Forewarning of major false flag events in 2015

omnithanos

omnithanos wrote: »

I didn't have time to research it properly and the clues are terribly subtle and I'm not Flash Gordon here to save the world. I'm not even sure the building collapse on the 26th is related but the crash in the Alps looks incredibly dodgy.

So why, when you didn't research it properly, did you declare it as a definite thing?

Given that your prediction failed utterly, and you utterly failed to predict events that did happen, have you considered that your conclusions about other events might also be just as flawed?

endacl

omnithanos wrote: »

Here’s a very interesting video linking the illuminati card game published in 1995 with the Boston Marathon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvM3R3wAP98

As you can see the woman in green is dressed up like the woman on the card.
On 1min 56 secs, immediately after the detonation, you can see her toss an object to the man behind her who falls WHILE CATHCING IT. This “detonator” is then passed on to other goons.

Note the same illuminati card game predicted the twin towers and the pentagon with these following cards

Twin Towers card
http://www.cuttingedge.org/Terrorist_nuke.jpg

Pentagon card
http://www.cuttingedge.org/pentagon.jpg

and here's the jogger card
http://www.secretsofthefed.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BOSTON-MARATHON-JOGGERS-ILLUMINATI-CARD-GAME1.jpg

degrassinoel

k..

new posters in CT's be aware of our forum charter and try to avoid pissing all over it when you post here, or like in the above post pissing all over two forums, irritating religious folk and Ctheorists alike.

One Red card issued already today in this thread. If you dont agree, discuss, if you cant discuss - leave. Otherwise mods have to do things..

omnithanos

King Mob wrote: »

So why, when you didn't research it properly, did you declare it as a definite thing?

Given that your prediction failed utterly, and you utterly failed to predict events that did happen, have you considered that your conclusions about other events might also be just as flawed?

I still reckon we'll have a Chicago event this year and an upcoming event in London on the 3rd of August in the next few years.

I really don't understand why flawed official accounts are accepted by the majority when evidence shows the contrary.

degrassinoel

any reason why those specific dates?

NewCorkLad

omnithanos wrote: »

I still reckon we'll have a Chicago event this year and an upcoming event in London on the 3rd of August in the next few years.

I really don't understand why flawed official accounts are accepted by the majority when evidence shows the contrary.

You do realise that nobody takes youtube video's expressing people's interpretation of grainy out of focus pictures as evidence?

omnithanos

degrassinoel wrote: »

any reason why those specific dates?

Here's a mad video showing the prediction. I must be mad posting this in here for your resident naysayers to take the piss but I think it's interesting how on 1min 31secs the call of duty audio is reversed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo1dyCMClsA

I know it looks mental but I believe this more than the wishy washy explanations of how all the fake flag events officially occurred.

omnithanos

NewCorkLad wrote: »

You do realise that nobody takes youtube video's expressing people's interpretation of grainy out of focus pictures as evidence?

Bit of a generalisation. Didn't the media use grainy out of focus images to convince us that planes hit the twin towers?

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

Bit of a generalisation. Didn't the media use grainy out of focus images to convince us that planes hit the twin towers?

So tell me why my friend who is an air accident investigator says your claims are wrong?

endacl

omnithanos wrote: »

Bit of a generalisation. Didn't the media use grainy out of focus images to convince us that planes hit the twin towers?

They also used lots of high quality images, footage, and had eye witness testimony from tens of thousands of people who watched it happen.

omnithanos

endacl wrote: »

They also used lots of high quality images, footage, and had eye witness testimony from tens of thousands of people who watched it happen.

Correction they PRODUCED high quality images with digitally inserted air-planes and eye witness testimony form actors and people working for media organisations like CNN. The only real live footage of the second tower exploding show an object hitting which doesn't appear to be a plane.
In the following video on 4mins 20secs the evening news use the exact same footage but insert a plane coming in from a different angle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPKq2K2dh6k

degrassinoel

omnithanos wrote: »

Here's a mad video showing the prediction. I must be mad posting this in here for your resident naysayers to take the piss but I think it's interesting how on 1min 31secs the call of duty audio is reversed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo1dyCMClsA

I know it looks mental but I believe this more than the wishy washy explanations of how all the fake flag events officially occurred.

Fair enough if that's your belief

Though famous landmarks have been imaginarily blown up since man has had imagination. Film, Games, Books, Roman Grafiti, Cave paintings.. you name it.. any source of media at all and it's been done a billion times over. I cant see why one or even a million of these would have a hidden warning prior to the event unless the person/s responsible produced the media or gave themselves away to the people that produced the media. Which would make them pretty dumb to begin with. At very best, stupidly arrogant.

Imo it's a flimsy theory but you have the right to fill it out as best as you can, i just think you'll need more than a video to warrant it as being believable. Essentially you're predicting the future, until that future becomes the present you are not wrong but the theory is too broad to be a conspiracy theory.

in short, it's a beefstew with no meat.

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

Correction they PRODUCED high quality images with digitally inserted air-planes and eye witness testimony form actors and people working for media organisations like CNN. The only real live footage of the second tower exploding show an object hitting which doesn't appear to be a plane.
In the following video on 4mins 20secs the evening news use the exact same footage but insert a plane coming in from a different angle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPKq2K2dh6k

I watched the second plane hitting LIVE as it happened.

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I watched the second plane hitting LIVE as it happened.

On TV or in New York?

omnithanos

If you mean the live feed of the plane hitting the second tower this was the only live feed which was produced with video fakery as is shown in the following clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i73XmZUxnVo

Mallagio

Frank being France??!

WTF lol

omnithanos

Mallagio wrote: »

Frank being France??!

WTF lol

France was settled by the tribe of the Franks.

omnithanos

degrassinoel wrote: »

Fair enough if that's your belief

Though famous landmarks have been imaginarily blown up since man has had imagination. Film, Games, Books, Roman Grafiti, Cave paintings.. you name it.. any source of media at all and it's been done a billion times over. I cant see why one or even a million of these would have a hidden warning prior to the event unless the person/s responsible produced the media or gave themselves away to the people that produced the media. Which would make them pretty dumb to begin with. At very best, stupidly arrogant.

Imo it's a flimsy theory but you have the right to fill it out as best as you can, i just think you'll need more than a video to warrant it as being believable. Essentially you're predicting the future, until that future becomes the present you are not wrong but the theory is too broad to be a conspiracy theory.

in short, it's a beefstew with no meat.

I previously posted a video showing how the first two Back to the Future films forewarned 9/11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPJQ-1Y8jfY
The perpetrators own the media and that is how they put messages out in mainstream media like Family Guy foretelling the Boston Marathon and Robin Williams' (murder) death. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X289sq1pLk
His death was also predicted on another conspiracy forum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2kSD3wFrFI
And here's Michael Jackson telling us the exact time of the first explosion at the north tower on 9/11 with his hand signals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFEgEwrkutQ
9/11 forewarning in cartoons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QUv9grv-WE

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So tell me why my friend who is an air accident investigator says your claims are wrong?

Maybe he's in on it.
https://www.google.ie/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=boeing%20honeywell%20uninterruptible%20autopilot%20lufthansa

stuar

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

I just showed your post and video's to an air crash investigator who flew these planes for years. There is no system where a jet pilot can remotely take over a passenger plane and he just laughed at the video "evidence" and thanked me for the giggles.

I'm not really getting into this thread, but your "air crash investigator" "friend" just got some giggles from a air crash disaster?, how highly professional of your "friend".

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Hmmmmm

Who to believe?

A random video from you tube or an air crash investigator who i have known for years and who flew passenger jets around the world for 25 years?

Decisions decisions.

Again your "friend" with 25 years experience should know that such systems do infact exist, and have done for years, in 2006, Boeing was awarded a US patent for an ‘uninterruptible autopilot system’. This would allow pilots, ground controllers or security agencies to activate an automatic flight mode that cannot be turned off by anyone on board.

Once the "uninterruptible autopilot system" is activated, it cannot be reversed. Ground controllers can then guide the plane to its destination via remote digital control using radio waves, satellite GPS, and existing landing aids known as "autoland function."
March 8th 2007
http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/08/remote-controlled-autopilot-to-prevent-hijacking/

Published 4 December 2006
Boeing wins patent on uninterruptible autopilot system.
New technology can be activated by the pilots, government agencies, even on-board sensors; not even a tortured pilot can give up control; dedicated electrical circuits ensure the system’s total independence.

Boeing’s is, of course, not the first autopilot technology in existence, but this one has been designed with counterterrorism first and foremost in mind. Not only is it “uninterruptible” — so that even a tortured pilot cannot turn it off — but it can be activated remotely via radio or satellite by government agencies. The system might even include senors on the cockpit door that activate the autopilot of a certain amount of force is used against it. “There is a need for a technique that ensures the continuation of the desired path of travel of a vehicle by removing any type of human decision process that may be influenced by the circumstances of the situation, including threats or further violence onboard the vehicle,” the patent application explains. To make it fully independent, the system also has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers.
http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/boeing-wins-patent-uninterruptible-autopilot-system

Maybe your "friend" should do a refresh course at "air crash investigator school".

SoulTrader

omnithanos wrote: »

Yes I got the day wrong. A 9/11 style event was expected to occur around the 22nd. This crash in the Alps on the 24th appears to be the planned event. Note the similarity with the fake Shanksville crash. I wonder was the building collapse in New York on the 26th a deliberate clue to link it to 9/11?

OP, genuine question here. Why would somebody leave clues such as this? I get what you're saying - plane flies into mountain in the same manner as a plane flew into skyscrapers in NY. Then a building collapses in NY. But do the people who are supposedly responsible for all this plotting want to get caught by deliberately leaving clues?

Mallagio

omnithanos wrote: »

France was settled by the tribe of the Franks.

I hope for your sanity you're a class A troll.

omnithanos

SoulTrader wrote: »

OP, genuine question here. Why would somebody leave clues such as this? I get what you're saying - plane flies into mountain in the same manner as a plane flew into skyscrapers in NY. Then a building collapses in NY. But do the people who are supposedly responsible for all this plotting want to get caught by deliberately leaving clues?

If the perpetrators are Satanists, which is universally touted, they believe they get power from doing this stuff and telling people however subtly in advance.
I expected an event on the 22nd because of the eclipse, Robin Williams died on the night of a blood moon which is the perfect time for a human sacrifice, the Boston Bombing occurred on the anniversary of the sinking of the titanic etc.
Everyone should accept by now that 9/11 was an inside job but as you saw the white house directly orderd the commission not to investigate it so these guys consider themselves untouchable.

omnithanos

Mallagio wrote: »

I hope for your sanity you're a class A troll.

No I'm completely mental
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie0AUkV3xl8

stuar

omnithanos didn't see your link to uninterruptible autopilot system before I posted kinda the same links, I was watching your "Back to the future" link, never realised all the 911's, twin/lone, middle eastern terrorists etc.......

Anyway just a little tip, when posting videos in future(pardon the pun), click the youtube icon and place the code after the = from the video between the ][ in the centre of the youtube][youtube that appears.
For example the BTTF video would have uPJQ-1Y8jfY pasted in there to make it like this.....

YOUTUBE]uPJQ-1Y8jfY[/YOUTUBE and it will appear like this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPJQ-1Y8jfY

Have a nice future......:)

omnithanos

stuar wrote: »

omnithanos didn't see your link to uninterruptible autopilot system before I posted kinda the same links, I was watching your "Back to the future" link, never realised all the 911's, twin/lone, middle eastern terrorists etc.......

Anyway just a little tip, when posting videos in future(pardon the pun), click the youtube icon and place the code after the = from the video between the ][ in the centre of the youtube][youtube that appears.
For example the BTTF video would have uPJQ-1Y8jfY pasted in there to make it like this.....

YOUTUBE]uPJQ-1Y8jfY[/YOUTUBE and it will appear like this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPJQ-1Y8jfY

Have a nice future......:)

Thanks Moses (pardon the pun)

endacl

omnithanos wrote: »

On TV or in New York?

Not in NY. Where were you when all your *ahem* 'evidence' was produced? Trawling echo chamber websites?

Mallagio

I was trying to take this seriously until I looked at the date.

Timberrrrrrrr

stuar wrote: »

I'm not really getting into this thread, but your "air crash investigator" "friend" just got some giggles from a air crash disaster?, how highly professional of your "friend".

No

He got the giggles from the conspiracy theory that is being touted here.

Again your "friend" with 25 years experience should know that such systems do infact exist, and have done for years, in 2006, Boeing was awarded a US patent for an ‘uninterruptible autopilot system’. This would allow pilots, ground controllers or security agencies to activate an automatic flight mode that cannot be turned off by anyone on board.

How many planes have this system installed?

Maybe your "friend" should do a refresh course at "air crash investigator school".

Well he is employed by the Irish Aviation Authority so they seem to think that his credentials are pretty sound.

weisses

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Well he is employed by the Irish Aviation Authority so they seem to think that his credentials are pretty sound.

I hope For his sake he wasn't working today

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/two-ryanair-planes-clip-each-other-at-dublin-airport-1.2161135