WWE Hell In A Cell 2014 Pre Show && PPV Thread *Spoilers* **no stream requests**

rovert

The plan as of Monday/Tuesday for the Brock Lesnar-less Hell in the Cell PPV is Ambrose and Cena wrestling with the winner getting Rollins in the Hell in the Cell later that night. The loser gets to wrestle Randy Orton.

Credit: Dave Meltzer

Loughc

rovert wrote: »

The plan as of Monday/Tuesday for the Brock Lesnar-less Hell in the Cell PPV is Ambrose and Cena wrestling with the winner getting Rollins in the Hell in the Cell later that night. The loser gets to wrestle Randy Orton.

Credit: Dave Meltzer

Fecking hell talk about an awful runner up prize! Cena Rollins it is so. I hope the crowd firmly gets behind Ambrose!

colmufc

rovert wrote: »

The plan as of Monday/Tuesday for the Brock Lesnar-less Hell in the Cell PPV is Ambrose and Cena wrestling with the winner getting Rollins in the Hell in the Cell later that night. The loser gets to wrestle Randy Orton.

Credit: Dave Meltzer

well that sucks

Moneymaker

That's retarded. I don't see that happening.

They can't cheat the fans out of seeing the Ambrose/Rollins feud reaching its conclusion, Ambrose getting a big win and his revenge on Rollins.

Lord TSC

Depends on the outcome. If Ambrose beat Cena and then Ambrose/Rollins put on a sterling HIAC, it would create two new stars.

That said, it baffles me that the ending of NoC was the perfect set up for Brock and Cena to have a HIAC match, Moros than the usual feud starting matches that take place....

Surely though the only way to have Ambrose win would be interference. Wouldn't make him look particularly great and would leave the company guy against Orton in a meaningless match.

Moneymaker

Well we all know the golden boy won't be jobbed to Ambrose. As good an idea as that would be.

Jerichoholic

I just can't sit through Orton/Cena ever again. Wasn't there some stip at the Unification match that they would never wrestle each other again??

Lithium93_

rovert wrote: »

The plan as of Monday/Tuesday for the Brock Lesnar-less Hell in the Cell PPV is Ambrose and Cena wrestling with the winner getting Rollins in the Hell in the Cell later that night. The loser gets to wrestle Randy Orton.

Credit: Dave Meltzer

I can picture how that went down in a creative meeting,

Vince: For Hell In A Cell, we'll have Dean Ambrose facing off against John Cena with the winner getting to face Seth Rollins later in the show, the loser faces Orton

Ambrose: Rollins is as good as mine, you're goin down Cena

Cena To Ambrose: alright an easy victory, i don't job to anyone jack,

Orton: internally thinks (And what we're all thinking) Please God don't let me wrestle Cena again, it's been done to death


May not have happened, it's just how i see it in my head.

Lord TSC

Jerichoholic wrote: »

I just can't sit through Orton/Cena ever again. Wasn't there some stip at the Unification match that they would never wrestle each other again??

CastorTroy

we're meant to forget anything that happened a few months ago yet they've no problem having the total divas fight on Raw over some argument that took place months beforehand

orestes

Look at it this way - Ambrose is being positioned on the same level as Cena and Orton is now the second heel in the company after Rollins - I think this could be a good transitional phase if something good can come of it and be carried through to the Rumble.

I'm just trying to wring any possible positives from even the prospect of Cena/Orton XXVII

Moneymaker

Seeing how;

Ambrose steals the MITB case on Smackdown, maybe we have a sitation where he returns the case if Rollins agrees to face him at HIAC. Maybe.

Scavenger XIII

My prediction of how that would go down:

• Cena beats Ambrose because CENAWINSLOL.
• Ambrose is outraged and refuses to leave.
• Security cart him out of the arena.
• His match with Orton never happens.
• Ambrose reappears later during the HIAC match and breaks INTO the cell to get at Rollins.

Bounty Hunter

So no WWE Title match / Brock at Night of Champions then? guessing thats not confirmed but seemingly likely if this is true.

Surely Ambrose vs Rollins and Cena vs Brock for the title in 2 HIAC matches that culminate thier feuds would be a lot more logical.

wait, WWE and logic... O yeah

Scavenger XIII wrote: »

My prediction of how that would go down:

• Cena beats Ambrose because CENAWINSLOL.
• Ambrose is outraged and refuses to leave.
• Security cart him out of the arena.
• His match with Orton never happens.
• Ambrose reappears later during the HIAC match and breaks INTO the cell to get at Rollins.

honestly would not surprise me but WWE really have to stop having matches not happen at PPVs, been too many recently, (well 2 off the top of my head but still 3 in 3/4 PPVs is too much)

Moneymaker

Maybe there is an element of truth to the rumours about Brock's health.

Hope not but it makes you think..

Hangballlouie

Bounty Hunter wrote: »

So no WWE Title match / Brock at Night of Champions then? guessing thats not confirmed but seemingly likely if this is true.

Surely Ambrose vs Rollins and Cena vs Brock for the title in 2 HIAC matches that culminate thier feuds would be a lot more logical.

wait, WWE and logic... O yeah



honestly would not surprise me but WWE really have to stop having matches not happen at PPVs, been too many recently, (well 2 off the top of my head but still 3 in 3/4 PPVs is too much)

Could be they don't wanna pay Brock more cash, and they feel his dates would be better used with different opponents and on different cards.

rovert

Moneymaker wrote: »

Maybe there is an element of truth to the rumours about Brock's health.

Hope not but it makes you think..

Or they are saving Brock for Survivor Series.

Lithium93_

Why waste Brock on a not so important ppv, besides Paul Heyman can do all of Lesnar's talking while he ain't there.

Moneymaker

rovert wrote: »

Or they are saving Brock for Survivor Series.

I hope so.

It just so happens SS is in St.Louis, Orton's hometown.

Where better to have that match and have Lesnar go through another top guy.

Bounty Hunter

Considering all the talk about Brocks available dates, Is an appearance on Raw considered the same as a PPV appearance (match) with regards using up one of his available dates. Not sure if this has been asked before or if its public knowledge but if it was the same I would have Brock never skip a PPV as long as he has the WWE title.

He made 2 appearances on Raw building to NOCs for example. The one the night after SS and the one the week where Cena said he would fight Heyman if Brock didn't show. cut one of those out and instead have Heyman talk about how if they want Brock they should pay 9.99 and get the network cos you gotta pay to see his client then have him and the title at HIAC. After the two matches him & Cena have had especially with how the last one finished Cena vs Brock inside HIAC just makes so much sense to me anyway

CSF

If the Hell in a Cell match is anything other than Ambrose v Rollins WWE can **** right off.

There are times where the Cena ****e has to be tolerated but this is not one.

Riddle101

CSF wrote: »

If the Hell in a Cell match is anything other than Ambrose v Rollins WWE can **** right off.

There are times where the Cena ****e has to be tolerated but this is not one.

I don't know, Hell and a Cell matches have always been a big deal for the main event. They're supposed to be fued enders, which serves the Cena/Lesnar feud better because after HIAC they won't feud again. At least not it the foreseeable future. But It makes sense to have Cena/Lesnar in the Hell In A Cell match, their feud is a big deal and should be treated as such. As for Ambrose/Rollins, I still think there is more to come of their rivalry. I mean their feud could go on all year long. So from that standpoint I don't think they should be in the Hell In A Cell match. However I do think they should be booked in a TLC match for the TLC PPV this year.

Diabhal Beag

Think Cena will put Ambrose over tbh. And we'll all forget how much people he's put over all over again.

Rjd2

Riddle101 wrote: »

I don't know, Hell and a Cell matches have always been a big deal for the main event. They're supposed to be fued enders, which serves the Cena/Lesnar feud better because after HIAC they won't feud again. At least not it the foreseeable future. But It makes sense to have Cena/Lesnar in the Hell In A Cell match, their feud is a big deal and should be treated as such. As for Ambrose/Rollins, I still think there is more to come of their rivalry. I mean their feud could go on all year long. So from that standpoint I don't think they should be in the Hell In A Cell match. However I do think they should be booked in a TLC match for the TLC PPV this year.

I dunno, it has been going on for a few months now, another month or so after HIAC maybe, but defo not another 12 months.

Riddle101

Rjd2 wrote: »

I dunno, it has been going on for a few months now, another month or so after HIAC maybe, but defo not another 12 months.

Oh no, I don't mean go on for another year. I mean I think it could go on for the rest of this year at least. But you have to wonder where they're going with it since Ambrose said he will never allow Rollins to cash in his MITB briefcase.

leggo

I can't see them doing something as brazen as 'loser gets Orton'. Maybe Brock costs Cena the match to swerve everyone and set up a rematch.

Riddle101

From today's Wrestling Observer Radio:

The plan as of this week for Hell in a Cell is for Cena vs. Ambrose to be the opening match. The winner gets to face Rollins inside the Cell, while the loser gets the consolation of facing Orton inside the Cell.

