Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Lord of the Rings - [Amazon] *Spoilers*

Options
1121315171847

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,848 ✭✭✭✭silverharp



    funny aside, one reviewer jokingly said they must not have seen this Steve Coogan sketch "we rise at daybreak"



    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,191 ✭✭✭corkie


    The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power - 5 things to know about Nori Brandyfoot

    1. Her character isn't inspired from Tolkien's works
    2. She is an ancestor of the Harfoot Hobbits
    3. Nori was an unusual, inquisitive, and adventurous hobbit
    4. She is played by Markella Kavenagh
    5. She was the voice behind the teaser narration

    Watch both episodes today, it was good and enjoyable watch, but a bit predictable because of been a prequel.

    The Digital Services Act 2024 [EU] ~ Social Media and You ~ Nanny State guidance for parental monitoring of apps ~ Censorship: - broad laws that will probably effect Adult use of same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,158 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I'd agree with the reviews that are saying in some parts strong and other parts weak so far.

    Elrond, the Dwarves, and the Black Elf/Men plot are a highlight. The visuals of course as well but for 60m per episode I'd expect nothing else. The Harfoots and Galadriel plot need to pick up fast.

    Ultimately I would say quite an admirable start but there are concerns there, but having said that I'm just a grump before his time in his 30s. I've no doubt it will be a smash for Amazon, there's enough there.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Will Pavee Point be protesting Amazon for its cultural appropriation of the Irish Travellers with the Oirish Harfoots



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,106 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I enjoyed it. Slow. Not sure if it will grab non-Tolkien fans. Watching some of the flashback scenes I makes me think it is a pity it's not the Silmarillion as an anthology series :(

    Amazon did the same with accents in Wheel of Time with the Oirish Tinkers.

    I found the accents a bit overdone...

    Elves - Received pronunciation, stilted at times, with added rolling Rs that Tolkien used when reading LOTR e.g. Morrrdorrr

    Humans - Northern English (Yorkshire?)

    Harfoots / Halflings - Oirish brogue... even some of the phrasings are Hiberno-English: "Where is this you're from"

    Dwarves - Scottish thick like porridge

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not cheerleader of The Wheel Of Time but there's good reason to give them Irish accents, going by the books inspiration for their name



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,191 ✭✭✭corkie


    The Digital Services Act 2024 [EU] ~ Social Media and You ~ Nanny State guidance for parental monitoring of apps ~ Censorship: - broad laws that will probably effect Adult use of same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's odd they didn't do the English West County accent for the Harfoots like Sean Astin.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I like it



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    Awful shite, not Tolkien at all ...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    Thats complete propoganda, you'd think she'd reign it in just a little, to make it more believable ..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    End of first episode.


    None of this makes any sense.

    No Feanor, Kinslaying, Ungolianth, Thangorodrim, or bloody Silmarils.

    Breezing over the Two Trees with no explanation

    Gil-Galad reduced to that and he is the one to offer passage back to Valinor?


    Outside some names this is not Tolkien, so far



    And screw these Oirish accents



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    And those Irish accents are awful, whats the story with that ??



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    My wife, who is not a Tolkien reader, understood nothing of the motivations or actions of the characters or lore


    She's actually just asked if I would mind her not watching anymore, if I'm carrying on with it.

    Can't believe it, honestly thought it might pull it out of the bag, but I'm out though.

    That actually disappointed me in how bad an adaption it is.

    Surprisingly I quite liked the actor playing Galadriel



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,848 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    just watched the first episode, boring! and forgettable. 5/10, i'd give it to episode 4, if it doesnt pick up I'd give up on it

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    And whats with the rolling of the R's ?

    Galadrrrrriel ... and Saurrrrrron ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭naughtyboy


    Dreadful stuff , the writing is so poor this show never had a chance



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    When they see that people see through the utter scutter they've put out they'll just do like they did with the latest star wars stuff. Not take any personal responsibility for the writing etc and just blame it on a so called toxic fanbase.

    They've destroyed star trek. They've destroyed star wars. Now it time to destroy LOTR...



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,848 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    on the plus side it might redeem the Hobbit trilogy somewhat. lol

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The real positives in this are the absolutely stunning visuals but as posted above that's where the money went. The not so-good list is a lot longer and it is a distraction. The lethargic pace is one of those and that could kill if off very quickly. I am not all that sold on Galadriel showing up in every second scene, in one as a brilliant mountaineer and then inventing the crawl to do an Olympic style ultra swim across an open sea and always doing the grim warrior queen. She's getting all the action but to what end?

    It is early days and they do need to set the chessboard but that can be done without the Harfeet and their really atrocious and irritating accents. Equally something could be done on the massive roster of characters who bring nothing to the story at all.

    Like The Hobbit there's just not enough material and quality imagination to fill this tale. One nice little nugget was the Frankie goes to Holywood/TS Eliot reference but otherwise the dialogue bounces between comic relief and the actors being really serious with some iffy lines.

    So far really not brilliant at all and it has some really low dips but its real problem IMO is that it is just all over the place and that the writers have just built a world but with a very limited and, for now, incoherent story. I hope it gets better but I have never really been convinced about this concept anyway. There's a lot of hubris to this project with Bezos just exploiting his vast wealth to show he can, no matter what way it turns out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    It's just too boring. It looks great at times but it's lifeless. The dialogue is awful they're not even trying to sound like Tolkien. Galadriel seems to be another Mary Sue character like Michael Burnham from star Trek.

    I read the books when I was a teenager and I got lost in Tolkien's magical world. There's nothing in this that resembles it.

    Oh ya and there's an awful lot of actors with punchable faces in it especially Elrond.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I was tired watching it so only got half way through but I can't concentrate because my brain is constantly trying to remember what various names and places from the books are. I would almost prefer that this was just "Elf Wars" or something with no link to LotR.

    Surprised with myself that my favourite part is the actress playing Galadriel.

    They can't destroy anything. If you don't like the new stuff just ignore it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Dreadful stuff altogether. The acting is so overwrought. What's with the mispronunciation of anything with an r? It's Tolkien not Shakespeare. The lore is all over the place. Jesus, it's embarrassing. Whether you're a fan of the original trilogy or not there's no denying that they were infinitely more faithful to the source material. Tolkien must be spinning in his grave.

    And the less said about that battle with the troll the better.

    Post edited by TomsOnTheRoof on


  • Registered Users Posts: 331 ✭✭sekiro


    It's funny how preferred media outlets getting early access and VIP treatments is seen as "critics loved it and they can totally be trusted" but some nerds giving it 1 star because they hated it are painted as evil internet trolls. Of course all the member of the public who want to give it 5 stars are just being completely reasonable and honest.

    It's pathetic to see a company who paid so much to make this show and invested so much in getting positive mainstream media coverage run and hide because normal people don't like their product.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's not normal people though. It will be an avalanche of horsesht about Mary Sues and how the world is gonna end because there is a black Hobbit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The rolling R was always there. Just listen back to Aragon or Gandalf speaking Elvish words.



  • Registered Users Posts: 331 ✭✭sekiro


    Haha. Well, I can only go with what was quoted in the article and the worst example they could come up with is ""an affront to true fans, the person responsible for this disaster should be arrested."

    Now, that's obviously a pretty dumb review from a "not normal" (your words, not mine) person but are they not entitled to that review and that opinion? Is there a list of criteria to be met before being allowed to give a 1 star review?

    Amazon is loaded with rubbish 1 star reviews for all kinds of products. "My product arrived late, 1 star." "The postman left it with a neighbor and my neighbor stole it, 1 star." Those reviews are allowed on Amazon. There are loads of books on the site with 1 star reviews because the reviewer ordered the wrong language. "I thought this was the English language version but it's French, 1 star." That kind of review is allowed of course.

    Amazon should ban users who are openly racist etc on their platform. Simple as that.

    Acting like you can only give a 1 star review to something only if the logic behind the review is sound is such nonsense. Like your review needs to be graded by an English teacher to make sure that it's passable before you can say that Rings of Power is trash?

    They should just be honest. Amazon is blocking reviews of their own products because they fear negative reviews could affect the amount of money they make. However, they do not extend this service to other products being sold on their site.

    Why bother pretending that this is being done to stop "trolls"? It's being done to protect their profits.

    The bought and paid for critic reviews are the only REAL reviews, right?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yoystan is a Lord Of The Rings super nerd, gives fantastic reviews and character insights.

    Probably the most diplomatic person in the public fandom.

    If he's, politely, ripping your project to shreds, you've fucked it up





  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,129 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Watched the first episode last night and the second this morning. I'd definitely advise watching them as close together as you can as the two together give a much better idea of what the show's shooting for than the first alone.

    The first definitely struggles from having to lay down some tricky groundwork. Funny that this was released the same weekend as Michael Flatley's Blackbird, because in their way they're both vanity projects: rich men using their wealth to push themselves onto a particular stage. At least Bezos had the good sense to hand the creative side of things over to actual creatives, but even at that the team are on the back (har)foot given the very nature of this absurd project. They need to make a compelling story out of feckin' appendices, live up to a beloved series of books & films, and even need to justify the project's mere existence. And it's in the very nature of prequel stories that they're kind of fundamentally redundant: very few turn out to be as rich and necessary an extension as, say, Better Call Saul.

    The first episode here is definitely very mixed. They wisely at least spend a lot of time with Galadriel right out the gate - her character (well-realised here) is both familiar and immediately determined, centering the audience and at least giving one major character clear motivation. The other subplots... less immediately compelling, to put it diplomatically. A few of the central characters, particularly Arondir, are honestly pretty bland, and the lack of immediate stakes or purpose for them creates an episode that often drags when we're not with Galadriel. The Rings of Power has a fundamental issue: it simply does not have a hook as compelling as the Lord of the Rings nor one as simple & accessible as The Hobbit. That's a hell of a hurdle to leap. Add to that some dodgy dialogue that betrays the writers' relative inexperience, and things are off to a messy start.

    Thankfully, things improve in episode two, even if it doesn't necessarily completely clear that aforementioned hurdle. We get a much better idea of where these characters are at and the kind of challenges they're facing. That's largely done by some solidly staged setpieces (Bayonra a smart hire in that respect), but there's also some fun world-building such as the sojourn to the dwarf city (the dwarves themselves, much like in LotR itself, add much-needed levity and energy to proceedings). The episode clips along at a much better pace, and sets a more interesting groundwork for what's to come. But like with all shows this is simply the opening chapters, so it's hard to say how successfully they'll expand from here.

    What is clear at least is that this is definitely operating on a different level aesthetically speaking to other big-budget fantasy shows. It looks and sounds like the most expensive show ever made: a back-handed compliment, yes, but a compliment nonetheless. When you see something like Obi-Wan Kenobi looking like it was shot in a crappy backlot, this at least has put the money on screen - easily out-spectacling even the likes of Game of Thrones. This is a blockbuster show that wouldn't look out of place on a cinema screen, but more importantly marks a welcome return to a more grounded, 'earthier' take on Middle Earth than the weightless, CG-obsessed one of The Hobbit trilogy while still having some flavour and texture of its own to separate it from the Jackson take (even if that take is a major, major influence). That's not to say there isn't CG spectacle here, because of course there is: it's just better balanced with actual physical sets, locations and design choices than the dreadfully hollow Hobbit films. And even some of the CG stuff here lends certain scenes a sort of shiny, otherworldly aura befitting the events they're depicting. I was worried by some of the effects shown off in the trailers, but in this final, properly mastered version it all looks undeniably impressive, with McCreary enhancing it with a suitably grand soundscape.

    Whether TV needs blockbuster-scale spectacle on this level is another question, given how that will ultimately make producers more conservative in the sort of creative and business choices they make: we've seen how vanilla Hollywood blockbuster filmmaking has become, and even how the chase for an automatic hit has led to several franchises (The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, Marvel, Star Wars) getting mountains of broadcast resources that'd be much better spent on more original endeavors. At least at this stage there's no shortage of great prestige TV out there, so it's not as if the mega-projects are sucking in all the resources. But there is a concern if massive projects like this inflate budgets to a preposterous degree that'll hurt the medium more broadly.

    For now, at least, Rings of Power mostly clears one low bar: more Lord of the Rings, but on TV this time. It has a lot more work to do over those next six episodes, and there are plenty of rough edges and basic challenges (not least: why does this need to exist?) to overcome. But at least there's enough there that I'll be back next week, which is honestly more than I can say for several other big-budget TV shows these days.

    The Irish accents are bloody terrible, though.

    Post edited by johnny_ultimate on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,158 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Galadriel, who seems to be central to the main plot and also the BIG name that they're counting on, seems to be the least interesting character.

    The subplots are more interesting so far (bar the Harfoots) and you can tell they took extra care in inserting these characters into the mythos. Makes you wonder if they took things for granted with Galadriel and thought the name alone was a win.



Advertisement