Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 Thread Part II

17172747677334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,636 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    they grabbed a coffee and pastries from the lounge on their way through...
    and then boarded a corporate aircraft.... how sad... i would have at least expected caviar :) The coffee and pastries in the lounge are for the crew :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭lambayire


    bkehoe wrote: »
    Often Oceanic airspace crossing clearances have time restrictions. In this airspace here is no radar coverage so separation is ensured based upon something called the mach number technique; aircraft fly a constant mach number and are separated from preceding and following aircraft by time. Therefore, its quite common that aircraft are told that they may enter oceanic airspace 'At or after' a time, to ensure that the aircraft ahead of them has enough time to create sufficient separation. Usually flying slower in domestic airspace ensures this, but often it isn't possible to fly slow enough to meet this restriction and so some form of delaying action is required - often a delaying vector to create more track miles, or a simple hold or two.

    thanking you.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MoeJay wrote: »
    Looks like a tactical delay probably to make an oceanic entry time restriction.

    Wouldn't have thought this would be necessarily the reason, as crews generally get their Oceanics via acars just before departure from Dublin. So they would they could have timed their request for push based on this.

    More likely it was a tech issue that caused them to orbit to see if they could resolve it before continuing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 500 ✭✭✭MoeJay


    Wouldn't have thought this would be necessarily the reason, as crews generally get their Oceanics via acars just before departure from Dublin. So they would they could have timed their request for push based on this.

    More likely it was a tech issue that caused them to orbit to see if they could resolve it before continuing.

    There are a lot of variables, maybe they did have a clearance before departure that maybe a delay on taxi meant they couldn't comply with their time and had to get a new time; out of Dublin it's usually fine to get the clearance airborne, Shannon however it's a different story. Could've been a track change, anything!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭rocky911


    MoeJay wrote: »
    There are a lot of variables, maybe they did have a clearance before departure that maybe a delay on taxi meant they couldn't comply with their time and had to get a new time; out of Dublin it's usually fine to get the clearance airborne, Shannon however it's a different story. Could've been a track change, anything!

    Could have been a bear in the woods...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 262 ✭✭PinOnTheRight


    Probably a tech issue being worked before proceeding oceanic. Any time restriction that would require holding before entry would more likely result in a re-clearance via an adjacent track or at a non-preferred level. West bound track capacity at the time of the EI109 isn't much of an issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭calibratedtool


    Probably a tech issue being worked before proceeding oceanic. Any time restriction that would require holding before entry would more likely result in a re-clearance via an adjacent track or at a non-preferred level. West bound track capacity at the time of the EI109 isn't much of an issue.

    It was an injured cabin crew.
    Crew were seeking medical advice before continuing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Can't say all the bases aren't covered here! Thanks lads


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭jimbis


    Would this be a glitch with flight radar or are these 2 very close?
    Both decending at the same level/rate (close enough anyway).
    Flybe at 200kts and Ryanair at 240kts


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    jimbis wrote: »
    Would this be a glitch with flight radar or are these 2 very close?
    Both decending at the same level/rate (close enough anyway).
    Flybe at 200kts and Ryanair at 240kts

    Yeah its a glitch, the one from BCN landed on the M2 according to FR24, so its a glitch.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    It was an injured cabin crew.
    Crew were seeking medical advice before continuing.


    ^^
    http://avherald.com/h?article=48313a7f&opt=0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    EIN43K just took off for Milan but is returning because the nose gear didn't retract.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    crosstownk wrote: »
    EIN43K just took off for Milan but is returning because the nose gear didn't retract.

    That explain why Delta 411 went around at the same time.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That explain why Delta 411 went around at the same time.

    Delta went around because the EIN43K hit a hare after landing and rescue vehicle/catering needed to scrape it off the runway.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Air Corsica A320 just starting up at the hangars in Dublin for a test flight out to the northwest and back to Dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Anyone know why theres a city jet heading from DUB-SNN


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Anyone know why theres a city jet heading from DUB-SNN

    Take rugger fans from down that way to Cardiff perhaps ?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Take rugger fans from down that way to Cardiff perhaps ?!

    Just preformed a Touch and Go, so Id be doubtful.


  • Moderators Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭Wise Old Elf


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    Just preformed a Touch and Go, so Id be doubtful.

    Someone mentioned before (I think), the T at the end of the flight code usually means it's a test flight. Might have had some maintenance in Dublin then on to Shannon to test it out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    Someone mentioned before (I think), the T at the end of the flight code usually means it's a test flight. Might have had some maintenance in Dublin then on to Shannon to test it out?

    Probably. Its on its 2nd touch and go now.

    There 2 special flights from DUB-CWL and 1 SNN-CWL today. Aer Lingus are also using an A320 instead of an ATR72-600 on their DUB-CWL route


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    Cityjet is doing base training for new pilots. Each pilot usually does 6 touch and goes each.


    Sometimes the letters at the end of a callsign mean...
    T - Training flight
    M - Post maintenance test flight
    P - Positioning


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 544 ✭✭✭Nemanrio


    Air Corsica A320 just starting up at the hangars in Dublin for a test flight out to the northwest and back to Dublin

    Off cork coast now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 594 ✭✭✭rocky911


    Nemanrio wrote: »
    Off cork coast now

    Grand day for a spin :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭Reoil


    Nemanrio wrote: »
    Off cork coast now

    Time to head home now I guess!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 482 ✭✭bronn


    New arrival en route for RYR.

    Screenshot%202015-03-13%2014.30.54_zpsv1t6juq4.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    An Aer Lingus A320 with a Stobart Callsign.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭AGC


    Additional capacity for Rugby fans


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,487 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    AGC wrote: »
    Additional capacity for Rugby fans

    I know, I posted about it already :)

    Unusual though, does it actually have the Stobart callsign or it is just a FR24 error.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,840 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Carnacalla wrote: »
    I know, I posted about it already :)

    Unusual though, does it actually have the Stobart callsign or it is just a FR24 error.

    Its still a stobart flight, just a 'leased' aircraft for that flight, it will still fly under the stobart callsign and flight number


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,746 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    billie1b wrote: »
    Its still a stobart flight, just a 'leased' aircraft for that flight, it will still fly under the stobart callsign and flight number

    "welcome to your Aer Lingus Regional flight operated by Aer Lingus for Stobart for Aer Lingus"

    Somehow doubt the CC will be saying that!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement