Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford to ban swearing/smoking in parks

  • 23-06-2015 11:57am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,503 ✭✭✭


    http://www.newstalk.com/Waterford-City-Council-smoking-cursing-fines-new-rules-children-parks

    Waterford Council has voted in a by law that fines someone cursing in a public park €1,270. Also banning skateboarding and roller blading unless your a council employee.

    Smoking and E-Cigs also banned with effect from July 1st.

    Seems to be put in place to curb anti social behavior. Why not just enforce current laws?

    Nanny council or necessary measure ?

    No idea how to put up a poll for this.


«134

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 243 ✭✭316


    Waterford Council have too much time on their hands to be introducing this foolishness, how are they going to police it. The swear cops?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    This is ridiculous. There are plenty of public order laws in existance to help deal with this sort of behaviour without adding in laws penalising people for appropriately enjoying the oublic space. I need to see the particular wording, but it seems that barbeques (regardless of the fuel used), cycling and smoking are to be banned. E-cigarettes have been included in the edict, despite there being absolutely no evidence of harm.
    any idea of who voted in favour of this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭actuallylike


    What's cursing? Different people think different things. Are they going to release a list of outlawed words? That would be funny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 B.I.O.Y.H.


    Sounds more like a headline from Waterford Whispers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    From the WC&C parks website;

    "The People’s Park which is adjacent to the City Centre offers a relaxing environment for strollers, joggers, skate boarders and families."

    Scratch skate boarders!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 63 ✭✭plasticman3327


    What about the actual skatepark located in the park itself?!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    What about the actual skatepark located in the park itself?!?

    Elf 'n safety, mate! We won't take the responsibility, but won't allow people exercise personal responsibility either. Safer that way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭MRnotlob606


    thomasm wrote:
    Waterford Council has voted in a by law that fines someone cursing in a public park €1,270. Also banning skateboarding and roller blading unless your a council employee.


    So we'll be seeing council employees on skateboards more often?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭MRnotlob606


    Who elected these people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,245 ✭✭✭old gregg


    A bag of cans at the bandstand just won't be the same :P


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    So we'll be seeing council employees on skateboards more often?

    not without the proper training, safety equipment, licensng...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,886 ✭✭✭stephenl15


    Whatever about the smoking... But swearing!! What a ****ing joke


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    Maybe hey mean the whole Bible/court thing? Yearh, that must be what is is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    Maybe hey mean the whole Bible/court thing? Yeah, that must be what is is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 Gas Jockey


    THis might help.
    mentalfloss.com/article/21106/obscenity-vs-profanity-vs-vulgarity-whats-difference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,682 ✭✭✭deisemum


    Bloody ridiculous, smacks of a money making exercise going by the size of the fines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭beyondbelief67


    B.I.O.Y.H. wrote: »
    Sounds more like a headline from Waterford Whispers.

    That's exactly what I told my son when he told me about it, I thought someone was winding him up !
    How are they going to enforce this in the skate park in the people's park in Waterford, how do they expect kids to get to it !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,924 ✭✭✭✭BuffyBot


    To call this slightly idiotic would be an understatement..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,300 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Big willy poopoo


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    thomasm wrote: »
    http://www.newstalk.com/Waterford-City-Council-smoking-cursing-fines-new-rules-children-parks

    . Also banning skateboarding and roller blading unless your a council employee.
    .

    ????????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,439 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    hahaha time to dust off the skateboard,roller blades and loud hailer. ive a few things to say!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    Pensioner robbed in city centre .....

    But its ok because 5 people were caught using foul language in the parks ,
    3 for the F word ,
    1 for the wrong use of the word Balls
    and 1 for using the word Kilkenny .

    In other news
    A dawn raid has manage to catch 7 known E-cig users in the act ,a spoke person for the council has said.. it's great to get these dangerous criminals of the streets.
    In a related matter Waterford council today said they are delighted with their employees sign up figures in the new roller blade for life programme.


    :D
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,809 ✭✭✭Stokolan


    Now if they could just get people to pick up their dog's S̶h̶i̶t̶e̶ we'll be sorted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭DivingDuck


    Paully D wrote: »
    Plenty of this so:

    <Father Ted 'Fupp Off' scene>

    That was my thought, as well. Utter nonsense, all of it. No swearing? No e-cigs, outdoors? Rollerblades only for council workers?!

    Did someone release an inter-office prank memo as a press release, or...?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    DivingDuck wrote: »
    That was my thought, as well. Utter nonsense, all of it. No swearing? No e-cigs, outdoors? Rollerblades only for council workers?!

    Did someone release an inter-office prank memo as a press release, or...?
    I can see the logic of the e-cigs. We have banned them in my workplace, indoors or outdoors. Otherwise it's impossible for the people who are supposed to police these things to know at a distance what kind of cigarette someone is smoking. They would have to go over, check it wasn't a real cigarette. Someone could be smoking a real one, put it out and whip out the e-cigarette by the time the person checking got to them (and don't laugh, that was one of the "tricks" smokers admitted to in my workplace, and which initiated the total ban)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,396 ✭✭✭DivingDuck


    katydid wrote: »
    I can see the logic of the e-cigs. We have banned them in my workplace, indoors or outdoors. Otherwise it's impossible for the people who are supposed to police these things to know at a distance what kind of cigarette someone is smoking. They would have to go over, check it wasn't a real cigarette. Someone could be smoking a real one, put it out and whip out the e-cigarette by the time the person checking got to them (and don't laugh, that was one of the "tricks" smokers admitted to in my workplace, and which initiated the total ban)

    I see where you're coming from, though I doubt people would go to this effort in a park, which is a temporary locale, as opposed to work, which is a lot less temporary. Maybe that's overly optimistic, though.

    To be honest, I absolutely hate smoking and would be happy to see the back of it for good, but e-cigs seem to be helping smokers put real cigs behind them, and considering the exhale is basically lightly scented water vapour, I feel it's unreasonable to ban it in an outdoor environment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,751 ✭✭✭ec18


    surely this is something that is unenforceable from a legal point of view?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    DivingDuck wrote: »
    I see where you're coming from, though I doubt people would go to this effort in a park, which is a temporary locale, as opposed to work, which is a lot less temporary. Maybe that's overly optimistic, though.

    To be honest, I absolutely hate smoking and would be happy to see the back of it for good, but e-cigs seem to be helping smokers put real cigs behind them, and considering the exhale is basically lightly scented water vapour, I feel it's unreasonable to ban it in an outdoor environment.


    Can't see it been enforced and if it was by who ? I'm sure the Gardaí will have better things to do ,So are we looking at extra duties for the Traffic wardens or Dog wardens even ,is there plans to create a few jobs around these new rules.

    I'm a E-cig user and it has got me off a 40 a day habit and keep me off them for nearly 2 years now so I am bias but I can't see the logic about barring what is as you said Scented water valour in open spaces .

    Also maybe the more legally minded could let us know if it would stand up in court etc etc if someone was to take it that far.


    One last thing I know of 2 elderly gentlemen who meet most mornings for a chat and a smoke on a bench (far from any kids play areas ) So are we to now to treat hem like criminal/lawbreakers for doing something they have been doing for years . Just doesn't seem right to me.


    .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,275 ✭✭✭bpmurray


    Did anyone actually read the bye-law document? You can download it here.

    It defines parks and playgrounds as smoke-free zones, stating that also includes E-cigs, so that's nothing unusual. It has, however a few things that could be considered overly broad.:
    • You may not "Beg, gamble, use obscene or profane language, behave indecently or cause annoyance". Since "obscene" is subjective and "profane" is actually unconstitutional (you can't limit religion) and neither term is defined, it's unenforceable.
    • "No person shall organise, conduct or participate in any musical performance (whether vocal or instrumental)" so don't sing in the park!
    • "No person shall use any park or open space for the purpose of making a film": this actually forbids you from taking a film of your kids on your iPhone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,411 ✭✭✭jonski


    katydid wrote:
    I can see the logic of the e-cigs. We have banned them in my workplace, indoors or outdoors. Otherwise it's impossible for the people who are supposed to police these things to know at a distance what kind of cigarette someone is smoking. They would have to go over, check it wasn't a real cigarette. Someone could be smoking a real one, put it out and whip out the e-cigarette by the time the person checking got to them (and don't laugh, that was one of the "tricks" smokers admitted to in my workplace, and which initiated the total ban)


    What a great idea , ye should follow it up with the banning of drinking any kind of liquid , you know , just in case they are trying to sneak an alcohol hit . Is that guy actually sniffling from a cold ? Or is he just after snorting cocaine ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    bpmurray wrote: »
    Did anyone actually read the bye-law document? You can download it here.

    It defines parks and playgrounds as smoke-free zones, stating that also includes E-cigs, so that's nothing unusual. It has, however a few things that could be considered overly broad.:
    • You may not "Beg, gamble, use obscene or profane language, behave indecently or cause annoyance". Since "obscene" is subjective and "profane" is actually unconstitutional (you can't limit religion) and neither term is defined, it's unenforceable.
    • "No person shall organise, conduct or participate in any musical performance (whether vocal or instrumental)" so don't sing in the park!
    • "No person shall use any park or open space for the purpose of making a film": this actually forbids you from taking a film of your kids on your iPhone.

    Thanks for the link ,interesting read.
    Found this part interesting,

    [e] Where an employee of the Council or a member of the Garda Siochana is of the opinion that a person is committing or has committed an offence under these byelaws, the employee of the Council may demand the name and address of such person and if that demand is refused or the person gives a name or address which is false or misleading, that person shall be guilty of an offence.


    Always thought it was only a member of An Gardaí that could demand your name etc which I would have no problem giving, if they requested it, But I would not give my name or information to any Council employee.

    .


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    jonski wrote: »
    What a great idea , ye should follow it up with the banning of drinking any kind of liquid , you know , just in case they are trying to sneak an alcohol hit . Is that guy actually sniffling from a cold ? Or is he just after snorting cocaine ?

    Not the same thing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 814 ✭✭✭debok


    ROCKMAN wrote: »
    Thanks for the link ,interesting read.
    Found this part interesting,

    [e] Where an employee of the Council or a member of the Garda Siochana is of the opinion that a person is committing or has committed an offence under these byelaws, the employee of the Council may demand the name and address of such person and if that demand is refused or the person gives a name or address which is false or misleading, that person shall be guilty of an offence.


    Always thought it was only a member of An Gardaí that could demand your name etc which I would have no problem giving, if they requested it, But I would not give my name or information to any Council employee.

    .
    This is getting ridiculous. Country is turning into something out of one of those futuristic films where the government makes all the decisions. No swearing is the best iv ever heard.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭MentalMario


    You can't beat a sense of humour: https://www.facebook.com/events/1663638397198628/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    You can't beat a sense of humour: https://www.facebook.com/events/1663638397198628/

    ::D:D:D

    that's what I like to see ,,,

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,737 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    You can't beat a sense of humour: https://www.facebook.com/events/1663638397198628/

    I'm thinking of coming home specially if this goes ahead. See ye all there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    Strangely though this is sort of already in the Constitution for years...
    we have the right to freedom of speech.. BUT
    "The publication or utterance of blasphemous, seditious, or indecent matter is an offence which shall be punishable in accordance with law."

    article 40.6 covers it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    The lunatics have at last taken over the asylum.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 972 ✭✭✭Digital Society


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    So people should be allowed smoke around other peoples kids? Some auld dirty diseased smelly ****er in the park where kids are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    So people should be allowed smoke around other peoples kids? Some auld dirty diseased smelly ****er in the park where kids are.

    NO not around kids play areas ,but in other areas YES its the people's park not just the kids park and its the ****ing outdoors......

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,411 ✭✭✭jonski


    So people should be allowed smoke around other peoples kids? Some auld dirty diseased smelly ****er in the park where kids are.


    They should ban noisy kids as well , people going in there for a nice relaxing stroll in the park and having their ears accosted by screaming kids , it's a disgrace Joe , noise pollution .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,658 ✭✭✭✭OldMrBrennan83


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    Patww79 wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.




    And don't forget DOGS...




    Runs for cover


    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,124 ✭✭✭7upfree


    So, can you shout swear words in over the Park wall at someone? Just sayin'......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    Lets get the park back to what its good at and designed for.

    Underage Drinking
    Loutish behaviour
    Dodging School
    and
    Population growth.


    :pac::D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 691 ✭✭✭wellboy76


    Disgusting the damage done in there last night


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭ROCKMAN


    wellboy76 wrote: »
    Disgusting the damage done in there last night

    100% AGREE


  • Advertisement
Advertisement