Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

UFC 220 - Miocic Vs Ngannou

Options
123457

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,133 ✭✭✭akelly02


    Jon Jones for me is one of the greatest athletes to ever compete in the UFC. While his technique is also very good and he has a range of tools, it was his freakish strength (in spite of his lanky frame) and his endurance which made him so hard to beat. His strength in the clinch is second to none. And his endurance won him his two toughest fights - v Gus and DC first time round, where he dominated the final 2-3 rounds to get the decision.

    For those reasons, I can't consider JBJ one of the best, because without his physical capabilities he wouldn't have been near as dominant imo.

    and the steroids? no great mention of them?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    akelly02 wrote: »
    and the steroids? no great mention of them?

    That's exactly what I'm talking about - they enhanced his physical capabilities. I thought I made that obvious :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭LollipopJimmy


    akelly02 wrote: »
    and the steroids? no great mention of them?

    My reading of the last line says otherwise


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,615 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    That's exactly what I'm talking about - they enhanced his physical capabilities. I thought I made that obvious :D

    Which is why hes not in the "greatest" conversation. Hes out. Could be just a fairly decent juiced up fighter for all we know. Maybe he would've tapped or had his arm snapped by Vitor if he wasn't juicing.

    Vitor is also a cheat I know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    The Nal wrote: »
    Which is why hes not in the "greatest" conversation. Hes out.

    Nonsense. Regardless of his use of PED's or how long it's been going on for he's still absolutely one of the pound for pound greatest fighters of all time.
    PED's don't make you a JUCO National Champion, PED's don't make you a 24 year old world LHW champion. They're factor but they're not the biggest factor, by a long way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭Fromvert


    What was the deal with Ngannou's corner wrapping him in a towel between rounds, was anything said about it on the commentary or after the fight? I couldn't really hear the commentary and didn't see the presser.

    Surely this is counterproductive, his body is trying to cool down and he's being wrapped in a towel! And Rogan running with the 'he only strikes in training, no grappling' makes it seem like the whole team is full of people with no clue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    Ngannou needs to tell his coach that from now on, he's his striking coach and nothing else. He's clearly doing a decent job at that so no point throwing the baby out with the bath water but he needs to being in someone with a history and understanding of MMA. He also needs to spend about 6 months getting absolutely mauled by some D1 collegiate and US international team wrestlers so he can learn how to defend takedowns and get back up if he's taken down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,065 ✭✭✭thewheel2.0


    Fromvert wrote: »
    What was the deal with Ngannou's corner wrapping him in a towel between rounds, was anything said about it on the commentary or after the fight? I couldn't really hear the commentary and didn't see the presser.

    Surely this is counterproductive, his body is trying to cool down and he's being wrapped in a towel! And Rogan running with the 'he only strikes in training, no grappling' makes it seem like the whole team is full of people with no clue.

    I read somewhere that the towels were soaked in ice water. Weirdly though the towels were branded Body Armour, which is the official sports drink of the UFC and Francis is one of their three representatives.

    The other two representatives are Cody Garbrandt and Cynthia Calvillo so Francis was the final one to suffer the Body Armor curse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    Nonsense. Regardless of his use of PED's or how long it's been going on for he's still absolutely one of the pound for pound greatest fighters of all time.
    PED's don't make you a JUCO National Champion, PED's don't make you a 24 year old world LHW champion. They're factor but they're not the biggest factor, by a long way.

    I really disagree. Taking PEDs that could give him an extra 10-15% are absolutely a big factor. The biggest factor probably not but you're underestimating the influence of PEDs. Particularly for the reasons I gave above - he's one of the greatest athletes the UFC has ever seen. Coincidence much???

    I don't consider JBJ in the greatest list because (imo) he has probably been dirty his whole career.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    I don't understand the argument - oh but PEDs don't make you a champion!

    Eh, they kind of help. A lot if it's being done consistently and systematically. As it did with Armstrong, Ben Johnson, and MMA fighters like Jones and Sonnen (remember his meteoric rise to fame? You could almost say that there was a link between him taking PEDs and going from top 20 to championship material!). Similarly, and I know these guys haven't been caught, but look at the downfall of Hendricks and Pettis post-USADA. It's like looking at a completely different fighter - from championship calibre to top 15-20. I think we all know that Hendricks in particular was up to no good.

    The reality is that, yes technique is a big part of the sport as well, but you need both. Show me an average athlete with excellent technique who's become a champion in MMA - it's more than a bit rare. Having excellent physical qualities is just as important as excelling in the technical aspects of fighting.

    Again, for those reasons Jones gets cut out of my list when discussing the greatest ever.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,459 ✭✭✭The White Feather


    DC via Submission
    Again, for those reasons Jones gets cut out of my list when discussing the greatest ever.


    I would think the same way as you about Jones. No doubting he is/was a hell of a fighter but how long was he on PEDs? This would rule him out of being the goat in my view.

    Incidentally do PEDS come curry flavoured?!! Just a thought!


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,157 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    DC via Submission
    That's exactly what I'm talking about - they enhanced his physical capabilities. I thought I made that obvious :D
    I thought it was clear FWIW
    Nonsense. Regardless of his use of PED's or how long it's been going on for he's still absolutely one of the pound for pound greatest fighters of all time.
    PED's don't make you a JUCO National Champion, PED's don't make you a 24 year old world LHW champion. They're factor but they're not the biggest factor, by a long way.

    Exactly.
    I don't understand the argument - oh but PEDs don't make you a champion!

    Eh, they kind of help. A lot if it's being done consistently and systematically. As it did with Armstrong, Ben Johnson, and MMA fighters like Jones and Sonnen (remember his meteoric rise to fame? You could almost say that there was a link between him taking PEDs and going from top 20 to championship material!). Similarly, and I know these guys haven't been caught, but look at the downfall of Hendricks and Pettis post-USADA. It's like looking at a completely different fighter - from championship calibre to top 15-20. I think we all know that Hendricks in particular was up to no good.

    The reality is that, yes technique is a big part of the sport as well, but you need both. Show me an average athlete with excellent technique who's become a champion in MMA - it's more than a bit rare. Having excellent physical qualities is just as important as excelling in the technical aspects of fighting.

    Again, for those reasons Jones gets cut out of my list when discussing the greatest ever.
    The PEDs make him a cheater. Nobody disputes that.
    The PEDs give him an edge in the physical aspect . Again no disputes.
    I have no idea why people can't separate that from technique?

    It's not about how effective he is in the clinch, or how devastating his punches are when they connect. For me it's about the things he sees that no other fighter sees. PEDs don't do that.

    I wanted to stick a GIF in here of the foot sweep he hit on a retreating Cormier in the last night. But can't find it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,985 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    Mellor wrote: »
    I wanted to stick a GIF in here of the foot sweep he hit on a retreating Cormier in the last night. But can't find it.

    Would he have hit it without years of PED use?

    Would his twitch reaction speed have been good enough?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,615 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Nonsense. Regardless of his use of PED's or how long it's been going on for he's still absolutely one of the pound for pound greatest fighters of all time.
    PED's don't make you a JUCO National Champion, PED's don't make you a 24 year old world LHW champion. They're factor but they're not the biggest factor, by a long way.

    Strongly disagree. PED's can make you a 24 year old world LHW champion. Course they can!

    Again, people seem to underestimate how much of an impact anabolic steroids can have.

    6.-Doping-In-MMA-Alistair-Overeem.jpg
    5.-Doping-In-MMA-Vitor-Belfort.jpg
    2.-Doping-In-MMA-Fighter-Records-Before-After-Ban.png

    Sad thing is, most of the great MMA fighters are cheats. Proper Lance Armstrong levels of cheats. The sport is in a state when it comes to credibility. Cycling aside, can't think of a sport with worse cred than MMA. Bit of a joke tbh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,848 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    DC via Decision
    such a shame rumble has retired, would have given anything to see him and ngannou square up.
    It was the first thought I had after the bout.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    Every single sport on the planet is riddled with people using PEDs, if you think otherwise you're being willfully ignorant.

    Cycling and athletics aren't the worst offenders, they're just the most tested.

    In cycling in Ireland alone last year there was 405 tests for a sport with only 15 professional athletes representing in country, most of whom dont even live on Ireland.
    There were 105 tests in rugby, a sport with over 150 professional player in Ireland and thousands of amateurs.
    Same with soccer and even GAA, people can go their entire careers without ever being tested to the point that Joe Hart had a whinge on twitter about the fact that he had to do his first ever ped test after a game when he was 28 because it inconvenienced him.
    American athletes in sports like the NFL and NBA never pop because they literally get notice that they're going to be tested because their players unions and the leagues agreed to it.

    Cycling and athletics have bad "reps" but they're not actually worse than other sports, they're just more targeted because of perception.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    mailburner wrote: »
    such a shame rumble has retired, would have given anything to see him and ngannou square up.
    It was the first thought I had after the bout.

    The what you smoking. The size difference would be insane, Rumble would be murdered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,848 ✭✭✭✭mailburner


    DC via Decision
    The what you smoking. The size difference would be insane, Rumble would be murdered.

    He fought at heavyweight, could do so again and would be as big as a lot
    of heavyweights.
    rumble is a killer also and probably only second to ngannou standing but with quicker hands.
    I'm sure plenty would like to see the two of them
    I've never seen rumble in any kind of trouble standing against anyone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    Mellor wrote: »
    I thought it was clear FWIW


    Exactly.

    The PEDs make him a cheater. Nobody disputes that.
    The PEDs give him an edge in the physical aspect . Again no disputes.
    I have no idea why people can't separate that from technique?

    It's not about how effective he is in the clinch, or how devastating his punches are when they connect. For me it's about the things he sees that no other fighter sees. PEDs don't do that.

    I wanted to stick a GIF in here of the foot sweep he hit on a retreating Cormier in the last night. But can't find it.
    Of course I see the technique. But technique alone won't make you the goat - it's a mix of brain and brawn. Jones was a phenomenal athlete and that was part of what gave him an enormous advantage.

    It's all pieces of the puzzle. Jones' physical advantage isn't the whole puzzle, but it's a significant piece.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    Every single sport on the planet is riddled with people using PEDs, if you think otherwise you're being willfully ignorant.

    Cycling and athletics aren't the worst offenders, they're just the most tested.

    In cycling in Ireland alone last year there was 405 tests for a sport with only 15 professional athletes representing in country, most of whom dont even live on Ireland.
    There were 105 tests in rugby, a sport with over 150 professional player in Ireland and thousands of amateurs.
    Same with soccer and even GAA, people can go their entire careers without ever being tested to the point that Joe Hart had a whinge on twitter about the fact that he had to do his first ever ped test after a game when he was 28 because it inconvenienced him.
    American athletes in sports like the NFL and NBA never pop because they literally get notice that they're going to be tested because their players unions and the leagues agreed to it.

    Cycling and athletics have bad "reps" but they're not actually worse than other sports, they're just more targeted because of perception.
    I don't really understand your point. Is it that Jones retains his legacy because you think that everyone else was cheating too?

    There are most definitely guys who cheat and haven't been caught (yet), but to say it's riddled with PEDs is a bit disingenuous. How could you possibly know that?

    Could guys like DC, Gus, Rumble be using..I guess they could be, but it's unfair to tarnish them for an obvious reason. Jon Jones has popped while they have not.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    I don't really understand your point. Is it that Jones retains his legacy because you think that everyone else was cheating too?

    There are most definitely guys who cheat and haven't been caught (yet), but to say it's riddled with PEDs is a bit disingenuous. How could you possibly know that?

    Could guys like DC, Gus, Rumble be using..I guess they could be, but it's unfair to tarnish them for an obvious reason. Jon Jones has popped while they have not.

    Do you consider Bolt the best sprinter of all time? Because he's almost certainly a cheater. His strength and conditioning coach was a BALCO chemist who supplied countless basketball, american football, soccer and rugby players with designer PED's as well as track and field athletes, don't believe me, google Heredia's interview with Der Spiegel in 2008.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    Do you consider Bolt the best sprinter of all time? Because he's almost certainly a cheater. His strength and conditioning coach was a BALCO chemist who supplied countless basketball, american football, soccer and rugby players with designer PED's as well as track and field athletes, don't believe me, google Heredia's interview with Der Spiegel in 2008.

    You've slightly gone off on a tangent. Assuming you're right, which there's no hard proof of but I will admit there's a good likelihood, I still don't really see your point in relation to mine.

    My point is that Jones has had a significant unfair advantage over his opponents through his cheating. There's no evidence to suggest that his opponents had been cheating in a similar manner. Do you not agree?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    My point is you're making an emotional argument based on your own notions of fairness or honour.
    Jones hasn't even been found guilty of doping yet and you're claiming everything he's achieved is because of his alleged PED use.

