Forewarning of major false flag events in 2015

omnithanos

7th December - Charlie Hebdo shooting forewarned in Apple ipad Air commercial which first aired in January 2014.

Pause at 40 secs into the ad to see the warning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mYCIKTX0ug

Also note that the Ad is narrated by Robin Williams who was reported to have committed suicide in late 2014, an event which was also alluded to in an episode of Family Guy which episode was again shown on BBC3 and concluded the instant before Robin Williams death was announced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taB1NA3wc_I

As the instigators of these dastardly events are reportedly Satanists there is a very high probability of another such event of huge proportions occurring this weekend in conjunction with the solar eclipse.

March 22nd has been alluded to many times in films etc. and ISIS have suggested on twitter that the old Republic building in Chicago is a target for 2015.

The current attack in the Museum in Tunisia also appears to be a complete fake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B5QzVp5-2Y

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

7th December - Charlie Hebdo shooting forewarned in Apple ipad Air commercial which first aired in January 2014.

Pause at 40 secs into the ad to see the warning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mYCIKTX0ug

Also note that the Ad is narrated by Robin Williams who was reported to have committed suicide in late 2014, an event which was also alluded to in an episode of Family Guy which episode was again shown on BBC3 and concluded the instant before Robin Williams death was announced.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taB1NA3wc_I

As the instigators of these dastardly events are reportedly Satanists there is a very high probability of another such event of huge proportions occurring this weekend in conjunction with the solar eclipse.

March 22nd has been alluded to many times in films etc. and ISIS have suggested on twitter that the old Republic building in Chicago is a target for 2015.

The current attack in the Museum in Tunisia also appears to be a complete fake.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B5QzVp5-2Y

How is this a forewarning of the CH attacks? It's someone writing (very bad) poetry.

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

How is this a forewarning of the CH attacks? It's someone writing (very bad) poetry.

The ipad ads are full of satanic references.
The poem at 40 secs shows two proper names, Charles, representing Charlie Hebdo and Frank representing France which was settled by the tribe of the Franks. The poem itself states "When the mouth offends a hand is needed to cover it" a reference to the blasphemous cartoon which was the alleged trigger for the attack.

degrassinoel

omnithanos wrote: »

The ipad ads are full of satanic references.
The poem at 40 secs shows two proper names, Charles, representing Charlie Hebdo and Frank representing France which was settled by the tribe of the Franks. The poem itself states "When the mouth offends a hand is needed to cover it" a reference to the blasphemous cartoon which was the alleged trigger for the attack.

or..



Also, the narration done by Robin Williams could very easily have been pre-recorded prior to his death. Wasn't that an excerpt from his film Dead Poets Society?

Yeah it is..
see for yourself

omnithanos

I know that, and the ad went out in January 2014, seven months before his death. I just thought it was interesting that they used someone in the ad who was alleged to have been murdered by them in a satanic blood ritual.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

I know that, and the ad went out in January 2014, seven months before his death. I just thought it was interesting that they used someone in the ad who was alleged to have been murdered by them in a satanic blood ritual.

What??? :Confused:

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

The ipad ads are full of satanic references.
The poem at 40 secs shows two proper names, Charles, representing Charlie Hebdo and Frank representing France which was settled by the tribe of the Franks. The poem itself states "When the mouth offends a hand is needed to cover it" a reference to the blasphemous cartoon which was the alleged trigger for the attack.

How do you know Charles stands for Charlie Hebdo?

How does Frank translate to France? Frank is also a shortened version of Francis so it could be about St Francis of Assisi for all you know.

"When the mouth offends a hand is needed to cover it" means just that.

You really are reading what you want into the most innocent of things.

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

How do you know Charles stands for Charlie Hebdo?

How does Frank translate to France? Frank is also a shortened version of Francis so it could be about St Francis of Assisi for all you know.

"When the mouth offends a hand is needed to cover it" means just that.

You really are reading what you want into the most innocent of things.

As I said before the ipad ads are full of satanic references, these events are always forewarned and I have previously linked a video to the uncensored shooting of the french police man which shows it was a fake event.

NIMAN

Conspiracy theories are so easy to invent as some people will believe absolutely everything.

