Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Man squeezes woman's boobs too hard - it ends up in court - should it have?

Options
179111213

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    What's that got to do with what I posted?

    Eh everything?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    Eh everything?

    Eh. Explain how then please. Thanks.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    neonsofa wrote: »
    So what exactly was the point of your post then...?

    What's yours?


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,555 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Who said ALL women have experienced rape and sexual assaurt. I didnt say it. Can you show me who did?

    You were alluding to it. If not, then what did your above post in response to whoopsadoodles and Permabear actually mean?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭neonsofa


    What's yours?

    You're a delight.

    Mine was a question to you. You dont seem to understand how a discussion works. A poster claimed all women have experienced and expect sexual abuse/assault and rape. Posters refuted this claim. You responded to their posts with out of context posts of your own. Im asking you to explain what exactly your point is for the clarity of the thread. So would you care to actually make your point?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    o1s1n wrote: »
    You were alluding to it. If not, then what did your above post in response to whoopsadoodles and Permabear actually mean?

    Show me where I was 'alluding' to it. My respone to Permabear was he said only a minority of women suffer sexual assault, and it has decreased since historical times.

    I pointed out the masses of sexual assault stories from women against men in the news in the last 2 weeks , to show him that his point was in fact, ludicrous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Candie wrote: »
    It's as if people need an interpreter to understand what is meant by STOP.

    If someone say stop, then stop. It's really that easy.

    Nobody is saying that he should have the right to keep doing what he wants despite her protestations. Of course he should have stopped. He's a dickhead for not doing so but what has that got to do with the question posed in the OP of this thread? I don't see anyone saying he should be able to do to her what he wanted to.

    The question posed is whether or not this should have ended up in court. Surely this woman has to take some responsibility for the consequences of continuing to have sex with someone who was clearly turned on by squeezing her boobs harder than she liked. Tell him to leave. Don't have sex with him again.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    neonsofa wrote: »
    You're a delight.

    Mine was a question to you. You dont seem to understand how a discussion works. A poster claimed all women have experienced and expect sexual abuse/assault and rape. Posters refuted this claim. You responded to their posts with out of context posts of your own. Im asking you to explain what exactly your point is for the clarity of the thread. So would you care to actually make your point?

    You're a delight yourself.

    I believe I have made my point. If you're too stupid to grasp it, it's not my fault.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    You're a delight yourself.

    I believe I have made my point. If you're too stupid to grasp it, it's not my fault.

    You haven't made any point. As usual.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭neonsofa


    You're a delight yourself.

    I believe I have made my point. If you're too stupid to grasp it, it's not my fault.

    :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    The poster you are conversing with has previously started a thread in which she suggested that if a man does not make a woman orgasm during consensual sex, he has sexually assaulted her.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    The poster you are conversing with has previously started a thread in which she suggested that if a man does not make a woman orgasm during consensual sex, he has sexually assaulted her.

    Jaysus, I must be like larry murphy on steroids in that case.

    There's a string of frustrated women behind me let me tell you!:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    You're a delight yourself.

    I believe I have made my point. If you're too stupid to grasp it, it's not my fault.

    Mod note:No need for the abuse. Don't post in this thread again.

    Buford T. Justice


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    neonsofa wrote: »
    :)

    :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    The poster you are conversing with has previously started a thread in which she suggested that if a man does not make a woman orgasm during consensual sex, he has sexually assaulted her.

    I did not say that whoopsadoodles. Thats an outright lie. Maybe you might consider why you have a reputation for being so arrogant and disparaging to women on here, including another woman on this thread before me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    Ah abusive PMs! Sure to win any rational argument :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,126 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    But he hasn't been struck off anything. There may be a year or two when he is ineligible for practice, after he graduates, but he will be eligible to register with the GMC thereafter.

    It kinda seems like a fair price to pay for assaulting someone. I'm sure hell decide to do a masters or a PhD before he eventually registers.

    You know feck all about the medical industry I see.
    the_syco wrote: »
    It sounds like he said no, left, and she brought him up on charges.