    I'm saying that if he cheated it enhanced his fighting but he'd still be the best 205er ever with or without PEDs. PED's don't make him a better positionally aware wrestler, a more skilful submission artist, a more intelligent or accurate striker. They'd make him stronger, sure. Faster, maybe. Better endurance, yeah. But without already being one of the best on the planet those augmentations mean nothing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,615 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Jones hasn't even been found guilty of doping yet

    Huh?

    I'm saying that if he cheated it enhanced his fighting but he'd still be the best 205er ever with or without PEDs. PED's don't make him a better positionally aware wrestler, a more skilful submission artist, a more intelligent or accurate striker. They'd make him stronger, sure. Faster, maybe. Better endurance, yeah. But without already being one of the best on the planet those augmentations mean nothing.

    WTF? Its more difficult to position yourself correctly when you're tired, strikes aren't as accurate if you're tired, submissions aren't as effective if you're tired.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,683 ✭✭✭Subcomandante Marcos


    Miocic via Submission
    The Nal wrote: »
    Huh?

    He hasn't been, the findings from his previous case were that "the arbitration panel concluded that Jones didn't take the banned substances intentionally and was not a drug cheat".


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,590 ✭✭✭CurryFlavoured


    My point is you're making an emotional argument based on your own notions of fairness or honour.
    Jones hasn't even been found guilty of doping yet and you're claiming everything he's achieved is because of his alleged PED use.

    I'm saying that if he cheated it enhanced his fighting but he'd still be the best 205er ever with or without PEDs. PED's don't make him a better positionally aware wrestler, a more skilful submission artist, a more intelligent or accurate striker. They'd make him stronger, sure. Faster, maybe. Better endurance, yeah. But without already being one of the best on the planet those augmentations mean nothing.

    Mate you're sounding like an apologist. He failed a test for a PED (actually two tests) - I think it's fair at this point to say that he's a cheater. We know that turanibol was in his body. You can't say that he's not because they're putting forward a 'tainted supplement' case again :rolleyes:

    And you're putting words in my mouth. I never said the PEDs are everything, but I said they're a significant part of the puzzle. They're one factor of what made him so good, but they gave him a significant unfair advantage regardless.

    On your suggestion that he'd be the greatest regardless of cheating, that's just conjecture. We'll never know, maybe he would have, maybe he wouldn't, you're entitled to that opinion but I don't think that it holds much weight. All we know for now is that he used illegal substances to give himself a significant physical advantage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,615 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    He hasn't been, the findings from his previous case were that "the arbitration panel concluded that Jones didn't take the banned substances intentionally and was not a drug cheat".

    Amazing the amount of young healthy people in need of dick pills isn't it? Anderson Silvas go to excuse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,405 ✭✭✭Lukker-


    Funny coincidence for Jones that the steroid he tested positive for was on the same order as his dick pills.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭Effects


    Fromvert wrote: »
    What was the deal with Ngannou's corner wrapping him in a towel between rounds

    Making sure the sponsorship message was seen clearly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 39,157 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    DC via Submission
    Of course I see the technique. But technique alone won't make you the goat - it's a mix of brain and brawn. Jones was a phenomenal athlete and that was part of what gave him an enormous advantage.

    It's all pieces of the puzzle. Jones' physical advantage isn't the whole puzzle, but it's a significant piece.
    I'm not disregarding the difference athleticism makes. But I see that as an advantage in a fight, in terms of performance.
    For example, say I roll with a big blue belt who is stronger than me, then I roll with a high experience belt who is smaller than me. They'll both give me an equally hard time. But afterwards, I feel I couldn't unquestionable state that the purple belt was more technical. More skillful.
    Does that make sense?

    I don't think Jones is/was one of the best because of his results, performances, or because he could physically pull off athletic the moves. It was more the way he was hardwired to even attempt them. If somebody else was as athletic and strong as Jones, they probably would do any of that stuff.

    Compare that to Ngannou. Devastating power and speed. But that's about it. There's nothing technically impressive about his striking. He loads up and wings it, if it connects it's goodnight. If somebody else had that power, they could probably pull off those KOs.
    The Nal wrote: »
    WTF? Its more difficult to position yourself correctly when you're tired, strikes aren't as accurate if you're tired, submissions aren't as effective if you're tired.

    You are still huge up on performances and trying to make the point that steroids make a difference. That is completely true, but nobody has disputed that.


Advertisement