I checked out the 1st clip, no way I was listening to an internet geek on the 2nd and got bored after about 60sec of the third. Sorry.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

As I said before the ipad ads are full of satanic references, these events are always forewarned and I have previously linked a video to the uncensored shooting of the french police man which shows it was a fake event.

So yet again we have no evidence from you just your opinion of what something MAY mean.

degrassinoel

NIMAN wrote: »

Conspiracy theories are so easy to invent as some people will believe absolutely everything.

I checked out the 1st clip, no way I was listening to an internet geek on the 2nd and got bored after about 60sec of the third. Sorry.

probably not the right forum for you then, read the CT's charter if you decide it is the right forum for you

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So yet again we have no evidence from you just your opinion of what something MAY mean.

Let's wait and see what happens on Sunday.
If nothing happens that's grand but if ISIS blow the hell out of Chicago don't rubbish the notion of forewarning.

omnithanos

omnithanos wrote: »

Let's wait and see what happens on Sunday.
If nothing happens that's grand but if ISIS blow the hell out of Chicago don't rubbish the notion of forewarning.

If nothing happens in Chicago on Sunday will you take that as evidence that your ideas about forewarning are possibly flawed?

omnithanos

King Mob wrote: »

If nothing happens in Chicago on Sunday will you take that as evidence that your ideas about forewarning are possibly flawed?

If nothing happens there'll be no evidence of anything.

I expect there will be a huge event though not necessarily in Chicago.

omnithanos

omnithanos wrote: »

If nothing happens there'll be no evidence of anything.

I expect there will be a huge event though not necessarily in Chicago.

So something non-specific will happen somewhere non-specific on some nonspecific point on Sunday?

So basically you can't be wrong?

Timberrrrrrrr

King Mob wrote: »

So something non-specific will happen somewhere non-specific on some nonspecific point on Sunday?

So basically you can't be wrong?

And if it doesn't happen it doesn't mean he was wrong

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

And if it doesn't happen it doesn't mean he was wrong

Not something non specific, I mentioned a major event, which will be faked on Sunday, possibly in Chicago and possibly involving a nuclear bomb.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

Not something non specific, I mentioned a major event, which will be faked on Sunday, possibly in Chicago and possibly involving a nuclear bomb.

And if nothing happens then you will admit you are wrong?

omnithanos

omnithanos wrote: »

Not something non specific, I mentioned a major event, which will be faked on Sunday, possibly in Chicago and possibly involving a nuclear bomb.

Define "a major event".

Are you referring to an attack of some kind?

omnithanos

King Mob wrote: »

Define "a major event".

Are you referring to an attack of some kind?

I think we'll recognise it if it happens.
If Chicago gets nuked will I be the main suspect?

irelandrover

But you said it would be faked. Do you believe that they will fake nuclear bomb Chicago?

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

But you said it would be faked. Do you believe that they will fake nuclear bomb Chicago?

They did a fake nuclear thingy before in Japan when the tsunami hit.
Didn't they use a nuke to take down building 6 on 9/11 as well?

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

They did a fake nuclear thingy before in Japan when the tsunami hit.
Didn't they use a nuke to take down building 6 on 9/11 as well?

Right so, I'm going to ignore the Japan reference because I know nothing about it.
If they used a nuclear bomb to bring down building 6 of the world trade center then it wasn't fake. The fact that it brought down a building would prove this.

What exactly would a fake nuclear bomb comprise of? They couldn't leave survivors in the vicinity. It would have to damage nearby bulidings and deem that area uninhabitable for the foreseeable future. In which case it wouldn't be a fake bombing but a real bombing.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

They did a fake nuclear thingy before in Japan when the tsunami hit.
Didn't they use a nuke to take down building 6 on 9/11 as well?

So basically

What you are claiming is

EVERY single natural disaster/terror attack/bombing etc was faked?

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So basically

What you are claiming is

EVERY single natural disaster/terror attack/bombing etc was faked?

I never said that.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

I never said that.

Name a major event in the last 20 years that wasn't one then.

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Name a major event in the last 20 years that wasn't one then.

The helicopter accident with all the french actors.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

The helicopter accident with all the french actors.

That was an accident and it happened last week :rolleyes:

I said name a MAJOR event.

irelandrover

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So basically

What you are claiming is

EVERY single natural disaster/terror attack/bombing etc was faked?

omnithanos wrote: »

The helicopter accident with all the french actors.

A helicopter crash is not a natural disaster/terror attack/bombing

irelandrover wrote: »

What exactly would a fake nuclear bomb comprise of? They couldn't leave survivors in the vicinity. It would have to damage nearby bulidings and deem that area uninhabitable for the foreseeable future. In which case it wouldn't be a fake bombing but a real bombing.

Can you also answer the bit in bold?

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

A helicopter crash is not a natural disaster/terror attack/bombing



Can you also answer the bit in bold?

Who know, using a real nuke to blow up an area but having it quietly abandoned first and populated with fake dummies?
Or maybe they'll just kill everyone in Chicago.

These are silly questions really, I'm just saying there was forewarning of a big disaster or terrorist attack planned for 22nd March. Anything beyond that is just speculation.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

Who know, using a real nuke to blow up an area but having it quietly abandoned first and populated with fake dummies?
Or maybe they'll just kill everyone in Chicago.

These are silly questions really, I'm just saying there was forewarning of a big disaster or terrorist attack planned for 22nd March. Anything beyond that is just speculation.

Evidence please?

Also still.waiting for you to name a MAJOR event in the last 20 years that wasn't a hoax.

Overheal

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So basically

What you are claiming is

EVERY single natural disaster/terror attack/bombing etc was faked?

Careful Now. Take your hands off of the Hyperbole and back away slowly. Do not post in this thread again until tomorrow. Everyone else return to the actual topic.

omnithanos

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Evidence please?

Also still.waiting for you to name a MAJOR event in the last 20 years that wasn't a hoax.

Pick any of these from the list that I haven't already mentioned as being a hoax.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255i.html

Reg'stoy

omnithanos wrote: »

Pick any of these from the list that I haven't already mentioned as being a hoax.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255i.html

I'm confused, is a real event been planned for the 22nd or will an event be staged to coincide with that date to fulfill a prophesy.

I'm going to take a leap of faith here and imagine that this coming 22nd there will of course be some 'event' some where in the world. This event could be quite literally anything, shooting in the states be it lone gunman or Cop killing another civilian. A plane could crash, boat could sink or an extremist group in the middle east, north or central Africa could commit another outrage. That is the world we live in today, we don't need any clandestine group to fake or stage outrages; we are quite capable of doing it ourselves.

I personally don't believe in any CT's of the kind you have mentioned, I don't get what their ultimate goal would be. What is to be gained by risking exposure considering the vast majority of the population just want to live their lives.

In making your claim of some event this coming 22nd; you are not no much throwing a dart for the bull, you are just simply attempting to hit the wall that the board is hanging on. All too easy a claim to make Sir, and quite impossible to debunk considering the world we live in and the people that populate it.

Timberrrrrrrr

Sooooooo

Sunday 22nd passed without incident

When is the next predicted date for something happening?

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

The helicopter accident with all the french actors.

You are saying that was faked? You have seen the video of the accident right? Or is that fake as well?

ShoulderChip

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Sooooooo

Sunday 22nd passed without incident

When is the next predicted date for something happening?

Its amazing how convincing this is the first time you hear of it, not the above, but the movie zeitgeist really blew me away about 9/11 being hoaxed at the age of 17, now it is just hilarious to see others caught up in it in the same way, but the level that some people get absorbed by it is frightening.

degrassinoel

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

You are saying that was faked? You have seen the video of the accident right? Or is that fake as well?

That's not what he was saying at all, the complete opposite infact

c_man

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Sunday 22nd passed without incident

"They" were rumbled by this thread :pac:

How heavily involved are the Family Guy/American Dad production teams involved in the conspiracy? The guy in the second video (among many other items) implies that the episode where Brian died was foreshadowing the death of Paul Walker six days later. I mean c'mon but if you're buying it, then how deep does it go? Is it the writers themselves or is it confined to Seth MacFarlane?

rtron

So a plane crashed today, if this happened two days ago the 22nd proficiy would have been true.

Timberrrrrrrr

rtron wrote: »

So a plane crashed today, if this happened two days ago the 22nd proficiy would have been true.

Ah they delayed it a few days because op had rumbled their plan.

Loughc

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Ah they delayed it a few days because op had rumbled their plan.

Just where is the OP anyway? I was certain he'd come in here on the 23rd and admit he was wrong. :pac:

Timberrrrrrrr

Loughc wrote: »

Just where is the OP anyway? I was certain he'd come in here on the 23rd and admit he was wrong. :pac:

Yeah he seems to have lost his way, i'm sure another thread warning of future atrocities is around the corner though.

degrassinoel

That's enough, you both know the score by now, and if you don't - read the charter again.

omnithanos

Loughc wrote: »

Just where is the OP anyway? I was certain he'd come in here on the 23rd and admit he was wrong. :pac:

Yes I got the day wrong. A 9/11 style event was expected to occur around the 22nd. This crash in the Alps on the 24th appears to be the planned event. Note the similarity with the fake Shanksville crash. I wonder was the building collapse in New York on the 26th a deliberate clue to link it to 9/11?

Last night’s programme on TV3 referred to the “truth” of the crash on numerous occasions. As what they are peddling as “truth” is mere supposition, is this just bad reporting or deliberate propaganda? Towards the end of the program they showed the front wheel of the plane alongside the Germanwings purple colours while in reality the entire underside of the plane is completely grey, no purple.
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/625/media/images/81884000/jpg/_81884417_026471277.jpg

This video exposes the evidence put forward thus far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09t8Ngj02iA

Two fighter jets were seen alongside the plane according to early witness reports but this was subsequently taken out of the report. Why did these jets not engage the automatic pilot remotely and take over the controls unless they had other plans for the plane!
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2015/03/28/more-evidence-french-jets-caused-crash-of-germanwings-airliner/

Note the unusual piece of wreckage in the shape of Germany with the German flag and Plane identity number fully intact in this short video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkvkEw0htvI

omnithanos

omnithanos wrote: »

Yes I got the day wrong. A 9/11 style event was expected to occur around the 22nd. This crash in the Alps on the 24th appears to be the planned event. Note the similarity with the fake Shanksville crash. I wonder was the building collapse in New York on the 26th a deliberate clue to link it to 9/11?

Why were you wrong about the 22nd?
How did you not catch any of the clues about the 24th or 26th before those events occurred?

omnithanos

King Mob wrote: »

Why were you wrong about the 22nd?
How did you not catch any of the clues about the 24th or 26th before those events occurred?

I didn't have time to research it properly and the clues are terribly subtle and I'm not Flash Gordon here to save the world. I'm not even sure the building collapse on the 26th is related but the crash in the Alps looks incredibly dodgy.

Timberrrrrrrr

omnithanos wrote: »

Yes I got the day wrong. A 9/11 style event was expected to occur around the 22nd. This crash in the Alps on the 24th appears to be the planned event. Note the similarity with the fake Shanksville crash. I wonder was the building collapse in New York on the 26th a deliberate clue to link it to 9/11?

Last night’s programme on TV3 referred to the “truth” of the crash on numerous occasions. As what they are peddling as “truth” is mere supposition, is this just bad reporting or deliberate propaganda? Towards the end of the program they showed the front wheel of the plane alongside the Germanwings purple colours while in reality the entire underside of the plane is completely grey, no purple.
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/625/media/images/81884000/jpg/_81884417_026471277.jpg

This video exposes the evidence put forward thus far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09t8Ngj02iA

Two fighter jets were seen alongside the plane according to early witness reports but this was subsequently taken out of the report. Why did these jets not engage the automatic pilot remotely and take over the controls unless they had other plans for the plane!
http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2015/03/28/more-evidence-french-jets-caused-crash-of-germanwings-airliner/

Note the unusual piece of wreckage in the shape of Germany with the German flag and Plane identity number fully intact in this short video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkvkEw0htvI

I just showed your post and video's to an air crash investigator who flew these planes for years. There is no system where a jet pilot can remotely take over a passenger plane and he just laughed at the video "evidence" and thanked me for the giggles.

NewCorkLad

Do you honestly believe that airplane manufacturers would build in a system for someone to remotely take control of a plane.

NewCorkLad

And have it in the passenger compartment??????????

omnithanos

Here's the proof that the system exists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL0urxc31K4