Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Operation Transformation

  • 10-02-2016 9:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭


    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Hitchens wrote: »
    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!

    How was the poor man humiliated so to speak?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Because he appeared on an RTE show or what happened? I do not watch the show but am familiar with its concept.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭StewartGriffin


    Hitchens wrote: »
    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!

    Is this a future thread about Enda Kenny in tomorrow nights debate?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    No idea what you're on about OP. People here read books and don't watch TV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    Every ****ing thread has someone trying to make a funny reference to Enda Kenny, every ****ing one.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭strelok


    ThisRegard wrote: »
    Every ****ing thread has someone trying to make a funny reference to Enda Kenny, every ****ing one.

    enda kennys hairy vagina


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,891 ✭✭✭✭Hugo Stiglitz


    Hitchens wrote: »
    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!

    What happened, H?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    ThisRegard wrote: »
    Every ****ing thread has someone trying to make a funny reference to Enda Kenny, every ****ing one.

    Go home Enda. You're drunk.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    ThisRegard wrote: »
    Every ****ing thread has someone trying to make a funny reference to Enda Kenny, every ****ing one.

    But they're hilarious!!! -_-


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,592 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    strelok wrote: »
    enda kennys hairy vagina


    Used to smoke but got angina.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Hammer89


    Hitchens wrote: »
    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!

    Come on mate. I'd quite like to know why he was humiliated on national television but you're giving me nothing.

    This isn't Game of Thrones. Not everybody watches this heap of you know what, so not everybody is going to know what you're on about. Can anybody shed light on why the chap was humiliated?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    it will probably be on the player (shouldn't be though) and a picture paints a thousand words ..........bloody nasty it was (again IMO)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Hammer89


    Hitchens wrote: »
    it will probably be on the player (shouldn't be though) and a picture paints a thousand words ..........bloody nasty it was (again IMO)

    Ban this chap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Hitchens wrote: »
    it will probably be on the player (shouldn't be though) and a picture paints a thousand words ..........bloody nasty it was (again IMO)

    Don't leave us hanging


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,152 ✭✭✭✭KERSPLAT!


    You may fill everyone in or I can lock the thread as its pointless without something to discuss bar your outrage


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭Hitchens




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,193 ✭✭✭✭Kerrydude1981




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    ThisRegard wrote: »
    Every ****ing thread has someone trying to make a funny reference to Enda Kenny, every ****ing one.

    Once they include the 'Kenny' bit, I'm cool with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    Is this a future thread about Enda Kenny in tomorrow nights debate?

    Given he is up against Meehole, I doubt Enda will be quaking in his boots.

    Anyway, what happened to the guy on RTE tonight?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭Lights On


    I'd much rather RTE spent my money on making a show called Operation Transformers where two groups of people set out to make a giant robot and at the end of the series have them both fight to the death!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    Lights On wrote: »
    I'd much rather RTE spent my money on making a show called Operation Transformers where two groups of people set out to make a giant robot and at the end of the series have them both fight to the death!

    Same here. Sounds like a winner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,003 ✭✭✭Hammer89


    Hitchens wrote: »
    it will probably be on the player (shouldn't be though) and a picture paints a thousand words ..........bloody nasty it was (again IMO)

    I thought he sh*t himself on the scales or something after reading this.

    There's nothing nasty or humiliating about gaining 1.5 lbs. Weight loss is hard but it's nigh-on impossible if you beat yourself up over setbacks. This leads to self-sabotage and a relapse into old habits. I suppose it's much more upsetting when your weight gain is televised, which probably explains the tears, but you need a very thick skin for weight loss - a capacity to get back on the horse immediately - and this fella seems to lack a bit of stoicism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    Ffs, I thought it would be something like losing control of his bowels too (or worse). Strange idea of shocking. The OP's indignation has to be feigned.

    Poor guy though - sad to read of him getting upset.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,738 ✭✭✭Naos


    Probably didn't do enough of those 2kg water bottle bicep curls Karl Henry set out for him.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I assumed they tackled Karl Henry on how many triathlons he pulled out of.

