Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gameweek 5 Matchday Thread

1282931333446

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Thepoet85 wrote: »
    Mark from FFS is saying the hold back is to do with two assists, not "that" goal.

    Jesus, they should really abandon that rule if this is the approach they're gonna take. That's not right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,250 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    Thepoet85 wrote: »
    Mark from FFS is saying the hold back is to do with two assists, not "that" goal.

    Yeah, Matt Phillips was one anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,022 ✭✭✭jamesbere


    stephenl15 wrote: »
    Williams could be getting that assist :(

    I'll take that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,439 ✭✭✭✭km79


    wonski wrote: »
    It has not unless they change something. They haven't changed anything so far.

    points are confirmed one hour after last game finishes
    game finished at approx 730
    points should have been confirmed by 830
    they haven't
    precedent set


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭stephenl15




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    This is worse than a dodgy count in a US Presidential election!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,268 ✭✭✭IsMiseMyself


    Tbh, I'd rather they be late and correct than within the arbitrary time limits they've set. But I mean I get it: rules are rules and where do they draw the line in the future?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Honestly, the best way around this going forward is scratch the 1 hour rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,439 ✭✭✭✭km79


    CSF wrote: »
    Honestly, the best way around this going forward is scratch the 1 hour rule.

    Agreed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭stephenl15


    Yeah, Matt Phillips was one anyway.

    Walcott the other I'd imagine


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,672 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    If a Williams assist now comes through, it'll be hilarious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,250 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    stephenl15 wrote: »
    Walcott the other I'd imagine

    Yeah a guy who works for Opta said on FFS that Phillips and Walcott assists were the only 2 things being investigated. All goals will stand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    CSF wrote: »
    No no, that's fine and all. But why have rules if we're not gonna follow them? Fwiw I think its wrong to not leave it open, but that's the rules they made so they should follow them, like they should have the other times they didn't follow the rules.

    Yeah but CSF you're a man of principles and precision. When you put a deadline up, you clinically stick to it. ;). No bias. No exception. Just pure rectitude. And a fair wisdom to everyone. You're the Eliott Ness of FPL FSA :D.
    On the other hand, the FPL towers gave in to the PL £ power and the 4m players potential economy. It suits them to keep secret some of the mechanics of the game. They became the Scarfaces of FPL.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,439 ✭✭✭✭km79


    SlickRic wrote: »
    If a Williams assist now comes through, it'll be hilarious.

    If it takes bonus away from lukaku I'm all for it despite shelling out the extra .5 to switch Williams to baines on WC
    Along with Bolasie to Barkley......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,250 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    SlickRic wrote: »
    If a Williams assist now comes through, it'll be hilarious.

    It won't unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Yeah a guy who works for Opta said on FFS that Phillips and Walcott assists were the only 2 things being investigated. All goals will stand.

    What Walcott assist are we talking about though? If they change his to an OG then that's not all goals standing. I'd be furious if I was a Walcott owner if that's what it was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    iroced wrote: »
    Yeah but CSF you're a man of principles and precision. When you put a deadline up, you clinically stick to it. ;). No bias. No exception. Just pure rectitude. And a fair wisdom to everyone. You're the Eliott Ness of FPL FSA :D.
    On the other hand, the FPL towers gave in to the PL £ power and the 4m players potential economy. It suits them to keep secret some of the mechanics of the game. They became the Scarfaces of FPL.

    Hahaha that's a complement I'll take :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,250 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    CSF wrote: »
    What Walcott assist are we talking about though? If they change his to an OG then that's not all goals standing. I'd be furious if I was a Walcott owner if that's what it was.

    Sanchez goal I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,250 ✭✭✭✭Scorpion Sting


    Assists for Walcott and Phillips added just there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,439 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Assists for Walcott and Phillips added just there.

    Doesn't affect me but it's a joke
    Rules are rules
    But not anymore
    Why don't they look at lukaku "goal" now too?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    km79 wrote: »
    Doesn't affect me but it's a joke
    Rules are rules
    But not anymore
    Why don't they look at lukaku "goal" now too?

    By all accounts they have looked at his goal and concluded differently to us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Points confirmed :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,962 ✭✭✭Hogey007


    Assists for Walcott and Phillips added just there.
    How was there even a doubt over the Walcott one? Shot saved by keeper, sanchez scored rebound. I assumed it was already given. Are they really only getting to that now? (Didn't see Phillips one but seemed very obvious by fotmob reports too)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,478 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Hogey007 wrote: »
    How was there even a doubt over the Walcott one? Shot saved by keeper, sanchez scored rebound. I assumed it was already given. Are they really only getting to that now? (Didn't see Phillips one but seemed very obvious by fotmob reports too)

    My guess is they spent ages over the Lukaku one, concluded it was his, and then acted like his one was never in doubt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,022 ✭✭✭jamesbere


    Kdb 3 bps, didn't think he'd get that. Lukaku goal confirmed puts me to 55. Happy days


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    Antonio was very impressive on MOTD. Could easily have had another goal and an assist


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭jamesbondings


    57 from 6 hazard and McCauley letting me down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,274 ✭✭✭✭FHFC


    spock. wrote: »
    Antonio was very impressive on MOTD. Could easily have had another goal and an assist

    Payet coulda scored heavily too. I think he's gonna explode soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭stephenl15


    FHFC wrote: »
    Payet coulda scored heavily too. I think he's gonna explode soon.

    West Ham look horrendous though kinda putting me off them


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭spock.


    stephenl15 wrote:
    West Ham look horrendous though kinda putting me off them

    Their defence is hopeless but they will score plenty goals


Advertisement