Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

The all new, revised and easier quiz! (mod note posts 1 and 2042)

11617192122334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,643 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    Was it the wren?

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,427 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Nope, not that one!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    looksee wrote: »
    What animal was shown on the pre-decimal Irish half-penny (I seem to have a money thing going)

    A lady pig and her little family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,427 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Right Brens - and you are away again!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    Oh, those foreigners - they'll argue about anything! Did you know that the Mayans, the Babylonians, the Sumerians and the Indians all claim to have invented the same thing, i.e. nothing! I kid you not! What exactly are they arguing about?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,427 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Calendar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    The digit 0 (Zero), or the concept of nothing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    bonzodog2 wrote: »
    The digit 0 (Zero), or the concept of nothing

    Yes, zero, zip, nought, nowt, nawh'n. Maths got much better with zero! I think honours actually belong to the Babylonians but the others "helped".

    Over to you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    What is special about the number 1789 ?

    edit: It's a mathematical thing, not about dates


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    bonzodog2 wrote: »
    What is special about the number 1789 ?

    edit: It's a mathematical thing, not about dates

    Hmmm, "mathematical" as in "logical"?

    This is arithmetical at most and certainly not logical: In my student years, the "weird wan" told us all about magic numbers, angel numbers and other vital information. 1+7+8+9 = 25; 2+5 = 7 and, as we all know, "7" is a magic / angel number and, when we have "7", all is well with the world. Oh how we laughed!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    BrensBenz wrote: »
    Hmmm, "mathematical" as in "logical"?

    This is arithmetical at most and certainly not logical: In my student years, the "weird wan" told us all about magic numbers, angel numbers and other vital information. 1+7+8+9 = 25; 2+5 = 7 and, as we all know, "7" is a magic / angel number and, when we have "7", all is well with the world. Oh how we laughed!

    Not what I had in mind. Its the smallest number that has the property I am thinking of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,427 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Its the smallest perfect number that can be divided by twice the square root of 1.










    possibly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    looksee wrote: »
    Its the smallest perfect number that can be divided by twice the square root of 1.










    possibly.

    Not true, given that twice the square root of 1 is 2
    But it the smallest number that has the property


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 30,427 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    bonzodog2 wrote: »
    Not true, given that twice the square root of 1 is 2
    But it the smallest number that has the property

    Sorry Bonzo, I was making that up as I went along, I have zero maths ability - though I can add up in the supermarket pretty fast!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I was going to answer that it's the taxi cab number but I was out by 60. I dunno. It's a prime number at least? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    Samaris wrote: »
    I was going to answer that it's the taxi cab number but I was out by 60. I dunno. It's a prime number at least? :D

    It is prime, but not the smallest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    I'll give you an hour or two, then I'll ask a different one, as its prob not that easy if you're not a connoisseur of obscure arithmetical facts!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    Isn't there a mathematician's "magic" number 6714 or 6174 maybe? There's a sequence of subtracting a number from itself in reverse, e.g. 9871 - 1789 which gives you 8082. Then you do the same with 8082 and repeat the subtraction until you fall asleep I mean arrive at 6714 / 6174. Obviously I'm struggling to remember the details but it'a bit like those "think of a number, don't tell me; add 5; subtract 2; divide by 6", etc. etc. and you can magically reveal the secret number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    Clue: its the smallest number that satisfies a particular condition. It involves a sum, i.e. a+b


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Er, it's not the smallest number expressible by the sum of two cubes in two different ways, is it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    Samaris wrote: »
    Er, it's not the smallest number expressible by the sum of two cubes in two different ways, is it?

    It most certainly is, well done! 10**3 + 9**3 or 12**3 + 1**3

    Off ya go Samaris


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    bonzodog2 wrote: »
    What is special about the number 1789 ?

    Sorry lads, I'm lost!

    10**3 = (1000) + 9**3 (729) = 1729

    12**3 = (1728) + 1**3 (1) = 1729

    And isn't 1729 the "taxi cab" number from Samaris post 556, which was "out by 60"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    BrensBenz wrote: »
    Sorry lads, I'm lost!

    10**3 = (1000) + 9**3 (729) = 1729

    12**3 = (1728) + 1**3 (1) = 1729

    And isn't 1729 the "taxi cab" number from Samaris post 556, which was "out by 60"?

    *coughs* Yeah, I had a feeling it was that from the clues, but I'm afraid it should be 1729, yis.

    What is the biggest moon in our solar system?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    Yeah buh....the original question in Bonzo's post 550 concerned 1789 and not 1729?

    Anyway, Ganymede.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Pulsating Star


    Titan?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Ganymede it is, the third moon of Jupiter.

    You're up, Brens!

    Edit: Misread Titan as Triton, somehow.. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,341 ✭✭✭bonzodog2


    Oops! I did of course mean 1729. Apologies!
    I'm sure you would have all got it instantly....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    OK. Who or what was demoted because "it doesn't dominate and hasn't cleaned up its neighbourhood?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    BrensBenz wrote: »
    OK. Who or what was demoted because "it doesn't dominate and hasn't cleaned up it's neighbourhood?

    I don't know the direct quote, but I'm thinking a cathedral to a church?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,292 ✭✭✭BrensBenz


    Samaris wrote: »
    I don't know the direct quote, but I'm thinking a cathedral to a church?

    No, not that. The quote may not be the exact words used by the authority making the decision but it gives the gist of their reasoning.

    Oh, I should mention that I corrected their spelling of "neighbourhood".....so they probably come from that far away land of bad spellers.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement