The 8th amendment(Mod warning in op)

Ken.

Mod-Thread reopened.

amdublin

2wsxcde3 wrote: »

Just because women are having abortions, it does not mean that abortion is ok. Pro-choicers seem to confuse the idea that if something is already happening, then that thing is a good and ok thing.

We have people not paying their TV licence. Does that mean we should stop stigmatizing people who dont pay their TV licence and do away with the TV licence and shut RTE down? Men are getting on a plane every weekend and travelling to Amsterdam to have sex with 3 or more prostitutes. Does that mean we should stop stigmatizing men who travel to another country to have sex with a prostitute and introduce brothels in every town and village across Ireland?

I think the point is that nothing will change, just the location. The sky will not fall down.


I am wondering why you are mentioning stigmatizing/Amsterdam in a thread about abortion/the 8th amendment. Do you think there is a stigma about abortion/women who have had an abortion?

AnneFrank

This go's back to my previous point, having the mob jumping down the neck of anyone with a differing view,pro life in this case will just stop debate out of fear of being labelled,just like the recent marriage referendum.Pity but the modern follow the sheep trend I guess

eviltwin

AnneFrank wrote: »

This go's back to my previous point, having the mob jumping down the neck of anyone with a differing view,pro life in this case will just stop debate out of fear of being labelled,just like the recent marriage referendum.Pity but the modern follow the sheep trend I guess

7000 posts says you are wrong. There is no one stopping debate here. The majority of posters on this page are in favour of repeal just as the majority supported SSM. Being outnumbered doesnt mean you are being ganged up on.

AnneFrank

eviltwin wrote: »

7000 posts says you are wrong. There is no one stopping debate here. The majority of posters on this page are in favour of repeal just as the majority supported SSM. Being outnumbered doesnt mean you are being ganged up on.

I think you're missing the point,

SusieBlue

AnneFrank wrote: »

This go's back to my previous point, having the mob jumping down the neck of anyone with a differing view,pro life in this case will just stop debate out of fear of being labelled,just like the recent marriage referendum.Pity but the modern follow the sheep trend I guess

Well when people are going around making unfounded, ignorant and highly offensive comments with no basis on reality it’s bound to get people’s backs up.

Just within the last day I’ve seen abortion compared to FGM, the holocaust, and most recently, prostitution.
There is no defense for making those comparisons.
Can you imagine how distressing and angering it may be to read such claims, especially considering many posters here may have had or know someone who has had an abortion themselves?

eviltwin

AnneFrank wrote: »

I think you're missing the point,

What is your point?

Beethoven9th

Unfortunately its the unborn who have absolutely no voice in this debate, or ever will

Sweetemotion

eviltwin wrote: »

What is your point?

If a pro-lifer called the pro-choice brigade a bunch of kuntz. Do you think they would still be able to post in this thread?

eviltwin

Sweetemotion wrote: »

If a pro-lifer called the pro-choice brigade a bunch of kuntz. Do you think they would still be able to post in this thread let alone this site?

No they wouldn't just as my comment wasn't allowed to stay. I think the mods here are quite consistent and fair. I don't know if this thread is specifically what Anne is referring to or the debate in general.

Captain Obvious

WhiteRoses wrote: »

Well when people are going around making unfounded, ignorant and highly offensive comments with no basis on reality it’s bound to get people’s backs up.

Like that everyone who disagrees is a "bunch of kuntz"?

WhiteRoses wrote: »

Just within the last day I’ve seen abortion compared to FGM, the holocaust, and most recently, prostitution.
There is no defense for making those comparisons.
Can you imagine how distressing and angering it may be to read such claims, especially considering many posters here may have had or know someone who has had an abortion themselves?

I wonder how distressing it is to people who have had miscarriages to hear their loss dismissed as "just a bunch of cells". I've seen the pro life side being dismissed as controlling misogynists. Let's not pretend this is good vs evil here. There are people on each side of the debate that who can't debate the issue without getting personal.

NuMarvel

2wsxcde3 wrote: »

Just because women are having abortions, it does not mean that abortion is ok. Pro-choicers seem to confuse the idea that if something is already happening, then that thing is a good and ok thing.

We have people not paying their TV licence. Does that mean we should stop stigmatizing people who dont pay their TV licence and do away with the TV licence and shut RTE down? Men are getting on a plane every weekend and travelling to Amsterdam to have sex with 3 or more prostitutes. Does that mean we should stop stigmatizing men who travel to another country to have sex with a prostitute and introduce brothels in every town and village across Ireland?

As I said before, it isn't just a case of people having abortions anyway, it's a case of no one; pro life, pro choice, repeal, or anti-repeal, wanting to stop them.

There is political will and public support for the prosecution of people who don't pay their TV licence, or break speed limits, or buy drugs. The same cannot be said about women who have abortions. Many anti-repealers go to lengths to say they don't want to see women criminalised, even though that's exactly what the status quo permits.

And when it comes to traveling abroad, abortion is the only act that's illegal in Ireland which for there is express constitutional protection to travel abroad to carry out. We voted that in just over 25 years ago, and no one wants to see it overturned.

So if we've already voted to say it's okay to have abortions elsewhere, and no one has any interest in enforcing the law here, retaining the law serves no practical purpose and it should be done away with.

January

Beethoven9th wrote: »

Unfortunately its the unborn who have absolutely no voice in this debate, or ever will

Because they shouldn't have. Why should something that hasn't even taken a breath have more rights than me or the children I have already given birth to?

SusieBlue

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Like that everyone who disagrees is a "bunch of kuntz"?



I wonder how distressing it is to people who have had miscarriages to hear their loss dismissed as "just a bunch of cells". I've seen the pro life side being dismissed as controlling misogynists. Let's not pretend this is good vs evil here. There are people on each side of the debate that who can't debate the issue without getting personal.

Sorry but you can’t equate someone saying a fetus is a bunch of cells (which it is) to someone referring to abortion in the same breath as FGM and the Holocaust.

Captain Obvious

WhiteRoses wrote: »

Sorry but you can’t equate someone saying a fetus is a bunch of cells (which it is) to someone referring to abortion in the same breath as FGM and the Holocaust.

I didn't. I was comparing the distress experienced y people affected by both issues.

Sweetemotion

WhiteRoses wrote: »

Sorry but you can’t equate someone saying a fetus is a bunch of cells (which it is) to someone referring to abortion in the same breath as FGM and the Holocaust.

We are all a bunch of cells. Can I ask how that "someone" referred to abortion in the same breath as FGM and the Holocaust?

Crea

Captain Obvious wrote: »

Like that everyone who disagrees is a "bunch of kuntz"?



I wonder how distressing it is to people who have had miscarriages to hear their loss dismissed as "just a bunch of cells". I've seen the pro life side being dismissed as controlling misogynists. Let's not pretend this is good vs evil here. There are people on each side of the debate that who can't debate the issue without getting personal.

It's probably less distressing than a person who had a termination for ffa to have pro lifers describe those who have had abortions as "baby murderers".and the usual line trotted out "nothing justifies murdering a baby"

Captain Obvious

Crea wrote: »

It's probably less distressing than a person who had a termination for ffa to have pro lifers describe those who have had abortions as "baby murderers".and the usual line trotted out "nothing justifies murdering a baby"

I'd imagine so. I think you missed the point of my post though. I'm not trying to start a pissing contest, I'm pointing out that those kind of comments are coming from both sides and neither are contributing to the debate by doing so.

SusieBlue

Sweetemotion wrote: »

We are all a bunch of cells. Can I ask how that "someone" referred to abortion in the same breath as FGM and the Holocaust?

Certainly. Here is where FGM and the holocaust were mentioned.

2wsxcde3 wrote: »

And used to heat hospitals.

Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals
(Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/15/aborted-babies-incinerated-to-heat-uk-hospitals/ )

Sound familiar? The nazis used the corpses of jews they had gassed to heat the houses in the concentration camps.

2wsxcde3 wrote: »

We're talking about dumping a readily identifiable baby into raw sewerage???

Can you not understand how countries who practice FGM for example look at us here in the west and think we are as gone in the head as we like to think they are?

Andrew Beef

amdublin wrote: »

Andrew Beef wrote: »

With the greatest respect, no they don’t.

If women want to end the lives of their unborn children, they should be compelled to travel overseas.

I am at a loss. Do you care about the unborn children or not?


This seems like you care to a point, but once it is a fait accompli once it happens overseas then fair game


(At least it's difficult for the woman/kind of like she has been punished for daring to have an abortion??)

I absolutely care about the unborn child; if it were up to me, I would criminalise women who travel overseas for abortions.

BabysCoffee

Andrew Beef wrote: »

I absolutely care about the unborn child; if it were up to me, I would criminalise women who travel overseas for abortions.

Why?

Bannasidhe

Andrew Beef wrote: »

I absolutely care about the unborn child; if it were up to me, I would criminalise women who travel overseas for abortions.

One presumes that you put a great deal of energy into ensuring that children who are already born are not the victims of homelessness, poverty, lack of health care, lack of support services etc.
Also that you support affordable childcare, fully paid maternity leave, child benefit back dated to the date of conception...

Or is it, like so many pro-lifers here, all about the 'unborn' and then a total lack of interest one they are born and their mother needs support?

Andrew Beef

BabysCoffee wrote: »

Andrew Beef wrote: »

I absolutely care about the unborn child; if it were up to me, I would criminalise women who travel overseas for abortions.

Why?

Because I believe that abortion is murder.

The unborn child has a right to life which trumps the woman’s right to choose.

pitifulgod

Andrew Beef wrote: »

Because I believe that abortion is murder.

The unborn child has a right to life which trumps the woman’s right to choose.

Would you wish the women who have abortions to be convicted for murder?

BabysCoffee

Andrew Beef wrote: »

The unborn child has a right to life which trumps the woman’s right to choose.

This makes me sad.

By denying choice to woman they may be destined to die. I can't justify this.

swampgas

Andrew Beef wrote: »

Because I believe that abortion is murder.

The unborn child has a right to life which trumps the woman’s right to choose.

Not everyone accepts this as true. Can you explain why we should change our minds to believe the same thing you do? I mean go ahead and try to persuade me why you think your view is correct.

Simply repeating "That's what I believe" doesn't convince anyone of anything.

Andrew Beef

pitifulgod wrote: »

Andrew Beef wrote: »

Because I believe that abortion is murder.

The unborn child has a right to life which trumps the woman’s right to choose.

Would you wish the women who have abortions to be convicted for murder?

No, but an offence of “uteral infanticide” or something like that.

It is morally wrong.

swampgas

Andrew Beef wrote: »

No, but an offence of “uteral infanticide” or something like that.

It is morally wrong.

According to whose moral code?

SusieBlue

Andrew Beef wrote: »

No, but an offence of “uteral infanticide” or something like that.

It is morally wrong.

I suppose it’s just unfortunate collateral damage that numerous women live in distress and fear, suffer health complications and even die just because your view is forced on the whole of society.

I think it’s morally wrong to put the fetus before the needs, wants and wellbeing of the woman carrying it.

However I don’t believe in imposing my view on the whole of society - I think we should leave it up to each individual woman as to whether she prioritizes her own life or that of the fetus.

eviltwin

Andrew Beef wrote: »

No, but an offence of “uteral infanticide” or something like that.

It is morally wrong.

It's interesting and somewhat confusing that we have granted the unborn equal right to life but we don't consider them equal enough that a woman who has an abortion here will be charged with murder. It's like having an abortion here is a crime against the state rather than the unborn. It's a weird state of affairs.

What kind of penalty would you impose on these women?