Rumoured a huge sports star has had an affair and gotten his kids teacher pregnant!

dexter_morgan

I always thought he was gay. Wasnt there a movie made about him called "Bender like Beckham"

Avatar MIA

dexter_morgan wrote: »

I always thought he was gay. Wasnt there a movie made about him called "Bender like Beckham"

Must be true so :pac:

Wibbs

_Dara_ wrote: »

It doesn’t seem to work like that for these people. Remember when Jude Law cheated on Sienna Miller with his children’s nanny? I guess they are just so pampered that they think they are shielded and can do whatever they want and eventually end up shitting where they eat. It might even be thrill-seeking behaviour for people who have everything.

Same with Schwarzenegger hopping on his housekeeper(who god love her was hardly a looker). I would say D a lot of it is access and "trust". Sure, any of these type of guys would have a long queue of women lining up to grease their wheels, but tupping a stranger would be risky. Could be ready to hit the tabloids as soon as the deed was done. "My sexy night of romping with [insert married star here]".

Much safer to either go pro with an escort service which do big business in tinseltown and elsewhere and can be trusted to be discreet, or go for someone close, even under your roof and in your employ, or someone you work with "in the trade"(film set playing away shags are common). You would know them and they've more to lose by going to the press, doubly so if they're well known themselves. You've also got simple access to them. Again even trying to pick up some young wan you don't know could land you in the papers. Never mind the recent #metoo stuff where serial lechers and rapists are being outed. One lech and you're on the list.

diomed

Publicity seeker seeks publicity.

BorneTobyWilde

twowheelsonly

jojofizzio wrote: »

Don’t know if he has,but I have to say I’ve never seen anyone look as dis-interested in their partner as she did at the royal wedding,so if that’s the reception at home......

They've been together 21 years. I'd say they're well over the fawning all over each other bit by now :rolleyes:

squawker

Georgie bleedin Burgess

diomed

^ everything through a prism.

razorblunt

Surprising no? They're less a married couple, more a brand.
It would be "bad for business" to split up.

mad muffin

Has Wayne Rooney no shame? Hasn’t he hurt Coleen enough? :mad:










































































:pac:

4068ac1elhodqr

A betting form (with a pauchant for lucky green pants) has suspended betting, on a 'certain celeb couple' spilitting.

Not sure if it's realted to this development.

erica74

Wibbs wrote: »

Same with Schwarzenegger hopping on his housekeeper(who god love her was hardly a looker). I would say D a lot of it is access and "trust". Sure, any of these type of guys would have a long queue of women lining up to grease their wheels, but tupping a stranger would be risky. Could be ready to hit the tabloids as soon as the deed was done. "My sexy night of romping with [insert married star here]".

Much safer to either go pro with an escort service which do big business in tinseltown and elsewhere and can be trusted to be discreet, or go for someone close, even under your roof and in your employ, or someone you work with "in the trade"(film set playing away shags are common). You would know them and they've more to lose by going to the press, doubly so if they're well known themselves. You've also got simple access to them. Again even trying to pick up some young wan you don't know could land you in the papers. Never mind the recent #metoo stuff where serial lechers and rapists are being outed. One lech and you're on the list.

I genuinely read this as you suggesting they start wearing a gopro for their sexy romps:pac:

jojofizzio

twowheelsonly wrote: »

They've been together 21 years. I'd say they're well over the fawning all over each other bit by now :rolleyes:

Not what I’m saying at all tbf....Who said anything about fawning??-of course you don’t fawn ove your partner after that length of time....my point is it was downright hostility...just not sure why she is still with him if all that is/has been going on?

Call me Al

jojofizzio wrote: »

Not what I’m saying at all tbf....Who said anything about fawning??-of course you don’t fawn ove your partner after that length of time....my point is it was downright hostility...just not sure why she is still with him if all that is/has been going on?

I have to agree.
They are a brand. They are probably worth more as a a couple than individually.
But if he's been playing away and she's aware of it then she is looking terribly silly and desperate in the photo opportunities she's throwing up on Instagram.
The body language between them at the royal wedding doesn't bode well though.

corks finest

lawred2 wrote: »

Why would your phone be buzzing about someone else's business?

FFS old women gossiping

Pac1Man

Ah leave him. Monogamy is not natural for us anyways.

_Kaiser_

Call me Al wrote: »

I have to agree.
They are a brand. They are probably worth more as a a couple than individually.
But if he's been playing away and she's aware of it then she is looking terribly silly and desperate in the photo opportunities she's throwing up on Instagram.
The body language between them at the royal wedding doesn't bode well though.

The whole thing has always struck me as a carefully managed business plan rather than a genuine relationship to be honest.

Part of the problem to be fair is that when they met, they were both already famous (him for United and her for the Spice Girls) and so the whole relationship has been in the public spotlight from day one, as well as the initial rush I'm sure for both of them being with someone so famous. Can you even HAVE a normal relationship in those circumstances?

Some good advisers though have turned it into a successful marketing campaign and "brand" which brings a lifestyle and money that both are probably very happy with. Are they still/were they ever in love? Well, who knows.. But does it really matter if that was the goal?

The kids are the ones who you'd feel sorry for though.. Having their parents lives (and by extension their own) constantly under a tabloid spotlight (it's even worse now with instant social media "reporting"), getting old enough to read the speculation and accusations for themselves, and then the extremely tacky nonsense of betting sites offering odds on whether their parents will split up. It's no way to live, and probably explains why so many kids of famous people are a bit odd or go off the rails a bit.

It's more an indictment of the element of society that laps this celeb culture up and thus perpetuates more and more of this "news"

Spanish Eyes

These existing or former footballers have/had more money than brains and some just cannot deal with the loot they have.

Odelay

Spanish Eyes wrote: »

These existing or former footballers have/had more money than brains and some just cannot deal with the loot they have.

It's his mickey he's having trouble dealing with, not his money.

Spanish Eyes

Odelay wrote: »

It's his mickey he's having trouble dealing with, not his money.

Ah well, when you can buy every luxury item on the planet, the only thing left is to bed the unatainable woman. Another notch in the bedpost.

His wife knows this, it is unbelievable that she would stay with such a cretin. But no one knows what goes on behind closed doors either do they?

Donald Trump

umop episdn wrote: »

No, we are fairly sure Beckham hasn't been shagging Giles.

I'd say Johnny would have been doing the driving for that one!

valoren

Imagine having Becks pounding away at you with his 'squeaky' chipmunk sex noises. Yech!

Ipso

Odelay wrote: »

It's his mickey he's having trouble dealing with, not his money.

If it wasn’t for the money, they wouldn't give his mickey a second (should that be first) look.