Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Waterford GAA Discussion Thread 3 ***Updated Mod Note Post 1***

1180181183185186338

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭deiseach


    What a depressing performance. Should have won that game easy.

    *sees Offaly's result against Westmeath*

    Im-So-Happy-Meme-Despicable-Me-20.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 51,054 ✭✭✭✭Professey Chin


    Michael Ryan really is doing a great job with them. Delighted for him


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,601 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    We will be sick of seeing that Clare Jersey

    League final replay and championship (which could end in a draw quite easily) and we're playing them in the under 21 championship in July

    So if the league final replay ends in a draw after ET is it another replay. They should have best of 5 penalties with different players taking them

    http://gaa.tickets.ie/Listing/EventInformation/29971

    €25 again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭Psychedelic


    On KK being defensive, I don't think we ever saw them play with only two forwards in their opponent's half?
    Giveitfong wrote: »
    Then there was the terrible shooting by both sides. If half of the 39 wides had been scored, both teams would have exceeded thirty points and we would have been marvelling about that. The key point here is that, despite the systems, there was no shortage of scoring opportunities, with the actual number of scores being restricted by poor execution.
    Let's be fair though the main problem on Sunday was our shooting and not the system, we badly missed Maurice and Paudie for the frees i counted i think 6 missed free's several which were easy chances, Had our shooting been decent we would have won that game by 5-6 points, system needs tweaking yes but we were the better team imo for the majority of the match just didn't take half the chances we had.
    I wonder though are the poor wides because of not enough (or any!) shooting practice in training, with too much focus on winning "dirty ball" and tactics?

    The other thing is, with the system the players usually have to shoot from further out, so there's a greater chance of missing. I'd like to see one of those heat maps of where all the points and wides were from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carter10


    €25 again on Sunday, Typical GAA suck as much money out of the supporters as possible. Sickening greed. Stuck an extra €2 on the programme last Sunday as well. Treating supporters like suckers.-

    While I'm at it-on the week of a lot of publicity about Hillsborough- left the old stand last Sunday to be greeted by everyone having to leave by the ONE open exit, very dangerous situation. Not a steward to be seen and although there were numerous mentions about it on Social media- no comment or apology from the gaa. Again treating the supporter like a sucker.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭letsseehere14


    I wonder though are the poor wides because of not enough (or any!) shooting practice in training, with too much focus on winning "dirty ball" and tactics?


    I did mention this here, I think after the Kilkenny league match even though ye won that match. The system lends itself especially against better opposition to a low amount of goals and lots of long range efforts. It is why, come summer, I can't see Waterford winning the AI playing this way. Against the better teams the system as it stands just won't do enough damage on the score board to keep with Kilkenny or Tipperary


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 con89


    Either or, if not both, Maurice Shanahan & Pauric Mahony need to start Sunday.

    Had Maurice started I think Waterford would have won.
    Lost count of how many frees Waterford missed before he Maurice came on with 15 minutes left.

    No reliable free taker on the field, Patrick Curran, Austin Gleeson & Shane Bennett were swapping free taking responsibility.

    Shane Fives my man of the match, seemed to catch every ball around him.

    Maurice, Tommy Ryan, Brian O'Halloran & Tom Devine all had a positive influence after coming on.
    Nobody had a bad game, although Jake Dillon didn't seem to see much of the ball. Gleeson wasn't up to his usual high standards but still played well.

    Bennett & Curran had great games from play.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu



    The other thing is, with the system the players usually have to shoot from further out, so there's a greater chance of missing. I'd like to see one of those heat maps of where all the points and wides were from.

    Exactly, people who are defending the tactics are trying to say that it was just a bad day at the office shooting wise and that other than that the ''system'' worked fine, but they fail to realise that the two things are inherently linked, and that will remain the case.

    I for some unknown reason went to Thurles on Sunday as a neutral and it was putrid stuff, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry it was so bad. Again people who are defending the system say that it doesn't matter how you win an AI as long as you win it, that I can agree with, but the reality is you will not win an AI with that current system, its just not possible, there is a reason Waterford have been in two successive league finals but when faced with genuine opposition in the championship failed, the system is designed to ensure you don't loose but you have to go and win the game at some stage, the hurlers are there, no question but until McGrath gives them the license to show it they are destined to be just behind the contenders.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    carter10 wrote: »
    €25 again on Sunday, Typical GAA suck as much money out of the supporters as possible. Sickening greed. Stuck an extra €2 on the programme last Sunday as well. Treating supporters like suckers.-

    While I'm at it-on the week of a lot of publicity about Hillsborough- left the old stand last Sunday to be greeted by everyone having to leave by the ONE open exit, very dangerous situation. Not a steward to be seen and although there were numerous mentions about it on Social media- no comment or apology from the gaa. Again treating the supporter like a sucker.

    €25 for a national final seems pretty reasonable to me, if you can find a cheaper equivilant in any other sport Id be amazed.

    Programmes are done by Thurles Sarsfields themselves so the price is out of control of Croke Park or the stadium management.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    con89 wrote: »
    Either or, if not both, Maurice Shanahan & Pauric Mahony need to start Sunday.

    Had Maurice started I think Waterford would have won.
    Lost count of how many frees Waterford missed before he Maurice came on with 15 minutes left.

    No reliable free taker on the field, Patrick Curran, Austin Gleeson & Shane Bennett were swapping free taking responsibility.

    Shane Fives my man of the match, seemed to catch every ball around him.

    Maurice, Tommy Ryan, Brian O'Halloran & Tom Devine all had a positive influence after coming on.
    Nobody had a bad game, although Jake Dillon didn't seem to see much of the ball. Gleeson wasn't up to his usual high standards but still played well.

    Bennett & Curran had great games from play.

    I don't think I would be starting Maurice, held his nerve brilliantly to land the pressure free but lets be honest he was dire up until that, he's touch looked miles off, I'd be keeping him for the last 20 minutes max.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carter10


    danganabu wrote: »
    €25 for a national final seems pretty reasonable to me, if you can find a cheaper equivilant in any other sport Id be amazed.

    Programmes are done by Thurles Sarsfields themselves so the price is out of control of Croke Park or the stadium management.

    Its not reasonable at all and its not 'any other sport' its an amateur association based on supporters not customers. Mostly it will be the same people next sunday as last and again the same people for the munster first round. They could even have taken off a token €5 in recognition of this but no the grab all association wouldn't think of it.
    Most of these people like myself are already paying into club draws and joining supporters clubs etc. How much more money do they need to suck out of us?

    Thurles Sarsfield charging the extra 2 euros is typical of gaa greed. Always looking for more off the loyal supporter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭danganabu


    carter10 wrote: »
    Its not reasonable at all and its not 'any other sport' its an amateur association based on supporters not customers. Mostly it will be the same people next sunday as last and again the same people for the munster first round. They could even have taken off a token €5 in recognition of this but no the grab all association wouldn't think of it.
    Most of these people like myself are already paying into club draws and joining supporters clubs etc. How much more money do they need to suck out of us?

    Thurles Sarsfield charging the extra 2 euros is typical of gaa greed. Always looking for more off the loyal supporter.

    You talk as if this money is going into a big black hole, you do realise that almost every county board and a huge amount of clubs around the country are in debt. People seem to think that the GAA runs itself.

    The fact that it is an amateur organisation is a complete red herring and irrelevant, besides its amateur in name only.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,164 ✭✭✭redlead


    carter10 wrote: »
    Its not reasonable at all and its not 'any other sport' its an amateur association based on supporters not customers. Mostly it will be the same people next sunday as last and again the same people for the munster first round. They could even have taken off a token €5 in recognition of this but no the grab all association wouldn't think of it.
    Most of these people like myself are already paying into club draws and joining supporters clubs etc. How much more money do they need to suck out of us?

    Thurles Sarsfield charging the extra 2 euros is typical of gaa greed. Always looking for more off the loyal supporter.

    I've just stopped buying the programmes. With the way the Waterford team is named they never have accurate teams on them anyway and that's all you want from them. The rest of them are a load of crap. I just have the two teams on my phone and save the money.

    25 for a national final is great value in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭seananigans


    Diarmuid kirwan to ref the replay


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Deskjockey


    On KK being defensive, I don't think we ever saw them play with only two forwards in their opponent's half?



    I have a picture from a Kilkenny league game from earlier this year where they had exactly that. I took it with my own phone. Kilkenny people seem to be conveniently blind about this at times, it seems to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭mountgomery burns


    Deskjockey wrote: »
    I have a picture from a Kilkenny league game from earlier this year where they had exactly that. I took it with my own phone. Kilkenny people seem to be conveniently blind about this at times, it seems to me.

    The Tipp game I'd say? Ryan telegraphed that they were going to play direct which was a mad idea anyway against Kilkenny and Cody duly brought them all back against the wind.

