Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A Third World War on the cards.

  • 25-05-2015 7:42pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭


    Has the entire Ukrainian crisis been a fantastic case of maskirovka on the part of NATO?

    Some subtle prodding of the Russian bear and manipulation of media to paint Putin's Russia as the aggressor. This article gives a fascinating perspective on the flipside of our EU-centric views.

    It takes two to tango.


    http://humansarefree.com/2014/05/cold-war-2-has-begun-us-and-nato-are.html


«1345

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Russia Cannot win a Conventional war with the EU and will not try.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,730 ✭✭✭Sheep Lover


    Will I bring the washing in off the line so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    I haven't heard anything about Ukraine or Crimea in ages, now that you mention it.

    Maybe it wasn't such a big deal after all and someone in the media thought it would be a good idea to stir shíte.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    No there isn't. No one wants a major war. Most countries are deeply interconnected economically and tradewise. Not to mention cultural links and descendents etc.

    This blip is temporary insanity that is curable through honest negotiations and compromise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    How old is too old to be conscripted? I'm 30 and am eager to please MILFs on the homefront.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭pmasterson95


    I thought egginacup would be the OP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    catallus wrote: »
    I haven't heard anything about Ukraine or Crimea in ages, now that you mention it.

    Maybe it wasn't such a big deal after all and someone in the media thought it would be a good idea to stir shíte.

    I work in Poland and there's a lot of concern here. They have home defense militias being set up and citizens joining gun clubs. Lots of nerves here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    c_man wrote: »
    How old is too old to be conscripted? I'm 30 and am eager to please MILFs on the homefront.

    You would probably still be fine the none EU army :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,729 ✭✭✭Balmed Out


    They have a great source within the secret US government.
    Top news source.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Balmed Out wrote: »
    They have a great source within the secret US government.
    Top news source.

    You mean top men.


    TOP......MEN......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Reiver wrote: »
    I work in Poland and there's a lot of concern here. They have home defense militias being set up and citizens joining gun clubs. Lots of nerves here.

    You're living in a country which has only existed in it's current form for a few years. It will get bigger and smaller as time goes on, just like in the past. History does not stand still.

    In 1492, the territory of Poland-Lithuania - not counting the fiefs of Mazovia, Moldavia, and East Prussia - covered 1,115,000 km2 (431,000 sq mi), making it the largest territory in Europe; by 1793, it had fallen to 215,000 km2 (83,000 sq mi), the same size as Great Britain, and in 1795, it disappeared completely.[4] The first 20th-century incarnation of Poland, the Second Polish Republic, occupied 389,720 km2 (150,470 sq mi), while, since 1945, a more westerly Poland covered 312,677 km2 (120,725 sq mi).[5]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭fleet_admiral


    We are already in WW3 but its economic instead of use of arms


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    We are already in WW3 but its economic instead of use of arms

    With who ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    You're living in a country which has only existed in it's current form for a few years. It will get bigger and smaller as time goes on, just like in the past. History does not stand still.

    In 1492, the territory of Poland-Lithuania - not counting the fiefs of Mazovia, Moldavia, and East Prussia - covered 1,115,000 km2 (431,000 sq mi), making it the largest territory in Europe; by 1793, it had fallen to 215,000 km2 (83,000 sq mi), the same size as Great Britain, and in 1795, it disappeared completely.[4] The first 20th-century incarnation of Poland, the Second Polish Republic, occupied 389,720 km2 (150,470 sq mi), while, since 1945, a more westerly Poland covered 312,677 km2 (120,725 sq mi).[5]

    The Baltic states are nervous as well. Everyone feels South Ossetia and Crimea were just the starter. Belarus, Poland and others are the main course.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Reiver wrote: »
    The Baltic states are nervous as well. Everyone feels South Ossetia and Crimea were just the starter. Belarus, Poland and others are the main course.

    NATO members will be fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Reiver wrote: »
    The Baltic states are nervous as well. Everyone feels South Ossetia and Crimea were just the starter. Belarus, Poland and others are the main course.

    You are probably as far away from South Ossetia as you are from Ireland. A little local difficulty in Central Europe is par for the course and hardly any indicator of Global Conflict Number Three.

    http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/2000/index.html

    One thing guaranteed, that map will not stay the same. It never has in the past.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭mad muffin


    A Third World War is sorely needed. It's benefits will be wide reaching. Just like the two before it.

    Firstly it will thin out the herd.

    It will advance science and medicine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    mad muffin wrote: »
    A Third World War is sorely needed. It's benefits will be wide reaching. Just like the two before it.

    Firstly it will thin out the herd.

    It will advance science and medicine.

    That's a very simplistic view.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    mad muffin wrote: »
    A Third World War is sorely needed. It's benefits will be wide reaching. Just like the two before it.

    Firstly it will thin out the herd.

    It will advance science and medicine.

    War is God's pruning knife.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    We are already in WW3 but its economic instead of use of arms

    Hmm, definite lack of MILFs though.

    Wtf can I get with three packs of nylon pantyhose and a pack of smokes?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    You are probably as far away from South Ossetia as you are from Ireland. A little local difficulty in Central Europe is par for the course and hardly any indicator of Global Conflict Number Three.

    http://www.euratlas.net/history/europe/2000/index.html

    One thing guaranteed, that map will not stay the same. It never has in the past.

    It was a little "local difficulty" in what we called the Polish Corridor that sparked off the largest war the world has ever seen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    c_man wrote: »
    Hmm, definite lack of MILFs though.

    Wtf can I get with three packs of nylon pantyhose and a pack of smokes?

    The best night out of your life............in Mullingar.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    Russia Cannot win a Conventional war with the EU and will not try.

    Because the EU don't have an army???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Herb Powell


    mad muffin wrote: »
    A Third World War is sorely needed. It's benefits will be wide reaching. Just like the two before it.

    Firstly it will thin out the herd.

    It will advance science and medicine.

    Off with you so, my good man


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mad muffin wrote: »
    A Third World War is sorely needed. It's benefits will be wide reaching. Just like the two before it.

    Firstly it will thin out the herd.

    It will advance science and medicine.
    Well, correct on point one, but if the war is fierce enough and goes nuclear, technology and medicine will be back to the stone age!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,797 ✭✭✭Sir Osis of Liver.


    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

    A.Einstein


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭AndonHandon


    France would just surrender.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭StewartGriffin


    c_man wrote: »
    Hmm, definite lack of MILFs though.

    Wtf can I get with three packs of nylon pantyhose and a pack of smokes?

    Panti Bliss?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

    A.Einstein

    Same guy who did not believe in Black holes so no need to fix his calculations ? Not always right.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 519 ✭✭✭tipparetops


    It is in every nations interest to go nuclear.
    When a nation gets the bomb, no one ****s with them.
    Ukraine's biggest mistake was giving up their nuclear arsenal.
    Best advice for Poland, Baltic States etc, is to buy some nukes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭Reiver


    “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

    A.Einstein

    Balls.


    The war would continue, just both sides would know to disperse more so they don't present a tempting target. No one is going to waste a nuke on a few hundred soldiers. The whole going back to the stone age thing is fantastical thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Reiver wrote: »
    It was a little "local difficulty" in what we called the Polish Corridor that sparked off the largest war the world has ever seen.

    And the Russians were involved in that as well helping out their buddies in divvying up Poland between them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭Streetwalker


    It is long overdue alright. I don't know who's crazier the Americans or the Russians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭irishlad12345


    reckon China and taiwan will be what starts WW3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    reckon China and taiwan will be what starts WW3

    China's army is defensive in nature keeping the people in line. They don't really have the capacity to wage large scale war on the west without uniting their people against the west somehow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    China's army is defensive in nature keeping the people in line. They don't really have the capacity to wage large scale war on the west without uniting their people against the west somehow.

    That's what they want you to think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭newmug


    I hope it never happens, but I think WW3 will definitely happen within our lifetimes. This period of peace in Europe has been the longest ever, in history. Its just a matter of time, and with ISIS knocking at the neighbours door, and Russia knocking at ours, its as likely as ever.

    And do you know what else? I wouldnt rule out a second civil war in Ireland either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    newmug wrote: »
    I hope it never happens, but I think WW3 will definitely happen within our lifetimes. This period of peace in Europe has been the longest ever, in history. Its just a matter of time, and with ISIS knocking at the neighbours door, and Russia knocking at ours, its as likely as ever.

    And do you know what else? I wouldnt rule out a second civil war in Ireland either.

    That's too vague, saying within our lifetimes. That could be one year for a person or one hundred years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭silverfeather


    The combined 28 nations of NATO have a combined population triple that of Russia. They have budgets many times he size of Russia. Their combines forces easily outgun russia many times over. NATO nuclear sharing vastly over powers Russia.


    WWIII is a hypothetical event.

    I think if you want to hypothesize you need to be aware of the actual military plans that automatically kick into place should this arise. Also the attack warning systems. Current ones are top secret but past ones aren't. Operation Behemoth ,NATO nuclear sharing,Exercise Internal Look

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III#Military_plans

    Exercises Grand Slam, Longstep, and Mainbrace.

    Looking at historical close calls. Some of them believe it or not have been total accidents. The Norwegian rocket incident was a total accident. Nearly caused wwIII there were many false alarms during the cold war. The Crimean crisis.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭silverfeather


    newmug wrote: »

    And do you know what else? I wouldnt rule out a second civil war in Ireland either.
    I think I would.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    The combined 28 nations of NATO have a combined population triple that of Russia. They have budgets many times he size of Russia. Their combines forces easily outgun russia many times over. NATO nuclear sharing vastly over powers Russia.


    WWIII is a hypothetical event.

    I think if you want to hypothesize you need to be aware of the actual military plans that automatically kick into place should this arise. Also the attack warning systems. Current ones are top secret but past ones aren't. Operation Behemoth ,NATO nuclear sharing,Exercise Internal Look

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III#Military_plans

    Exercises Grand Slam, Longstep, and Mainbrace.

    Looking at historical close calls. Some of them believe it or not have been total accidents. The Norwegian rocket incident was a total accident. Nearly caused wwIII there were many false alarms during the cold war. The Crimean crisis.

    Exactly why you think Russia has not cough cough Directly intervened in Ukraine. Crimea excuse was not an invasion as troops were there already.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭silverfeather


    jacksie66 wrote: »
    Between the Yes and No voters..
    The no side lost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,465 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    newmug wrote: »
    I hope it never happens, but I think WW3 will definitely happen within our lifetimes. This period of peace in Europe has been the longest ever, in history. Its just a matter of time, and with ISIS knocking at the neighbours door, and Russia knocking at ours, its as likely as ever.

    And do you know what else? I wouldnt rule out a second civil war in Ireland either.

    Why would the UK goto war with the Republic ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The no side lost.

    And the No side lost the last civil war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭jacksie66


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,154 ✭✭✭silverfeather


    Exactly why you think Russia has not cough cough Directly intervened in Ukraine. Crimea excuse was not an invasion as troops were there already.
    It's interesting Russian officials have declared
    an information war.

    These stories play on half-truths, like the presence of far-right nationalists at Maidan, and reasonable doubt, like skepticism of western meddling.

    Interesting tactic. Very tough to see clearly not even if you were on the ground. It needs high intelligence to figure out. Putin knew that and it's effect in making citizens in the west less inclined to act or want their govt to act.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,851 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    We weren't in WW2. I think we should stay out WW3 (and WW4,5 and 6) as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭bur


    That's too vague, saying within our lifetimes. That could be one year for a person or one hundred years.

    Have you ever been called pedantic?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement