Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for Leinster to stay at Lansdowne road?

Options
  • 13-07-2013 1:56pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭


    at the moment they sell out the RDS nearly every match
    when they play at Lansdown they always get big crowds, the derby is a sell out 50,000 plus Heineken they always top 30,000 plus

    so why not stay at Lansdowne?

    as it is theyre one of the best supported teams in Europe
    but still behind Toulouse and Leicester ....because the ground is smaller, their average gate is probably 17000 at rds

    if they stayed at lansdown over a whole season what would that average be over a whole season?

    Id guess well over 25,000?

    your thoughts?


«13

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 23,924 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    Because they have already signed a lease on the RDS, they wouldn't be able to fill (or even get half capacity) for the majority of games and because if they were to have the Aviva as their home ground they wouldn't be able to play a semi-final there. Their current setup of a ground they can sell out regularly along with the Aviva when they need a larger ground is ideal for them.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    That semi final rule is gone.

    Lansdowne is simply too big. It's a fantastic resource to have for Leinster to move to when needed but they certainly don't sell out nearly every game in the RDS. They sell out the HEC games and a couple Rabo ones but I doubt the move would make financial sense for the majority of games. Also playing in a half full stadium constantly would be awful for players and fans.

    The RDS is bring upgraded to about 22k which is perfect for now and for the foreseeable future. If they have the demand to move in 15 years when the lease is up then that's the time to do it. They should definitely try and negotiate a better lease deal with the RDS though


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    when is this expansion to 22000 meant to be happening....as it stands theyre losing 8000 to 10000 ticket sales per match by not playing at Lansdowne road.....even if they don't move, they should play more matches there and yes leinster do get close to or sell out nearly every home match


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    when is this expansion to 22000 meant to be happening....as it stands theyre losing 8000 to 10000 ticket sales per match by not playing at Lansdowne road.....even if they don't move, they should play more matches there and yes leinster do get close to or sell out nearly every home match

    Where are you getting these extra 8-10 thousand supporters from? Leinster pull respectable crowds, but only posted full houses in the Pro 12 at the RDS against Connacht and Ulster. They got just over 13000 to the semi final against Glasgow. There isn't a hope of them pulling an extra 8000 supporters against the likes of Zebre or the Dragons.
    A big heineken cup fixture is always going to put extra bums on seats, but walk over league games aren't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭LostArt


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    when is this expansion to 22000 meant to be happening....as it stands theyre losing 8000 to 10000 ticket sales per match by not playing at Lansdowne road.....even if they don't move, they should play more matches there and yes leinster do get close to or sell out nearly every home match

    where are you getting 8-10k from? and it also does cost Leinster to rent Lansdowne road for a game.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭phog


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    at the moment they sell out the RDS nearly every match
    when they play at Lansdown they always get big crowds, the derby is a sell out 50,000 plus Heineken they always top 30,000 plus

    so why not stay at Lansdowne?

    as it is theyre one of the best supported teams in Europe
    but still behind Toulouse and Leicester ....because the ground is smaller, their average gate is probably 17000 at rds

    if they stayed at lansdown over a whole season what would that average be over a whole season?

    Id guess well over 25,000?

    your thoughts?

    To get an average of 25k in the Aviva you'd have peaks and troughs, I hate to be in the Aviva for the trough. Leinster can manage the gate receipts quite well by having the bigger games in the Aviva, they might prefer to hold a few more but they seem to be contracted to hold X number of games in the RDS.

    Their lowest attendance this season was 13K, imagine that in the Aviva, even double it could look poor.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    LostArt wrote: »
    where are you getting 8-10k from? and it also does cost Leinster to rent Lansdowne road for a game.
    I realise theres a rental charge.....every time they play there they get at least 10,000 more sometimes 30,000 more ...obviously this varies....but fans simply prefer attending a world class stadium like Lansdowne with greta viewing positions too.....its the same when the London clubs play at Twickenham or Cardiff at millennium stadium....the venue itself adds thousands sometimes tens of thousands.....some indoor gigs don't sell out, but the same acts get 30.000 40,000 plus crowds when they turn up at a world class stadium...the test stadiums have greater access to everything, booze, food, hats, scarves, toilets etc etc and of course way better viewing ....youll find also women and children prefer the comfort and feel safer in a modern stadium.its the way of the modern world people want and demand luxury....


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    phog wrote: »
    To get an average of 25k in the Aviva you'd have peaks and troughs, I hate to be in the Aviva for the trough. Leinster can manage the gate receipts quite well by having the bigger games in the Aviva, they might prefer to hold a few more but they seem to be contracted to hold X number of games in the RDS.

    Their lowest attendance this season was 13K, imagine that in the Aviva, even double it could look poor.
    looking poor? 26000 ? who cares about looking poor? an extra 13000 tickets at £30 is £390,000 plus 13000 extra buying food, hats , booze, scarves, programmes, coach tickets, maybe theyd be tempted to retun and buy more tickets etc yes wed need to share it with the IRFU but so what its all profit

    Id expect 130000 extra to net us £500,000 plus pretty sure that would cover the rent

    personally id play there a lot more....lets become the biggest supported club in europe


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Good God no. People will stop going when they feel the stadium offers no match day experience and Leinster start losing because they don't have their usual 'blue army' vocal fan base.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    .ak wrote: »
    Good God no. People will stop going when they feel the stadium offers no match day experience and Leinster start losing because they don't have their usual 'blue army' vocal fan base.
    I have no idea what youre talking about now


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,318 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    looking poor? 26000 ? who cares about looking poor? an extra 13000 tickets at £30 is £390,000 plus 13000 extra buying food, hats , booze, scarves, programmes, coach tickets, maybe theyd be tempted to retun and buy more tickets etc yes wed need to share it with the IRFU but so what its all profit

    Id expect 130000 extra to net us £500,000 plus pretty sure that would cover the rent

    personally id play there a lot more....lets become the biggest supported club in europe

    In fairness if the economics of the situation were as incredibly simple and straightforward as you make out then I'm sure the IRFU/Leinster board (who I suspect include the odd person familiar with business, accountancy, supply + demand etc) would be on the case already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,796 ✭✭✭✭phog


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    looking poor? 26000 ? who cares about looking poor? an extra 13000 tickets at £30 is £390,000 plus 13000 extra buying food, hats , booze, scarves, programmes, coach tickets, maybe theyd be tempted to retun and buy more tickets etc yes wed need to share it with the IRFU but so what its all profit

    Id expect 130000 extra to net us £500,000 plus pretty sure that would cover the rent

    personally id play there a lot more....lets become the biggest supported club in europe


    Ask yourself why haven't Leinster full houses for all their games before thinking it's so easy to half fill the Aviva not to mind filling it for the majority of the games.

    I think the RDS holds about 18k without the extra capacity seating being installed, why haven't Leinster used the extra seating for all their games?

    Off the 15 games in the RDS this season nine of them had less than 17k one of these was the Pro12 s/final, maybe harder to sell due to short notice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭swiftman


    stpaddy, your putting the donkey before the horse!

    the supporters are going to the aviva because its a big game, ie heineken vs clermount or pro12 vs munster. there not going to the aviva because the game is played there.
    as pointed out, leinster have great numbers average 19k or so, most games arent sold out. they didnt play the semi vs glasgow there because there was no need.


    you worked the maths out there with 30k people, it doesnt work at €30 due to kids and value of season ticket.
    doesnt the aviva cost 500k per game? leinster rugby wouldnt be making much, if any more profit then the RDS


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    at the moment they sell out the RDS nearly every match

    Not true.

    It is a bad idea, just look at Edinburgh.

    They have the right idea at the moment, the RDS for every match bar a handful of high profile games.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Love the little grounds, no need to leave RDS. Should be treasured not shunned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    I have no idea what youre talking about now

    People are already giving out about the lack of atmosphere in Aviva. And that's when it's full! Imagine it only being half full? I don't mind it personally, but I would miss being in the RDS for the pre and post match banter and atmosphere. I'd imagine the average fan would too. In the Aviva you're in and out, places like Slattery's is too busy to go into after the game so you just end up skipping from bar to bar until you find one more closer to the city centre then you'd like. People would get sick of it after a while. The numbers would drop, and that would be that.

    Also, the elephant in the room is the fact the RDS, whilst almost always nearly 80% full, rarely sells out.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The RDS is also a lot more family friendly with the huge open areas for kids to mess around in and the unreserved seats in the north and south stands. Its a great stadium.

    Plus you're steadfastly ignoring the main point that the RDS sells out for less than half the games. The aviva games are Munster which always be the biggest draw and the top HEC game played near Christmas when people go for the event. And they STILL don't sell out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    Not being smart but Leinster aren't likely to be as dominant as they have been over the last few years. This will see a drop off in the casual supporter. The same thing happened in Munster.

    Therefore the question posed in your thread would make little sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    I have no idea what youre talking about now

    Diehards like to go to matches with other diehards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    Skid X wrote: »
    Not true.

    It is a bad idea, just look at Edinburgh.

    They have the right idea at the moment, the RDS for every match bar a handful of high profile games.

    it is true
    why compare to Edinburgh? theyre one of the poorest supported teams in Europe whereas we are on of the best at leinster....we average 20,000 (inc Lansdowne) Edinburgh average less than 5000 so your comparism is worthless


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    This would not work at all. Imagine Leinster vs Dragons in the middle of a six nations window, it'd be a ghost town


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    Diehards like to go to matches with other diehards.
    so stay small and only cater to the so called die hards and don't encourage thousands od new fans? that's hardly the attitude of a genuine fan who wants whats best for leinster


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    so stay small and only cater to the so called die hards and don't encourage thousands od new fans? that's hardly the attitude of a genuine fan who wants whats best for leinster

    You're completely ignoring the fact that although Leinster have a healthy fan base, they simply don't have the numbers to justify the move. The vast majority of Raboo games would make the stadium look vastly empty

    That's not something the players, province or fans want


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,444 ✭✭✭✭Skid X


    If Leinster were selling out every game at the RDS and there were thousands of people desperate to get tickets, this might be a runner.

    But they don't, and it isn't.

    There were very few sellouts at the RDS last year.

    http://www.leinsterrugby.ie/team/results/results_leinster.php#.UeGS8I3ql3U


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    Skid X wrote: »
    If Leinster were selling out every game at the RDS and there were thousands of people desperate to get tickets, this might be a runner.

    But they don't, and it isn't.

    There were very few sellouts at the RDS last year.

    http://www.leinsterrugby.ie/team/results/results_leinster.php#.UeGS8I3ql3U
    as Ive said many times, more fans would turn up at a world class venue like Lansdowne, the quality of the venue compared to rds would net thousands more as has already been proved. this is an experiemtn worth taking as the upside outweighs the downside massively. its only the cynical views of people who want to keep leinster small that prevent this experiement happening. this narrow minded view is sad and is part reason why rugby hasn't grown to a world sport to challenge football


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭Ugo Monye spacecraft experience


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    as Ive said many times, more fans would turn up at a world class venue like Lansdowne, the quality of the venue compared to rds would net thousands more as has already been proved. this is an experiemtn worth taking as the upside outweighs the downside massively. its only the cynical views of people who want to keep leinster small that prevent this experiement happening. this narrow minded view is sad and is part reason why rugby hasn't grown to a world sport to challenge football

    You're still completely missing the point

    It's not viable at all, even people have no insight into Leinsters intake of ticket money and tickets sold could tell your that by just looking at a less than capacity RDS for most rabo games

    If it was viable, it would happen, but it's not at all

    Basically your whole argument is "if they build it, they will come".


  • Registered Users Posts: 697 ✭✭✭swiftman


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    as Ive said many times, more fans would turn up at a world class venue like Lansdowne, the quality of the venue compared to rds would net thousands more as has already been proved. this is an experiemtn worth taking as the upside outweighs the downside massively. its only the cynical views of people who want to keep leinster small that prevent this experiement happening. this narrow minded view is sad and is part reason why rugby hasn't grown to a world sport to challenge football

    this is a forum or ive no idea what college and coarses you have done.
    leinster rugby pay people who have masters from top colleges good money to expand the club. they know what there doing.

    how can you explan how leinster will pay 500k per game?
    if you cant answer this, then your point is invalid


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,208 ✭✭✭overshoot


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    so stay small and only cater to the so called die hards and don't encourage thousands od new fans? that's hardly the attitude of a genuine fan who wants whats best for leinster
    as has been said REPEATEDLY if leinster were selling out every game you may have a point but they are not! and looking to a future without BOD, sexton, darcy etc, and a rising ulster where they may not be the dominent force and have the same crowd pulling capacity.
    the RDS is expanding anyway so there will be extra capacity.
    they move game to the aviva as they are glamour fixtures, the games the bandwagoners and neutrals have an interest in and the games where fans tight on money, who work weekends will make an extra effort to go.

    if its all about a shiny building with extra capacity, why can ospreys not half fill the liberty stadium and edinburgh... where's the 38,000 who was at the toulouse QF now?

    and all thats just about addressing bums on seats, never mind the extra cost in using the stadium! plus give me a cosy atmospheric 90% full stadium over a half full wake house even if it is the same numbers at both

    edit if its all about capacity why did Juventus knock their 69,000 capacity stadium and reduce it to 41,000?


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,589 ✭✭✭✭Aidric


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    as Ive said many times, more fans would turn up at a world class venue like Lansdowne, the quality of the venue compared to rds would net thousands more as has already been proved. this is an experiemtn worth taking as the upside outweighs the downside massively. its only the cynical views of people who want to keep leinster small that prevent this experiement happening. this narrow minded view is sad and is part reason why rugby hasn't grown to a world sport to challenge football

    This isn't 'Field of Dreams'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    A comparable enough situation would be to look at the likes of the Blues and Tahs in the Super 15. They regularly play games in stadia the same size as Lansdowne, do well to half fill them and generally the atmosphere is dire.

    I'd rather not see that happen with Leinster to be honest


Advertisement