Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Budget 2016

Options
1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,907 ✭✭✭✭Kristopherus


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Anyone have clarity on the childcare changes? We are currently paying for a second year of pre-school for our 4 year old, last year was free so we are paying for this one - should we now get this year for free??

    Free from age 3 to age 5.5yrs or goes to full school.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭xabi




  • Registered Users Posts: 17,895 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    xabi wrote: »
    that's last years
    Dont bother clicking on 2016 on it either:
    This is a preliminary calculator and as such is the same as 2015 at the moment.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,907 ✭✭✭✭Kristopherus


    xabi wrote: »
    that's last years

    You can click on 2016, but its the same as 2015.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Surprising fact from RTE -> 22% of all income tax and USC is paid by just 1% of taxpayers

    How if we could get some more of those 1%ers....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭Dickerty


    efb wrote: »
    No, takes effect from Sept 16

    Are you sure? None of the news sources have stated that. The statutory paternity leave of two weeks is the only thing I can see taking effect in September 2016.

    Scratch that - "Central to the €83m package is the roll-out of two years free pre-school for children aged between 3-5 from September 2016." from the Indo

    Madness to introduce something that would be a big plus to families, in a 'giveaway' budget, and then say it wouldn't apply for 11 months - well after the election.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,137 ✭✭✭✭TheDoc


    Surprising fact from RTE -> 22% of all income tax and USC is paid by just 1% of taxpayers

    How if we could get some more of those 1%ers....

    Some would argue they pay enough...


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭Dickerty


    Surprising fact from RTE -> 22% of all income tax and USC is paid by just 1% of taxpayers

    How if we could get some more of those 1%ers....

    A stat that many opposition politicians choose to ignore when they crow about going after those who can afford to pay more...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Are you sure? None of the news sources have stated that. The statutory paternity leave of two weeks is the only thing I can see taking effect in September 2016.

    Scratch that - "Central to the €83m package is the roll-out of two years free pre-school for children aged between 3-5 from September 2016." from the Indo

    Madness to introduce something that would be a big plus to families, in a 'giveaway' budget, and then say it wouldn't apply for 11 months - well after the election.

    I heard him say it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Dickerty wrote: »
    Are you sure? None of the news sources have stated that. The statutory paternity leave of two weeks is the only thing I can see taking effect in September 2016.

    Scratch that - "Central to the €83m package is the roll-out of two years free pre-school for children aged between 3-5 from September 2016." from the Indo

    Madness to introduce something that would be a big plus to families, in a 'giveaway' budget, and then say it wouldn't apply for 11 months - well after the election.

    Link with school year


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,454 ✭✭✭Icepick


    €2.2 billion goes to the Department of Justice, in 2016 funding is being made available to recruit and train a further 600 gardaí.
    Good but also increase the retirement age by 5 years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,770 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    Seems like the mooted sugar tax would have been a no brainer?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dob74


    Surprising fact from RTE -> 22% of all income tax and USC is paid by just 1% of taxpayers

    How if we could get some more of those 1%ers....


    It's not like those high flying bankers have ever got any assistance from the state. And Let's write off more money from bankrupt property developers.
    The poor 1%.

    F €€k em


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭xabi




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,663 ✭✭✭dr.kenneth noisewater


    efb wrote: »
    Contactless limit raised from €15 to €30

    Missed this, is it for all banks? Should really be up to €50 to try encourage more people to use it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Missed this, is it for all banks? Should really be up to €50 to try encourage more people to use it

    More chance for fraud


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,895 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    xabi wrote: »
    As I said on the previous page, thats just the 2015 one, it might never be updated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 48,148 ✭✭✭✭km79


    So FEMPI is dead now right ? financial crisis obviously over with this budget
    Loom forward to not paying 7.5% of my wages to a "pension levy"


  • Registered Users Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Greyian


    xabi wrote: »

    I know that this isn't your tax calculator, but it doesn't have the correct USC bands for 2016.

    It has 12,000 as the cut-off for Band 1, which is actually 13,000 now. So if you have a salary that is in Band 3 (~€18,500 or more), your annual USC bill is actually €20 less than the calculator says (it's taking the €1k between 12 and 13k at 3%, instead of the 1% it should be at).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭xabi


    Thargor wrote: »
    As I said on the previous page, thats just the 2015 one, it might never be updated.

    its updated for me anyway


  • Registered Users Posts: 976 ✭✭✭Greyian


    Thargor wrote: »
    As I said on the previous page, thats just the 2015 one, it might never be updated.

    It has been updated, but the USC bands are incorrect (they are at 12000 and ~18500, instead of 13000 and ~18500).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Dobbo got Lucinda's party name wrong lol


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TheDoc wrote: »
    Some would argue they pay enough...

    On those figures it would seem so.

    I meant getting a few more people into that earning category....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dob74 wrote: »
    It's not like those high flying bankers have ever got any assistance from the state. And Let's write off more money from bankrupt property developers.
    The poor 1%.

    F €€k em

    I wouldnt be surprised if the property developers were not in the top 1% of high income tax payers. They would only pay themselves a salary (and therfore pay income tax and USC) if it was the most tax efficent way to live.

    I wonder what level of income would bring a single person into the top 1% income tax category?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,160 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Excellent budget, promotes the value of work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 732 ✭✭✭Mister Robinson


    Was there any increase/decrease in student contribution fees for third level education or is that something separate and/or not budget related?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,541 ✭✭✭Heisenberg.


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Surprising fact from RTE -> 22% of all income tax and USC is paid by just 1% of taxpayers

    How if we could get some more of those 1%ers....


    We all cant have Ryan Tubridy's salary


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,789 ✭✭✭Coat22


    Slowly but surely the country is turning into some sort of socialist dreamland where everyone who's gotten off their ar$e and is earning more than €70k a year (the cheek of them) has their income equalised by some sort of Robin Hood politics.

    I am married, my wife remains home and rears our 2 kids, I earn a good wage, work on average 10/11 hours a day to do so and am away from my family 3 to 4 days most weeks. However in the eyes of the great socialist movement in this country I'm loaded so should therefore pay a disproportionate level of tax so that 750,000 don't have to pay any.

    I just calculated that if, rather than me earning and my wife staying at home with the kids, we both worked and earned half each what I earn (so same combined income) we would be almost €8k a year better off - €8000!!!! So not only am I f*cked by the government for earning more, I'm f*cked again because I'm the sole earner in the family!

    Family budget my eye - populist, socialist scam more like


Advertisement