    Donal Og highlighted it in the second half of the all ireland last year, the pictures from that night don't lie. And then he is labelled as a Kilkenny hater, you couldn't win with them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Deskjockey


    The Tipp game I'd say? Ryan telegraphed that they were going to play direct which was a mad idea anyway against Kilkenny and Cody duly brought them all back against the wind.

    Donal Og highlighted it in the second half of the all ireland last year, the pictures from that night don't lie. And then he is labelled as a Kilkenny hater, you couldn't win with them.

    Yes it was the Tipp game. Not a mention of it in the paper the day after as it doesn't suit the narrative.

    Just to add that yes I'm well aware that we do it a lot more than Kilkenny, but the way some of them go on, they only ever play 6 2 6 which is raiméas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭mountgomery burns


    Some thoughts on the general state of play:


    1) Progression

    I have noticed a lot of dismay at no obvious signs of progression this year. I'm not exactly sure what was expected but I'd like to offer a counterpoint or two to the worries about the attack. This time last year, Maurice Shanahan and Paudie Mahony were the two best forwards on the Waterford team. Could you imagine last year knowing they wouldn't be available against Tipp in Thurles this year, or in a league semi and final? Do you think we would have thought we'd beat Tipp, score 3-23 against Limerick or be a last minute of additional time free from winning the league again?

    Last year Shane Bennett played very well for his age but he has come on a lot in the space of a year and his been outstanding this year. Patrick Curran only came late into the panel, and has made some strides in 12 months. He was outstanding in the air on Sunday, tough as nails. Their mettle will be tested in the championship but with Maurice back you go from a forward line dependent on one player to one with options. There's room for improvement but let's not forget it's May.

    I think some people believe the backline and midfield cannot get any better than last year but the very addition of a fit Darragh Fives is huge, even in terms of the options it gives. And I think there was plenty of scope for improvement all the same and I think the duly have improved.

    2) The System

    There really is too much talk about this. An extra man comes from midfield to cover center back while the center back drops in front of the full back. A corner forward roams around the middle to provide support play, and pace to attack and create overlaps in the opposition defense. And when not in position the team work to get back, work very hard. It's really not that complicated, intricate or indeed original. But it is effective and it has helped cultivate a belief that we can win every day we go out. Which was some turnaround from 2014.

    But it cannot be used as the basis for how every game is won/lost. At the end of the day, the team did everything right except put the ball over the bar on Sunday. I agree that playing with reduced numbers and deeper lines means that when the ball moves quickly up the field sometimes a long range shot is the only or most convenient option. But I do think on Sunday there was some poor shooting from play and particularly from frees. What I think is being missed though is that when you work so hard to create chances and win frees it can get on top of you fairly easily when you miss a few. I believe there was a chain reaction on Sunday to that, and the confidence was dented. That can happen any day you go out, god knows there were days we hit plenty of wides in the heyday of Waterford hurling's attacking prowess. And there was no system to blame then!

    The talent and work rate of the players first and foremost wins them games, how they setup (as has been proven by some imitations) merely complements their abilities.

    3) Contenders

    Now the most bemusing thing of all is the fact that we are being written off in some quarters to not being able to win later in the summer, that ultimately we are heading down the same road as last year. The bottom line is Waterford have not played a championship match since Kilkenny last year. They won the league already last year, so I think there's this expectation that unless they win every game by 10 points this year they haven't improved and it will be the same story.

    I think that is beyond unrealistic. Ultimately, they cannot improve on last year's championship until they actually play in this year's championship. There is a tendency too I think to laud displays of great attacking flair where defense is neglected and bias towards it where great defense isn't heralded the same way. Clare beating Kilkenny a prime example of that, it was bizarre to see three pundits on Seo Spoirt on Friday tipping Clare to win. Despite what Waterford have done in the past year, a unanimous verdict in favour of Clare. Case and point really.

    Moreover, we know enough about the heartbreak a leaky defense can cause. It's got a very talented Tipperary team beaten on more occasions in big matches now than bears mentioning. And further still, there are plenty of question marks over a lot of teams. Tipperary are not contenders according to their own, would not rule them out but at the same time it's hard to see what has been found that has not been there in the last 5 seasons. Galway could still be contenders, it's not beyond them, but it will be a tough road for them. Clare might well be, they are still missing a few but again they have more to prove than Waterford in my opinion.

    And Kilkenny are still rightfully the favourites and are until they are knocked out, but the bottom line is Tyrell is gone, Power is gone, Aylward is injured, Mick Fennelly managed to get himself fit 3 times last year and was massive but you're expecting a lot to think that can continue, and Larkin has not hit a ball in the first 5 months of the year. It's not getting any easier for them, and the assumption that they'll all be available is exactly that. And when you assume...etc


    If Waterford keep bringing the tenacity to matches the way they have done so far this year and can stay as relatively injury free as they have been to be fair in the past two seasons, then they will be contenders. And in May, there is no more than you can ask for.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,601 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    redlead wrote: »
    I've just stopped buying the programmes. With the way the Waterford team is named they never have accurate teams on them anyway and that's all you want from them. The rest of them are a load of crap. I just have the two teams on my phone and save the money.

    25 for a national final is great value in my opinion.

    The Waterford team is always wrong in the programmes for some reason. Shane Mcnulty always named at number 9

    I love reading programmes and I pay €50 a year for a digital download of gaa programmes for my iPad (I always get the programmes the night before the games).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 578 ✭✭✭Topcat32


    Some thoughts on the general state of play:


    1) Progression

    I have noticed a lot of dismay at no obvious signs of progression this year. I'm not exactly sure what was expected but I'd like to offer a counterpoint or two to the worries about the attack. This time last year, Maurice Shanahan and Paudie Mahony were the two best forwards on the Waterford team. Could you imagine last year knowing they wouldn't be available against Tipp in Thurles this year, or in a league semi and final? Do you think we would have thought we'd beat Tipp, score 3-23 against Limerick or be a last minute of additional time free from winning the league again?

    Last year Shane Bennett played very well for his age but he has come on a lot in the space of a year and his been outstanding this year. Patrick Curran only came late into the panel, and has made some strides in 12 months. He was outstanding in the air on Sunday, tough as nails. Their mettle will be tested in the championship but with Maurice back you go from a forward line dependent on one player to one with options. There's room for improvement but let's not forget it's May.

    I think some people believe the backline and midfield cannot get any better than last year but the very addition of a fit Darragh Fives is huge, even in terms of the options it gives. And I think there was plenty of scope for improvement all the same and I think the duly have improved.

    2) The System

    There really is too much talk about this. An extra man comes from midfield to cover center back while the center back drops in front of the full back. A corner forward roams around the middle to provide support play, and pace to attack and create overlaps in the opposition defense. And when not in position the team work to get back, work very hard. It's really not that complicated, intricate or indeed original. But it is effective and it has helped cultivate a belief that we can win every day we go out. Which was some turnaround from 2014.

    But it cannot be used as the basis for how every game is won/lost. At the end of the day, the team did everything right except put the ball over the bar on Sunday. I agree that playing with reduced numbers and deeper lines means that when the ball moves quickly up the field sometimes a long range shot is the only or most convenient option. But I do think on Sunday there was some poor shooting from play and particularly from frees. What I think is being missed though is that when you work so hard to create chances and win frees it can get on top of you fairly easily when you miss a few. I believe there was a chain reaction on Sunday to that, and the confidence was dented. That can happen any day you go out, god knows there were days we hit plenty of wides in the heyday of Waterford hurling's attacking prowess. And there was no system to blame then!

    The talent and work rate of the players first and foremost wins them games, how they setup (as has been proven by some imitations) merely complements their abilities.

    3) Contenders

    Now the most bemusing thing of all is the fact that we are being written off in some quarters to not being able to win later in the summer, that ultimately we are heading down the same road as last year. The bottom line is Waterford have not played a championship match since Kilkenny last year. They won the league already last year, so I think there's this expectation that unless they win every game by 10 points this year they haven't improved and it will be the same story.

    I think that is beyond unrealistic. Ultimately, they cannot improve on last year's championship until they actually play in this year's championship. There is a tendency too I think to laud displays of great attacking flair where defense is neglected and bias towards it where great defense isn't heralded the same way. Clare beating Kilkenny a prime example of that, it was bizarre to see three pundits on Seo Spoirt on Friday tipping Clare to win. Despite what Waterford have done in the past year, a unanimous verdict in favour of Clare. Case and point really.

    Moreover, we know enough about the heartbreak a leaky defense can cause. It's got a very talented Tipperary team beaten on more occasions in big matches now than bears mentioning. And further still, there are plenty of question marks over a lot of teams. Tipperary are not contenders according to their own, would not rule them out but at the same time it's hard to see what has been found that has not been there in the last 5 seasons. Galway could still be contenders, it's not beyond them, but it will be a tough road for them. Clare might well be, they are still missing a few but again they have more to prove than Waterford in my opinion.

    And Kilkenny are still rightfully the favourites and are until they are knocked out, but the bottom line is Tyrell is gone, Power is gone, Aylward is injured, Mick Fennelly managed to get himself fit 3 times last year and was massive but you're expecting a lot to think that can continue, and Larkin has not hit a ball in the first 5 months of the year. It's not getting any easier for them, and the assumption that they'll all be available is exactly that. And when you assume...etc


    If Waterford keep bringing the tenacity to matches the way they have done so far this year and can stay as relatively injury free as they have been to be fair in the past two seasons, then they will be contenders. And in May, there is no more than you can ask for.

    Agree with your thoughts on assumptions, this time last year who would have thought Ger Alyward, Shane Maloney or Conor Whelan would make such an impact in the championship. I have a feeling that Kilkenny will get Fennelly fit but this could be his last year, Larkin will also be strong, he was excellent when he came back from Kosovo, I think Liam Blanchfield will be given his chance to impress as will Rob Lennon if they can keep him fit, Waterford an Clare have to be the favourites tho.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭mountgomery burns


    Topcat32 wrote: »
    Agree with your thoughts on assumptions, this time last year who would have thought Ger Alyward, Shane Maloney or Conor Whelan would make such an impact in the championship. I have a feeling that Kilkenny will get Fennelly fit but this could be his last year, Larkin will also be strong, he was excellent when he came back from Kosovo, I think Liam Blanchfield will be given his chance to impress as will Rob Lennon if they can keep him fit, Waterford an Clare have to be the favourites tho.

    He was very good last year to be fair, there'll be a day he comes back from the well with no water though.

    Been impressed with Lennon from what I've seen, no doubt Blanchfield is promising and Bolger looked good too for the 21s last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 419 ✭✭JesusRef


    Some thoughts on the general state of play:


    1) Progression

    I have noticed a lot of dismay at no obvious signs of progression this year. I'm not exactly sure what was expected but I'd like to offer a counterpoint or two to the worries about the attack. This time last year, Maurice Shanahan and Paudie Mahony were the two best forwards on the Waterford team. Could you imagine last year knowing they wouldn't be available against Tipp in Thurles this year, or in a league semi and final? Do you think we would have thought we'd beat Tipp, score 3-23 against Limerick or be a last minute of additional time free from winning the league again?

    Last year Shane Bennett played very well for his age but he has come on a lot in the space of a year and his been outstanding this year. Patrick Curran only came late into the panel, and has made some strides in 12 months. He was outstanding in the air on Sunday, tough as nails. Their mettle will be tested in the championship but with Maurice back you go from a forward line dependent on one player to one with options. There's room for improvement but let's not forget it's May.

    I think some people believe the backline and midfield cannot get any better than last year but the very addition of a fit Darragh Fives is huge, even in terms of the options it gives. And I think there was plenty of scope for improvement all the same and I think the duly have improved.

    2) The System

    There really is too much talk about this. An extra man comes from midfield to cover center back while the center back drops in front of the full back. A corner forward roams around the middle to provide support play, and pace to attack and create overlaps in the opposition defense. And when not in position the team work to get back, work very hard. It's really not that complicated, intricate or indeed original. But it is effective and it has helped cultivate a belief that we can win every day we go out. Which was some turnaround from 2014.

    But it cannot be used as the basis for how every game is won/lost. At the end of the day, the team did everything right except put the ball over the bar on Sunday. I agree that playing with reduced numbers and deeper lines means that when the ball moves quickly up the field sometimes a long range shot is the only or most convenient option. But I do think on Sunday there was some poor shooting from play and particularly from frees. What I think is being missed though is that when you work so hard to create chances and win frees it can get on top of you fairly easily when you miss a few. I believe there was a chain reaction on Sunday to that, and the confidence was dented. That can happen any day you go out, god knows there were days we hit plenty of wides in the heyday of Waterford hurling's attacking prowess. And there was no system to blame then!

    The talent and work rate of the players first and foremost wins them games, how they setup (as has been proven by some imitations) merely complements their abilities.

    3) Contenders

    Now the most bemusing thing of all is the fact that we are being written off in some quarters to not being able to win later in the summer, that ultimately we are heading down the same road as last year. The bottom line is Waterford have not played a championship match since Kilkenny last year. They won the league already last year, so I think there's this expectation that unless they win every game by 10 points this year they haven't improved and it will be the same story.

    I think that is beyond unrealistic. Ultimately, they cannot improve on last year's championship until they actually play in this year's championship. There is a tendency too I think to laud displays of great attacking flair where defense is neglected and bias towards it where great defense isn't heralded the same way. Clare beating Kilkenny a prime example of that, it was bizarre to see three pundits on Seo Spoirt on Friday tipping Clare to win. Despite what Waterford have done in the past year, a unanimous verdict in favour of Clare. Case and point really.

    Moreover, we know enough about the heartbreak a leaky defense can cause. It's got a very talented Tipperary team beaten on more occasions in big matches now than bears mentioning. And further still, there are plenty of question marks over a lot of teams. Tipperary are not contenders according to their own, would not rule them out but at the same time it's hard to see what has been found that has not been there in the last 5 seasons. Galway could still be contenders, it's not beyond them, but it will be a tough road for them. Clare might well be, they are still missing a few but again they have more to prove than Waterford in my opinion.

    And Kilkenny are still rightfully the favourites and are until they are knocked out, but the bottom line is Tyrell is gone, Power is gone, Aylward is injured, Mick Fennelly managed to get himself fit 3 times last year and was massive but you're expecting a lot to think that can continue, and Larkin has not hit a ball in the first 5 months of the year. It's not getting any easier for them, and the assumption that they'll all be available is exactly that. And when you assume...etc


    If Waterford keep bringing the tenacity to matches the way they have done so far this year and can stay as relatively injury free as they have been to be fair in the past two seasons, then they will be contenders. And in May, there is no more than you can ask for.

    Great post - very sensible stuff - you are dead right


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,055 ✭✭✭deisedude


    redlead wrote: »
    25 for a national final is great value in my opinion.

    You would have paid €35 to sit in the stand to watch Munster play Edinburgh last Friday for a regular Pro 12 game so I'd agree €25 is good value


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭DiscoStew


    According to reports Conlons injury is more long term than was originally predicted.
    Shane Fives is also extremely doubtful for Sunday according to McGrath. Would imagine Gleeson or McNulty would slot in corner back rather than trying to reshuffle to include Maurice that way somehow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭DiscoStew


    Pleasantly surprised to see that the Ladies football national league final replay between Waterford and Tipperary will take place before the men's league final Sunday. Hopefully Déise fans will be able to get in early and support both teams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭deiseach


    DiscoStew wrote: »
    Pleasantly surprised to see that the Ladies football national league final replay between Waterford and Tipperary will take place before the men's league final Sunday. Hopefully Déise fans will be able to get in early and support both teams.

    Joined-up thinking! Whatever next, someone opening more than one gate out of the stand?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭hurler on de ditch


    JesusRef wrote: »
    100% this - make us crap to watch, make us hated, make us winners - and feck what anyone else thinks
    its no coincidence here we win an All Irealand on average once every 65 years or so and our record in Musters and Leagues is not much better ,we are lucky to be in with a chance of winning any of the above ,,but i have not seen many of these teams winning trophies with 2 or possibly 3 men in what should be a 6 man forward line,i myself would love to see us winning either of the above,but when you see us playing such a **** negative system,i really cant see it especially the big one ,granted we started well beating three of the top counties in the game,might have just been ahead on fitness but the games since then for me anyway have been horrendous to watch,its actually hard to put into words how watching Waterford play this brand of hurling pains but not only me but im sure thousands of people that pay to watch it ,lets hope things improve


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,230 ✭✭✭seananigans


    deiseach wrote: »
    Joined-up thinking! Whatever next, someone opening more than one gate out of the stand?

    i sent the story to the tip off email of the42.ie see will they pick up the story, wonder if some of ye might do the same for other papers ? if one crowd ring them for comment theyll have to cop the f on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6 Thegooche


    What do yee make of an rinn? Any players worth mentioning come championship?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,601 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    i sent the story to the tip off email of the42.ie see will they pick up the story, wonder if some of ye might do the same for other papers ? if one crowd ring them for comment theyll have to cop the f on

    They guy with the keys must of went home for his tea.

    I do find the stewards in semple a bit amauter and remind of lads who are just there for the free dinners and pints after. Wait til the championship where they will have assigned seats

    Attendance did seem higher than was announced ???

    The minors will play Limerick in Walsh Park in the Munster semi final on June 29th. Very good chance of a victory


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement