Gameweek 5 Matchday Thread.

IsMiseMyself

Seems to be a bit of a love-in for Spurs this week. I haven't a single Spurs player so I'm hoping they have a stinker. Last week was really good, so I'm expecting a dip.

Iused2likebusts

KevIRL wrote: »

Diouf

Crouch assist

Fair play on Diouf that's a serious differential in these parts and there is not many that would hold on after 2 home blanks.

wonski

QPR all over the Stoke. Pieters CS is not guaranteed.

KevIRL

Iused2likebusts wrote: »

Fair play on Diouf that's a serious differential in these parts and there is not many that would hold on after 2 home blanks.

A case of 2 things really. Backing my pre season selection, he has looked decent but also a bit of other more urgent areas requiring attention

wonski

Kranjcar with a great shot, very close to a screamer.

finnharpsboy

qpr goal

finnharpsboy

caulker goal

KevIRL

finnharpsboy wrote: »

caulker goal

Woot

Dr. Bre

caulker great man for popping up

Mr.Prodston

Caulker!!!!!!!!!!

Bardsley cleanie gone though :pac:

Paully D

finnharpsboy wrote: »

caulker goal

Crouch own goal, Caulker assist I thought?

FutureGuy

Caulker goal!!! Finally!!!

Ziegler1988

Welp, two cleanies and main differentials in H2H already gone. Not a good start

dahat

Unsure how I feel so far... Cleanies gone...good. Diouf goal bad... Caulker assist bad.... Meh...

daithijjj

Any chance they give that as an Adam og?

KevIRL

12 from 2 lol. All downhill from here though

wonski

Mr.Prodston wrote: »

Well that confirms that anyway.

Caulker you have about 75 minutes to score me a goal because you're shipping out in the morning and I'm not sure when we're going to see each other again.

I hate you.

Stoke CS gone. Could you post the same with Pieters included in the post?

finnharpsboy

pieters booked

AdMMM

Will that be credited as a Crouch o.g I wonder? Was going to straight to Charlie Adam otherwise...

Swiper the fox

Finally I got it right about Caulker:P

SpaceCowb0y

Caulker ye bastard!!! :mad:

Swiper the fox

AdMMM wrote: »

Will that be credited as a Crouch o.g I wonder? Was going to straight to Charlie Adam otherwise...

Was it on target? Charlie Adam doesn't matter

Mr.Prodston

It's down as a Caulker goal on the site. Haven't seen the goal itself though

manual_man

would class it as an o.g. myself, but i've seen them given. have Ferdinand myself of course :pac::pac:

daithijjj

Mr.Prodston wrote: »

It's down as a Caulker goal on the site. Haven't seen the goal itself though

Caulker headed back a back post corner, one of the Stoke lads (bad stream i have) sliced it into the net from a foot out, Caulker's header was on target but should have been easily cleared, defs got in each others way.

on livescore it's down as a Crouch OG

wonski

Mr.Prodston wrote: »

It's down as a Caulker goal on the site. Haven't seen the goal itself though

I missed it too but sounds like an accidental goal.

Caulker was the one I didn't want to see to score any points in this game.

Well done to all the owners anyway, even if it is overturned he will get an assist.

km79

FutureGuy wrote: »

Caulker goal!!! Finally!!!

I hate this game

Swiper the fox

daithijjj wrote: »

Caulker headed back a back post corner, one of the Stoke lads (bad stream i have) sliced it into the net from a foot out, Caulker's header was on target but should have been easily cleared, defs got in each others way.

My understanding is that if it's on target it doesn't matter how weak the effort is, it is a goal for Caulker

km79

finnharpsboy wrote: »

pieters booked

fffooookkkkk sake
swithed caulker to him last week
Bertrand in next week now