Same Sex Marriage (Poll on The Journal)

OldNotWIse

hansfrei wrote: »

Spelt his name wrong

in·ten·tion·al

/ɪnˈtɛnʃənl/ Show Spelled [in-ten-shuh-nl] Show IPA
adjective 1. done with intention or on purpose; intended: an intentional insult.

2. of or pertaining to intention or purpose.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

hansfrei wrote: »

Very possible. The only reasoned response I've read so far.

That;s probably because you're selectiviely reading most of these responcs, and completly ignoreing all the others.

Oh, if you ask me what you're "not" reading, I'll just link you back to the unanswered questions you requested and then ignored nd the link to a story that had nothing to do with marriage equality thay you pretended answered everything (even thoug you yourself did not read it).

In fact, no, I won't - you, along with everyone else here, know exactly what questions and what link so if you play dumb, it'll just leave this as my last word and proof that you really have no idea what you're talking about, no sensible objections to the idea and no real interest in educating yourself.

Czarcasm

Terry1985 wrote: »

Rubbish.
You're focusing on individuals rather than large scale psychological studies

Terry1985 wrote: »

How can you test that on an individual basis?

Hmm... So you tell one poster off for focussing on individuals rather than large scale studies, and then when you're shown the large scale studies, you ask how can they test on an individual basis?

Would you like to take a 50/50 or phone a friend?

OldNotWIse

Czarcasm wrote: »

Hmm... So you tell one poster off for focussing on individuals rather than large scale studies, and then when you're shown the large scale studies, you ask how can they test on an individual basis?

Would you like to take a 50/50 or phone a friend?

Can we simplify?:P

old hippy

hansfrei wrote: »

Weren't you criticising this kind of comment two minutes earlier? Pantomime thread is pantomime because of.posts like this.

Essentially the pantomime comes from those posters & serial derailers who seek to turn the thread into what it is not. You know the type "I'm not allowed to speak about this/what about polygamy/incest/animals/Barbapapa etc".

PopePalpatine

poundapunnet wrote: »

Go on and post those studies there

It will take him a while to sift through the I-moan-a Institute's site. :rolleyes:

hansfrei

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

That;s probably because you're selectiviely reading most of these responcs, and completly ignoreing all the others.

Oh, if you ask me what you're "not" reading, I'll just link you back to the unanswered questions you requested and then ignored nd the link to a story that had nothing to do with marriage equality thay you pretended answered everything (even thoug you yourself did not read it).

In fact, no, I won't - you, along with everyone else here, know exactly what questions and what link so if you play dumb, it'll just leave this as my last word and proof that you really have no idea what you're talking about, no sensible objections to the idea and no real interest in educating yourself.

Jealous? Someone brings reason into the debate to counter your blatant lying and misdirection and I get a completely OTT post like this.

hansfrei

PopePalpatine wrote: »

It will take him a while to sift through the I-moan-a Institute's site. :rolleyes:

Is that Iona?

Amirani

oldrnwisr and Czarcasm, whatever about your views (which I 100% agree with), that's some really awesome posting*. Rarely do you get such well referenced points in After Hours.

*I'm not saying others are making less valid points, but this is some journal-quality ****. :P

old hippy

Terry1985 wrote: »

You're the one reducing people to body parts.
A mother and a father have significantly different roles in child development, each bringing completely different skills, perspectives and child rearing approaches.

Says who? I know plenty of people who are single parents and their kids are doing just fine. My own cousin (who happens to be bi) brought her daughter up (daughter hetero and excelling in college).

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

In fact, no, I won't - you, along with everyone else here, know exactly what questions and what link so if you play dumb, it'll just leave this as my last word and proof that you really have no idea what you're talking about, no sensible objections to the idea and no real interest in educating yourself.

hansfrei wrote: »

Jealous? Someone brings reason into the debate to counter your blatant lying and misdirection and I get a completely OTT post like this.

Em... well, Q.E.D. folks and I'm otu of here.

Someone PM me if he actually does respond with reason, because there's nothing really more I need to add.

old hippy

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Em... well, Q.E.D. folks and I'm otu of here.

Someone PM me if he actually does respond with reason, because there's nothing really more I need to add.

Don't let the haters get to you, Princess. Otherwise they win.

humanji

And that's all we have time for this month. Tune in for December's same sex marriage thread for the same arguments, insults, infractions, bannings and definitions.