    Has he finished one yet?

    Not that any single person who watches Operation Transformation would ask that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭Darkest Horse


    I assumed they tackled Karl Henry on how many triathlons he pulled out of.

    Has he finished one yet?

    Not that any single person who watches Operation Transformation would ask that.

    Ha ha. Expand on that!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ha ha. Expand on that!

    Used to be a topic of fun on the athletics forum, analysis of his performances in events. He seemed to have racked up a fair few DNFs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,547 ✭✭✭✭Poor Uncle Tom


    Ha ha. Expand on that!

    I think that's John's problem, he takes this quote literally....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,741 ✭✭✭✭Ally Dick


    It's Operation Patronisation. I wouldn't watch it in a fit. I can't stand the notion that the country is behind these people, in their bid to lose weight. I'd rather have my mental health than be a bit overweight. If I went on that, I'd lose my self respect because of those patronising b@stards who judge you. I also can't stand that raucous, over enthusiastic Kathryn Thomas. Go off and marry your garda or whatever


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ally Dick wrote: »
    Operation Patronisation.

    Dammit, I was thinking of a way to describe it dismissively and express my contempt...and you managed it in 2 words. But I will steal it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Hitchens wrote: »
    Apologies if a thread on this exists.

    Gruesome viewing on it tonight. I believe that man was humiliated on National Television. Why the poor man (or anyone) would put himself in that position in the first place is a mystery, but it was not right to show it, IMO!

    i AGREE 100% and the thig is we don't normally watch it, but last night we were channel hopping when we witnessed that poor man being utterly embarrassed & humiliated on national Television (after losing both his parents too)?
    It was really bad tv, and we felt so sorry for that poor man, being put through that :(


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ally Dick wrote: »
    It's Operation Patronisation. I wouldn't watch it in a fit.
    +1. Much of it is let's feel better about yourself and cringe at the fatties. The faux concern, faux public health and faux "experts" help take the sting out of it. Mob TV at its finest and judging by viewing figures the mob like it.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 387 ✭✭boardie100


    I assumed they tackled Karl Henry on how many triathlons he pulled out of.

    Has he finished one yet?

    Not that any single person who watches Operation Transformation would ask that.

    he's probably too busy spending the 65k he gets for doing the show.... !


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wibbs wrote: »
    +1. Much of it is let's feel better about yourself and cringe at the fatties. The faux concern, faux public health and faux "experts" help take the sting out of it. Mob TV at its finest and judging by viewing figures the mob like it.

    This thread has given me another good line to nick. I think I might actually combine both your post and Ally's for a Facebook status update...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,554 ✭✭✭valoren


    I've been following the main meal plans and have lost half a stone.
    There's a lot of waste with the shopping though that's my only complaint.
    They don't re-use the ingredients enough and the perishables end up in the bin.
    Instead of re-using them yourself you'd end up adding them in so as not to waste them thus adding calories.

    I'm sure the OP's point is that the guy was being psychoanalysed on national television.
    You'd know what to expect when you apply I'm sure.
    He has missed his weight loss target for two weeks in a row.
    If appearing on national television doesn't light a fire under your ass to motivate your weight loss then there is something deeper and serious going on with the chap.

    And that would need to be dealt with privately and not with cliched psychobabble/warts and all reality TV.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    valoren wrote: »
    I've been following the main meal plans and have lost half a stone.
    There's a lot of waste with the shopping though that's my only complaint.
    They don't re-use the ingredients enough and the perishables end up in the bin.
    Instead of re-using them yourself you'd end up adding them in so as not to waste them thus adding calories.

    I'm sure the OP's point is that the guy was being psychoanalysed on national television.
    You'd know what to expect when you apply I'm sure.
    He has missed his weight loss target for two weeks in a row.
    If appearing on national television doesn't light a fire under your ass to motivate your weight loss then there is something deeper and serious going on with the chap.

    And that would need to be dealt with privately and not with cliched psychobabble/warts and all reality TV.
    Exactly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Hercule Poirot


    LordSutch wrote: »
    i AGREE 100% and the thig is we don't normally watch it, but last night we were channel hopping when we witnessed that poor man being utterly embarrassed & humiliated on national Television (after losing both his parents too)?
    It was really bad tv, and we felt so sorry for that poor man, being put through that :(

    If he hadn't of lost his parents, with his sad story of sacrificing himself to raise his brothers he wouldn't be on the show

    Fella I know applied to go on it and was selected for the intial process (or whatever it is) - there were a few problems though....

    Himself and the wife were very happy together
    He got on very well with his kids (as did the wife)
    He had a job he enjoyed

    He was just a simple fella who got on with life - and he wasn't selected, can't think why though :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭podgemonster


    Patronisation, humiliation and misery porn is what Operation transformation has become. Half the leaders are so far gone that they've nearly had to withdraw from the series. They are going for the Xfactor sob story half the time.

    I also can stand how they march them out in nothing but tight black spandex to cover their privates and measure them next to the stick thin well dressed Thomas.

    Then in the final episode they'll dress them up with a few M&S vouchers and put them on a runway to show how much weight they've lost compared to when they forced them into underpants on day 1.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    LordSutch wrote: »
    i AGREE 100% and the thig is we don't normally watch it, but last night we were channel hopping when we witnessed that poor man being utterly embarrassed & humiliated on national Television (after losing both his parents too)?
    It was really bad tv, and we felt so sorry for that poor man, being put through that :(
    I feel bad for the guy and I hate the "tough love" (i.e. being an aggressive jerk) approach by the panel (Dr Eva before - pure wagon approach) but the guy did know what he was letting himself in for, and volunteered still, so I don't see how it's humiliation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Oh it was just awful TV. Reminded of Tubs on last weeks Late Late show interviewing some poor man who had lost his daughter to cancer I think? and Tubridy asks him so what were the final momnets like with her as she slipped away 'or words to that effect'... it was totally cringeworthy and uncomfortable TV viewing.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Azalea wrote: »
    I feel bad for the guy and I hate the "tough love" (i.e. being an aggressive jerk) approach by the panel (Dr Eva before - pure wagon approach)
    Designed from the outset as that crap sells to the idiocracy. The Simon Cowell effect.
    but the guy did know what he was letting himself in for, and volunteered still, so I don't see how it's humiliation.
    The usually low IQ underclass types that Jeremy Kyle brings on so the mob can laugh at apparently know what they're letting themselves in for too and that's most certainly humiliation. This RTE programme is just more of the same only less obvious, more "acceptable". If anything it's worse as it cynically hides behind "health".

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    I want to see them get skinny people and get them to pile on muscle.
    Would probably have to be made over a year so they don't end up looking like operation transformation participants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 159 ✭✭BlimpyBoy


    Azalea wrote: »
    I feel bad for the guy and I hate the "tough love" (i.e. being an aggressive jerk) approach by the panel (Dr Eva before - pure wagon approach) but the guy did know what he was letting himself in for, and volunteered still, so I don't see how it's humiliation.

    I think the "tough love" thing can work for some people if it's done in the right way but that's clearly not what the guy needed.

    They "experts" just came across as cnuts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    valoren wrote: »
    I'm sure the OP's point is that the guy was being psychoanalysed on national television.
    It is, but I don't really see the problem.

    The reason why people are overweight is because they eat too much.

    For some people this is a symptom of a deeper issue more than, "Fnck it, I just love food".

    These people will have continual difficulty losing or maintaining weight, and it would be cruel to parade this guy around on TV struggling to lose weight when it's not going to work.

    If the aim of show is to present ways to improve one's health, then showing the emotional reality as well as the physical reality is both relevant and important.

    What he was told may have seemed harsh, but sugar-coating it doesn't work. You can't leave room for ambiguity in home truths - people's own defence mechanisms retreat into the ambiguities and become denial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I'm pretty satisfied that they are manipulating the results to add to the excitement of the show.
    Take John conmy.

    1 Small weight loss - gets abuse
    2 Small weight loss - gets abuse
    Expert goes to visit him then
    3 Massive weight loss of 8 pounds
    following week
    4 Weight gain of 1.5 pounds.

