the Premiership Final fixture. If a few players had to suddenly self-isolate then the backup players have to already be in the bubble. Look at the disaster of the Barbarians fixture. Ireland cannot afford to call off matches.




    I get that but clearly next week it's said players are released under strict conditions. I do hope these include provincial training and game for fringe players. Provinces squad are in kind of "bubles" too, and those players could engage into extra precaution in their life home


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »
    I get that but clearly next week it's said players are released under strict conditions. I do hope these include provincial training and game for fringe players. Provinces squad are in kind of "bubles" too, and those players could engage into extra precaution in their life home

    We saw what happened with premier league players going to play international football 3 or 4 weeks ago

    Think IRFU might have to keep a degree of separation. Expect only a handful of players to be released back if any


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    It was supposed to be an Eagles game in October, nothing happened?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »

    Nobody was wrong. Nobody knew what exactly the IRFU had planned given the importance of staging the games in the next 5 weeks and the situation can change in hours (look at the national football team to see)

    I would imagine players had been tested at least twice last week before they switched camps.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    You were abslotely wrong saying unlikely they wouldn't be released. They are. And for the best


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭b.gud


    connachta wrote: »
    You were abslotely wrong saying unlikely they wouldn't be released. They are. And for the best

    In fairness most people weren't saying that it was unlikely more they were saying that they would prefer the players to stay in the Ireland camp if it helped their chances of playing for Ireland rather than lining out against the Dragons.

    We should really be able to fairly easily dispatch Dragons without our internationals. If we can't then we have big problems. Though I must say it will be good to have one of Roux/Dillane available to give Thornbury a weekend off


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    You've got a Friend in me
    Dragons are absolute muck. the Eagles would probably beat a full strength Dragons side.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    b.gud wrote: »
    In fairness most people weren't saying that it was unlikely more they were saying that they would prefer the players to stay in the Ireland camp if it helped their chances of playing for Ireland rather than lining out against the Dragons.

    We should really be able to fairly easily dispatch Dragons without our internationals. If we can't then we have big problems. Though I must say it will be good to have one of Roux/Dillane available to give Thornbury a weekend off




    Dragons home is always a tricky (above all with Tompkins/Rowlands back). Could be decisive to have most internationals.


    And I agree with our defence coach saying they desperatly need real gamtime rather than imprisoned in training sessions only. Including to raise their chance for Ireland



    Except Bundee of course, who'll be rested


  • Registered Users Posts: 394 ✭✭Tommybojangles


    Mul, it's over
    Obviously theres lots of positives to having players in the Ireland squad but I think the reaction to Connachtas original post was a bit harsh. There's times over the last few years where the absence of Bundee and certainly Jack during the Injry crisis a few years ago cost us crucial points and we ended up narrowly out of the race for Europe.

    Look obviously then we held onto Bundee because he became an ireland regular while playing for us and that amazing, but I dont think anyone should be shot down for saying it would be nice to get Ultan back for Dragons, which is a must win game, and not one we are above losing


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    connachta wrote: »
    You were abslotely wrong saying unlikely they wouldn't be released. They are. And for the best

    No. I said movement in and out would be kept to a minimum. We didn't know what that would be exactly given the current covid 19 circumstances.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    https://www.the42.ie/abraham-papalii-connacht-5253684-Nov2020/?section=comment#comments

    Sounds like a really positive addition. Great to get a guy in the forwards like that along with Bundee.


  • Registered Users Posts: 780 ✭✭✭RonnieL


    FACECUTTR wrote: »
    https://www.the42.ie/abraham-papalii-connacht-5253684-Nov2020/?section=comment#comments

    Sounds like a really positive addition. Great to get a guy in the forwards like that along with Bundee.

    What's the story with Ben O'Donnell? Looks to me like we announced his signing 4 months ago, but he did his ACL in January - did we really sign him a few months into his recovery from an injury many players struggle to recover fully from?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    FACECUTTR wrote: »
    https://www.the42.ie/abraham-papalii-connacht-5253684-Nov2020/?section=comment#comments

    Sounds like a really positive addition. Great to get a guy in the forwards like that along with Bundee.




    50/50 O'Donnel comes for Champions Cup and Iterpros, massive incentive for him


    Big Papa is what I expected, Nick Williams 2.0


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    RonnieL wrote: »
    What's the story with Ben O'Donnell? Looks to me like we announced his signing 4 months ago, but he did his ACL in January - did we really sign him a few months into his recovery from an injury many players struggle to recover fully from?

    We were stuck at the time and Friend has worked with him in the past so I'd trust his judgement. If he gets over the injury only time will tell I suppose. Porch doing a great job at the moment at 15 and Wooton has been fantastic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 780 ✭✭✭RonnieL


    FACECUTTR wrote: »
    We were stuck at the time and Friend has worked with him in the past so I'd trust his judgement. If he gets over the injury only time will tell I suppose. Porch doing a great job at the moment at 15 and Wooton has been fantastic.

    Porch has been brilliant, and I would also trust Andy's judgement, it's all just come as a bit of a surprise to me. I remember the announcement of his signing, then news that he'd arrived in Galway, but only recently that he's actually (badly) injured. I assumed I just hadn't been paying proper attention. Fingers crossed he recovers well and contributes meaningfully to the squad sooner rather than later.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭realhorrorshow


    RonnieL wrote: »
    Porch has been brilliant, and I would also trust Andy's judgement, it's all just come as a bit of a surprise to me. I remember the announcement of his signing, then news that he'd arrived in Galway, but only recently that he's actually (badly) injured. I assumed I just hadn't been paying proper attention. Fingers crossed he recovers well and contributes meaningfully to the squad sooner rather than later.

    His injury was known about and many of us expressed concerns on here at the time, including myself. I personally have no idea why we signed him when we could have signed someone who didn’t have a torn acl, but time will tell I guess.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    His injury was known about and many of us expressed concerns on here at the time, including myself. I personally have no idea why we signed him when we could have signed someone who didn’t have a torn acl, but time will tell I guess.

    I'd imagine the contract was not a big money deal as he had the injury.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Mul, it's over
    Only Marmion and Roux available for Connacht from Ireland squad


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Only Marmion and Roux available for Connacht from Ireland squad




    Well that's exactly who we need, especially a 2nd row


    Weird about Carty, but it might bode well for him to play with Ireland, good news


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭roverjoyce


    You've got a Friend in me
    connachta wrote: »
    Well that's exactly who we need, especially a 2nd row


    Weird about Carty, but it might bode well for him to play with Ireland, good news

    Carty dropped from the squad


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement