Gameweek 5 Matchday Thread

km79

FHFC wrote: »

Agree. Must be about the goal. Site has been updated super fast this year so far.

Hhhhmmmmm
Would make a massive difference to ranks

CSF

Getting nervous here.

manual_man

would have thought that since it came from the Everton dressing room that they agreed that it's Rom's goal, that it's Rom's goal...

the wait, though

stephenl15

I'm pissed off as a non owner that he was awarded the goal in the first place, but if I was an owner, i'd be very annoyed for it to be taken off him at this stage, even though I think it should be Bolasie's goal

CSF

If they don't follow their own rules here I will be fit to kill. Goal or no goal, you can't just go tearing up your own rules whenever it suits you.

Cantona's Collars

32 so far with Shaw,Capoue,Zlatan and Benteke (c) still to play.My decision to stick with Sterling paid off.Nobody around me has Benteke so hoping he does big things against Stoke.

km79

CSF wrote: »

If they don't follow their own rules here I will be fit to kill. Goal or no goal, you can't just go tearing up your own rules whenever it suits you.

they do this though ! They have "rules" but they bend them to suit themselves

wonski

Just now recording highlights Just in case

CSF

km79 wrote: »

they do this though ! They have "rules" but they bend them to suit themselves

That's not ok though. If you want to leave the points open to change, no problem. But don't make it a rule that you can't, and not do it sometimes, but then another time say '**** it, who needs rules'.

wonski

km79 wrote: »

they do this though ! They have "rules" but they bend them to suit themselves

I remember Suarez. I am sure they will never ever make that mistake again.

iroced

Relax Lukaku will never be taken his goal away. They're just playing with your nerves .

km79

CSF wrote: »

That's not ok though. If you want to leave the points open to change, no problem. But don't make it a rule that you can't, and not do it sometimes, but then another time say '**** it, who needs rules'.

absolutely! But long story short they do ! Aguero non assist last year ......had it out with them as an assist had been given a week or 2 before that I had queries and got back an email that basically outlined an assist like the one aguero was then not awarded

FutureGuy

km79 wrote: »

absolutely! But long story short they do ! Aguero non assist last year ......had it out with them as an assist had been given a week or 2 before that I had queries and got back an email that basically outlined an assist like the one aguero was then not awarded

I'd rather they take their time and examine the incident so that the correct call is made.

CSF

FutureGuy wrote: »

I'd rather they take their time and examine the incident so that the correct call is made.

Even if their own rules say they can't?

iroced

FutureGuy wrote: »

I'd rather they take their time and examine the incident so that the correct call is made.

Yes but they never did that. How many times the dubious goal panel changed the goalscorer after FPL had finalised its GW?

It's like the price changes system.

FPL towers like a bit of chaotic obscurity over their game. It excites them !

wonski

I'll take whatever they say. Part of the game (like it or not)

And please do not bring up a topic of money leagues etc. This was designed to be a fun game after all.

FutureGuy

CSF wrote: »

Even if their own rules say they can't?

I cannot remember the exact incident last year but there was definitely an incident that went over the hour so there is precedence. For the sake of transparency, I have Bolaise but I have contacted FPL many times to point out issues even if they went against me point-wise.

km79

FutureGuy wrote: »

I'd rather they take their time and examine the incident so that the correct call is made.

I dont have lukaku and I REALLy hope he loses the goal BUT there has to be consistency
I was categorically told last year the hour rule was golden

Mr.Prodston

Who assisted Bolasie for this goal?

Or basically please tell me it was Mirallas :pac:

km79

Mr.Prodston wrote: »

Who assisted Bolasie for this goal?

Or basically please tell me it was Mirallas :pac:

Gay I think
was hoping baines

CSF

FutureGuy wrote: »

I cannot remember the exact incident last year but there was definitely an incident that went over the hour so there is precedence. For the sake of transparency, I have Bolaise but I have contacted FPL many times to point out issues even if they went against me point-wise.

No no, that's fine and all. But why have rules if we're not gonna follow them? Fwiw I think its wrong to not leave it open, but that's the rules they made so they should follow them, like they should have the other times they didn't follow the rules.

stephenl15

Scenes when Lukaku keeps his goal and Sanchez loses one of his

CSF

stephenl15 wrote: »

Scenes when Lukaku keeps his goal and Sanchez loses one of his

No I have them both!!!

km79

stephenl15 wrote: »

Scenes when Lukaku keeps his goal and Sanchez loses one of his

oh Jesus no

stephenl15

Mark Sutherns AKA "The Scout" commented on his website fantasyfootballscout:
No goals will change - it's an assist issue.

http://www.fantasyfootballscout.co.uk/2016/09/17/dugout-discussion-everton-vs-middlesbrough/?hc_page=46#hc_comment_14098617

km79

stephenl15 wrote: »

Mark Sutherns AKA "The Scout" commented on his website fantasyfootballscout:
No goals will change - it's an assist issue.

point still stands
the "hour rule " has been broken now

FHFC

Lukaku has been asked and confirmed its his....:)

https://twitter.com/moris_fc/status/777245778431598592

stephenl15

Williams could be getting that assist

Thepoet85

Mark from FFS is saying the hold back is to do with two assists, not "that" goal.

wonski

km79 wrote: »

point still stands
the "hour rule " has been broken now

It has not unless they change something. They haven't changed anything so far.