    His loss probably averages out at 3 or 4 pounds per week but that wouldn't be exciting enough for tv.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,063 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    seamus wrote: »
    It is, but I don't really see the problem.

    The reason why people are overweight is because they eat too much.

    For some people this is a symptom of a deeper issue more than, "Fnck it, I just love food".

    These people will have continual difficulty losing or maintaining weight, and it would be cruel to parade this guy around on TV struggling to lose weight when it's not going to work.

    If the aim of show is to present ways to improve one's health, then showing the emotional reality as well as the physical reality is both relevant and important.

    What he was told may have seemed harsh, but sugar-coating it doesn't work. You can't leave room for ambiguity in home truths - people's own defence mechanisms retreat into the ambiguities and become denial.

    All of that could have been done off camera, without ensuring it will remain on YouTube now forever, perhaps being used to torment members of his family in the future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Designed from the outset as that crap sells to the idiocracy. The Simon Cowell effect. The usually low IQ underclass types that Jeremy Kyle brings on so the mob can laugh at apparently know what they're letting themselves in for too and that's most certainly humiliation. This RTE programme is just more of the same only less obvious, more "acceptable". If anything it's worse as it cynically hides behind "health".
    Aye, but people who watch it avidly certainly can't be complaining about the humiliation.

    As I said though, I dislike the approach. And also disagree with "it's the only home truths, no need to sugar-coat" as if there's no alternative method. The panel could easily have said "that's a disappointing result, you're not making the required effort; new goal for next week is xyz" instead of going on and on. That's what your man does on the American "year to save my life" one and it's firm enough without being humiliating. Humiliation can often just send a person back to the bad place they were in rather than motivating them. It's why I don't watch OT. The American ons may be schmaltzy but the approach is a lot more humane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    mickdw wrote: »
    I'm pretty satisfied that they are manipulating the results to add to the excitement of the show.
    Take John conmy.

    1 Small weight loss - gets abuse
    2 Small weight loss - gets abuse
    Expert goes to visit him then
    3 Massive weight loss of 8 pounds
    following week
    4 Weight gain of 1.5 pounds.

    His loss probably averages out at 3 or 4 pounds per week but that wouldn't be exciting enough for tv.

    Weekly weight loss taken at one point of a certain day isn't the ideal way to measure it, even if he is a big lad.

    Daily/twice daily measurements for a week and average it out.

    Sure if he drank a litre of water before the measurement he would have gained over 2lbs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,433 ✭✭✭sideswipe


    Caught this bit while flicking through channels before the news last night. I promptly changed channel after Kathryn T's long dramatic pause before announcing the weight gain- trying to heighten the drama. I'm sure there were hi 5's amongst the production team.

    While there are some very important messages in this type of show, it's not a healthy, sustainable model for looking after yourself long terms. Expecting so much change in a relatively short space of time after a lifetime of self abuse:(

    This show is nothing more than a post christmas cash cow for RTE. They feed on peoples insecurities as well as their self loathing for the excess of the christmas holidays. Then get diet and fitness companies to pay a fortune for adverts during the ad breaks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,313 ✭✭✭✭Sam Kade


    valoren wrote: »
    I've been following the main meal plans and have lost half a stone.
    There's a lot of waste with the shopping though that's my only complaint.
    They don't re-use the ingredients enough and the perishables end up in the bin.
    Instead of re-using them yourself you'd end up adding them in so as not to waste them thus adding calories.

    I'm sure the OP's point is that the guy was being psychoanalysed on national television.
    You'd know what to expect when you apply I'm sure.
    He has missed his weight loss target for two weeks in a row.
    If appearing on national television doesn't light a fire under your ass to motivate your weight loss then there is something deeper and serious going on with the chap.

    And that would need to be dealt with privately and not with cliched psychobabble/warts and all reality TV.

    Their meal plan is a diet plan for your wallet not your waist. It's simple to lose weight all they are doing is making it seem impossible I bet they put more people off losing weight than encouraging them.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement