New Luas/Metro lines we might like.

Sam Russell

There appears to be great demand for new Luas/Metro lines now that the cross city line is working (?) and everyone wants one passing through their neighbourhood.

Crayons out and away you go.

cgcsb

From Clarehall along the Malahide road and into Fairview/Amien St seems a logical choice. UCD to the City centre, perhaps connecting to the Green line at Charlemont so the new green line will be UCD-Finglas, as the rest of the current green line gets absorbed into metro. I'd advocate more city centre capacity, another 2 cross city routes one north-south and one east-west. Luas should be inside the M50 only, far flung journeys like Citywest and Bray were never suitable for frequent stop urban light rail.

salmocab

I’d like to see one starting firhouse knocklyon sweeping to ballyboden Rathfarnham then in Terenure Harold’s cross and passing the planned one and darts wherever practical and then on out north wherever is needed (don’t know NS well enough to make a sound judgement but toward clontarf and then head north parallel with the dart but a few miles west would seem logical)

Triceratops Ballet

I'd like to see them come down the full length of the canals, red line could split at suir road and straight down to grand canal dock, where you can then change for the dart, there's no bus that runs a canal route afaik yet hundreds of people walk cycle and drive down the canal every day

Nermal

Branch off from the red line at Benburb St. in front of the Ashling hotel, continue up Parkgate St. into the Phoenix Park on Chesterfield Avenue. Go straight through the park, on exit follow the Castleknock Road and then Main St. through Blanchardstown up to Blanchardstown Shopping Centre.

blanch152

cgcsb wrote: »

From Clarehall along the Malahide road and into Fairview/Amien St seems a logical choice.

Interchange at Clontarf Road with DART?

Then go down to the Point?

cgcsb wrote: »

UCD to the City centre, perhaps connecting to the Green line at Charlemont so the new green line will be UCD-Finglas, as the rest of the current green line gets absorbed into metro.

Charlemont would be a proper interchange then.

cgcsb wrote: »

I'd advocate more city centre capacity, another 2 cross city routes one north-south and one east-west.

East-West should be along Thomas Street/Dame Street to terminate at College Green Plaza.

Is Christchurch Hill too steep? If not, North/South could head out Clanbrassil Street to Harold's Cross and/or Kimmage.

Heading the other way, it could interchange with Four Courts on Red, Grangegorman on Green and terminate at the Mater.

cgcsb wrote: »

Luas should be inside the M50 only, far flung journeys like Citywest and Bray were never suitable for frequent stop urban light rail.

From Heuston, along the N4 to Ballyfermot, Palmerstown, Liffey Valley and Lucan.

From Museum, through the Phoenix Park, stopping at the Zoo, Ashtown Gate, and linking to the Maynooth Line at Navan Road Parkway, before crossing the M50 to Abbotstown, ITB and Tyrellstown.

Broombridge to Finglas.

There would be no road space left for cars though.

daheff

I dont want to see anymore Luas lines. Would much rather we used sense and put in underground lines(appreciating these are much more expensive). Although these should be underground in city centre, where it makes sense put them overground outside the centre. We need to maximise available commuting options rather than redesignate existing roadspace.

Cant honestly say the cross city line is working.......

LeinsterDub

Nermal wrote: »

Branch off from the red line at Benburb St. in front of the Ashling hotel, continue up Parkgate St. into the Phoenix Park on Chesterfield Avenue. Go straight through the park, on exit follow the Castleknock Road and then Main St. through Blanchardstown up to Blanchardstown Shopping Centre.

The current lines don't have capacity for branching .

salmocab

daheff wrote: »

I dont want to see anymore Luas lines. Would much rather we used sense and put in underground lines(appreciating these are much more expensive). Although these should be underground in city centre, where it makes sense put them overground outside the centre. We need to maximise available commuting options rather than redesignate existing roadspace.

Cant honestly say the cross city line is working.......

The LUAS can run underground I know in my own dream I suggested putting it through Terenure and Harold’s cross I envisaged it being below ground.

wakka12

I thought cross city really shows that non segragated trams just do not work in a city with a narrow medieval street layout and bad traffic , metro is the only solution that will have any large long term benefits

loyatemu

wakka12 wrote: »

I thought cross city really shows that non segragated trams just do not work in a city with a narrow medieval street layout and bad traffic , metro is the only solution that will have any large long term benefits

I was in Munich last week and they have trams going right through the city without issue. Some parts of the city have obviously been modernised post-WW2 but there are sections that are narrow and medieval with trams on them. What was noticeable though was there are hardly any bus routes through the centre (there's also an underground network).

cgcsb

Plenty of room for surface running of luas tracks in Dublin City Centre, it's simply a matter of removing cars. That being said laying down tram tracks is no substitute for a proper metro. trams are good to serve inner suburbs and central parts of the city. longer distance routes need more segregation.

A Disgrace

Like some posters, I don't think the city can handle any more Luas lines.

However, I never understood why they didn't consider linking Red to Green, via the Liberities

James Hospial - Thomas St - Francis Street - St Patricks Cathedral - Kevin St - Cuffe St - Stephen's Green

Sam Russell

The massive advantage of the proposed Metrolink is that it has huge journey generators along the line. Dublin Airport- City Centre would be a justification on its own, but add Swords - Airport and DCU and Whitworth RD interchange and the existing Green Line overcapacity issue and you have justification in spades.

Are there any other journey generators in Dublin? Dart expansion will cover the west of the city, and Dart already cover some of the NE, so SW is thonly area that could generate a Metro level of traffic, given the Red Line already covers Tallaght, but goes the scenic route.

So, the only route to justify Metro would be Tallaght, Rathfarnham to Harolds Cross, then onto Smithfield. Not sure after that.

As far as Luas is concerned, we need a network of routes in the city centre, not just two lines. For example, the Red line could go down High St and onto Lord Edward St and join the Green line in College Green. That would allow a routing of Tallaght to Broombridge. Other cross routes might be worth looking at.

Equium

Nermal wrote: »

Branch off from the red line at Benburb St. in front of the Ashling hotel, continue up Parkgate St. into the Phoenix Park on Chesterfield Avenue. Go straight through the park, on exit follow the Castleknock Road and then Main St. through Blanchardstown up to Blanchardstown Shopping Centre.

I would love to see the Red Line moved underground from somewhere between St James' and Museum to the IFSC. I wouldn't love the disruption involved, however...

Although very much a pipe dream, doing this would increase capacity and allow for spurs to be built to, for example, Blanchardstown on the eastern end of the line. On the other end of line, I would like to see expansion to Irishtown/Ringsend via a new bridge next to the East Link. This spur would finish within the confines of the former Irish Glass Bottle site. This area is due to be developed into a large residential suburb in the near future. Another option would be to extend from The Point Depot to East Point business park. Again, this area is ripe for massive redevelopment.

With the Green Line, the obvious next step is the northwards extension into Finglas. From speaking to TII employees, substantial work has been put into planning this route. The (hoped) completion of Metrolink will obviously impact on the existing Green Line as well, leaving a stubbed end at Charlemont. I would welcome expansion of the tracks from just south of the Harcourt stop towards Leeson Street and then possibly either Grand Canal Dock or UCD.

Running an at-grade Luas towards the southwest of the city has been deemed undesirable by numerous studies, so any much-needed rail-based transport options for Harold's Cross, Kimmage, Terenure and beyond will have to be built underground. I would like to see a southwest-northeast line built which intersects with the proposed Metrolink line at either SSG, Tara Street or O'Connell Street.

Colonel Claptrap

Michael McDowell writing in the SBP claims the metro is a colossal waste of money. As is the proposed DART Underground. He describes them as pet projects for the state's transport engineers.

His proposed alternative:
For the same money you could have 6-8 new Luas lines throughout the city.

It you had a choice between Metro and say 6 Luas lines, which would you prefer?

For the record, I disagree with him.

cgcsb

Colonel Claptrap wrote: »

Michael McDowell writing in the SBP claims the metro is a colossal waste of money. As is the proposed DART Underground. He describes them as pet projects for the state's transport engineers.

His proposed alternative:
For the same money you could have 6-8 new Luas lines throughout the city.

It you had a choice between Metro and say 6 Luas lines, which would you prefer?

For the record, I disagree with him.

6 new luas lines aren't going to provide the capacity required though are they. Does he know anything about capacity? You could have thousands of cars for the same price I'm sure, but why bother with an irrelevant comparison.

Colonel Claptrap

cgcsb wrote: »

6 new luas lines aren't going to provide the capacity required though are they. Does he know anything about capacity? You could have thousands of cars for the same price I'm sure, but why bother with an irrelevant comparison.

He argues that the metro would not serve the majority of Dublin residents. 6 luas lines could spread out and interconnect. A north south metro is not much help to those not on or near the line.

Again, his argument, not mine.

LXFlyer

Look if there is one thing LUAS across-City has taught us, it is that non-segregated tram lines simply do not work.

There are very few arterial routes from the city centre that could support another tram line and frankly I’d say the chances of new lines being added (apart from extending existing ones to Finglas, Ringsend and towards Bray) are slim to zilch.

The Rathfarnham corridor was canned because there simply wasn’t the roadspace to deliver a reliable service that would be faster than the existing bus services and the CPO costs would be exhorbitant. That same argument can be applied to most other corridors. The only option for the south central area is a metro line.

While there is scope for redirecting some private traffic in the heart of the city centre, there are limits to how far you can go with that on the arterial corridors - people still need access. Dublin has far too many narrow local villages and corridors that prevent delivery of a reliable and fast tram network that can co-exist with other modes of traffic.

marno21

No more Luas lines or extensions until some proper high capacity routes through the city centre are built. The existing two surface lines are at or approaching capacity and expanding capacity on these lines in their current form is not feasible.

The city will grind to a halt if both the primary east west and north south rail corridors are at grade trams. When Metrolink and the interconnector tunnel are built we can explore further Luas expansions. In their present form the lines don't seem to be able to manage with current and future traffic volumes along the current lines let alone expanding them.

In the future a Metro from Tallaght through Harolds Cross/Rathfarnham/Terenure meeting with Metro in the city centre and heading out in the direction of the Malahide Road would make sense.

cgcsb

Colonel Claptrap wrote: »

He argues that the metro would not serve the majority of Dublin residents. 6 luas lines could spread out and interconnect. A north south metro is not much help to those not on or near the line.

Again, his argument, not mine.

6 luas lines all with insufficient capacity to serve their catchments. Why bother? Besides the scope for new surface luas running is limited by geography.

cgcsb

marno21 wrote: »

No more Luas lines or extensions until some proper high capacity routes through the city centre are built. The existing two surface lines are at or approaching capacity and expanding capacity on these lines in their current form is not feasible.

The city will grind to a halt if both the primary east west and north south rail corridors are at grade trams. When Metrolink and the interconnector tunnel are built we can explore further Luas expansions. In their present form the lines don't seem to be able to manage with current and future traffic volumes along the current lines let alone expanding them.

In the future a Metro from Tallaght through Harolds Cross/Rathfarnham/Terenure meeting with Metro in the city centre and heading out in the direction of the Malahide Road would make sense.

I would imagine that'll be the next metro line and it could be elevated running on the more suburban sections. This will take the pressure off the current red line which will be used for more short hops rather than Tallaght-City Centre, which can be delivered by metro in around 15 mins.

If/When that happens Dublin will have a pretty decent network in place. All we need at that point is to remove anti-progress elements who stifle high density development.

bk

marno21 wrote: »

No more Luas lines or extensions until some proper high capacity routes through the city centre are built. The existing two surface lines are at or approaching capacity and expanding capacity on these lines in their current form is not feasible.

While I would agree with your overall sentiment, I wouldn't say that is the case for all proposed extensions.

For instance extending the Green Line into Finglas makes absolute sense. The Broombridge to city center section is definitely no where near capacity and would easily able to handle more people on this section.

The capacity constraints are mostly from the south city center to Sandyford section which will obviously be upgraded to Metro.

But the Finglas extension would be a cheap and sensible upgrade. Likewise I'd say the same for the extension of the Red line to Poolbeg or even East Point Business Park.

Of course I completely agree with you on proposals of a spur off the Red Line to Lucan or Green line to Bray. Just I wouldn't lump them all in the same basket.

bk

cgcsb wrote: »

6 luas lines all with insufficient capacity to serve their catchments. Why bother? Besides the scope for new surface luas running is limited by geography.

Yes, the Green line is already bursting at the seams and the Red Line is also maxed out. Why would you build six more of those!!!!

marno21

bk wrote: »

While I would agree with your overall sentiment, I wouldn't say that is the case for all proposed extensions.

For instance extending the Green Line into Finglas makes absolute sense. The Broombridge to city center section is definitely no where near capacity and would easily able to handle more people on this section.

The capacity constraints are mostly from the south city center to Sandyford section which will obviously be upgraded to Metro.

But the Finglas extension would be a cheap and sensible upgrade. Likewise I'd say the same for the extension of the Red line to Poolbeg or even East Point Business Park.

Of course I completely agree with you on proposals of a spur off the Red Line to Lucan or Green line to Bray. Just I wouldn't lump them all in the same basket.

That's a good point regarding the Broombridge extension to Finglas, but I was more thinking about how the rest of the Green Line is jammed and how there may be knock on effects along the rest of the line especially with the DIT amalgamation at Grangegorman and potentially DART Expansion to Maynooth feeding into the Green Lne.

The notion that further Luas lines to as per McDowell's article in yesterdays SBP though needs to be quashed though. There is simply no way you can bring everyone into the city centre on narrow streets jam packed with at grade trams, buses, taxis and peds/cyclists.

bk

marno21 wrote: »

The notion that further Luas lines to as per McDowell's article in yesterdays SBP though needs to be quashed though. There is simply no way you can bring everyone into the city centre on narrow streets jam packed with at grade trams, buses, taxis and peds/cyclists.

Again, not really disagreeing with you as such, but I will say it could be technically possible. Lots of European cities have done it. But they did it by completely banning cars and taxis from their city centers and also removing most buses and giving most of the space over to trams, pedestrians and bikes.

While I'd love to see that happen. Realistically such a move would face tremendous political opposition from a bunch of rich and well connected folks, so very unlikely to actually fly.

And I suspect McDowell knows this perfectly well when he suggested it. Can Metrolink on the promise of building 6 Luas lines instead, knowing perfectly well that when it came to it the 6 Luas lines would face massive opposition and never get built and thus we end up with nothing but a stupid second M50.

BoatMad

Look if there is one thing LUAS across-City has taught us, it is that non-segregated tram lines simply do not work.

I disagree and many European Medieval Towns and cities do also

The issue is that on street trams require a significant degree of removal of vehicular traffic , both private and public , you cant have everyone competing for the same space, thats the " take out" . Interesting the original cross city proposal foresaw significant disruption ti buses, but its seems BE has squawked about it and doesnt want to do it

BoatMad

bk wrote: »

Yes, the Green line is already bursting at the seams and the Red Line is also maxed out. Why would you build six more of those!!!!

err because its clearly popular and works

bk

BoatMad wrote: »

err because its clearly popular and works

The problem is they are so full, that people are now being left behind at platforms and are thus going back to their cars or buses. It is over-capacity.

And this just 15 years after they first open! How will they cope with the increase in population over the next 20 years!

Instead build Metro lines that can actually carry the demand that is actually there.

In reality you need a mix of core, high capacity, Metro lines, fed by bus and trams lines. We need to start building Metros now, but also increase trams. It isn't one or the other.

LXFlyer

BoatMad wrote: »

I disagree and many European Medieval Towns and cities do also

The issue is that on street trams require a significant degree of removal of vehicular traffic , both private and public , you cant have everyone competing for the same space, thats the " take out" . Interesting the original cross city proposal foresaw significant disruption ti buses, but its seems BE has squawked about it and doesnt want to do it

Well you try and tell me how you would achieve that on the arterial routes in and out of the city - I’m talking the likes of Rathmines, Harold’s X, Terenure etc.

While removing the traffic is achievable to a degree in the city centre, doing so in the inner suburbs becomes far more difficult.

It’s a fantasy to think you can remove traffic from all of those areas. We need to be realistic about this.

As for the city centre - no one proposed a solution for the buses. In fact the original plans by the RPA assumed all of the the bus routes could co-exist with LUAS.

It was only in 2016 that DCC came up with the Plaza idea and in 2016 removed the Parliament St option for diverted routes. This is going to mean either significant diversions or buses no longer serving areas they have linked to for decades and leaving commuters with a potential 15 minute extra on their commute in BOTH directions. That’s a real problem potentially for many commuters. DB is voicing concern on their behalf here rather than the entity itself and people need to realise that - I’m assuming you meant Dublin Bus rather than BE.

DART Underground and more Metro lines (at the very least serving the south central core to southwest Dublin) are the only realistic long term solutions

Sam Russell

DU would be the EW high capacity rapid transit line allowing connection from Malahide through to Clondalkin, Hazelhatch and beyond. NS catered for by Metrolink. That leaves SW to NE, say Tallaght to Whitehall and Beaumont and beyond.

The Dart does SE to CC so a Metrolink or Dart going out towards Blanch from CC.

Three underground routes should do what is needed with interchanges spread around - we do not need a single 'An Lar' central interchange.

Zebra3

Would relocating Busáras to somewhere down near the Point/Port Tunnel be anyway helpful in getting buses out of the city centre?

Pete_Cavan

Personally I don't like the proposal of extending the Red Line across the river, it would require another opening bridge and very expensive for limited benefit. I think it would better to extend north to the port, Eastpoint and link with DART at Clontarf Road, relatively cheap and passenger demand already exists.

The southern end of the city centre Green Line could be used to serve Irishtown. From the bottom of Harcourt Street, continue down Adelaide Road, along the canal and over to Irishtown.

At Sandyford, the other remaining section of Luas could be extended north along the Eastern bypass corridor (which will never be built) and through UCD. Getting past Donnybrook would be extremely difficult but if it can be done, it could either go to Irishtown (linking with DART along the way) or connect back up with the Cross City section.

marno21

I don't think anyone has mentioned Metro West or similar yet either. Such a project would be meritorious as it stops everyone having to go to the city centre to access a different radial element of the city, and would help provide further accessibility to the sprawl created by the M50 which is now creating sufficient journeys to warrant a decent public transport system.

Someone going from Citywest to the Airport could use Metro West rather than clogging the Metro and Luas lines to the city centre to achieve such a journey.

bk wrote: »

Again, not really disagreeing with you as such, but I will say it could be technically possible. Lots of European cities have done it. But they did it by completely banning cars and taxis from their city centers and also removing most buses and giving most of the space over to trams, pedestrians and bikes.

While I'd love to see that happen. Realistically such a move would face tremendous political opposition from a bunch of rich and well connected folks, so very unlikely to actually fly.

And I suspect McDowell knows this perfectly well when he suggested it. Can Metrolink on the promise of building 6 Luas lines instead, knowing perfectly well that when it came to it the 6 Luas lines would face massive opposition and never get built and thus we end up with nothing but a stupid second M50.

I think we're in total agreement here to be honest - I wasn't trying to argue!

I also think you hit the nail on the head with the bolded point above - really is the major issue going forward for any surface based transport system be it bus or tram.

bk

marno21 wrote: »

I think we're in total agreement here to be honest - I wasn't trying to argue!

Oh no argument at all, just explaining for others who happen to read. Sorry if it came across that way.

marno21 wrote: »

I also think you hit the nail on the head with the bolded point above - really is the major issue going forward for any surface based transport system be it bus or tram.

The battle for the resource of limited road space. We don't like inconveniencing other people with change in Ireland, but we are going to have to get use to it, we don't have the space in Dublin any longer to keep everyone equally happy.

marno21

bk wrote: »

Oh no argument at all, just explaining for others who happen to read. Sorry if it came across that way.

Not at all - it was me not trying to come across that way.

bk wrote: »

The battle for the resource of limited road space. We don't like inconveniencing other people with change in Ireland, but we are going to have to get use to it, we don't have the space in Dublin any longer to keep everyone equally happy.

If anything, the fact that the College Green mess has become what it has become is a shocking indictment of the ability to adapt to transport system requirements. Given how that is gone I have little hope for the future.

Kellyconor1982

I would say that we definitely need to have a Metrolink line going from the city centre through either Rathmines or Harold's Cross and then going through the general area of terenure, templeogue (or/and rathfarnham), swinging around Knocklyon and then on to Tallaght.

I would love the original Metrowest line also to be considered. This was a good orbital line going around the outer suburbs and through big population centres.

The rest of the city is quite well served (far from perfect😀)if you throw in Dart lines and luas lines. There is nothing wrong with the Luas lines we have but they are already over capacity. Those extra metro lines would go someway to solving this but extra capacity on darts would be helpful. The plan for the extra luas lines would be good also.

ignorance is strength

bk wrote: »

Oh no argument at all, just explaining for others who happen to read. Sorry if it came across that way.

marno21 wrote: »

Not at all - it was me not trying to come across that way.

And everyone lived happily ever after.

marno21

ignorance is strength wrote: »

And everyone lived happily ever after.

Take a look in the Roads forum and you may redefine "happy ever after"

All we need now is a happy ever after for Metro North

citizen6

I would extend the proposed Finglas Luas to a new SDZ just outside the M50, with the Park+Ride just north of that again. SDZ would incorporate Metro West as well.

Also I would over-deliver on public transport, affordable housing etc in the other cities. Spread the jobs and population away from Dublin per the NPF, or Dublin's transport infrastructure will never catch up.

bk

citizen6 wrote: »

I would extend the proposed Finglas Luas to a new SDZ just outside the M50, with the Park+Ride just north of that again. SDZ would incorporate Metro West as well.

Dublin Industrial Estate should become a SDZ. A 100 acre light industrial site with mostly one or two storey warehouse buildings, could be developed into thousands of apartments and offices.

Prime location, both Broombridge Luas stop and Broombridge rail station right in the middle of it. Whitworth Road station with Metro not even 1km away, an extended Luas to Finglas likely to run right through the center of it.

Would become one of the best connected locations in the city and we are wastefully using it for low quality light industrial use clsoe to the city! Stupid.

cgcsb

bk wrote: »

Again, not really disagreeing with you as such, but I will say it could be technically possible. Lots of European cities have done it. But they did it by completely banning cars and taxis from their city centers and also removing most buses and giving most of the space over to trams, pedestrians and bikes.

While I'd love to see that happen. Realistically such a move would face tremendous political opposition from a bunch of rich and well connected folks, so very unlikely to actually fly.

And I suspect McDowell knows this perfectly well when he suggested it. Can Metrolink on the promise of building 6 Luas lines instead, knowing perfectly well that when it came to it the 6 Luas lines would face massive opposition and never get built and thus we end up with nothing but a stupid second M50.

If this government turned around tomorrow and said OK Michael we're going to build 8 luas lines criss crossing Dublin as you suggested, and all the car bans and even bus bans that go with that. You can bet your ass he'd be first in line to say those lines should be put underground because of the disruption.

cgcsb

bk wrote: »

Dublin Industrial Estate should become a SDZ. A 100 acre light industrial site with mostly one or two storey warehouse buildings, could be developed into thousands of apartments and offices.

Prime location, both Broombridge Luas stop and Broombridge rail station right in the middle of it. Whitworth Road station with Metro not even 1km away, an extended Luas to Finglas likely to run right through the center of it.

Would become one of the best connected locations in the city and we are wastefully using it for low quality light industrial use clsoe to the city! Stupid.

Agree, Dublin Industrial estate no longer serves it's original purpose, most of the units are empty or used to house churches and gyms. The unit size is too small for modern warehousing and there is no motorway access.

The site is also at a key PT interchange, with a Park to the North (no shadowing impact from high rise), right on the canal walking/cycle way, it's a short distance to the City Centre and would serve as a walkable 'connection' between the growing Ashtown area and Glasnevin. Ideally it could house 10,000 people or more.

The City's population needs to be refocused on the centre, it's no good having half the metropolitan population living outside the ring road. SDZs like this are the perfect opportunity to do that.

snotboogie

Ballincollig to Mahon

Nermal

LeinsterDub wrote: »

The current lines don't have capacity for branching .

I haven't finished!

Send the red line underground at Fatima, across to at least Stephen's Green and perhaps on to Pearse.

Now half the trams from Tallaght go northside on the existing route, half go southside. Same for those from Blanchardstown.

There might actually be a possibility of a reasonable service to Lucan on the 'southside red' route. The current plan won't compete with the bus.

bk

Nermal wrote: »

Send the red line underground at Fatima, across to at least Stephen's Green and perhaps on to Pearse.

So a Metro line which replicates/replaces the DART Underground route.

I've suggested the same myself before, a Metro route starting deep in the redeveloped docklands area, following roughly the DU route to Hueston and then onto Lucan as a cheaper alternative to DU.

There are a lot of folk who would be very unhappy with that idea, but it does have advantages.

orangerhyme

cgcsb wrote: »

Agree, Dublin Industrial estate no longer serves it's original purpose, most of the units are empty or used to house churches and gyms. The unit size is too small for modern warehousing and there is no motorway access.

The site is also at a key PT interchange, with a Park to the North (no shadowing impact from high rise), right on the canal walking/cycle way, it's a short distance to the City Centre and would serve as a walkable 'connection' between the growing Ashtown area and Glasnevin. Ideally it could house 10,000 people or more.

The City's population needs to be refocused on the centre, it's no good having half the metropolitan population living outside the ring road. SDZs like this are the perfect opportunity to do that.

I agree. People have been saying this for years but nothing's happened.

I'd extend the luas green line from Broombridge across the canal, up Ratoath Rd and out Dunsink Lane.
There's hundreds of acres around Dunsink Lane and also Dublin Industrial Estate.

End of housing crisis, no more crazy commutes.
Have properly planned towns with sports , schools etc

bk

Nermal wrote: »

Send the red line underground at Fatima, across to at least Stephen's Green and perhaps on to Pearse.

Now half the trams from Tallaght go northside on the existing route, half go southside. Same for those from Blanchardstown.

Actually what you could do is spur the Red Line at Jame's St towards Christchurch - Dame St to College Green. Have every second Tallaght tram use this route and the other use the existing red route. That might give you enough capacity for your spur to Blanchardstown. Specially if the Dart Underground tunnel was also built, as it would remove a lot of congestion along the corridor.

Though I do hope that the current proposed redesign of DART Underground includes an extension of it to either Lucan or Blanch. It's current design of just ending at Heuston is a bit of a waste of a good Tunnel Boring Machine. A simplification of DU, but also an extension of it could give us a much more useful project.

murphaph

bk wrote: »

So a Metro line which replicates/replaces the DART Underground route.

I've suggested the same myself before, a Metro route starting deep in the redeveloped docklands area, following roughly the DU route to Hueston and then onto Lucan as a cheaper alternative to DU.

There are a lot of folk who would be very unhappy with that idea, but it does have advantages.

To be honest I'd be strongly against an East West tunnel that wasn't DU.

It's the same reason why it makes sense to upgrade the green line for small beer during the metro North build. You are capitalising on the expensive tunnel part by allowing existing infrastructure to feed it.

Post metro and DU the bus network would fundamentally shift focus from an lar to "nearest metro/DART station".

LXFlyer

murphaph wrote: »

To be honest I'd be strongly against an East West tunnel that wasn't DU.

It's the same reason why it makes sense to upgrade the green line for small beer during the metro North build. You are capitalising on the expensive tunnel part by allowing existing infrastructure to feed it.

Post metro and DU the bus network would fundamentally shift focus from an lar to "nearest metro/DART station".

Except for the south central swathe between the (current) LUAS lines, and the area around the Malahide Road - those areas would still require a major city centre bus operation.

They aren’t inconsequential by any means.

bk

murphaph wrote: »

To be honest I'd be strongly against an East West tunnel that wasn't DU.

It's the same reason why it makes sense to upgrade the green line for small beer during the metro North build. You are capitalising on the expensive tunnel part by allowing existing infrastructure to feed it.

Post metro and DU the bus network would fundamentally shift focus from an lar to "nearest metro/DART station".

Yes, I know, I keep going back and forward on this.

The original DU project seemed in some ways to be an expensive waste given the way that it simply connected Docklands to Hueston and didn't do much else.

Yes, yes, I know all about electrification of the Hazelhatch line, etc. But now we are seeing that most of that can be done anyway via PPT and Whitworth Road without necessary the expense of the DU tunnel. Something I always suspected.

Given the possibilities of the PPT/Whitworth Road, I'd like to see them being a bit more expansive with it.

I suspect with the redesign, any idea of running anything but DARTs through it will be gone, no intercity, no long distance trains like some people imagined. I even won't be surprised if it will end up being limited to just 4 carriage DARTs, which would be about 90m long. A 4 carriage every 5 minutes would have the same capacity as a 8 carriage every 10 minutes. In some ways it will likely end up much the same as a Metro, with similar capacity. Simpler design, smaller station boxes, etc.

But then maybe then would have the money to do something more interesting with it.

Maybe from Docklands, swing into Ringsend/Irishtown with the expected redevelopment of the docks there, then over to Grand Canal Dock, Stephens Green North, Hueston and then out to Blanch or Lucan. You could then have every second train going to Blanch/Lucan and Hazelhatch. Or just have folks from Hazelhatch going to the south city change at Hueston.

Just some ideas.