So it looks like I was wrong about Cena/Lesnar. It's going to be Ambrose/Cena, and then whoever wins/loses will face Orton or Rollins.

Can't say i'm happy about this. I would have preferred Lesnar/Cena and Ambrose/Rollins. But now they're going with this? I mean Ambrose just returned, I was hoping that maybe Ambrose would get a ppv victory over Rollins to help his momentum, and add some drama to their rivalry. Now I fear Ambrose will lose to Cena, and could lose to Orton afterwards too.

Deadlie

It'd be easy enough to set up Cena losing to Ambrose. Ambrose wants Rollins a hell of a lot more than Cena does - and fans want Cena/Brock and Rollins/Ambrose so it makes sense. Cenas just pissed he lost his chance on Brock, but there title is still his priority, not revenge.

Brock coming out to the ramp to distract Cena during the match sets up both matches nicely.

JP Liz V1

rovert wrote: »

The plan as of Monday/Tuesday for the Brock Lesnar-less Hell in the Cell PPV is Ambrose and Cena wrestling with the winner getting Rollins in the Hell in the Cell later that night. The loser gets to wrestle Randy Orton.

Credit: Dave Meltzer

Ambrose Vs. Rollins 1 on 1 in the cell will happen hopefully


Orton, Show, Sheamus, Henry, Kane, Cesaro etc., plenty who could be used for a match with Lesnar


I'm hoping Damian Mizdow gets to feud with Ziggler for IC title

CSF

Cesaro v Ziggler seems on the cards

Rjd2

Any chance of Brie v Nikki been in the cell?

JP Liz V1

Rjd2 wrote: »

Any chance of Brie v Nikki been in the cell?

Maybe on the pre show or Total Divas or better not at all

Rjd2

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Maybe on the pre show or Total Divas or better not at all

It needs to be hell in a cell and ideally it should close. Its the feud that everyone is talking about.

DIED IN THE WOMB!:eek:

colmufc

my gf just got sky sports for 18 for 6 months so happy days I can see raw again , watched 5 mins tonight from last Monday , when cena and ambrose go after the authority rollins makes a beeline for Orton and just sprints past rollins ,maybe I'm reading too much into it but I won't be surprised if we see Dean turn his attention and rollins - cena become a hiac

CastorTroy

Does that mean the cell symbolises the womb?

rovert

CastorTroy wrote: »

Does that mean the cell symbolises the womb?

Made the Womb in a Tomb joke a few weeks ago.


Personally want a Pole match with BELLA in big cut out letters on the top of it.

J. Marston

What a crap PPV poster.

ShaneU

Has the hell in a cell ppv every had a classic hell in a cell match? Gimmick ppvs are the worst.

orestes

J. Marston wrote: »

What a crap PPV poster.

Didn't the one last year feature just R-Truth and he wasn't even on the show?

Bounty Hunter

orestes wrote: »

Didn't the one last year feature just R-Truth and he wasn't even on the show?

yup he was on the kick off panel

rovert

The ever so reliable Metsfan on Wreddit is saying we are actually getting Womb in the Tomb:

http://www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/2hqrds/as_of_now_a_spoiler_for_hell_in_a_cell/

I can confirm that as of tonight, the Bella Twins will be competing against each other in a Hell in a Cell match at the next PPV. Now of course plenty of things can change from now until the PPV. But as of right now, they are 100% going with Brie vs. Nikki inside the cell.

Like the Dolphins GUY I think the lad is a chancer. He is the one who said AJ Lee was totes legit pregnant about six months ago.

CSF

Will genuinely stop watching for good

Rjd2

Not going to lie, a Bella match in HIAC would entertain me immensely for all the wrong reasons.

Moneymaker

No fecking way is that happening. Unless Vince has demanded WWE win all the Wrestlecrap and Gooker awards under the sun.

CSF

OH MY GOD, HIP TOSS THROUGH THE CELL!!!

Deadlie

Just imagine how long Botchamania would be the week after

grames_bond

J. Marston wrote: »

What a crap PPV poster.

thats not the real one - this is



global affiliates site still isnbt updated - heres the original:

Lord TSC

RE: Bells in a Cell.

Why? There's been no interference problems so can't say its to keep people out. And there won't be a single "hardcore" move either. Would be an utter, utter waste of the gimmick.

the groutch

they'd need the Spongebob narrator when they try to climb the cell

CSF

They weren't really gonna put Roman Reigns in the Hell in a Cell match were they? That match is made for Rollins/Ambrose