    He squeezed, she stabbed. He gets put on the sex offenders list, she gets off scot free. There's nothing else to say, but the system is fcuked.

    That would be lady doctor that did the stabbing looks quite nice.
    I know how sexist of me to actually dare think such a thing. :rolleyes:
    Why does crazy always have to look good ?

    https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/medical-student-too-bright-for-prison-is-spared-jail-for-stabbing-boyfriend-with-bread-knife-36166924.html
    The poster you are conversing with has previously started a thread in which she suggested that if a man does not make a woman orgasm during consensual sex, he has sexually assaulted her.

    Can you please point me in direction of that thread ?
    I just need a laugh, it's been a bad day so far.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,910 ✭✭✭begbysback


    I can't decide. I'm on the fence. Perhaps. Maybe. Who's to say really.
    Wow it's like coronation street in here


    On topic - do we have a squeeze barometer?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    jmayo wrote: »
    Can you please point me in direction of that thread ?
    I just need a laugh, it's been a bad day so far.

    Certainly :)

    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057737373/1/#post103419761


  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Zadkiel


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!
    I did not say that whoopsadoodles. Thats an outright lie. Maybe you might consider why you have a reputation for being so arrogant and disparaging to women on here, including another woman on this thread before me.

    You're opinion of someone doesn't equate to a reputation.
    I've never found Whoops' posts to be arrogant or disparaging of anyone.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭midlandsmissus


    No it shouldn't, are you mad!

    Perfect! That thread points out the lie.

    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.

    Why don't you use the dictionary to look under the two different words:
    1. Abuse.
    2.Assault.

    I think you'll find they mean two different things.

    Don't twist my words again. Evidence always points to the truth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    Perfect! That thread points out the lie.

    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.

    Why don't you use the dictionary to look under the two different words:
    1. Abuse.
    2.Assault.

    I think you'll find they mean two different things.

    Don't twist my words again. Evidence always points to the truth.

    :pac:

    Oh well then. That's a perfectly reasonable and rational view.

    Jesus :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,863 ✭✭✭mikhail


    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.
    The main abuse there was your abuse of the word abuse. Sexual abuse is a very serious thing, and statements like yours are frankly sickening conflation of something very different with it for the purposes of sophistry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 34,555 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Perfect! That thread points out the lie.

    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.

    Why don't you use the dictionary to look under the two different words:
    1. Abuse.
    2.Assault.

    I think you'll find they mean two different things.

    Don't twist my words again. Evidence always points to the truth.

    Is sex, where the man orgasms, and doesn't attempt to make the woman orgasm: Abusive sex?

    Is sex, where the man orgasms, and doesn't attempt to make the woman orgasm: Sexual Assault?

    So is 'abusive sex' not 'sexual assault' then no?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,098 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I thought no but then I seen his picture and changed my mind. I know, unfair, but life's unfair.
    Perfect! That thread points out the lie.

    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.
    A worldview that equates not "giving" anyone an orgasm is a worldview with a fair few screws loose.
    Don't twist my words again.
    No need.
    Evidence always points to the truth.
    The fcuking irony. 432652.gif :pac:

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,224 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    I can't decide. I'm on the fence. Perhaps. Maybe. Who's to say really.
    Ah abusive PMs! Sure to win any rational argument :)

    Copy and paste them here, don't keep the fun to yourself.

    Buford T. Justice

    Best Mod name ever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭whoopsadoodles


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    Copy and paste them here, don't keep the fun to yourself.

    Ah that there is against the rules and there are many things I would happily get banned for but someone else's inability to enter a discussion without being abusive is not one of those things.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,039 ✭✭✭✭retro:electro


    I can't decide. I'm on the fence. Perhaps. Maybe. Who's to say really.
    Perfect! That thread points out the lie.

    I said Abuse. I knew I said abuse seeing as I wrote the thread.

    Why don't you use the dictionary to look under the two different words:
    1. Abuse.
    2.Assault.

    I think you'll find they mean two different things.

    Don't twist my words again. Evidence always points to the truth.

    I don't think the terminology was the issue! Well actually it is, but not for the reason you think.


Advertisement